Industrial wastewater volume reduction through osmotic concentration: Membrane module selection and process modeling

Osmotic concentration (OC), a form of forward osmosis (FO) but without draw solution recovery, can be applied for reducing wastewater disposal volumes in the oil & gas industry. Within this industry, wastewater is often disposed of by injection through disposal wells into deep underground reserv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of water process engineering 2021-04, Vol.40, p.101760, Article 101760
Hauptverfasser: Minier-Matar, Joel, Al-Maas, Mashael, Dardor, Dareen, Janson, Arnold, Nasser, Mustafa S., Adham, Samer
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 101760
container_title Journal of water process engineering
container_volume 40
creator Minier-Matar, Joel
Al-Maas, Mashael
Dardor, Dareen
Janson, Arnold
Nasser, Mustafa S.
Adham, Samer
description Osmotic concentration (OC), a form of forward osmosis (FO) but without draw solution recovery, can be applied for reducing wastewater disposal volumes in the oil & gas industry. Within this industry, wastewater is often disposed of by injection through disposal wells into deep underground reservoirs. By reducing wastewater disposal volumes, the sustainability of the disposal reservoir is improved. In this application of OC, seawater or brine from a desalination plant serves as the draw solution and the diluted seawater is discharged to the sea. This study compared 3 commercial hollow-fiber FO membranes (CTA, TFC, aquaporin proteins) for reducing the volume of low salinity wastewater generated during liquified natural gas (LNG) production. Additionally, a model was developed to predict the performance of commercial full-scale membranes by identifying optimum operating conditions, taking into consideration the trade-off between feed concentration factor and water flux. Bench-scale tests were conducted using synthetic and actual wastewater from an LNG facility to evaluate OC technology performance and validate model predictions. Based on model results with a feed mimicking the salinity of actual wastewater, a 4x concentration factor produced a reasonable compromise between feed recovery and draw solution dilution and was considered the optimum for future tests. At higher concentration factors, the increased dilution of the draw solution negatively impacted flux. In bench tests with real wastewater, the TFC chemistry had a ≈5x higher water flux (9.7 vs. 1.9 L/m2-h) and a ≈3x lower specific reverse solute flux (192 vs. 551 mg/L) compared to the CTA chemistry. However, both membranes showed less than 5% fouling and a specific forward organic solute flux of less than 0.5 mg/L of total organic carbon (TOC). Pilot testing for >50 h showed stable performance, comparable to bench scale data and model predictions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101760
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000632947500003CitationCount</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2214714420306371</els_id><sourcerecordid>S2214714420306371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-687f96df357055c1b41f1e19038d3d3f36ff16755ed01d5a54e4efe951efa4593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtLAzEQgBdRsGj_gKfcpTXZJPsQL1J8FCpe9BzSZNKm7G5Kku3iv3e3W8STeJphZr5h5kuSG4LnBJPsbjffdXuYpzg9FvIMnyWTNCVslhPGzn_ll8k0hB3GOC055kUxSeKy0W2I3soKdTJE6GQEjw6uamtAHnSronUNilvv2s0WuVC7aBVSrlHQRC-H7j16g3rtZQOodrqtAAWoYARlo9HeOwUhDE2obLO5Ti6MrAJMT_Eq-Xx--li8zlbvL8vF42qmKGNxlhW5KTNtKM8x54qsGTEESIlpoammhmbGkCznHDQmmkvOgIGBkhMwkvGSXiXpuFd5F4IHI_be1tJ_CYLFoE7sxKBODOrEqK6HihHqYO1MUBb6T3_A3l1G05LlvM8wXdh4NLBwbRN79Pb_aD_9ME5Dr-BgwYsToa3v5Qnt7F93fgNzMZto</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Industrial wastewater volume reduction through osmotic concentration: Membrane module selection and process modeling</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Minier-Matar, Joel ; Al-Maas, Mashael ; Dardor, Dareen ; Janson, Arnold ; Nasser, Mustafa S. ; Adham, Samer</creator><creatorcontrib>Minier-Matar, Joel ; Al-Maas, Mashael ; Dardor, Dareen ; Janson, Arnold ; Nasser, Mustafa S. ; Adham, Samer</creatorcontrib><description>Osmotic concentration (OC), a form of forward osmosis (FO) but without draw solution recovery, can be applied for reducing wastewater disposal volumes in the oil &amp; gas industry. Within this industry, wastewater is often disposed of by injection through disposal wells into deep underground reservoirs. By reducing wastewater disposal volumes, the sustainability of the disposal reservoir is improved. In this application of OC, seawater or brine from a desalination plant serves as the draw solution and the diluted seawater is discharged to the sea. This study compared 3 commercial hollow-fiber FO membranes (CTA, TFC, aquaporin proteins) for reducing the volume of low salinity wastewater generated during liquified natural gas (LNG) production. Additionally, a model was developed to predict the performance of commercial full-scale membranes by identifying optimum operating conditions, taking into consideration the trade-off between feed concentration factor and water flux. Bench-scale tests were conducted using synthetic and actual wastewater from an LNG facility to evaluate OC technology performance and validate model predictions. Based on model results with a feed mimicking the salinity of actual wastewater, a 4x concentration factor produced a reasonable compromise between feed recovery and draw solution dilution and was considered the optimum for future tests. At higher