Resumption and progression of meiosis and circulating levels of steroids and prostaglandin F2α of Piaractus mesopotamicus induced by hypophysation with prostaglandin F2α

We have previously shown an increase on the ovulation rate of pacu, Piaractus mesopotamicus, using hypophysation with prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) (HPG protocol) rather than hypophysation (H); only, however, a persistent lack of ovulation in some females could not be further explained by PGF2α and ster...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aquaculture research 2021-03, Vol.52 (3), p.1026-1037
Hauptverfasser: Sato, Rafael Tomoda, Kuradomi, Rafael Yutaka, Calil, Marina Cabral, Jesus Silva, Laiza Maria, Abreu, Mariana Roza, Figueiredo‐Ariki, Daniel Guimarães, Freitas, Guilherme Antônio, Batlouni, Sergio Ricardo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1037
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1026
container_title Aquaculture research
container_volume 52
creator Sato, Rafael Tomoda
Kuradomi, Rafael Yutaka
Calil, Marina Cabral
Jesus Silva, Laiza Maria
Abreu, Mariana Roza
Figueiredo‐Ariki, Daniel Guimarães
Freitas, Guilherme Antônio
Batlouni, Sergio Ricardo
description We have previously shown an increase on the ovulation rate of pacu, Piaractus mesopotamicus, using hypophysation with prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) (HPG protocol) rather than hypophysation (H); only, however, a persistent lack of ovulation in some females could not be further explained by PGF2α and steroid plasma levels at time of ovulation. Considering this, here we compared the meiotic process and steroids and PGF2α levels during spawning induction using both protocols. To that, H and HPG were treated with conventional hypophysation (0.6 mg/kg priming and 5.4 mg/kg resolving dose), and the latter received synthetic PGF2α (2 mL/fish) at resolving dose. A negative control (saline solution), a SPG group (receiving only PGF2α) and a PPG group (receiving priming and PGF2α) were included. An initial PGF2α peak between one to four hours post‐resolving dose (1‐4 hr) occurred in groups receiving PGF2α (HPG, SPG and PPG). Only H and HPG showed a 17α‐20β‐dihydroxy‐4‐pregnen‐3‐one (DHP) peak 4 hr, concomitant with meiosis resumption, and a final PGF2α peak 12 hours. The HPG protocol resulted in higher PGF2α plasma levels for longer periods (1‐4 and 12 hr) than H (single peak 12 hr), occasioning in the former higher and concomitant levels of both PGF2α and DHP at 4 h. Considering that DHP is known to induce expression of prostaglandin receptors in fish, the concomitant plasma peaks of DHP and PGF2α may also explain the ovulation rate gain previously published, using HPG protocol, which can be further improved adjusting the priming dose and defining the exact interval of PGF2α ovulatory action in this species.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/are.14957
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000583487400001CitationCount</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2487443840</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p2237-af3be959d31afa2308db7eba0f22fbdbca1369cf2709536cae6a9bea03d65b5a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9u1DAQxi1EJcrSA28QiSNK6z_xJjlWqxaQKoEqKvUWjZ3JrqtsHDwOVZ6JEy_CM-GkhRMHfPE38m--Gc8w9lbwc5HOBQQ8F0WtyxfsVKitzqXg9ctFa51rXd6_Yq-JHjgXBVfilP24RZqOY3R-yGBoszH4fUCiJfZddkTnydH6ZF2wUw_RDfusx-_Y00JQxOBdS3-yKcK-T9oN2bX89XNBvjgIYONEyY786CMcnU2RG9rJYpuZOTvMox8PM8HayKOLh394vWEnHfSEZ8_3ht1dX33dfcxvPn_4tLu8yUcpVZlDpwzWum6VgA6k4lVrSjTAOyk70xoLaTC17WTJa622FnALtUHgqt1qo0Ft2Lsn39TCtwkpNg9-CkMq2ciiKotCVWl4G1Y9UY9ofEfW4WCxGYM7Qpgbzrmu1EInxcXOxfVrOz8NMaW-___URF88067H-S8meLNsvEkbb9aNN5e3V6tQvwEs-6WB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2487443840</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resumption and progression of meiosis and circulating levels of steroids and prostaglandin F2α of Piaractus mesopotamicus induced by hypophysation with prostaglandin F2α</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><creator>Sato, Rafael Tomoda ; Kuradomi, Rafael Yutaka ; Calil, Marina Cabral ; Jesus Silva, Laiza Maria ; Abreu, Mariana Roza ; Figueiredo‐Ariki, Daniel Guimarães ; Freitas, Guilherme Antônio ; Batlouni, Sergio Ricardo</creator><creatorcontrib>Sato, Rafael Tomoda ; Kuradomi, Rafael Yutaka ; Calil, Marina Cabral ; Jesus Silva, Laiza Maria ; Abreu, Mariana Roza ; Figueiredo‐Ariki, Daniel Guimarães ; Freitas, Guilherme Antônio ; Batlouni, Sergio Ricardo</creatorcontrib><description>We have previously shown an increase on the