Phylogenetic diversity of two geographically overlapping lichens: isolation by distance, environment, or fragmentation?
Aim Phylogenetic diversification is a precursor to speciation, but the underlying patterns and processes are not well‐studied in lichens. Here we investigate what factors drive diversification in two tropical, morphologically similar macrolichens that occupy a similar range but differ in altitudinal...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of biogeography 2021-03, Vol.48 (3), p.676-689 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 689 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 676 |
| container_title | Journal of biogeography |
| container_volume | 48 |
| creator | Moncada, Bibiana Mercado‐Díaz, Joel A. Magain, Nicolas Hodkinson, Brendan P. Smith, Clifford W. Bungartz, Frank Pérez‐Pérez, Rosa‐Emilia Gumboski, Emerson Sérusiaux, Emmanuël Lumbsch, H. Thorsten Lücking, Robert |
| description | Aim
Phylogenetic diversification is a precursor to speciation, but the underlying patterns and processes are not well‐studied in lichens. Here we investigate what factors drive diversification in two tropical, morphologically similar macrolichens that occupy a similar range but differ in altitudinal and habitat preferences, testing for isolation by distance (IBD), environment (IBE), and fragmentation (IBF).
Location
Neotropics, Hawaii, Macaronesia.
Taxon
Sticta andina, S. scabrosa (Peltigeraceae).
Methods
We analysed 395 specimens from 135 localities, using the fungal ITS barcoding marker to assess phylogenetic diversification, through maximum likelihood tree reconstruction, TCS haplotype networks, and Tajima's D. Mantel tests were employed to detect structure in genetic vs. geographic, environmental, and fragmentation distances. Habitat preferences were quantitatively assessed by statistical analysis of locality‐based BIOclim variables.
Results
Sticta andina exhibited high phenotypic variation and reticulate phylogenetic diversity across its range, whereas the phenotypically uniform S. scabrosa contained two main haplotypes, one unique to Hawaii. Sticta andina is restricted to well‐preserved andine forests and paramos, naturally fragmented habitats due to disruptive topology, whereas S. scabrosa thrives in lowland to lower montane zones in exposed or disturbed microsites, representing a continuous habitat. Sticta scabrosa showed IBD only across its full range (separating the Hawaiian population) but not within continental Central and South America, there exhibiting a negative Tajima's D. Sticta andina did not exhibit IBD but IBE at continental level and IBF in the northern Andes.
Main conclusions
Autecology, particularly preference for either low or high altitudes, indirectly drives phylogenetic diversification. Low diversification in the low altitude species, S. scabrosa, can be attributed to rapid expansion and effective gene flow across a more or less continuous niche due to disturbance tolerance. In contract, high diversification in the high altitude species, S. andina, can be explained by niche differentiation (IBE) and fragmentation (IBF) caused by the Andean uplift. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jbi.14033 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000605449200001</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2493442094</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3763-8ebdc44609151abd138c8b1e56aff4f8cd51fc54491ba61cf0c2e0f4d40ad24e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtv1DAUhS0EEkPbBf_AEitE0_oVT8IGlRGPokqwKGvLca4zHrl2sDMzyr_H01TskOqNr-3vXB3fg9BbSq5oWde7zl1RQTh_gVaUy7pism1fohXhpK4IW5PX6E3OO0JIW3OxQsdf29nHAQJMzuDeHSBlN804WjwdIx4gDkmPW2e09-W2PHs9ji4M2DuzhZA_Ypej15OLAXdz6ZAnHQxcYggHl2J4gDBd4piwTXo4HR7RT-foldU-w8XTfoZ-f_1yv_le3f38dru5uasMX0teNdD1RghJWlpT3fWUN6bpKNRSWytsY_qaWlML0dJOS2osMQyIFb0gumcC-BniS1_vYAAVU-fUgamo3VLv_aC0UR0oxmSjWC05XxfVu0U1pvhnD3lSu7hPoRhVTLRcCEZaUaj3C2VSzDmBVWNyDzrNihJ1SkOVNNRjGoX9sLBH6KLNxkEZ0j--xCHJ6ResVIQWunk-vXHLTDdxH6YivX6SOg_z_x2pH59vF2t_ASIlrro</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2493442094</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phylogenetic diversity of two geographically overlapping lichens: isolation by distance, environment, or fragmentation?</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><creator>Moncada, Bibiana ; Mercado‐Díaz, Joel A. ; Magain, Nicolas ; Hodkinson, Brendan P. ; Smith, Clifford W. ; Bungartz, Frank ; Pérez‐Pérez, Rosa‐Emilia ; Gumboski, Emerson ; Sérusiaux, Emmanuël ; Lumbsch, H. Thorsten ; Lücking, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Moncada, Bibiana ; Mercado‐Díaz, Joel A. ; Magain, Nicolas ; Hodkinson, Brendan P. ; Smith, Clifford W. ; Bungartz, Frank ; Pérez‐Pérez, Rosa‐Emilia ; Gumboski, Emerson ; Sérusiaux, Emmanuël ; Lumbsch, H. Thorsten ; Lücking, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
