Behavioral and cortisol responses to feeding frequency in pregnant sows under isocaloric intake

Abstract The study focused on behavioral and cortisol responses to feeding frequency in pregnant sows under isocaloric intake. Twenty-four sows [(Landrace × Yorkshire); BW 216.70 ± 3.98 kg; parity 3.04 ± 0.53] were balanced for parity and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 feeding frequency regimes. Sows w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2020-08, Vol.98 (8), p.1-8, Article 226
Hauptverfasser: Manu, Hayford, Lee, Suhyup, Keyes, Mike C, Cairns, Jim, Baidoo, Samuel K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 8
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 98
creator Manu, Hayford
Lee, Suhyup
Keyes, Mike C
Cairns, Jim
Baidoo, Samuel K
description Abstract The study focused on behavioral and cortisol responses to feeding frequency in pregnant sows under isocaloric intake. Twenty-four sows [(Landrace × Yorkshire); BW 216.70 ± 3.98 kg; parity 3.04 ± 0.53] were balanced for parity and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 feeding frequency regimes. Sows were fed corn–soybean meal-based diet 1× [0730 (Control), T1], 2× [half ration at 0730 and 1530 hours, T2], or 3× [one-third portion at 0730, 1130, and 1530 hours, T3] from days 30 to 60 of gestation. Sows received 7055 kcal ME/d during gestation from 2.21 kg of diet formulated to contain SID Lys/ME of 1.71 g/Mcal. Saliva samples were collected every 2 hr from 0630 to 1830 hours on day 52 and assayed for cortisol using ELISA procedure. Behavior data were collected for 7 d from day 53 of gestation by affixing a remote insights ear tag to each sow. Each sow had 120,960 data points categorized into: “Active”, “Feed,” or “Dormant”. Because of housing constraint, all sows were housed in individual stalls in the same room presenting a potential limitation of the study. The data were analyzed using PROC MIXED and GLIMMIX procedures of SAS 9.4 for cortisol and behavior count data, respectively. Sow was the experimental unit. The area under the curve (AUC) is quantitative evaluation of response as threshold varies over all possible values. The T2 sows had reduced 12-hr cortisol AUC compared with control sows (P = 0.024) and T3 sows (P = 0.004), respectively. The T2 sows had lower 3 hr (P = 0.039) and 5 hr (P = 0.015) postfeeding cortisol AUC compared with control sows. Feed anticipatory activity (FAA), 24-hr total activity, and feeding activities (eating and/or sham chewing) were reduced for T2 sows relative to the control and T3 sows (P < 0.01). Consequently, T2 sows had lower 24-hr total activity (P < 0.001) and feeding activities (P < 0.001) AUC compared with both the control and T3 sows, respectively. The T3 sows had greater FAA (P < 0.001) and 24-hr total activity AUC (P = 0.010) compared with control sows. Our data although inconclusive due to small sample size, twice daily feeding appears to be the threshold that reduces sows’ total activity AUC, feeding activity AUC, and activation of hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, reduced hunger, and exhibit potential to improve sow welfare in relation to once and thrice daily feeding regimes under isocaloric intake per kilogram live metabolic weight.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jas/skaa226
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000610051700010CitationCount</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jas/skaa226</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2424996554</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-944f28d999861793bd56a5173d16a2472de3ec16856d0c1367c675409c6d2d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1rVDEUxYModqyu3EtAEKE8m5uv97IRdLAqFNx0HzJJ3jTTN8mY5LX0vzdlxvFjIa4SyO-c3HMPQi-BvAOi2PnGlPNyYwyl8hFagKCiYyDZY7QghEI3DEBP0LNSNoQAFUo8RSeMygEkhwXSH_21uQ0pmwmb6LBNuYaSJpx92aVYfME14dF7F-Iaj9l_n3209zhEvMt-HU2suKS7gufofMZNas2UcrCNqObGP0dPRjMV_-JwnqKri09Xyy_d5bfPX5cfLjvLOamd4nykg1NKDRJ6xVZOSCOgZw6kobynzjNvQQ5COmKByd7KXnCirHTUcXaK3u9td_Nq6531sbZEepfD1uR7nUzQf77EcK3X6Vb3nAEFaAZvDwY5tYil6m0o1k-TiT7NRVNOuVJSiIe_Xv-FbtKcY0vXKCZ6yigXjTrbUzanUrIfj8MA0Q-96dabPvTW6Fe_z39kfxb1y-7Or9JYbGgt-CNGCJFASFtYuwFp9PD_9DJUU0OKyzTH2qRv9tI07_458g8yh8MU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2435723245</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Behavioral and cortisol responses to feeding frequency in pregnant sows under isocaloric intake</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Manu, Hayford ; Lee, Suhyup ; Keyes, Mike C ; Cairns, Jim ; Baidoo, Samuel K</creator><creatorcontrib>Manu, Hayford ; Lee, Suhyup ; Keyes, Mike C ; Cairns, Jim ; Baidoo, Samuel K</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The study focused on behavioral and cortisol responses to feeding frequency in pregnant sows under isocaloric intake. Twenty-four sows [(Landrace × Yorkshire); BW 216.70 ± 3.98 kg; parity 3.04 ± 0.53] were balanced for parity and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 feeding frequency regimes. Sows were fed corn–soybean meal-based diet 1× [0730 (Control), T1], 2× [half ration at 0730 and 1530 hours, T2], or 3× [one-third portion at 0730, 1130, and 1530 hours, T3] from days 30 to 60 of gestation. Sows