ovulation rate of pacu, Piaractus mesopotamicus, using hypophysation with prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) (HPG protocol) rather than hypophysation (H); only, however, a persistent lack of ovulation in some females could not be further explained by PGF2α and steroid plasma levels at time of ovulation. Considering this, here we compared the meiotic process and steroids and PGF2α levels during spawning induction using both protocols. To that, H and HPG were treated with conventional hypophysation (0.6 mg/kg priming and 5.4 mg/kg resolving dose), and the latter received synthetic PGF2α (2 mL/fish) at resolving dose. A negative control (saline solution), a SPG group (receiving only PGF2α) and a PPG group (receiving priming and PGF2α) were included. An initial PGF2α peak between one to four hours post‐resolving dose (1‐4 hr) occurred in groups receiving PGF2α (HPG, SPG and PPG). Only H and HPG showed a 17α‐20β‐dihydroxy‐4‐pregnen‐3‐one (DHP) peak 4 hr, concomitant with meiosis resumption, and a final PGF2α peak 12 hours. The HPG protocol resulted in higher PGF2α plasma levels for longer periods (1‐4 and 12 hr) than H (single peak 12 hr), occasioning in the former higher and concomitant levels of both PGF2α and DHP at 4 h. Considering that DHP is known to induce expression of prostaglandin receptors in fish, the concomitant plasma peaks of DHP and PGF2α may also explain the ovulation rate gain previously published, using HPG protocol, which can be further improved adjusting the priming dose and defining the exact interval of PGF2α ovulatory action in this species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1355-557X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2109</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/are.14957</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>HOBOKEN: Wiley</publisher><subject>DHP ; Fish ; Fisheries ; hormonal induction ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Meiosis ; Ovulation ; Piaractus mesopotamicus ; Plasma levels ; plasma profile ; Priming ; priming dose ; prostaglandin ; Prostaglandin receptors ; Protocol ; Saline solutions ; Science &amp; Technology ; Spawning ; Steroid hormones ; Steroids</subject><ispartof>Aquaculture research, 2021-03, Vol.52 (3), p.1026-1037</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>7</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000583487400001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-p2237-af3be959d31afa2308db7eba0f22fbdbca1369cf2709536cae6a9bea03d65b5a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8675-1101 ; 0000-0003-2422-6875 ; 0000-0002-3690-7769 ; 0000-0002-1753-2543 ; 0000-0002-8579-2750 ; 0000-0002-8220-7042 ; 0000-0003-3579-2530</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fare.14957$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fare.14957$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,39263,45579,45580</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sato, Rafael Tomoda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuradomi, Rafael Yutaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calil, Marina Cabral</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jesus Silva, Laiza Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abreu, Mariana Roza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo‐Ariki, Daniel Guimarães</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freitas, Guilherme Antônio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batlouni, Sergio Ricardo</creatorcontrib><title>Resumption and progression of meiosis and circulating levels of steroids and prostaglandin F2α of Piaractus mesopotamicus induced by hypophysation with prostaglandin F2α</title><title>Aquaculture research</title><addtitle>AQUAC RES</addtitle><description>We have previously shown an increase on the ovulation rate of pacu, Piaractus mesopotamicus, using hypophysation with prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) (HPG protocol) rather than hypophysation (H); only, however, a persistent lack of ovulation in some females could not be further explained by PGF2α and steroid plasma levels at time of ovulation. Considering this, here we compared the meiotic process and steroids and PGF2α levels during spawning induction using both protocols. To that, H and HPG were treated with conventional hypophysation (0.6 mg/kg priming and 5.4 mg/kg resolving dose), and the latter received synthetic PGF2α (2 mL/fish) at resolving dose. A negative control (saline solution), a SPG group (receiving only PGF2α) and a PPG group (receiving priming