Phylogenetic diversification is a precursor to speciation, but the underlying patterns and processes are not well‐studied in lichens. Here we investigate what factors drive diversification in two tropical, morphologically similar macrolichens that occupy a similar range but differ in altitudinal and habitat preferences, testing for isolation by distance (IBD), environment (IBE), and fragmentation (IBF).
Location
Neotropics, Hawaii, Macaronesia.
Taxon
Sticta andina, S. scabrosa (Peltigeraceae).
Methods
We analysed 395 specimens from 135 localities, using the fungal ITS barcoding marker to assess phylogenetic diversification, through maximum likelihood tree reconstruction, TCS haplotype networks, and Tajima's D. Mantel tests were employed to detect structure in genetic vs. geographic, environmental, and fragmentation distances. Habitat preferences were quantitatively assessed by statistical analysis of locality‐based BIOclim variables.
Results
Sticta andina exhibited high phenotypic variation and reticulate phylogenetic diversity across its range, whereas the phenotypically uniform S. scabrosa contained two main haplotypes, one unique to Hawaii. Sticta andina is restricted to well‐preserved andine forests and paramos, naturally fragmented habitats due to disruptive topology, whereas S. scabrosa thrives in lowland to lower montane zones in exposed or disturbed microsites, representing a continuous habitat. Sticta scabrosa showed IBD only across its full range (separating the Hawaiian population) but not within continental Central and South America, there exhibiting a negative Tajima's D. Sticta andina did not exhibit IBD but IBE at continental level and IBF in the northern Andes.
Main conclusions
Autecology, particularly preference for either low or high altitudes, indirectly drives phylogenetic diversification. Low diversification in the low altitude species, S. scabrosa, can be attributed to rapid expansion and effective gene flow across a more or less continuous niche due to disturbance tolerance. In contract, high diversification in the high altitude species, S. andina, can be explained by niche differentiation (IBE) and fragmentation (IBF) caused by the Andean uplift.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-0270</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1365-2699</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2699</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jbi.14033</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>HOBOKEN: Wiley</publisher><subject>Altitude ; Autecology ; Biologie végétale (sciences végétales, sylviculture, mycologie...) ; Brazil ; Diversification ; drift ; Ecology ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Fragmentation ; Galapagos ; Gene flow ; Geography, Physical ; Habitat fragmentation ; Habitat preferences ; Habitats ; Haplotypes ; High altitude ; Lichens ; Life sciences ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Low altitude ; Mexico ; Mountain environments ; Niches ; Phenotypic variations ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; Physical Geography ; Physical Sciences ; Phytobiology (plant sciences, forestry, mycology...) ; Puerto Rico ; Sagraea scabrosa ; Science & Technology ; Sciences du vivant ; Speciation ; Statistical analysis ; Sticta ; Topology</subject><ispartof>Journal of biogeography, 2021-03, Vol.48 (3), p.676-689</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>10</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000605449200001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3763-8ebdc44609151abd138c8b1e56aff4f8cd51fc54491ba61cf0c2e0f4d40ad24e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3763-8ebdc44609151abd138c8b1e56aff4f8cd51fc54491ba61cf0c2e0f4d40ad24e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0717-9264 ; 0000-0003-2193-0023 ; 0000-0001-5409-9518 ; 0000-0003-1512-835X ; 0000-0002-3431-4636 ; 0000-0001-9984-2918 ; 0000-0002-0456-0131</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjbi.14033$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjbi.14033$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,1418,27929,27930,39263,45579,45580</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moncada, Bibiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercado‐Díaz, Joel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magain, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodkinson, Brendan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Clifford W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bungartz, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez‐Pérez, Rosa‐Emilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gumboski, Emerson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sérusiaux, Emmanuël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lumbsch, H. Thorsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lücking, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Phylogenetic diversity of two geographically overlapping lichens: isolation by distance, environment, or fragmentation?</title><title>Journal of biogeography</title><addtitle>J BIOGEOGR</addtitle><description>Aim