received 7055 kcal ME/d during gestation from 2.21 kg of diet formulated to contain SID Lys/ME of 1.71 g/Mcal. Saliva samples were collected every 2 hr from 0630 to 1830 hours on day 52 and assayed for cortisol using ELISA procedure. Behavior data were collected for 7 d from day 53 of gestation by affixing a remote insights ear tag to each sow. Each sow had 120,960 data points categorized into: “Active”, “Feed,” or “Dormant”. Because of housing constraint, all sows were housed in individual stalls in the same room presenting a potential limitation of the study. The data were analyzed using PROC MIXED and GLIMMIX procedures of SAS 9.4 for cortisol and behavior count data, respectively. Sow was the experimental unit. The area under the curve (AUC) is quantitative evaluation of response as threshold varies over all possible values. The T2 sows had reduced 12-hr cortisol AUC compared with control sows (P = 0.024) and T3 sows (P = 0.004), respectively. The T2 sows had lower 3 hr (P = 0.039) and 5 hr (P = 0.015) postfeeding cortisol AUC compared with control sows. Feed anticipatory activity (FAA), 24-hr total activity, and feeding activities (eating and/or sham chewing) were reduced for T2 sows relative to the control and T3 sows (P &lt; 0.01). Consequently, T2 sows had lower 24-hr total activity (P &lt; 0.001) and feeding activities (P &lt; 0.001) AUC compared with both the control and T3 sows, respectively. The T3 sows had greater FAA (P &lt; 0.001) and 24-hr total activity AUC (P = 0.010) compared with control sows. Our data although inconclusive due to small sample size, twice daily feeding appears to be the threshold that reduces sows’ total activity AUC, feeding activity AUC, and activation of hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, reduced hunger, and exhibit potential to improve sow welfare in relation to once and thrice daily feeding regimes under isocaloric intake per kilogram live metabolic weight.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa226</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32681641</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Agriculture, Dairy &amp; Animal Science ; Animal behavior ; Animal Behavior and Cognition ; Animal Feed - analysis ; Animals ; Behavior, Animal ; Body Weight ; Chewing ; Cortisol ; Data points ; Diet ; Diet - veterinary ; Eating ; Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ; Feeding ; Feeding regimes ; Female ; Gestation ; Glycine max ; Hogs ; Hunger ; Hydrocortisone - analysis ; Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis ; Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System - metabolism ; Hypothalamus ; Lactation ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Parity ; Pituitary ; Pituitary-Adrenal System - microbiology ; Pregnancy ; Random Allocation ; Saliva ; Science &amp; Technology ; Soybeans ; Swine - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2020-08, Vol.98 (8), p.1-8, Article 226</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science.</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press Aug 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>3</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000610051700010</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-944f28d999861793bd56a5173d16a2472de3ec16856d0c1367c675409c6d2d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-944f28d999861793bd56a5173d16a2472de3ec16856d0c1367c675409c6d2d43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6730-9190</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7431211/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7431211/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,1585,27929,27930,28253,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32681641$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Manu, Hayford</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Suhyup</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keyes, Mike C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cairns, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baidoo, Samuel K</creatorcontrib><title>Behavioral and cortisol responses to feeding frequency in pregnant sows under isocaloric intake</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J ANIM SCI</addtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description>Abstract The study focused on behavioral and cortisol responses to feeding frequency in pregnant sows under isocaloric intake. Twenty-four sows [(Landrace × Yorkshire); BW 216.70 ± 3.98 kg; parity 3.04 ± 0.53] were balanced for parity and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 feeding frequency regimes. Sows were fed corn–soybean meal-based diet 1× [0730 (Control), T1], 2× [half ration at 0730 and 1530 hours, T2], or 3× [one-third portion at 0730, 1130, and 1530 hours, T3] from days 30 to 60 of gestation. Sows received 7055 kcal ME/d during gestation from 2.21 kg of diet formulated to contain SID Lys/ME of 1.71 g/Mcal. Saliva samples were collected every 2 hr from 0630 to 1830 hours on day 52 and assayed for cortisol using ELISA procedure. Behavior data were collected for 7 d from day 53 of gestation by affixing a remote insights ear tag to each sow. Each sow had 120,960 data