Quantification of Lambda (Λ) in multi-elemental compound-specific isotope analysis

In multi-elemental compound-specific isotope analysis the lambda (Λ) value expresses the isotope shift of one element versus the isotope shift of a second element. In dual-isotope plots, the slope of the regression lines typical reveals the footprint of the underlying isotope effects allowing to dis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chemosphere (Oxford) 2021-03, Vol.267, p.129232, Article 129232
Hauptverfasser: Höhener, Patrick, Imfeld, Gwenaël
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 129232
container_title Chemosphere (Oxford)
container_volume 267
creator Höhener, Patrick
Imfeld, Gwenaël
description In multi-elemental compound-specific isotope analysis the lambda (Λ) value expresses the isotope shift of one element versus the isotope shift of a second element. In dual-isotope plots, the slope of the regression lines typical reveals the footprint of the underlying isotope effects allowing to distinguish degradation pathways of an organic contaminant molecule in the environment. While different conventions and fitting procedures are used in the literature to determine Λ, it remains unclear how they affect the magnitude of Λ. Here we generate synthetic data for benzene δ2H and δ13C with two enrichment factors εH and εC using the Rayleigh equation to examine how different conventions and linear fitting procedures yield distinct Λ. Fitting an error-free data set in a graph plotting the δ2H versus δ13C overestimates Λ by 0.225%⋅εH/εC, meaning that if εH/εCis larger than 22, Λ is overestimated by more than 5%. The correct fitting of Λ requires a natural logarithmic transformation of δ2H versus δ13C data. Using this transformation, the ordinary linear regression (OLR), the reduced major-axis (RMA) and the York methods find the correct Λ, even for large εH/εC. Fitting a dataset with synthetic data with typical random errors let to the same conclusion and positioned the suitability of each regression method. We conclude that fitting of non-transformed δ values should be discontinued. The validity of most previous Λ values is not compromised, although previously obtained Λ values for large εH/εC could be corrected using our error estimation to improve comparison. [Display omitted] •The parameter Λ represents dual element stable isotope data.•Two conventions for quantifying Λ give different Λ values.•Linear regressions of delta values in a dual element plot overestimate Λ.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129232
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000608802100092CitationCount</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0045653520334299</els_id><sourcerecordid>33338724</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-a4a7bc210f0a6d1e26688a84086a49147065792391a4fc513bc03599ccc8de3d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtq3DAUQEVJaaZpfyE4u4Tg6ZUsy9IymOYBA6W0XQtZvmY02JaxNCn5lv5TvymaOh2yjDZCl3ME9xByQWFNgYovu7Xd4uDDtMUZ1wxYmjPFCvaOrKisVJ5e8oSsAHiZi7IoT8nHEHYASS7VB3JapCMrxlfkx_e9GaPrnDXR-THzXbYxQ9Oa7PLvn6vMjdmw76PLsccBx2j6zPph8vuxzcOE9iBmLvjoJ8zMaPqn4MIn8r4zfcDPL_cZ-XX79Wd9n2--3T3UN5vccsFibripGssodGBES5EJIaWRHKQwXFFegSirtJWihne2pEVjoSiVstbKFou2OCNXy79b0-tpdoOZn7Q3Tt_fbPRhBgVIJoE_0sSqhbWzD2HG7ihQ0IeoeqdfRdWHqHqJmtzzxZ32zYDt0fxfMQFyAX5j47tgHY4Wj1jKLkBKSJsCKFa7-C91nSLGpF6_XU10vdCYsj46nPWL0boZbdStd2_Y5xnDGa7O</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantification of Lambda (Λ) in multi-elemental compound-specific isotope analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><creator>Höhener, Patrick ; Imfeld, Gwenaël</creator><creatorcontrib>Höhener, Patrick ; Imfeld, Gwenaël</creatorcontrib><description>In multi-elemental compound-specific isotope analysis the lambda (Λ) value expresses the isotope shift of one element versus the isotope shift of a second element. In dual-isotope plots, the slope of the regression lines typical reveals the footprint of the underlying isotope effects allowing to distinguish degradation pathways of an organic contaminant molecule in the environment. While different conventions and fitting procedures are used in the literature to determine Λ, it remains unclear how they affect the magnitude of Λ. Here we generate synthetic data for benzene δ2H and δ13C with two enrichment factors εH and εC using the Rayleigh equation to examine how different conventions and linear fitting procedures yield distinct Λ. Fitting an error-free data set in a graph plotting the δ2H versus δ13C overestimates Λ by 0.225%⋅εH/εC, meaning that if εH/εCis larger than 22, Λ is overestimated by more than 5%. The correct fitting of Λ requires a natural logarithmic transformation of δ2H versus δ13C data. Using this transformation, the ordinary linear regression (OLR), the reduced major-axis (RMA) and the York methods find the correct Λ, even for large εH/εC. Fitting a dataset with synthetic data with typical random errors let to the same conclusion and positioned the suitability of each regression method. We conclude that fitting of non-transformed δ values should be discontinued. The validity of most previous Λ values is not compromised, although previously obtained Λ values for large εH/εC could be corrected using our error estimation to improve comparison. [Display omitted] •The parameter Λ represents dual element stable isotope data.