Comparative Analysis of Antigen-Specific Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Isotypes in COVID-19 Patients

Serological tests for detection of anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Abs in blood are expected to identify individuals who have acquired immunity against SARS-CoV-2 and indication of seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Many serological tests have been developed to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of immunology (1950) 2021-05, Vol.206 (10), p.2393-2401
Hauptverfasser: Fujigaki, Hidetsugu, Inaba, Masato, Osawa, Michiko, Moriyama, Saya, Takahashi, Yoshimasa, Suzuki, Tadaki, Yamase, Kenya, Yoshida, Yukihiro, Yagura, Yo, Oyamada, Takayoshi, Takemura, Masao, Doi, Yohei, Saito, Kuniaki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2401
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2393
container_title The Journal of immunology (1950)
container_volume 206
creator Fujigaki, Hidetsugu
Inaba, Masato
Osawa, Michiko
Moriyama, Saya
Takahashi, Yoshimasa
Suzuki, Tadaki
Yamase, Kenya
Yoshida, Yukihiro
Yagura, Yo
Oyamada, Takayoshi
Takemura, Masao
Doi, Yohei
Saito, Kuniaki
description Serological tests for detection of anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Abs in blood are expected to identify individuals who have acquired immunity against SARS-CoV-2 and indication of seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Many serological tests have been developed to detect Abs against SARS-CoV-2. However, these tests have considerable variations in their specificity and sensitivity, and whether they can predict levels of neutralizing activity is yet to be determined. This study aimed to investigate the kinetics and neutralizing activity of various Ag-specific Ab isotypes against SARS-CoV-2 in serum of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients confirmed via PCR test. We developed IgG, IgM, and IgA measurement assays for each Ag, including receptor-binding domain (RBD) of spike (S) protein, S1 domain, full-length S protein, S trimer, and nucleocapsid (N) domain, based on ELISA. The assays of the S protein for all isotypes showed high specificity, whereas the assays for all isotypes against N protein showed lower specificity. The sensitivity of all Ag-specific Ab isotypes depended on the timing of the serum collection and all of them, except for IgM against N protein, reached more than 90% at 15-21 d postsymptom onset. The best correlation with virus-neutralizing activity was found for IgG against RBD, and levels of IgG against RBD in sera from four patients with severe COVID-19 increased concordantly with neutralizing activity. Our results provide valuable information regarding the selection of serological test for seroprevalence and vaccine evaluation studies.
doi_str_mv 10.4049/jimmunol.2001369
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000648758200014CitationCount</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2522191233</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-53d6ea771b9bc7d992b1a2521ab6bfa129d41e20022f8b5b1c0e7fdc27c8a00a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LwzAYgIMoOj_unqRHQTLfpG3SHEf9GgiK011LkqYSaZvatMr-vZmbO3vKB8_7wPsgdE5gmkAirj9s04ytq6cUgMRM7KEJSVPAjAHbRxMASjHhjB-hY-8_AIABTQ7RURyLhLCUT1CRu6aTvRzsl4lmraxX3vrIVeE-2HfT4kVntK2s_v3Ai9nLAuduienvW7lyFc29G1ad8ZFto_xpOb_BRETPwWjawZ-ig0rW3pxtzxP0dnf7mj_gx6f7eT57xDoBPuA0LpmRnBMllOalEFQRSVNKpGKqkoSKMiGGrheqMpUqosHwqtSU60wCyPgEXW68Xe8-R-OHorFem7qWrXGjL4KLEkFoHAcUNqjunfe9qYqut43sVwWBYp21-MtabLOGkYutfVSNKXcDfx0DcLUBvo1ylddhd2122Dp8kvE0Cz4gSaCz_9O5HUJL1-ZubIf4B_aJlNk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2522191233</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Analysis of Antigen-Specific Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Isotypes in COVID-19 Patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Fujigaki, Hidetsugu ; Inaba, Masato ; Osawa, Michiko ; Moriyama, Saya ; Takahashi, Yoshimasa ; Suzuki, Tadaki ; Yamase, Kenya ; Yoshida, Yukihiro ; Yagura, Yo ; Oyamada, Takayoshi ; Takemura, Masao ; Doi, Yohei ; Saito, Kuniaki</creator><creatorcontrib>Fujigaki, Hidetsugu ; Inaba, Masato ; Osawa, Michiko ; Moriyama, Saya ; Takahashi, Yoshimasa ; Suzuki, Tadaki ; Yamase, Kenya ; Yoshida, Yukihiro ; Yagura, Yo ; Oyamada, Takayoshi ; Takemura, Masao ; Doi, Yohei ; Saito, Kuniaki</creatorcontrib><description>Serological tests for detection of anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Abs in blood are expected to identify individuals who have acquired immunity against SARS-CoV-2 and indication of seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Many