Utility of 7 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables high resolution imaging and potentially improves the detection of morphologic abnormalities in patients with epilepsy. However, its added value compared with conventional 1.5T and 3.0T MRI is unclear. We reviewed the evidence for the use of 7 Tesla MR...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Frontiers in neurology 2021-03, Vol.12, p.621936-621936 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 621936 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 621936 |
container_title | Frontiers in neurology |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Park, Ji Eun Cheong, E-Nae Jung, Da Eun Shim, Woo Hyun Lee, Ji Sung |
description | 7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables high resolution imaging and potentially improves the detection of morphologic abnormalities in patients with epilepsy. However, its added value compared with conventional 1.5T and 3.0T MRI is unclear. We reviewed the evidence for the use of 7 Tesla MRI in patients with epilepsy and compared the detection rate of focal lesions with clinical MRI.
Clinical retrospective case studies were identified using the indexed text terms "epilepsy" AND "magnetic resonance imaging" OR "MR imaging" AND "7T" OR "7 Tesla" OR "7T" in Medline (2002-September 1, 2020) and Embase (1999-September 1, 2020). The study setting, MRI protocols, qualitative, and quantitative assessment were systematically reviewed. The detection rate of morphologic abnormalities on MRI was reported in each study in which surgery was used as the reference standard. Meta-analyses were performed using a univariate random-effects model in diagnostic performance studies with patients that underwent both 7T MRI and conventional MRI.
Twenty-five articles were included (467 patients and 167 healthy controls) consisting of 10 case studies, 10 case-control studies, 4 case series, and 1 cohort study. All studies included focal epilepsy; 12 studies (12/25, 48%) specified the disease etiology and 4 studies reported focal but non-lesional (MRI-negative on 1.5/3.0T) epilepsy. 7T MRI showed superior detection and delineation of morphologic abnormalities in all studies. In nine comparative studies, 7T MRI had a superior detection rate of 65% compared with the 22% detection rate of 1.5T or 3.0T.
7T MRI is useful for delineating morphologic abnormalities with a higher detection rate compared with conventional clinical MRI. Most studies were conducted using a case series or case study; therefore, a cohort study design with clinical outcomes is necessary.
Class IV Criteria for Rating Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3389/fneur.2021.621936 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2171eaad1fdd4c8e9097fb5bf48acd63</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2171eaad1fdd4c8e9097fb5bf48acd63</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2508891137</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-60a383127b0664969a7cc3ca164f1298ecfde66a276e02948ac84c3b07a272483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU9P3DAQxSNUBIjyAXqpfOwlW_9JHLuHSisE7UqgohbUozVxJsEocbaxlyrfvl5CEfhia_zeb2b0suwDoyshlP7cetxNK045W0nOtJAH2QmTssg51-W7V-_j7CyEB5qO0EkmjrLjBGAlL9lJ5u-i612cydiSitxi6IFcQ-cxOkt-Yhg9eItkM0DnfEecJzcQHfoYyG8X78nF1vW4DfMXsia_5hBxgMX56PAvAd-Qa4yQrz30c3DhfXbYQh_w7Pk-ze4uL27Pv-dXP75tztdXuS1kGXNJQSjBeFXTtIWWGiprhQUmi5ZxrdC2DUoJvJJIuS4UWFVYUdMqlXihxGm2WbjNCA9mO7kBptmM4MxTYZw6A1MatEfDWcUQoGFt0xRWoaa6auuybvfURorE-rqwtrt6wMam5Sfo30Df_nh3b7rx0SjKKs72gE_PgGn8s8MQzeCCxb4Hj-MuGF5SpTRjokpStkjtNIYwYfvShlGzj908xW72sZsl9uT5-Hq-F8f_kMU_sV6qWA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2508891137</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utility of 7 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Park, Ji Eun ; Cheong, E-Nae ; Jung, Da Eun ; Shim, Woo Hyun ; Lee, Ji Sung</creator><creatorcontrib>Park, Ji Eun ; Cheong, E-Nae ; Jung, Da Eun ; Shim, Woo Hyun ; Lee, Ji Sung</creatorcontrib><description>7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables high resolution imaging and potentially improves the detection of morphologic abnormalities in patients with epilepsy. However, its added value compared with conventional 1.5T and 3.0T MRI is unclear. We reviewed the evidence for the use of 7 Tesla MRI in patients with epilepsy and compared the detection rate of focal lesions with clinical MRI.