•Two conventions for quantifying Λ give different Λ values.•Linear regressions of delta values in a dual element plot overestimate Λ.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-6535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1298</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129232</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33338724</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>OXFORD: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Analytical chemistry ; Assessment ; Benzene ; Biodegradation, Environmental ; Bioremediation ; Carbon Isotopes - analysis ; Chemical Sciences ; Environmental Engineering ; Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Pollution ; Regression Analysis ; Science &amp; Technology ; Stable isotopes</subject><ispartof>Chemosphere (Oxford), 2021-03, Vol.267, p.129232, Article 129232</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>6</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000608802100092</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-a4a7bc210f0a6d1e26688a84086a49147065792391a4fc513bc03599ccc8de3d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-a4a7bc210f0a6d1e26688a84086a49147065792391a4fc513bc03599ccc8de3d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7054-4666 ; 0000-0002-4453-566X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129232$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,3551,27929,27930,39263,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33338724$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://amu.hal.science/hal-03082804$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Höhener, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imfeld, Gwenaël</creatorcontrib><title>Quantification of Lambda (Λ) in multi-elemental compound-specific isotope analysis</title><title>Chemosphere (Oxford)</title><addtitle>CHEMOSPHERE</addtitle><addtitle>Chemosphere</addtitle><description>In multi-elemental compound-specific isotope analysis the lambda (Λ) value expresses the isotope shift of one element versus the isotope shift of a second element. In dual-isotope plots, the slope of the regression lines typical reveals the footprint of the underlying isotope effects allowing to distinguish degradation pathways of an organic contaminant molecule in the environment. While different conventions and fitting procedures are used in the literature to determine Λ, it remains unclear how they affect the magnitude of Λ. Here we generate synthetic data for benzene δ2H and δ13C with two enrichment factors εH and εC using the Rayleigh equation to examine how different conventions and linear fitting procedures yield distinct Λ. Fitting an error-free data set in a graph plotting the δ2H versus δ13C overestimates Λ by 0.225%⋅εH/εC, meaning that if εH/εCis larger than 22, Λ is overestimated by more than 5%. The correct fitting of Λ requires a natural logarithmic transformation of δ2H versus δ13C data. Using this transformation, the ordinary linear regression (OLR), the reduced major-axis (RMA) and the York methods find the correct Λ, even for large εH/εC. Fitting a dataset with synthetic data with typical random errors let to the same conclusion and positioned the suitability of each regression method. We conclude that fitting of non-transformed δ values should be discontinued. The validity of most previous Λ values is not compromised, although previously obtained Λ values for large εH/εC could be corrected using our error estimation to improve comparison. [Display omitted] •The parameter Λ represents dual element stable isotope data.•Two conventions for quantifying Λ give different Λ values.•Linear regressions of delta values in a dual element plot overestimate Λ.</description><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>Benzene</subject><subject>Biodegradation, Environmental</subject><subject>Bioremediation</subject><subject>Carbon Isotopes - analysis</subject><subject>Chemical Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Stable isotopes</subject><issn>0045-6535</issn><issn>1879-1298</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtq3DAUQEVJaaZpfyE4u4Tg6ZUsy9IymOYBA6W0XQtZvmY02JaxNCn5lv5TvymaOh2yjDZCl3ME9xByQWFNgYovu7Xd4uDDtMUZ1wxYmjPFCvaOrKisVJ5e8oSsAHiZi7IoT8nHEHYASS7VB3JapCMrxlfkx_e9GaPrnDXR-THzXbYxQ9Oa7PLvn6vMjdmw76PLsccBx2j6zPph8vuxzcOE9iBmLvjoJ8zMaPqn4MIn8r4zfcDPL_cZ-XX79Wd9n2--3T3UN5vccsFibripGssodGBES5EJIaWRHKQwXFFegSirtJWihne2pEVjoSiVstbKFou2OCNXy79b0-tpdoOZn7Q3Tt_fbPRhBgVIJoE_0sSqhbWzD2HG7ihQ0IeoeqdfRdWHqHqJmtzzxZ32zYDt0fxfMQFyAX5j47tgHY4Wj1jKLkBKSJsCKFa7-C91nSLGpF6_XU10vdCYsj46nPWL0boZbdStd2_Y5xnDGa7O</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Höhener, Patrick</creator><creator>Imfeld, Gwenaël</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7054-4666</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4453-566X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Quantification