Utility of 7 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables high resolution imaging and potentially improves the detection of morphologic abnormalities in patients with epilepsy. However, its added value compared with conventional 1.5T and 3.0T MRI is unclear. We reviewed the evidence for the use of 7 Tesla MR...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in neurology 2021-03, Vol.12, p.621936-621936
Hauptverfasser: Park, Ji Eun, Cheong, E-Nae, Jung, Da Eun, Shim, Woo Hyun, Lee, Ji Sung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 621936
container_issue
container_start_page 621936
container_title Frontiers in neurology
container_volume 12
creator Park, Ji Eun
Cheong, E-Nae
Jung, Da Eun
Shim, Woo Hyun
Lee, Ji Sung
description 7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables high resolution imaging and potentially improves the detection of morphologic abnormalities in patients with epilepsy. However, its added value compared with conventional 1.5T and 3.0T MRI is unclear. We reviewed the evidence for the use of 7 Tesla MRI in patients with epilepsy and compared the detection rate of focal lesions with clinical MRI. Clinical retrospective case studies were identified using the indexed text terms "epilepsy" AND "magnetic resonance imaging" OR "MR imaging" AND "7T" OR "7 Tesla" OR "7T" in Medline (2002-September 1, 2020) and Embase (1999-September 1, 2020). The study setting, MRI protocols, qualitative, and quantitative assessment were systematically reviewed. The detection rate of morphologic abnormalities on MRI was reported in each study in which surgery was used as the reference standard. Meta-analyses were performed using a univariate random-effects model in diagnostic performance studies with patients that underwent both 7T MRI and conventional MRI. Twenty-five articles were included (467 patients and 167 healthy controls) consisting of 10 case studies, 10 case-control studies, 4 case series, and 1 cohort study. All studies included focal epilepsy; 12 studies (12/25, 48%) specified the disease etiology and 4 studies reported focal but non-lesional (MRI-negative on 1.5/3.0T) epilepsy. 7T MRI showed superior detection and delineation of morphologic abnormalities in all studies. In nine comparative studies, 7T MRI had a superior detection rate of 65% compared with the 22% detection rate of 1.5T or 3.0T. 7T MRI is useful for delineating morphologic abnormalities with a higher detection rate compared with conventional clinical MRI. Most studies were conducted using a case series or case study; therefore, a cohort study design with clinical outcomes is necessary. Class IV Criteria for Rating Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fneur.2021.621936
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2171eaad1fdd4c8e9097fb5bf48acd63</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2171eaad1fdd4c8e9097fb5bf48acd63</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2508891137</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-60a383127b0664969a7cc3ca164f1298ecfde66a276e02948ac84c3b07a272483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU9P3DAQxSNUBIjyAXqpfOwlW_9JHLuHSisE7UqgohbUozVxJsEocbaxlyrfvl5CEfhia_zeb2b0suwDoyshlP7cetxNK045W0nOtJAH2QmTssg51-W7V-_j7CyEB5qO0EkmjrLjBGAlL9lJ5u-i612cydiSitxi6IFcQ-cxOkt-Yhg9eItkM0DnfEecJzcQHfoYyG8X78nF1vW4DfMXsia_5hBxgMX56PAvAd-Qa4yQrz30c3DhfXbYQh_w7Pk-ze4uL27Pv-dXP75tztdXuS1kGXNJQSjBeFXTtIWWGiprhQUmi5ZxrdC2DUoJvJJIuS4UWFVYUdMqlXihxGm2WbjNCA9mO7kBptmM4MxTYZw6A1MatEfDWcUQoGFt0xRWoaa6auuybvfURorE-rqwtrt6wMam5Sfo30Df_nh3b7rx0SjKKs72gE_PgGn8s8MQzeCCxb4Hj-MuGF5SpTRjokpStkjtNIYwYfvShlGzj908xW72sZsl9uT5-Hq-F8f_kMU_sV6qWA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2508891137</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utility of 7 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Park, Ji Eun ; Cheong, E-Nae ; Jung, Da Eun ; Shim, Woo Hyun ; Lee, Ji Sung</creator><creatorcontrib>Park, Ji Eun ; Cheong, E-Nae ; Jung, Da Eun ; Shim, Woo Hyun ; Lee, Ji Sung</creatorcontrib><description>7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables high resolution imaging and potentially improves the detection of morphologic abnormalities in patients with epilepsy. However, its added value compared with conventional 1.5T and 3.0T MRI is unclear. We reviewed the evidence for the use of 7 Tesla MRI in patients with epilepsy and compared the detection rate of focal lesions with clinical MRI. Clinical retrospective case studies were identified using the indexed text terms "epilepsy" AND "magnetic resonance imaging" OR "MR imaging" AND "7T" OR "7 Tesla" OR "7T" in Medline (2002-September 1, 2020) and Embase (1999-September 1, 2020). The study setting, MRI protocols, qualitative, and quantitative assessment were systematically reviewed. The detection rate of morphologic abnormalities on MRI was reported in each study in which surgery was used as the reference standard. Meta-analyses were performed using a univariate random-effects model in diagnostic performance studies with patients that underwent both 7T MRI and conventional MRI. Twenty-five articles were included (467 patients and 167 healthy controls) consisting of 10 case studies, 10 case-control studies, 4 case series, and 1 cohort study. All studies included focal epilepsy; 12 studies (12/25, 48%) specified the disease etiology and 4 studies reported focal but non-lesional (MRI-negative on 1.5/3.0T) epilepsy. 