Scatter radiation reduction with a radiation-absorbing pad in interventional radiology examinations
•Radiation absorbing pads significantly reduces the radiation dose, particularly for upper body parts.•Additional radiation absorbing pad reduces the dose involved up to 80.6 % at eye level.•At the height of 165 cm a lead equivalence of 0.5 mm showed a radiation dose reduction (51.4 %, p < 0.01)...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of radiology 2020-11, Vol.132, p.109245, Article 109245 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 109245 |
container_title | European journal of radiology |
container_volume | 132 |
creator | Koenig, A.M. Maas, J. Viniol, S. Etzel, R. Fiebich, M. Thomas, R.P Mahnken, A.H. |
description | •Radiation absorbing pads significantly reduces the radiation dose, particularly for upper body parts.•Additional radiation absorbing pad reduces the dose involved up to 80.6 % at eye level.•At the height of 165 cm a lead equivalence of 0.5 mm showed a radiation dose reduction (51.4 %, p < 0.01) in comparison to a lead equivalence of 0.25 mm.
Radiation-absorbing pads are an additional possibility to reduce scattered radiation at its source. The goal of this study is to investigate the efficacy of a new reusable radiation-absorbing pad at its origin in an experimental setup.
All measurements were carried out using a clinical angiography system with a standardized fluoroscopy protocol, different C-arm angulations and an anthropomorphic torso phantom as a scattering body. An ionization chamber was used to measure the radiation exposure at five different heights of a simulated operator during a simulated transfemoral angiography intervention. Measurements were carried out with and without radiation-absorbing pads with lead equivalents of 0.25 and 0.5 mm placed onto the scattering body. For all measurements a mobile acrylic shield and an under-table lead curtain was used.
At all operator heights from 100 to 165 cm a significant radiation dose reduction of up to 80.6 % (p < 0.01) using the radiation-absorbing pad was measured, when compared to no radiation-absorbing pad. At the height of 165 cm the radiation-absorbing pad with a lead equivalence of 0.5 mm showed a significant radiation dose reduction (51.4 %, p < 0.01) in comparison to a lead equivalence of 0.25 mm.
The addition of a radiation-absorbing pad to the standard protection means results in a significant dose reduction for the operator, particularly for upper body parts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109245 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000585834300004CitationCount</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0720048X20304344</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0720048X20304344</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-10dc11d89425e06b0dbbc4c18a83c69a7dd0850583aed1de2ab4822cfb08938a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMobk5_gSC9l86TpF3TCy9k-AUDL1TwLuTjbGZs7Ui7zf1703bOOxECOeS8z-HkIeSSwpACHd3Mhzj3yg4ZsOYlZ0l6RPpUZCzOMpYdkz5kDGJIxEePnFXVHADSJGenpMc5UDqCpE_Mq1F1jT4Kk5yqXVlEHu3atNXW1Z-R-m3FSlel166YRStlI1eEE9gNFk1XLdpkuShnuwi_1NIVLVWdk5OpWlR4sb8H5P3h_m38FE9eHp_Hd5PY8DSvYwrWUGpFnrAUYaTBam0SQ4US3IxylVkLIoVUcIWWWmRKJ4IxM9Ugci4UHxDezTW-rCqPU7nybqn8TlKQjTI5l60y2SiTnbJAXXXUaq2XaA_Mj6MQuO4CW9TltDIOC4OHWCNVhJ0SHqo2Lf6fHru6VTQu10Ud0NsOxSBp49DLPW6dR1NLW7o_f_INGTag_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scatter radiation reduction with a radiation-absorbing pad in interventional radiology examinations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Koenig, A.M. ; Maas, J. ; Viniol, S. ; Etzel, R. ; Fiebich, M. ; Thomas, R.P ; Mahnken, A.H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Koenig, A.M. ; Maas, J. ; Viniol, S. ; Etzel, R. ; Fiebich, M. ; Thomas, R.P ; Mahnken, A.H.</creatorcontrib><description>•Radiation absorbing pads significantly reduces the radiation dose, particularly for upper body parts.•Additional radiation absorbing pad reduces the dose involved up to 80.6 % at eye level.•At the height of 165 cm a lead equivalence of 0.5 mm showed a radiation dose reduction (51.4 %, p < 0.01) in comparison to a lead equivalence of 0.25 mm.
Radiation-absorbing pads are an additional possibility to reduce scattered radiation at its source. The goal of this study is to investigate the efficacy of a new reusable radiation-absorbing pad at its origin in an experimental setup.
All measurements were carried out using a clinical angiography system with a standardized fluoroscopy protocol, different C-arm angulations and an anthropomorphic torso phantom as a scattering body. An ionization chamber was used to measure the radiation exposure at five different heights of a simulated operator during a simulated transfemoral angiography intervention. Measurements were carried out with and without radiation-absorbing pads with lead equivalents of 0.25 and 0.5 mm placed onto the scattering body. For all measurements a mobile acrylic shield and an under-table lead curtain was used.