Phylogenetic diversification is a precursor to speciation, but the underlying patterns and processes are not well‐studied in lichens. Here we investigate what factors drive diversification in two tropical, morphologically similar macrolichens that occupy a similar range but differ in altitudinal and habitat preferences, testing for isolation by distance (IBD), environment (IBE), and fragmentation (IBF).
Location
Neotropics, Hawaii, Macaronesia.
Taxon
Sticta andina, S. scabrosa (Peltigeraceae).
Methods
We analysed 395 specimens from 135 localities, using the fungal ITS barcoding marker to assess phylogenetic diversification, through maximum likelihood tree reconstruction, TCS haplotype networks, and Tajima's D. Mantel tests were employed to detect structure in genetic vs. geographic, environmental, and fragmentation distances. Habitat preferences were quantitatively assessed by statistical analysis of locality‐based BIOclim variables.
Results
Sticta andina exhibited high phenotypic variation and reticulate phylogenetic diversity across its range, whereas the phenotypically uniform S. scabrosa contained two main haplotypes, one unique to Hawaii. Sticta andina is restricted to well‐preserved andine forests and paramos, naturally fragmented habitats due to disruptive topology, whereas S. scabrosa thrives in lowland to lower montane zones in exposed or disturbed microsites, representing a continuous habitat. Sticta scabrosa showed IBD only across its full range (separating the Hawaiian population) but not within continental Central and South America, there exhibiting a negative Tajima's D. Sticta andina did not exhibit IBD but IBE at continental level and IBF in the northern Andes.
Main conclusions
Autecology, particularly preference for either low or high altitudes, indirectly drives phylogenetic diversification. Low diversification in the low altitude species, S. scabrosa, can be attributed to rapid expansion and effective gene flow across a more or less continuous niche due to disturbance tolerance. In contract, high diversification in the high altitude species, S. andina, can be explained by niche differentiation (IBE) and fragmentation (IBF) caused by the Andean uplift.</description><subject>Altitude</subject><subject>Autecology</subject><subject>Biologie végétale (sciences végétales, sylviculture, mycologie...)</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Diversification</subject><subject>drift</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences & Ecology</subject><subject>Fragmentation</subject><subject>Galapagos</subject><subject>Gene flow</subject><subject>Geography, Physical</subject><subject>Habitat fragmentation</subject><subject>Habitat preferences</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Haplotypes</subject><subject>High altitude</subject><subject>Lichens</subject><subject>Life sciences</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Low altitude</subject><subject>Mexico</subject><subject>Mountain environments</subject><subject>Niches</subject><subject>Phenotypic variations</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Physical Geography</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Phytobiology (plant sciences, forestry, mycology...)</subject><subject>Puerto Rico</subject><subject>Sagraea scabrosa</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Sciences du vivant</subject><subject>Speciation</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Sticta</subject><subject>Topology</subject><issn>0305-0270</issn><issn>1365-2699</issn><issn>1365-2699</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtv1DAUhS0EEkPbBf_AEitE0_oVT8IGlRGPokqwKGvLca4zHrl2sDMzyr_H01TskOqNr-3vXB3fg9BbSq5oWde7zl1RQTh_gVaUy7pism1fohXhpK4IW5PX6E3OO0JIW3OxQsdf29nHAQJMzuDeHSBlN804WjwdIx4gDkmPW2e09-W2PHs9ji4M2DuzhZA_Ypej15OLAXdz6ZAnHQxcYggHl2J4gDBd4piwTXo4HR7RT-foldU-w8XTfoZ-f_1yv_le3f38dru5uasMX0teNdD1RghJWlpT3fWUN6bpKNRSWytsY_qaWlML0dJOS2osMQyIFb0gumcC-BniS1_vYAAVU-fUgamo3VLv_aC0UR0oxmSjWC05XxfVu0U1pvhnD3lSu7hPoRhVTLRcCEZaUaj3C2VSzDmBVWNyDzrNihJ1SkOVNNRjGoX9sLBH6KLNxkEZ0j--xCHJ6ResVIQWunk-vXHLTDdxH6YivX6SOg_z_x2pH59vF2t_ASIlrro</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Moncada, Bibiana</creator><creator>Mercado‐Díaz, Joel A.