7T MRI showed superior detection and delineation of morphologic abnormalities in all studies. In nine comparative studies, 7T MRI had a superior detection rate of 65% compared with the 22% detection rate of 1.5T or 3.0T. 7T MRI is useful for delineating morphologic abnormalities with a higher detection rate compared with conventional clinical MRI. Most studies were conducted using a case series or case study; therefore, a cohort study design with clinical outcomes is necessary. Class IV Criteria for Rating Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-2295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-2295</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.621936</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33815251</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>7 Tesla ; epilepsy ; magnetic resonance imaging ; Neurology ; systematic review ; ultra-high field</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in neurology, 2021-03, Vol.12, p.621936-621936</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 Park, Cheong, Jung, Shim and Lee.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Park, Cheong, Jung, Shim and Lee. 2021 Park, Cheong, Jung, Shim and Lee</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-60a383127b0664969a7cc3ca164f1298ecfde66a276e02948ac84c3b07a272483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-60a383127b0664969a7cc3ca164f1298ecfde66a276e02948ac84c3b07a272483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8017213/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8017213/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33815251$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Park, Ji Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheong, E-Nae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Da Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shim, Woo Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Ji Sung</creatorcontrib><title>Utility of 7 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><title>Frontiers in neurology</title><addtitle>Front Neurol</addtitle><description>7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables high resolution imaging and potentially improves the detection of morphologic abnormalities in patients with epilepsy. However, its added value compared with conventional 1.5T and 3.0T MRI is unclear. We reviewed the evidence for the use of 7 Tesla MRI in patients with epilepsy and compared the detection rate of focal lesions with clinical MRI. Clinical retrospective case studies were identified using the indexed text terms "epilepsy" AND "magnetic resonance imaging" OR "MR imaging" AND "7T" OR "7 Tesla" OR "7T" in Medline (2002-September 1, 2020) and Embase (1999-September 1, 2020). The study setting, MRI protocols, qualitative, and quantitative assessment were systematically reviewed. The detection rate of morphologic abnormalities on MRI was reported in each study in which surgery was used as the reference standard. Meta-analyses were performed using a univariate random-effects model in diagnostic performance studies with patients that underwent both 7T MRI and conventional MRI. Twenty-five articles were included (467 patients and 167 healthy controls) consisting of 10 case studies, 10 case-control studies, 4 case series, and 1 cohort study. All studies included focal epilepsy; 12 studies (12/25, 48%) specified the disease etiology and 4 studies reported focal but non-lesional (MRI-negative on 1.5/3.0T) epilepsy. 7T MRI showed superior detection and delineation of morphologic abnormalities in all studies. In nine comparative studies, 7T MRI had a superior detection rate of 65% compared with the 22% detection rate of 1.5T or 3.0T. 7T MRI is useful for delineating morphologic abnormalities with a higher detection rate compared with conventional clinical MRI. Most studies were conducted using a case series or case study; therefore, a cohort study design with clinical outcomes is necessary. Class IV Criteria for Rating Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.