concentration factors, the increased dilution of the draw solution negatively impacted flux. In bench tests with real wastewater, the TFC chemistry had a ≈5x higher water flux (9.7 vs. 1.9 L/m2-h) and a ≈3x lower specific reverse solute flux (192 vs. 551 mg/L) compared to the CTA chemistry. However, both membranes showed less than 5% fouling and a specific forward organic solute flux of less than 0.5 mg/L of total organic carbon (TOC). Pilot testing for &gt;50 h showed stable performance, comparable to bench scale data and model predictions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2214-7144</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2214-7144</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101760</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>AMSTERDAM: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bench scale ; Engineering ; Engineering, Chemical ; Engineering, Environmental ; Forward osmosis ; Oil and gas ; Osmotic concentration ; Physical Sciences ; Pilot plant ; Science &amp; Technology ; Seawater ; Technology ; Wastewater treatment ; Water Resources</subject><ispartof>Journal of water process engineering, 2021-04, Vol.40, p.101760, Article 101760</ispartof><rights>2020 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>3</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000632947500003</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-687f96df357055c1b41f1e19038d3d3f36ff16755ed01d5a54e4efe951efa4593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-687f96df357055c1b41f1e19038d3d3f36ff16755ed01d5a54e4efe951efa4593</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9203-0455 ; 0000-0001-8119-7850</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Minier-Matar, Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Maas, Mashael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dardor, Dareen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janson, Arnold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasser, Mustafa S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adham, Samer</creatorcontrib><title>Industrial wastewater volume reduction through osmotic concentration: Membrane module selection and process modeling</title><title>Journal of water process engineering</title><addtitle>J WATER PROCESS ENG</addtitle><description>Osmotic concentration (OC), a form of forward osmosis (FO) but without draw solution recovery, can be applied for reducing wastewater disposal volumes in the oil &amp; gas industry. Within this industry, wastewater is often disposed of by injection through disposal wells into deep underground reservoirs. By reducing wastewater disposal volumes, the sustainability of the disposal reservoir is improved. In this application of OC, seawater or brine from a desalination plant serves as the draw solution and the diluted seawater is discharged to the sea. This study compared 3 commercial hollow-fiber FO membranes (CTA, TFC, aquaporin proteins) for reducing the volume of low salinity wastewater generated during liquified natural gas (LNG) production. Additionally, a model was developed to predict the performance of commercial full-scale membranes by identifying optimum operating conditions, taking into consideration the trade-off between feed concentration factor and water flux. Bench-scale tests were conducted using synthetic and actual wastewater from an LNG facility to evaluate OC technology performance and validate model predictions. Based on model results with a feed mimicking the salinity of actual wastewater, a 4x concentration factor produced a reasonable compromise between feed recovery and draw solution dilution and was considered the optimum for future tests. At higher concentration factors, the increased dilution of the draw solution negatively impacted flux. In bench tests with real wastewater, the TFC chemistry had a ≈5x higher water flux (9.7 vs. 1.9 L/m2-h) and a ≈3x lower specific reverse solute flux (192 vs. 551 mg/L) compared to the CTA chemistry. However, both membranes showed less than 5% fouling and a specific forward organic solute flux of less than 0.5 mg/L of total organic carbon (TOC). Pilot testing for &gt;50 h showed stable performance, comparable to bench scale data and model predictions.</description><subject>Bench scale</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering, Chemical</subject><subject>Engineering, Environmental</subject><subject>Forward osmosis</subject><subject>Oil and gas</subject><subject>Osmotic concentration</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Pilot plant</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Seawater</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Water Resources</subject><issn>2214-7144</issn><issn>2214-7144</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtLAzEQgBdRsGj_gKfcpTXZJPsQL1J8FCpe9BzSZNKm7G5Kku3iv3e3W8STeJphZr5h5kuSG4LnBJPsbjffdXuYpzg9FvIMnyWTNCVslhPGzn_ll8k0hB3GOC055kUxSeKy0W2I3soKdTJE6GQEjw6uamtAHnSronUNilvv2s0WuVC7aBVSrlHQRC-H7j16g3rtZQOodrqtAAWoYARlo9HeOwUhDE2obLO5Ti6MrAJMT_Eq-Xx--li8zlbvL8vF42qmKGNxlhW5KTNtKM8x54qsGTEESIlpoammhmbGkCznHDQmmkvOgIGBkhMwkvGSXiXpuFd5F4IHI_be1tJ_CYLFoE7sxKBODOrEqK6HihHqYO1MUBb6T3_A3l1G05LlvM8wXdh4NLBwbRN79Pb_aD_9ME5Dr-BgwYsToa3v5Qnt7F93fgNzMZto</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>Minier-Matar, Joel</creator><creator>Al-Maas, Mashael</creator><creator>Dardor, Dareen</creator><creator>Janson, Arnold</creator><creator>Nasser, Mustafa S.