At all operator heights from 100 to 165 cm a significant radiation dose reduction of up to 80.6 % (p < 0.01) using the radiation-absorbing pad was measured, when compared to no radiation-absorbing pad. At the height of 165 cm the radiation-absorbing pad with a lead equivalence of 0.5 mm showed a significant radiation dose reduction (51.4 %, p < 0.01) in comparison to a lead equivalence of 0.25 mm.
The addition of a radiation-absorbing pad to the standard protection means results in a significant dose reduction for the operator, particularly for upper body parts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0720-048X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109245</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33011604</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>CLARE: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Fluoroscopy ; Humans ; Interventional radiology ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Occupational Exposure ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation Exposure - prevention & control ; Radiation Protection ; Radiation-absorbing pad ; Radiography, Interventional ; Radiology, Interventional ; Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging ; Scattering, Radiation ; Science & Technology</subject><ispartof>European journal of radiology, 2020-11, Vol.132, p.109245, Article 109245</ispartof><rights>2020</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>21</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000585834300004</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-10dc11d89425e06b0dbbc4c18a83c69a7dd0850583aed1de2ab4822cfb08938a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-10dc11d89425e06b0dbbc4c18a83c69a7dd0850583aed1de2ab4822cfb08938a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8161-499X ; 0000-0002-8783-589X ; 0000-0002-8874-7664 ; 0000-0001-6596-8774</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109245$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3552,27931,27932,28255,46002</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33011604$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koenig, A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maas, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viniol, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Etzel, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiebich, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, R.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahnken, A.H.</creatorcontrib><title>Scatter radiation reduction with a radiation-absorbing pad in interventional radiology examinations</title><title>European journal of radiology</title><addtitle>EUR J RADIOL</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><description>•Radiation absorbing pads significantly reduces the radiation dose, particularly for upper body parts.•Additional radiation absorbing pad reduces the dose involved up to 80.6 % at eye level.•At the height of 165 cm a lead equivalence of 0.5 mm showed a radiation dose reduction (51.4 %, p < 0.01) in comparison to a lead equivalence of 0.25 mm.
Radiation-absorbing pads are an additional possibility to reduce scattered radiation at its source. The goal of this study is to investigate the efficacy of a new reusable radiation-absorbing pad at its origin in an experimental setup.
All measurements were carried out using a clinical angiography system with a standardized fluoroscopy protocol, different C-arm angulations and an anthropomorphic torso phantom as a scattering body. An ionization chamber was used to measure the radiation exposure at five different heights of a simulated operator during a simulated transfemoral angiography intervention. Measurements were carried out with and without radiation-absorbing pads with lead equivalents of 0.25 and 0.5 mm placed onto the scattering body. For all measurements a mobile acrylic shield and an under-table lead curtain was used.
At all operator heights from 100 to 165 cm a significant radiation dose reduction of up to 80.6 % (p < 0.01) using the radiation-absorbing pad was measured, when compared to no radiation-absorbing pad. At the height of 165 cm the radiation-absorbing pad with a lead equivalence of 0.5 mm showed a significant radiation dose reduction (51.4 %, p < 0.01) in comparison to a lead equivalence of 0.25 mm.