</description><subject>7 Tesla</subject><subject>epilepsy</subject><subject>magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>systematic review</subject><subject>ultra-high field</subject><issn>1664-2295</issn><issn>1664-2295</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU9P3DAQxSNUBIjyAXqpfOwlW_9JHLuHSisE7UqgohbUozVxJsEocbaxlyrfvl5CEfhia_zeb2b0suwDoyshlP7cetxNK045W0nOtJAH2QmTssg51-W7V-_j7CyEB5qO0EkmjrLjBGAlL9lJ5u-i612cydiSitxi6IFcQ-cxOkt-Yhg9eItkM0DnfEecJzcQHfoYyG8X78nF1vW4DfMXsia_5hBxgMX56PAvAd-Qa4yQrz30c3DhfXbYQh_w7Pk-ze4uL27Pv-dXP75tztdXuS1kGXNJQSjBeFXTtIWWGiprhQUmi5ZxrdC2DUoJvJJIuS4UWFVYUdMqlXihxGm2WbjNCA9mO7kBptmM4MxTYZw6A1MatEfDWcUQoGFt0xRWoaa6auuybvfURorE-rqwtrt6wMam5Sfo30Df_nh3b7rx0SjKKs72gE_PgGn8s8MQzeCCxb4Hj-MuGF5SpTRjokpStkjtNIYwYfvShlGzj908xW72sZsl9uT5-Hq-F8f_kMU_sV6qWA</recordid><startdate>20210319</startdate><enddate>20210319</enddate><creator>Park, Ji Eun</creator><creator>Cheong, E-Nae</creator><creator>Jung, Da Eun</creator><creator>Shim, Woo Hyun</creator><creator>Lee, Ji Sung</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210319</creationdate><title>Utility of 7 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><author>Park, Ji Eun ; Cheong, E-Nae ; Jung, Da Eun ; Shim, Woo Hyun ; Lee, Ji Sung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-60a383127b0664969a7cc3ca164f1298ecfde66a276e02948ac84c3b07a272483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>7 Tesla</topic><topic>epilepsy</topic><topic>magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>systematic review</topic><topic>ultra-high field</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Park, Ji Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheong, E-Nae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Da Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shim, Woo Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Ji Sung</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Park, Ji Eun</au><au>Cheong, E-Nae</au><au>Jung, Da Eun</au><au>Shim, Woo Hyun</au><au>Lee, Ji Sung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Utility of 7 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Front Neurol</addtitle><date>2021-03-19</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>12</volume><spage>621936</spage><epage>621936</epage><pages>621936-621936</pages><issn>1664-2295</issn><eissn>1664-2295</eissn><abstract>7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables high resolution imaging and potentially improves the detection of morphologic abnormalities in patients with epilepsy. However, its added value compared with conventional 1.5T and 3.0T MRI is unclear. We reviewed the evidence for the use of 7 Tesla MRI in patients with epilepsy and compared the detection rate of focal lesions with clinical MRI. Clinical retrospective case studies were identified using the indexed text terms "epilepsy" AND "magnetic resonance imaging" OR "MR imaging" AND "7T" OR "7 Tesla" OR "7T" in Medline (2002-September 1, 2020) and Embase (1999-September 1, 2020). The study setting, MRI protocols, qualitative, and quantitative assessment were systematically reviewed. The detection rate of morphologic abnormalities on MRI was reported in each study in which surgery was used as the reference standard. Meta-analyses were performed using a univariate random-effects model in diagnostic performance studies with patients that underwent both 7T MRI and conventional MRI. Twenty-five articles were included (467 patients and 167 healthy controls) consisting of 10 case studies, 10 case-control studies, 4 case series, and 1 cohort study. All studies included focal epilepsy; 12 studies (12/25, 48%) specified the disease etiology and 4 studies reported focal but non-lesional (MRI-negative on 1.5/3.0T) epilepsy. 7T MRI showed superior detection and delineation of morphologic abnormalities in all studies. In nine comparative studies, 7T MRI had a superior detection rate of 65% compared with the 22% detection rate of 1.5T or 3.0T. 7T MRI is useful for delineating morphologic abnormalities with a higher detection rate compared with conventional clinical MRI. Most studies were conducted using a case series or case study; therefore, a cohort study design with clinical outcomes is necessary. Class IV Criteria for Rating Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>33815251</pmid><doi>10.3389/fneur.2021.621936</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1664-2295
ispartof Frontiers in neurology, 2021-03, Vol.12, p.621936-621936
issn 1664-2295
1664-2295
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2171eaad1fdd4c8e9097fb5bf48acd63
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects 7 Tesla
epilepsy
magnetic resonance imaging
Neurology
systematic review
ultra-high field
title Utility of 7 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T19%3A51%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Utility%20of%207%20Tesla%20Magnetic%20Resonance%20Imaging%20in%20Patients%20With%20Epilepsy:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20neurology&rft.au=Park,%20Ji%20Eun&rft.date=2021-03-19&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=621936&rft.epage=621936&rft.pages=621936-621936&rft.issn=1664-2295&rft.eissn=1664-2295&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fneur.2021.621936&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2508891137%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2508891137&rft_id=info:pmid/33815251&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_2171eaad1fdd4c8e9097fb5bf48acd63&rfr_iscdi=true