serological tests have been developed to detect Abs against SARS-CoV-2. However, these tests have considerable variations in their specificity and sensitivity, and whether they can predict levels of neutralizing activity is yet to be determined. This study aimed to investigate the kinetics and neutralizing activity of various Ag-specific Ab isotypes against SARS-CoV-2 in serum of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients confirmed via PCR test. We developed IgG, IgM, and IgA measurement assays for each Ag, including receptor-binding domain (RBD) of spike (S) protein, S1 domain, full-length S protein, S trimer, and nucleocapsid (N) domain, based on ELISA. The assays of the S protein for all isotypes showed high specificity, whereas the assays for all isotypes against N protein showed lower specificity. The sensitivity of all Ag-specific Ab isotypes depended on the timing of the serum collection and all of them, except for IgM against N protein, reached more than 90% at 15-21 d postsymptom onset. The best correlation with virus-neutralizing activity was found for IgG against RBD, and levels of IgG against RBD in sera from four patients with severe COVID-19 increased concordantly with neutralizing activity. Our results provide valuable information regarding the selection of serological test for seroprevalence and vaccine evaluation studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1767</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-6606</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.2001369</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33941657</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BETHESDA: Amer Assoc Immunologists</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antibodies, Neutralizing - immunology ; Antibodies, Viral - immunology ; Antibody Specificity ; Antigens, Viral - immunology ; COVID-19 - diagnosis ; COVID-19 - immunology ; COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing ; Female ; Humans ; Immunoglobulin Isotypes - immunology ; Immunology ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Male ; Middle Aged ; SARS-CoV-2 - immunology ; Science &amp; Technology</subject><ispartof>The Journal of immunology (1950), 2021-05, Vol.206 (10), p.2393-2401</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>18</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000648758200014</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-53d6ea771b9bc7d992b1a2521ab6bfa129d41e20022f8b5b1c0e7fdc27c8a00a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-53d6ea771b9bc7d992b1a2521ab6bfa129d41e20022f8b5b1c0e7fdc27c8a00a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9655-1074 ; 0000-0002-3820-9542 ; 0000-0002-9620-2525 ; 0000-0001-6342-4087 ; 0000-0003-1651-0024</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33941657$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fujigaki, Hidetsugu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inaba, Masato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osawa, Michiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moriyama, Saya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Yoshimasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Tadaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamase, Kenya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Yukihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yagura, Yo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oyamada, Takayoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takemura, Masao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doi, Yohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Kuniaki</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Analysis of Antigen-Specific Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Isotypes in COVID-19 Patients</title><title>The Journal of immunology (1950)</title><addtitle>J IMMUNOL</addtitle><addtitle>J Immunol</addtitle><description>Serological tests for detection of anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Abs in blood are expected to identify individuals who have acquired immunity against SARS-CoV-2 and indication of seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Many serological tests have been developed to detect Abs against SARS-CoV-2. However, these tests have considerable variations in their specificity and sensitivity, and whether they can predict levels of neutralizing activity is yet to be determined. This study aimed to investigate the kinetics and neutralizing activity of various Ag-specific Ab isotypes against SARS-CoV-2 in serum of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients confirmed via PCR test. We developed IgG, IgM, and IgA measurement assays for each Ag, including receptor-binding domain (RBD) of spike (S) protein, S1 domain, full-length S protein, S trimer, and nucleocapsid (N) domain, based on ELISA. The assays of the S protein for all isotypes showed high specificity, whereas the assays for all isotypes against N protein showed lower specificity. The sensitivity of all Ag-specific Ab isotypes depended on the timing of the serum collection and all of them, except for IgM against N protein, reached more than 90% at 15-21 d postsymptom onset. The best correlation with virus-neutralizing activity was found for IgG against RBD, and levels of IgG against RBD in sera from four patients with severe COVID-19 increased concordantly with neutralizing activity. Our results provide valuable information regarding the selection of serological test for seroprevalence and vaccine evaluation studies.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Antibodies, Neutralizing - immunology</subject><subject>Antibodies, Viral - immunology</subject><subject>Antibody Specificity</subject><subject>Antigens, Viral - immunology</subject><subject>COVID-19 - diagnosis</subject><subject>COVID-19 - immunology</subject><subject>COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin Isotypes - immunology</subject><subject>Immunology</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2 - immunology</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><issn>0022-1767</issn><issn>1550-6606</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1LwzAYgIMoOj_unqRHQTLfpG3SHEf9GgiK011LkqYSaZvatMr-vZmbO3vKB8_7wPsgdE5gmkAirj9s04ytq6cUgMRM7KEJSVPAjAHbRxMASjHhjB-hY-8_AIABTQ7RURyLhLCUT1CRu6aTvRzsl4lmraxX3vrIVeE-2HfT4kVntK2s_v3Ai9nLAuduienvW7lyFc29G1ad8ZFto_xpOb_BRETPwWjawZ-ig0rW3pxtzxP0dnf7mj_gx6f7eT57xDoBPuA0LpmRnBMllOalEFQRSVNKpGKqkoSKMiGGrheqMpUqosHwqtSU60wCyPgEXW68Xe8-R-OHorFem7qWrXGjL4KLEkFoHAcUNqjunfe9qYqut43sVwWBYp21-MtabLOGkYutfVSNKXcDfx0DcLUBvo1ylddhd2122Dp8kvE0Cz4gSaCz_9O5HUJL1-ZubIf4B_aJlNk</recordid><startdate>20210515</startdate><enddate>20210515</enddate><creator>Fujigaki, Hidetsugu</creator><creator>Inaba, Masato</creator><creator>Osawa, Michiko</creator><creator>Moriyama, Saya</creator><creator>Takahashi, Yoshimasa</creator><creator>Suzuki, Tadaki</creator><creator>Yamase, Kenya</creator><creator>Yoshida, Yukihiro</creator><creator>Yagura, Yo</creator><creator>Oyamada, Takayoshi</creator><creator>Takemura, Masao</creator><creator>Doi, Yohei</creator><creator>Saito, Kuniaki</creator><general>Amer Assoc Immunologists</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9655-1074</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3820-9542</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9620-2525</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6342-4087</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1651-0024</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210515</creationdate><title>Comparative Analysis of Antigen-Specific Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Isotypes in COVID-19 Patients</title><author>Fujigaki, Hidetsugu ; Inaba, Masato ; Osawa, Michiko ; Moriyama, Saya ; Takahashi, Yoshimasa ; Suzuki, Tadaki ; Yamase, Kenya ; Yoshida, Yukihiro ; Yagura, Yo ; Oyamada, Takayoshi ; Takemura, Masao ; Doi, Yohei ; Saito, Kuniaki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-53d6ea771b9bc7d992b1a2521ab6bfa129d41e20022f8b5b1c0e7fdc27c8a00a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Antibodies, Neutralizing - immunology</topic><topic>Antibodies, Viral - immunology</topic><topic>Antibody Specificity</topic><topic>Antigens, Viral - immunology</topic><topic>COVID-19 - diagnosis</topic><topic>COVID-19 - immunology</topic><topic>COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin Isotypes - immunology</topic><topic>Immunology</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2 - immunology</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fujigaki, Hidetsugu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inaba, Masato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osawa, Michiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moriyama, Saya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Yoshimasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Tadaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamase, Kenya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Yukihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yagura, Yo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oyamada, Takayoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takemura, Masao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doi, Yohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Kuniaki</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of