points categorized into: “Active”, “Feed,” or “Dormant”. Because of housing constraint, all sows were housed in individual stalls in the same room presenting a potential limitation of the study. The data were analyzed using PROC MIXED and GLIMMIX procedures of SAS 9.4 for cortisol and behavior count data, respectively. Sow was the experimental unit. The area under the curve (AUC) is quantitative evaluation of response as threshold varies over all possible values. The T2 sows had reduced 12-hr cortisol AUC compared with control sows (P = 0.024) and T3 sows (P = 0.004), respectively. The T2 sows had lower 3 hr (P = 0.039) and 5 hr (P = 0.015) postfeeding cortisol AUC compared with control sows. Feed anticipatory activity (FAA), 24-hr total activity, and feeding activities (eating and/or sham chewing) were reduced for T2 sows relative to the control and T3 sows (P &lt; 0.01). Consequently, T2 sows had lower 24-hr total activity (P &lt; 0.001) and feeding activities (P &lt; 0.001) AUC compared with both the control and T3 sows, respectively. The T3 sows had greater FAA (P &lt; 0.001) and 24-hr total activity AUC (P = 0.010) compared with control sows. Our data although inconclusive due to small sample size, twice daily feeding appears to be the threshold that reduces sows’ total activity AUC, feeding activity AUC, and activation of hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, reduced hunger, and exhibit potential to improve sow welfare in relation to once and thrice daily feeding regimes under isocaloric intake per kilogram live metabolic weight.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agriculture, Dairy &amp; Animal Science</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal Behavior and Cognition</subject><subject>Animal Feed - analysis</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Chewing</subject><subject>Cortisol</subject><subject>Data points</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diet - veterinary</subject><subject>Eating</subject><subject>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</subject><subject>Feeding</subject><subject>Feeding regimes</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gestation</subject><subject>Glycine max</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Hunger</subject><subject>Hydrocortisone - analysis</subject><subject>Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis</subject><subject>Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System - metabolism</subject><subject>Hypothalamus</subject><subject>Lactation</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>Pituitary</subject><subject>Pituitary-Adrenal System - microbiology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Saliva</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Swine - physiology</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1rVDEUxYModqyu3EtAEKE8m5uv97IRdLAqFNx0HzJJ3jTTN8mY5LX0vzdlxvFjIa4SyO-c3HMPQi-BvAOi2PnGlPNyYwyl8hFagKCiYyDZY7QghEI3DEBP0LNSNoQAFUo8RSeMygEkhwXSH_21uQ0pmwmb6LBNuYaSJpx92aVYfME14dF7F-Iaj9l_n3209zhEvMt-HU2suKS7gufofMZNas2UcrCNqObGP0dPRjMV_-JwnqKri09Xyy_d5bfPX5cfLjvLOamd4nykg1NKDRJ6xVZOSCOgZw6kobynzjNvQQ5COmKByd7KXnCirHTUcXaK3u9td_Nq6531sbZEepfD1uR7nUzQf77EcK3X6Vb3nAEFaAZvDwY5tYil6m0o1k-TiT7NRVNOuVJSiIe_Xv-FbtKcY0vXKCZ6yigXjTrbUzanUrIfj8MA0Q-96dabPvTW6Fe_z39kfxb1y-7Or9JYbGgt-CNGCJFASFtYuwFp9PD_9DJUU0OKyzTH2qRv9tI07_458g8yh8MU</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Manu, Hayford</creator><creator>Lee, Suhyup</creator><creator>Keyes, Mike C</creator><creator>Cairns, Jim</creator><creator>Baidoo, Samuel K</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Univ Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6730-9190</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Behavioral and cortisol responses to feeding frequency in pregnant sows under isocaloric intake</title><author>Manu, Hayford ; Lee, Suhyup ; Keyes, Mike C ; Cairns, Jim ; Baidoo, Samuel K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-944f28d999861793bd56a5173d16a2472de3ec16856d0c1367c675409c6d2d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agriculture, Dairy &amp; Animal Science</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal Behavior and Cognition</topic><topic>Animal Feed - analysis</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Chewing</topic><topic>Cortisol</topic><topic>Data points</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diet - veterinary</topic><topic>Eating</topic><topic>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</topic><topic>Feeding</topic><topic>Feeding regimes</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gestation</topic><topic>Glycine max</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Hunger</topic><topic>Hydrocortisone - analysis</topic><topic>Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis</topic><topic>Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System - metabolism</topic><topic>Hypothalamus</topic><topic>Lactation</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>Pituitary</topic><topic>Pituitary-Adrenal System - microbiology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Saliva</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Swine - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Manu, Hayford</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Suhyup</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keyes, Mike C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cairns, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baidoo, Samuel K</creatorcontrib><collection>Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Manu, Hayford</au><au>Lee, Suhyup</au><au>Keyes, Mike C</au><au>Cairns, Jim</au><au>Baidoo, Samuel K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Behavioral and cortisol responses to feeding frequency in pregnant sows under isocaloric intake</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><stitle>J ANIM SCI</stitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>1-8</pages><artnum>226</artnum><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Abstract The study focused on behavioral and cortisol responses to feeding frequency in pregnant sows under isocaloric intake. Twenty-four sows [(Landrace × Yorkshire); BW 216.70 ± 3.98 kg; parity 3.04 ± 0.53] were balanced for parity and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 feeding frequency regimes. Sows were fed corn–soybean meal-based diet 1× [0730 (Control), T1], 2× [half ration at 0730 and 1530 hours, T2], or 3× [one-third portion at 0730, 1130, and 1530 hours, T3] from days 30 to 60 of gestation. Sows received 7055 kcal ME/d during gestation from 2.21 kg of diet formulated to contain SID Lys/ME of 1.71 g/Mcal. Saliva samples were collected every 2 hr from 0630 to 1830 hours on day 52 and assayed for cortisol using ELISA procedure. Behavior data were collected for 7 d from day 53 of gestation by affixing a remote insights ear tag to each sow. Each sow had 120,960 data points categorized into: “Active”, “Feed,” or “Dormant”. Because of housing constraint, all sows were housed in individual stalls in the same room presenting a potential limitation of the study. The data were analyzed using PROC MIXED and GLIMMIX procedures of SAS 9.4 for cortisol and behavior count data, respectively. Sow was the experimental unit. The area under the curve (AUC) is quantitative evaluation of response as threshold varies over all possible values. The T2 sows had reduced 12-hr cortisol AUC compared with control sows (P = 0.024) and T3 sows (P = 0.004), respectively. The T2 sows had lower 3 hr (P = 0.039) and 5 hr (P = 0.015) postfeeding cortisol AUC compared with control sows. Feed anticipatory activity (FAA), 24-hr total activity, and feeding activities (eating and/or sham chewing) were reduced for T2 sows relative to the control and T3 sows (P &lt; 0.01). Consequently, T2 sows had lower 24-hr total activity (P &lt; 0.001) and feeding activities (P &lt; 0.001) AUC compared with both the control and T3 sows, respectively. The T3 sows had greater FAA (P &lt; 0.001) and 24-hr total activity AUC (P = 0.010) compared with control sows. Our data although inconclusive due to small sample size, twice daily feeding appears to be the threshold that reduces sows’ total activity AUC, feeding activity AUC, and activation of hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, reduced hunger, and exhibit potential to improve sow welfare in relation to once and thrice daily feeding regimes under isocaloric intake per kilogram live metabolic weight.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>32681641</pmid><doi>10.1093/jas/skaa226</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6730-9190</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2020-08, Vol.98 (8), p.1-8, Article 226
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_webofscience_primary_000610051700010CitationCount
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; PubMed Central
subjects Agriculture
Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science
Animal behavior
Animal Behavior and Cognition
Animal Feed - analysis
Animals
Behavior, Animal
Body Weight
Chewing
Cortisol
Data points
Diet
Diet - veterinary
Eating
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Feeding
Feeding regimes
Female
Gestation
Glycine max
Hogs
Hunger
Hydrocortisone - analysis
Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis
Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System - metabolism
Hypothalamus
Lactation
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Parity
Pituitary
Pituitary-Adrenal System - microbiology
Pregnancy
Random Allocation
Saliva
Science & Technology
Soybeans
Swine - physiology
title Behavioral and cortisol responses to feeding frequency in pregnant sows under isocaloric intake
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T19%3A08%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Behavioral%20and%20cortisol%20responses%20to%20feeding%20frequency%20in%20pregnant%20sows%20under%20isocaloric%20intake&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Manu,%20Hayford&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=1-8&rft.artnum=226&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jas/skaa226&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2424996554%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2435723245&rft_id=info:pmid/32681641&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jas/skaa226&rfr_iscdi=true