</creator><creator>Adham, Samer</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9203-0455</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8119-7850</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>Industrial wastewater volume reduction through osmotic concentration: Membrane module selection and process modeling</title><author>Minier-Matar, Joel ; Al-Maas, Mashael ; Dardor, Dareen ; Janson, Arnold ; Nasser, Mustafa S. ; Adham, Samer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-687f96df357055c1b41f1e19038d3d3f36ff16755ed01d5a54e4efe951efa4593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bench scale</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering, Chemical</topic><topic>Engineering, Environmental</topic><topic>Forward osmosis</topic><topic>Oil and gas</topic><topic>Osmotic concentration</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Pilot plant</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Seawater</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Water Resources</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Minier-Matar, Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Maas, Mashael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dardor, Dareen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janson, Arnold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasser, Mustafa S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adham, Samer</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of water process engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Minier-Matar, Joel</au><au>Al-Maas, Mashael</au><au>Dardor, Dareen</au><au>Janson, Arnold</au><au>Nasser, Mustafa S.</au><au>Adham, Samer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Industrial wastewater volume reduction through osmotic concentration: Membrane module selection and process modeling</atitle><jtitle>Journal of water process engineering</jtitle><stitle>J WATER PROCESS ENG</stitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>40</volume><spage>101760</spage><pages>101760-</pages><artnum>101760</artnum><issn>2214-7144</issn><eissn>2214-7144</eissn><abstract>Osmotic concentration (OC), a form of forward osmosis (FO) but without draw solution recovery, can be applied for reducing wastewater disposal volumes in the oil &amp; gas industry. Within this industry, wastewater is often disposed of by injection through disposal wells into deep underground reservoirs. By reducing wastewater disposal volumes, the sustainability of the disposal reservoir is improved. In this application of OC, seawater or brine from a desalination plant serves as the draw solution and the diluted seawater is discharged to the sea. This study compared 3 commercial hollow-fiber FO membranes (CTA, TFC, aquaporin proteins) for reducing the volume of low salinity wastewater generated during liquified natural gas (LNG) production. Additionally, a model was developed to predict the performance of commercial full-scale membranes by identifying optimum operating conditions, taking into consideration the trade-off between feed concentration factor and water flux. Bench-scale tests were conducted using synthetic and actual wastewater from an LNG facility to evaluate OC technology performance and validate model predictions. Based on model results with a feed mimicking the salinity of actual wastewater, a 4x concentration factor produced a reasonable compromise between feed recovery and draw solution dilution and was considered the optimum for future tests. At higher concentration factors, the increased dilution of the draw solution negatively impacted flux. In bench tests with real wastewater, the TFC chemistry had a ≈5x higher water flux (9.7 vs. 1.9 L/m2-h) and a ≈3x lower specific reverse solute flux (192 vs. 551 mg/L) compared to the CTA chemistry. However, both membranes showed less than 5% fouling and a specific forward organic solute flux of less than 0.5 mg/L of total organic carbon (TOC). Pilot testing for &gt;50 h showed stable performance, comparable to bench scale data and model predictions.</abstract><cop>AMSTERDAM</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101760</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9203-0455</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8119-7850</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2214-7144
ispartof Journal of water process engineering, 2021-04, Vol.40, p.101760, Article 101760
issn 2214-7144
2214-7144
language eng
recordid cdi_webofscience_primary_000632947500003CitationCount
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Bench scale
Engineering
Engineering, Chemical
Engineering, Environmental
Forward osmosis
Oil and gas
Osmotic concentration
Physical Sciences
Pilot plant
Science & Technology
Seawater
Technology
Wastewater treatment
Water Resources
title Industrial wastewater volume reduction through osmotic concentration: Membrane module selection and process modeling
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T04%3A01%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Industrial%20wastewater%20volume%20reduction%20through%20osmotic%20concentration:%20Membrane%20module%20selection%20and%20process%20modeling&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20water%20process%20engineering&rft.au=Minier-Matar,%20Joel&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=40&rft.spage=101760&rft.pages=101760-&rft.artnum=101760&rft.issn=2214-7144&rft.eissn=2214-7144&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101760&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_webof%3ES2214714420306371%3C/elsevier_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S2214714420306371&rfr_iscdi=true