immunology (1950)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fujigaki, Hidetsugu</au><au>Inaba, Masato</au><au>Osawa, Michiko</au><au>Moriyama, Saya</au><au>Takahashi, Yoshimasa</au><au>Suzuki, Tadaki</au><au>Yamase, Kenya</au><au>Yoshida, Yukihiro</au><au>Yagura, Yo</au><au>Oyamada, Takayoshi</au><au>Takemura, Masao</au><au>Doi, Yohei</au><au>Saito, Kuniaki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Analysis of Antigen-Specific Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Isotypes in COVID-19 Patients</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of immunology (1950)</jtitle><stitle>J IMMUNOL</stitle><addtitle>J Immunol</addtitle><date>2021-05-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>206</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2393</spage><epage>2401</epage><pages>2393-2401</pages><issn>0022-1767</issn><eissn>1550-6606</eissn><abstract>Serological tests for detection of anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Abs in blood are expected to identify individuals who have acquired immunity against SARS-CoV-2 and indication of seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Many serological tests have been developed to detect Abs against SARS-CoV-2. However, these tests have considerable variations in their specificity and sensitivity, and whether they can predict levels of neutralizing activity is yet to be determined. This study aimed to investigate the kinetics and neutralizing activity of various Ag-specific Ab isotypes against SARS-CoV-2 in serum of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients confirmed via PCR test. We developed IgG, IgM, and IgA measurement assays for each Ag, including receptor-binding domain (RBD) of spike (S) protein, S1 domain, full-length S protein, S trimer, and nucleocapsid (N) domain, based on ELISA. The assays of the S protein for all isotypes showed high specificity, whereas the assays for all isotypes against N protein showed lower specificity. The sensitivity of all Ag-specific Ab isotypes depended on the timing of the serum collection and all of them, except for IgM against N protein, reached more than 90% at 15-21 d postsymptom onset. The best correlation with virus-neutralizing activity was found for IgG against RBD, and levels of IgG against RBD in sera from four patients with severe COVID-19 increased concordantly with neutralizing activity. Our results provide valuable information regarding the selection of serological test for seroprevalence and vaccine evaluation studies.</abstract><cop>BETHESDA</cop><pub>Amer Assoc Immunologists</pub><pmid>33941657</pmid><doi>10.4049/jimmunol.2001369</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9655-1074</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3820-9542</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9620-2525</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6342-4087</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1651-0024</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1767
ispartof The Journal of immunology (1950), 2021-05, Vol.206 (10), p.2393-2401
issn 0022-1767
1550-6606
language eng
recordid cdi_webofscience_primary_000648758200014CitationCount
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antibodies, Neutralizing - immunology
Antibodies, Viral - immunology
Antibody Specificity
Antigens, Viral - immunology
COVID-19 - diagnosis
COVID-19 - immunology
COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing
Female
Humans
Immunoglobulin Isotypes - immunology
Immunology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Male
Middle Aged
SARS-CoV-2 - immunology
Science & Technology
title Comparative Analysis of Antigen-Specific Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Isotypes in COVID-19 Patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T03%3A43%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Analysis%20of%20Antigen-Specific%20Anti-SARS-CoV-2%20Antibody%20Isotypes%20in%20COVID-19%20Patients&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20immunology%20(1950)&rft.au=Fujigaki,%20Hidetsugu&rft.date=2021-05-15&rft.volume=206&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2393&rft.epage=2401&rft.pages=2393-2401&rft.issn=0022-1767&rft.eissn=1550-6606&rft_id=info:doi/10.4049/jimmunol.2001369&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2522191233%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2522191233&rft_id=info:pmid/33941657&rfr_iscdi=true