of Lambda (Λ) in multi-elemental compound-specific isotope analysis</title><author>Höhener, Patrick ; Imfeld, Gwenaël</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-a4a7bc210f0a6d1e26688a84086a49147065792391a4fc513bc03599ccc8de3d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>Benzene</topic><topic>Biodegradation, Environmental</topic><topic>Bioremediation</topic><topic>Carbon Isotopes - analysis</topic><topic>Chemical Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Stable isotopes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Höhener, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imfeld, Gwenaël</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Chemosphere (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Höhener, Patrick</au><au>Imfeld, Gwenaël</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantification of Lambda (Λ) in multi-elemental compound-specific isotope analysis</atitle><jtitle>Chemosphere (Oxford)</jtitle><stitle>CHEMOSPHERE</stitle><addtitle>Chemosphere</addtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>267</volume><spage>129232</spage><pages>129232-</pages><artnum>129232</artnum><issn>0045-6535</issn><eissn>1879-1298</eissn><abstract>In multi-elemental compound-specific isotope analysis the lambda (Λ) value expresses the isotope shift of one element versus the isotope shift of a second element. In dual-isotope plots, the slope of the regression lines typical reveals the footprint of the underlying isotope effects allowing to distinguish degradation pathways of an organic contaminant molecule in the environment. While different conventions and fitting procedures are used in the literature to determine Λ, it remains unclear how they affect the magnitude of Λ. Here we generate synthetic data for benzene δ2H and δ13C with two enrichment factors εH and εC using the Rayleigh equation to examine how different conventions and linear fitting procedures yield distinct Λ. Fitting an error-free data set in a graph plotting the δ2H versus δ13C overestimates Λ by 0.225%⋅εH/εC, meaning that if εH/εCis larger than 22, Λ is overestimated by more than 5%. The correct fitting of Λ requires a natural logarithmic transformation of δ2H versus δ13C data. Using this transformation, the ordinary linear regression (OLR), the reduced major-axis (RMA) and the York methods find the correct Λ, even for large εH/εC. Fitting a dataset with synthetic data with typical random errors let to the same conclusion and positioned the suitability of each regression method. We conclude that fitting of non-transformed δ values should be discontinued. The validity of most previous Λ values is not compromised, although previously obtained Λ values for large εH/εC could be corrected using our error estimation to improve comparison. [Display omitted] •The parameter Λ represents dual element stable isotope data.•Two conventions for quantifying Λ give different Λ values.•Linear regressions of delta values in a dual element plot overestimate Λ.</abstract><cop>OXFORD</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33338724</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129232</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7054-4666</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4453-566X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0045-6535
ispartof Chemosphere (Oxford), 2021-03, Vol.267, p.129232, Article 129232
issn 0045-6535
1879-1298
language eng
recordid cdi_webofscience_primary_000608802100092CitationCount
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />
subjects Analytical chemistry
Assessment
Benzene
Biodegradation, Environmental
Bioremediation
Carbon Isotopes - analysis
Chemical Sciences
Environmental Engineering
Environmental Sciences
Environmental Sciences & Ecology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Pollution
Regression Analysis
Science & Technology
Stable isotopes
title Quantification of Lambda (Λ) in multi-elemental compound-specific isotope analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T14%3A11%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantification%20of%20Lambda%20(%CE%9B)%20in%20multi-elemental%20compound-specific%20isotope%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Chemosphere%20(Oxford)&rft.au=H%C3%B6hener,%20Patrick&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=267&rft.spage=129232&rft.pages=129232-&rft.artnum=129232&rft.issn=0045-6535&rft.eissn=1879-1298&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129232&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_webof%3E33338724%3C/pubmed_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/33338724&rft_els_id=S0045653520334299&rfr_iscdi=true