and PGF2α) were included. An initial PGF2α peak between one to four hours post‐resolving dose (1‐4 hr) occurred in groups receiving PGF2α (HPG, SPG and PPG). Only H and HPG showed a 17α‐20β‐dihydroxy‐4‐pregnen‐3‐one (DHP) peak 4 hr, concomitant with meiosis resumption, and a final PGF2α peak 12 hours. The HPG protocol resulted in higher PGF2α plasma levels for longer periods (1‐4 and 12 hr) than H (single peak 12 hr), occasioning in the former higher and concomitant levels of both PGF2α and DHP at 4 h. Considering that DHP is known to induce expression of prostaglandin receptors in fish, the concomitant plasma peaks of DHP and PGF2α may also explain the ovulation rate gain previously published, using HPG protocol, which can be further improved adjusting the priming dose and defining the exact interval of PGF2α ovulatory action in this species.</description><subject>DHP</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>hormonal induction</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Meiosis</subject><subject>Ovulation</subject><subject>Piaractus mesopotamicus</subject><subject>Plasma levels</subject><subject>plasma profile</subject><subject>Priming</subject><subject>priming dose</subject><subject>prostaglandin</subject><subject>Prostaglandin receptors</subject><subject>Protocol</subject><subject>Saline solutions</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Spawning</subject><subject>Steroid hormones</subject><subject>Steroids</subject><issn>1355-557X</issn><issn>1365-2109</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc9u1DAQxi1EJcrSA28QiSNK6z_xJjlWqxaQKoEqKvUWjZ3JrqtsHDwOVZ6JEy_CM-GkhRMHfPE38m--Gc8w9lbwc5HOBQQ8F0WtyxfsVKitzqXg9ctFa51rXd6_Yq-JHjgXBVfilP24RZqOY3R-yGBoszH4fUCiJfZddkTnydH6ZF2wUw_RDfusx-_Y00JQxOBdS3-yKcK-T9oN2bX89XNBvjgIYONEyY786CMcnU2RG9rJYpuZOTvMox8PM8HayKOLh394vWEnHfSEZ8_3ht1dX33dfcxvPn_4tLu8yUcpVZlDpwzWum6VgA6k4lVrSjTAOyk70xoLaTC17WTJa622FnALtUHgqt1qo0Ft2Lsn39TCtwkpNg9-CkMq2ciiKotCVWl4G1Y9UY9ofEfW4WCxGYM7Qpgbzrmu1EInxcXOxfVrOz8NMaW-___URF88067H-S8meLNsvEkbb9aNN5e3V6tQvwEs-6WB</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Sato, Rafael Tomoda</creator><creator>Kuradomi, Rafael Yutaka</creator><creator>Calil, Marina Cabral</creator><creator>Jesus Silva, Laiza Maria</creator><creator>Abreu, Mariana Roza</creator><creator>Figueiredo‐Ariki, Daniel Guimarães</creator><creator>Freitas, Guilherme Antônio</creator><creator>Batlouni, Sergio Ricardo</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8675-1101</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2422-6875</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3690-7769</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1753-2543</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8579-2750</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8220-7042</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3579-2530</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Resumption and progression of meiosis and circulating levels of steroids and prostaglandin F2α of Piaractus mesopotamicus induced by hypophysation with prostaglandin F2α</title><author>Sato, Rafael Tomoda ; Kuradomi, Rafael Yutaka ; Calil, Marina Cabral ; Jesus Silva, Laiza Maria ; Abreu, Mariana Roza ; Figueiredo‐Ariki, Daniel Guimarães ; Freitas, Guilherme Antônio ; Batlouni, Sergio Ricardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p2237-af3be959d31afa2308db7eba0f22fbdbca1369cf2709536cae6a9bea03d65b5a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>DHP</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>hormonal induction</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Meiosis</topic><topic>Ovulation</topic><topic>Piaractus mesopotamicus</topic><topic>Plasma levels</topic><topic>plasma profile</topic><topic>Priming</topic><topic>priming dose</topic><topic>prostaglandin</topic><topic>Prostaglandin receptors</topic><topic>Protocol</topic><topic>Saline solutions</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Spawning</topic><topic>Steroid hormones</topic><topic>Steroids</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sato, Rafael Tomoda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuradomi, Rafael Yutaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calil, Marina Cabral</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jesus Silva, Laiza Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abreu, Mariana Roza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo‐Ariki, Daniel Guimarães</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freitas, Guilherme Antônio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batlouni, Sergio