</creator><creator>Magain, Nicolas</creator><creator>Hodkinson, Brendan P.</creator><creator>Smith, Clifford W.</creator><creator>Bungartz, Frank</creator><creator>Pérez‐Pérez, Rosa‐Emilia</creator><creator>Gumboski, Emerson</creator><creator>Sérusiaux, Emmanuël</creator><creator>Lumbsch, H. Thorsten</creator><creator>Lücking, Robert</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>Q33</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0717-9264</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2193-0023</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5409-9518</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1512-835X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3431-4636</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9984-2918</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0456-0131</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Phylogenetic diversity of two geographically overlapping lichens: isolation by distance, environment, or fragmentation?</title><author>Moncada, Bibiana ; Mercado‐Díaz, Joel A. ; Magain, Nicolas ; Hodkinson, Brendan P. ; Smith, Clifford W. ; Bungartz, Frank ; Pérez‐Pérez, Rosa‐Emilia ; Gumboski, Emerson ; Sérusiaux, Emmanuël ; Lumbsch, H. Thorsten ; Lücking, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3763-8ebdc44609151abd138c8b1e56aff4f8cd51fc54491ba61cf0c2e0f4d40ad24e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Altitude</topic><topic>Autecology</topic><topic>Biologie végétale (sciences végétales, sylviculture, mycologie...)</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Diversification</topic><topic>drift</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences & Ecology</topic><topic>Fragmentation</topic><topic>Galapagos</topic><topic>Gene flow</topic><topic>Geography, Physical</topic><topic>Habitat fragmentation</topic><topic>Habitat preferences</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Haplotypes</topic><topic>High altitude</topic><topic>Lichens</topic><topic>Life sciences</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Low altitude</topic><topic>Mexico</topic><topic>Mountain environments</topic><topic>Niches</topic><topic>Phenotypic variations</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Physical Geography</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Phytobiology (plant sciences, forestry, mycology...)</topic><topic>Puerto Rico</topic><topic>Sagraea scabrosa</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Sciences du vivant</topic><topic>Speciation</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Sticta</topic><topic>Topology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moncada, Bibiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercado‐Díaz, Joel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magain, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodkinson, Brendan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Clifford W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bungartz, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez‐Pérez, Rosa‐Emilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gumboski, Emerson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sérusiaux, Emmanuël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lumbsch, H. Thorsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lücking, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Université de Liège - Open Repository and Bibliography (ORBI)</collection><jtitle>Journal of biogeography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moncada, Bibiana</au><au>Mercado‐Díaz, Joel A.</au><au>Magain, Nicolas</au><au>Hodkinson, Brendan P.</au><au>Smith, Clifford W.</au><au>Bungartz, Frank</au><au>Pérez‐Pérez, Rosa‐Emilia</au><au>Gumboski, Emerson</au><au>Sérusiaux, Emmanuël</au><au>Lumbsch, H. Thorsten</au><au>Lücking, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phylogenetic diversity of two geographically overlapping lichens: isolation by distance, environment, or fragmentation?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biogeography</jtitle><stitle>J BIOGEOGR</stitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>676</spage><epage>689</epage><pages>676-689</pages><issn>0305-0270</issn><issn>1365-2699</issn><eissn>1365-2699</eissn><abstract>Aim
Phylogenetic diversification is a precursor to speciation, but the underlying patterns and processes are not well‐studied in lichens. Here we investigate what factors drive diversification in two tropical, morphologically similar macrolichens that occupy a similar range but differ in altitudinal and habitat preferences, testing for isolation by distance (IBD), environment (IBE), and fragmentation (IBF).