The addition of a radiation-absorbing pad to the standard protection means results in a significant dose reduction for the operator, particularly for upper body parts.</description><subject>Fluoroscopy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interventional radiology</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation Exposure - prevention & control</subject><subject>Radiation Protection</subject><subject>Radiation-absorbing pad</subject><subject>Radiography, Interventional</subject><subject>Radiology, Interventional</subject><subject>Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging</subject><subject>Scattering, Radiation</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><issn>0720-048X</issn><issn>1872-7727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMobk5_gSC9l86TpF3TCy9k-AUDL1TwLuTjbGZs7Ui7zf1703bOOxECOeS8z-HkIeSSwpACHd3Mhzj3yg4ZsOYlZ0l6RPpUZCzOMpYdkz5kDGJIxEePnFXVHADSJGenpMc5UDqCpE_Mq1F1jT4Kk5yqXVlEHu3atNXW1Z-R-m3FSlel166YRStlI1eEE9gNFk1XLdpkuShnuwi_1NIVLVWdk5OpWlR4sb8H5P3h_m38FE9eHp_Hd5PY8DSvYwrWUGpFnrAUYaTBam0SQ4US3IxylVkLIoVUcIWWWmRKJ4IxM9Ugci4UHxDezTW-rCqPU7nybqn8TlKQjTI5l60y2SiTnbJAXXXUaq2XaA_Mj6MQuO4CW9TltDIOC4OHWCNVhJ0SHqo2Lf6fHru6VTQu10Ud0NsOxSBp49DLPW6dR1NLW7o_f_INGTag_Q</recordid><startdate>202011</startdate><enddate>202011</enddate><creator>Koenig, A.M.</creator><creator>Maas, J.</creator><creator>Viniol, S.</creator><creator>Etzel, R.</creator><creator>Fiebich, M.</creator><creator>Thomas, R.P</creator><creator>Mahnken, A.H.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8161-499X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8783-589X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8874-7664</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6596-8774</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202011</creationdate><title>Scatter radiation reduction with a radiation-absorbing pad in interventional radiology examinations</title><author>Koenig, A.M. ; Maas, J. ; Viniol, S. ; Etzel, R. ; Fiebich, M. ; Thomas, R.P ; Mahnken, A.H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-10dc11d89425e06b0dbbc4c18a83c69a7dd0850583aed1de2ab4822cfb08938a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Fluoroscopy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interventional radiology</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation Exposure - prevention & control</topic><topic>Radiation Protection</topic><topic>Radiation-absorbing pad</topic><topic>Radiography, Interventional</topic><topic>Radiology, Interventional</topic><topic>Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging</topic><topic>Scattering, Radiation</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koenig, A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maas, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viniol, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Etzel, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiebich, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, R.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahnken, A.H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koenig, A.M.</au><au>Maas, J.</au><au>Viniol, S.</au><au>Etzel, R.</au><au>Fiebich, M.</au><au>Thomas, R.P</au><au>Mahnken, A.H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scatter radiation reduction with a radiation-absorbing pad in interventional radiology examinations</atitle><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle><stitle>EUR J RADIOL</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><date>2020-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>132</volume><spage>109245</spage><pages>109245-</pages><artnum>109245</artnum><issn>0720-048X</issn><eissn>1872-7727</eissn><abstract>•Radiation absorbing pads significantly reduces the radiation dose, particularly for upper body parts.•Additional radiation absorbing pad reduces the dose involved up to 80.6 % at eye level.•At the height of 165 cm a lead equivalence of 0.5 mm showed a radiation dose reduction (51.4 %, p < 0.01) in comparison to a lead equivalence of 0.25 mm.
Radiation-absorbing pads are an additional possibility to reduce scattered radiation at its source. The goal of this study is to investigate the efficacy of a new reusable radiation-absorbing pad at its origin in an experimental setup.
All measurements were carried out using a clinical angiography system with a standardized fluoroscopy protocol, different C-arm angulations and an anthropomorphic torso phantom as a scattering body. An ionization chamber was used to measure the radiation exposure at five different heights of a simulated operator during a simulated transfemoral angiography intervention. Measurements were carried out with and without radiation-absorbing pads with lead equivalents of 0.25 and 0.5 mm placed onto the scattering body. For all measurements a mobile acrylic shield and an under-table lead curtain was used.
At all operator heights from 100 to 165 cm a significant radiation dose reduction of up to 80.6 % (p < 0.01) using the radiation-absorbing pad was measured, when compared to no radiation-absorbing pad. At the height of 165 cm the radiation-absorbing pad with a lead equivalence of 0.5 mm showed a significant radiation dose reduction (51.4 %, p < 0.01) in comparison to a lead equivalence of 0.25 mm.
The addition of a radiation-absorbing pad to the standard protection means results in a significant dose reduction for the operator, particularly for upper body parts.</abstract><cop>CLARE</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>33011604</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109245</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8161-499X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8783-589X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8874-7664</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6596-8774</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0720-048X |
ispartof | European journal of radiology, 2020-11, Vol.132, p.109245, Article 109245 |
issn | 0720-048X 1872-7727 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_webofscience_primary_000585834300004CitationCount |
source | MEDLINE; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Fluoroscopy Humans Interventional radiology Life Sciences & Biomedicine Occupational Exposure Phantoms, Imaging Radiation Dosage Radiation Exposure - prevention & control Radiation Protection Radiation-absorbing pad Radiography, Interventional Radiology, Interventional Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging Scattering, Radiation Science & Technology |
title | Scatter radiation reduction with a radiation-absorbing pad in interventional radiology examinations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T05%3A33%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scatter%20radiation%20reduction%20with%20a%20radiation-absorbing%20pad%20in%20interventional%20radiology%20examinations&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Koenig,%20A.M.&rft.date=2020-11&rft.volume=132&rft.spage=109245&rft.pages=109245-&rft.artnum=109245&rft.issn=0720-048X&rft.eissn=1872-7727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109245&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_webof%3ES0720048X20304344%3C/elsevier_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/33011604&rft_els_id=S0720048X20304344&rfr_iscdi=true |