Clinical retrospective case studies were identified using the indexed text terms "epilepsy" AND "magnetic resonance imaging" OR "MR imaging" AND "7T" OR "7 Tesla" OR "7T" in Medline (2002-September 1, 2020) and Embase (1999-September 1, 2020). The study setting, MRI protocols, qualitative, and quantitative assessment were systematically reviewed. The detection rate of morphologic abnormalities on MRI was reported in each study in which surgery was used as the reference standard. Meta-analyses were performed using a univariate random-effects model in diagnostic performance studies with patients that underwent both 7T MRI and conventional MRI.
Twenty-five articles were included (467 patients and 167 healthy controls) consisting of 10 case studies, 10 case-control studies, 4 case series, and 1 cohort study. All studies included focal epilepsy; 12 studies (12/25, 48%) specified the disease etiology and 4 studies reported focal but non-lesional (MRI-negative on 1.5/3.0T) epilepsy. 7T MRI showed superior detection and delineation of morphologic abnormalities in all studies. In nine comparative studies, 7T MRI had a superior detection rate of 65% compared with the 22% detection rate of 1.5T or 3.0T.
7T MRI is useful for delineating morphologic abnormalities with a higher detection rate compared with conventional clinical MRI. Most studies were conducted using a case series or case study; therefore, a cohort study design with clinical outcomes is necessary.
Class IV Criteria for Rating Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-2295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-2295</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.621936</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33815251</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>7 Tesla ; epilepsy ; magnetic resonance imaging ; Neurology ; systematic review ; ultra-high field</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in neurology, 2021-03, Vol.12, p.621936-621936</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 Park, Cheong, Jung, Shim and Lee.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Park, Cheong, Jung, Shim and Lee. 2021 Park, Cheong, Jung, Shim and Lee</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-60a383127b0664969a7cc3ca164f1298ecfde66a276e02948ac84c3b07a272483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-60a383127b0664969a7cc3ca164f1298ecfde66a276e02948ac84c3b07a272483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8017213/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8017213/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33815251$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Park, Ji Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheong, E-Nae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Da Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shim, Woo Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Ji Sung</creatorcontrib><title>Utility of 7 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><title>Frontiers in neurology</title><addtitle>Front Neurol</addtitle><description>7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables high resolution imaging and potentially improves the detection of morphologic abnormalities in patients with epilepsy. However, its added value compared with conventional 1.5T and 3.0T MRI is unclear. We reviewed the evidence for the use of 7 Tesla MRI in patients with epilepsy and compared the detection rate of focal lesions with clinical MRI.
Clinical retrospective case studies were identified using the indexed text terms "epilepsy" AND "magnetic resonance imaging" OR "MR imaging" AND "7T" OR "7 Tesla" OR "7T" in Medline (2002-September 1, 2020) and Embase (1999-September 1, 2020). The study setting, MRI protocols, qualitative, and quantitative assessment were systematically reviewed. The detection rate of morphologic abnormalities on MRI was reported in each study in which surgery was used as the reference standard. Meta-analyses were performed using a univariate random-effects model in diagnostic performance studies with patients that underwent both 7T MRI and conventional MRI.
Twenty-five articles were included (467 patients and 167 healthy controls) consisting of 10 case studies, 10 case-control studies, 4 case series, and 1 cohort study. All studies included focal epilepsy; 12 studies (12/25, 48%) specified the disease etiology and 4 studies reported focal but non-lesional (MRI-negative on 1.5/3.0T) epilepsy. 7T MRI showed superior detection and delineation of morphologic abnormalities in all studies. In nine comparative studies, 7T MRI had a superior detection rate of 65% compared with the 22% detection rate of 1.5T or 3.0T.
7T MRI is useful for delineating morphologic abnormalities with a higher detection rate compared with conventional clinical MRI. Most studies were conducted using a case series or case study; therefore, a cohort study design with clinical outcomes is necessary.
