Investigating 18F-FDG PET/CT Parameters as Prognostic Markers for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review

Aims: The aim of this study was to determine whether F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (F-18-FDG PET/CT) parameters might be prognostic markers for patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). Methods: We searched for eligible articles in PubMed, EMBAS...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in oncology 2021-05, Vol.11, p.648658-648658, Article 648658
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Hongxi, Dai, Hongyuan, Li, Qianrui, Shen, Guohua, Shi, Lei, Tian, Rong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aims: The aim of this study was to determine whether F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (F-18-FDG PET/CT) parameters might be prognostic markers for patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). Methods: We searched for eligible articles in PubMed, EMBASE (Ovid), Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to February 2021. We included studies addressing the association between F-18-FDG PET/CT parameters and clinical outcomes among patients with DTC. Quality assessment was performed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Results: A total of 25 studies including 2,954 patients (1,994 females, 67.5%) were included; 2,416 patients (81.8%) had papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), and the mean or median follow-up time ranged from 19.1 months to 17.1 years. Thirteen (52.0%) studies were assessed as "unclear" for the domain of study participation. The most common timing of PET/CT scans was after thyroidectomy (in 20 of 25 studies, 80%), especially in patients with an elevated thyroglobulin (Tg) and a negative radioiodine whole-body scan (WBS). The most common PET parameter was FDG uptake. Twelve of 17 (70.6%) and 12 of 12 (100%) studies showed an association between PET/CT parameters and disease progression and survival in patients with DTC, respectively. Conclusion: F-18-FDG PET/CT parameters alone or combined with other variables can serve as prognostic markers to identify DTC patients with poor outcomes, especially in the setting of an elevated Tg and a negative WBS. Future research is needed to confirm these findings and to examine the prognostic value of PET/CT parameters for DTC patients, considering the heterogeneity in PET/CT parameters, unclear information of patients, and PET/CT-adapted treatment modifications.
ISSN:2234-943X
2234-943X
DOI:10.3389/fonc.2021.648658