Location
Neotropics, Hawaii, Macaronesia.
Taxon
Sticta andina, S. scabrosa (Peltigeraceae).
Methods
We analysed 395 specimens from 135 localities, using the fungal ITS barcoding marker to assess phylogenetic diversification, through maximum likelihood tree reconstruction, TCS haplotype networks, and Tajima's D. Mantel tests were employed to detect structure in genetic vs. geographic, environmental, and fragmentation distances. Habitat preferences were quantitatively assessed by statistical analysis of locality‐based BIOclim variables.
Results
Sticta andina exhibited high phenotypic variation and reticulate phylogenetic diversity across its range, whereas the phenotypically uniform S. scabrosa contained two main haplotypes, one unique to Hawaii. Sticta andina is restricted to well‐preserved andine forests and paramos, naturally fragmented habitats due to disruptive topology, whereas S. scabrosa thrives in lowland to lower montane zones in exposed or disturbed microsites, representing a continuous habitat. Sticta scabrosa showed IBD only across its full range (separating the Hawaiian population) but not within continental Central and South America, there exhibiting a negative Tajima's D. Sticta andina did not exhibit IBD but IBE at continental level and IBF in the northern Andes.
Main conclusions
Autecology, particularly preference for either low or high altitudes, indirectly drives phylogenetic diversification. Low diversification in the low altitude species, S. scabrosa, can be attributed to rapid expansion and effective gene flow across a more or less continuous niche due to disturbance tolerance. In contract, high diversification in the high altitude species, S. andina, can be explained by niche differentiation (IBE) and fragmentation (IBF) caused by the Andean uplift.</abstract><cop>HOBOKEN</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/jbi.14033</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0717-9264</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2193-0023</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5409-9518</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1512-835X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3431-4636</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9984-2918</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0456-0131</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0305-0270 |
| ispartof | Journal of biogeography, 2021-03, Vol.48 (3), p.676-689 |
| issn | 0305-0270 1365-2699 1365-2699 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_webofscience_primary_000605449200001 |
| source | Access via Wiley Online Library; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /> |
| subjects | Altitude Autecology Biologie végétale (sciences végétales, sylviculture, mycologie...) Brazil Diversification drift Ecology Environmental Sciences & Ecology Fragmentation Galapagos Gene flow Geography, Physical Habitat fragmentation Habitat preferences Habitats Haplotypes High altitude Lichens Life sciences Life Sciences & Biomedicine Low altitude Mexico Mountain environments Niches Phenotypic variations Phylogenetics Phylogeny Physical Geography Physical Sciences Phytobiology (plant sciences, forestry, mycology...) Puerto Rico Sagraea scabrosa Science & Technology Sciences du vivant Speciation Statistical analysis Sticta Topology |
| title | Phylogenetic diversity of two geographically overlapping lichens: isolation by distance, environment, or fragmentation? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T09%3A33%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phylogenetic%20diversity%20of%20two%20geographically%20overlapping%20lichens:%20isolation%20by%20distance,%20environment,%20or%20fragmentation?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biogeography&rft.au=Moncada,%20Bibiana&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=676&rft.epage=689&rft.pages=676-689&rft.issn=0305-0270&rft.eissn=1365-2699&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jbi.14033&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2493442094%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2493442094&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |