Incidence of Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Palsy in Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive McKeown Esophagectomy in Prone Position: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

Background Esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy is the principal treatment for localized esophageal cancer. Conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (C-MIE) in prone position has spread worldwide as it is less invasive. However, its efficacy remains controversial. Robot-assisted MIE (RAMIE) can h...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgical oncology 2021-11, Vol.28 (12), p.7249-7257
Hauptverfasser: Oshikiri, Taro, Goto, Hironobu, Horikawa, Manabu, Urakawa, Naoki, Hasegawa, Hiroshi, Kanaji, Shingo, Yamashita, Kimihiro, Matsuda, Takeru, Nakamura, Tetsu, Kakeji, Yoshihiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy is the principal treatment for localized esophageal cancer. Conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (C-MIE) in prone position has spread worldwide as it is less invasive. However, its efficacy remains controversial. Robot-assisted MIE (RAMIE) can have more advantages than C-MIE. Therefore, the current study aimed to validate whether RAMIE is associated with lower incidence of left recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy compared with C-MIE in prone position. Patients and Methods In total, 404 patients with esophageal carcinoma underwent MIE (353 C-MIEs and 51 RAMIEs) in prone position at Kobe University between 2010 and 2020. Then, propensity score matching was performed, and results showed that 51 patients should be included in each group. Thereafter, the perioperative outcomes between the two groups were compared. Results The RAMIE group had a significantly longer operative time than the C-MIE group ( P  
ISSN:1068-9265
1534-4681
DOI:10.1245/s10434-021-10123-w