Class IV Criteria for Rating Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.</description><subject>7 Tesla</subject><subject>epilepsy</subject><subject>magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>systematic review</subject><subject>ultra-high field</subject><issn>1664-2295</issn><issn>1664-2295</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU9P3DAQxSNUBIjyAXqpfOwlW_9JHLuHSisE7UqgohbUozVxJsEocbaxlyrfvl5CEfhia_zeb2b0suwDoyshlP7cetxNK045W0nOtJAH2QmTssg51-W7V-_j7CyEB5qO0EkmjrLjBGAlL9lJ5u-i612cydiSitxi6IFcQ-cxOkt-Yhg9eItkM0DnfEecJzcQHfoYyG8X78nF1vW4DfMXsia_5hBxgMX56PAvAd-Qa4yQrz30c3DhfXbYQh_w7Pk-ze4uL27Pv-dXP75tztdXuS1kGXNJQSjBeFXTtIWWGiprhQUmi5ZxrdC2DUoJvJJIuS4UWFVYUdMqlXihxGm2WbjNCA9mO7kBptmM4MxTYZw6A1MatEfDWcUQoGFt0xRWoaa6auuybvfURorE-rqwtrt6wMam5Sfo30Df_nh3b7rx0SjKKs72gE_PgGn8s8MQzeCCxb4Hj-MuGF5SpTRjokpStkjtNIYwYfvShlGzj908xW72sZsl9uT5-Hq-F8f_kMU_sV6qWA</recordid><startdate>20210319</startdate><enddate>20210319</enddate><creator>Park, Ji Eun</creator><creator>Cheong, E-Nae</creator><creator>Jung, Da Eun</creator><creator>Shim, Woo Hyun</creator><creator>Lee, Ji Sung</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210319</creationdate><title>Utility of 7 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><author>Park, Ji Eun ; Cheong, E-Nae ; Jung, Da Eun ; Shim, Woo Hyun ; Lee, Ji Sung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-60a383127b0664969a7cc3ca164f1298ecfde66a276e02948ac84c3b07a272483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>7 Tesla</topic><topic>epilepsy</topic><topic>magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>systematic review</topic><topic>ultra-high field</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Park, Ji Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheong, E-Nae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Da Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shim, Woo Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Ji Sung</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Park, Ji Eun</au><au>Cheong, E-Nae</au><au>Jung, Da Eun</au><au>Shim, Woo Hyun</au><au>Lee, Ji Sung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Utility of 7 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Front Neurol</addtitle><date>2021-03-19</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>12</volume><spage>621936</spage><epage>621936</epage><pages>621936-621936</pages><issn>1664-2295</issn><eissn>1664-2295</eissn><abstract>7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables high resolution imaging and potentially improves the detection of morphologic abnormalities in patients with epilepsy. However, its added value compared with conventional 1.5T and 3.0T MRI is unclear. We reviewed the evidence for the use of 7 Tesla MRI in patients with epilepsy and compared the detection rate of focal lesions with clinical MRI.
Clinical retrospective case studies were identified using the indexed text terms "epilepsy" AND "magnetic resonance imaging" OR "MR imaging" AND "7T" OR "7 Tesla" OR "7T" in Medline (2002-September 1, 2020) and Embase (1999-September 1, 2020). The study setting, MRI protocols, qualitative, and quantitative assessment were systematically reviewed. The detection rate of morphologic abnormalities on MRI was reported in each study in which surgery was used as the reference standard. Meta-analyses were performed using a univariate random-effects model in diagnostic performance studies with patients that underwent both 7T MRI and conventional MRI.
Twenty-five articles were included (467 patients and 167 healthy controls) consisting of 10 case studies, 10 case-control studies, 4 case series, and 1 cohort study. All studies included focal epilepsy; 12 studies (12/25, 48%) specified the disease etiology and 4 studies reported focal but non-lesional (MRI-negative on 1.5/3.0T) epilepsy. 7T MRI showed superior detection and delineation of morphologic abnormalities in all studies. In nine comparative studies, 7T MRI had a superior detection rate of 65% compared with the 22% detection rate of 1.5T or 3.0T.
7T MRI is useful for delineating morphologic abnormalities with a higher detection rate compared with conventional clinical MRI. Most studies were conducted using a case series or case study; therefore, a cohort study design with clinical outcomes is necessary.
Class IV Criteria for Rating Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>33815251</pmid><doi>10.3389/fneur.2021.621936</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1664-2295 |
ispartof | Frontiers in neurology, 2021-03, Vol.12, p.621936-621936 |
issn | 1664-2295 1664-2295 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2171eaad1fdd4c8e9097fb5bf48acd63 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | 7 Tesla epilepsy magnetic resonance imaging Neurology systematic review ultra-high field |
title | Utility of 7 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T19%3A51%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Utility%20of%207%20Tesla%20Magnetic%20Resonance%20Imaging%20in%20Patients%20With%20Epilepsy:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20neurology&rft.au=Park,%20Ji%20Eun&rft.date=2021-03-19&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=621936&rft.epage=621936&rft.pages=621936-621936&rft.issn=1664-2295&rft.eissn=1664-2295&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fneur.2021.621936&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2508891137%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2508891137&rft_id=info:pmid/33815251&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_2171eaad1fdd4c8e9097fb5bf48acd63&rfr_iscdi=true |