Ricardo</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Aquaculture research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sato, Rafael Tomoda</au><au>Kuradomi, Rafael Yutaka</au><au>Calil, Marina Cabral</au><au>Jesus Silva, Laiza Maria</au><au>Abreu, Mariana Roza</au><au>Figueiredo‐Ariki, Daniel Guimarães</au><au>Freitas, Guilherme Antônio</au><au>Batlouni, Sergio Ricardo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resumption and progression of meiosis and circulating levels of steroids and prostaglandin F2α of Piaractus mesopotamicus induced by hypophysation with prostaglandin F2α</atitle><jtitle>Aquaculture research</jtitle><stitle>AQUAC RES</stitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1026</spage><epage>1037</epage><pages>1026-1037</pages><issn>1355-557X</issn><eissn>1365-2109</eissn><abstract>We have previously shown an increase on the ovulation rate of pacu, Piaractus mesopotamicus, using hypophysation with prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) (HPG protocol) rather than hypophysation (H); only, however, a persistent lack of ovulation in some females could not be further explained by PGF2α and steroid plasma levels at time of ovulation. Considering this, here we compared the meiotic process and steroids and PGF2α levels during spawning induction using both protocols. To that, H and HPG were treated with conventional hypophysation (0.6 mg/kg priming and 5.4 mg/kg resolving dose), and the latter received synthetic PGF2α (2 mL/fish) at resolving dose. A negative control (saline solution), a SPG group (receiving only PGF2α) and a PPG group (receiving priming and PGF2α) were included. An initial PGF2α peak between one to four hours post‐resolving dose (1‐4 hr) occurred in groups receiving PGF2α (HPG, SPG and PPG). Only H and HPG showed a 17α‐20β‐dihydroxy‐4‐pregnen‐3‐one (DHP) peak 4 hr, concomitant with meiosis resumption, and a final PGF2α peak 12 hours. The HPG protocol resulted in higher PGF2α plasma levels for longer periods (1‐4 and 12 hr) than H (single peak 12 hr), occasioning in the former higher and concomitant levels of both PGF2α and DHP at 4 h. Considering that DHP is known to induce expression of prostaglandin receptors in fish, the concomitant plasma peaks of DHP and PGF2α may also explain the ovulation rate gain previously published, using HPG protocol, which can be further improved adjusting the priming dose and defining the exact interval of PGF2α ovulatory action in this species.</abstract><cop>HOBOKEN</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/are.14957</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8675-1101</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2422-6875</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3690-7769</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1753-2543</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8579-2750</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8220-7042</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3579-2530</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1355-557X
ispartof Aquaculture research, 2021-03, Vol.52 (3), p.1026-1037
issn 1355-557X
1365-2109
language eng
recordid cdi_webofscience_primary_000583487400001CitationCount
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />
subjects DHP
Fish
Fisheries
hormonal induction
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Meiosis
Ovulation
Piaractus mesopotamicus
Plasma levels
plasma profile
Priming
priming dose
prostaglandin
Prostaglandin receptors
Protocol
Saline solutions
Science & Technology
Spawning
Steroid hormones
Steroids
title Resumption and progression of meiosis and circulating levels of steroids and prostaglandin F2α of Piaractus mesopotamicus induced by hypophysation with prostaglandin F2α
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T14%3A13%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resumption%20and%20progression%20of%20meiosis%20and%20circulating%20levels%20of%20steroids%20and%20prostaglandin%20F2%CE%B1%20of%20Piaractus%20mesopotamicus%20induced%20by%20hypophysation%20with%20prostaglandin%20F2%CE%B1&rft.jtitle=Aquaculture%20research&rft.au=Sato,%20Rafael%20Tomoda&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1026&rft.epage=1037&rft.pages=1026-1037&rft.issn=1355-557X&rft.eissn=1365-2109&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/are.14957&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2487443840%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2487443840&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true