Multidimensional trait morphology predicts ecology across ant lineages

Understanding the link between ecology and morphology is a fundamental goal in biology. Ants are diverse terrestrial organisms, known to exhibit ecologically driven morphological variation. While relationships between individual traits and ecologies have been identified, multidimensional interaction...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Functional ecology 2021-01, Vol.35 (1), p.139-152
Hauptverfasser: Sosiak, Christine E., Barden, Phillip, Higham, Timothy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 152
container_issue 1
container_start_page 139
container_title Functional ecology
container_volume 35
creator Sosiak, Christine E.
Barden, Phillip
Higham, Timothy
description Understanding the link between ecology and morphology is a fundamental goal in biology. Ants are diverse terrestrial organisms, known to exhibit ecologically driven morphological variation. While relationships between individual traits and ecologies have been identified, multidimensional interactions among traits and their cumulative predictive power remain unknown. As selective pressures may generate convergent syndromes spanning multiple traits, we applied multivariate analyses across a wide sampling of taxa to assess ecomorphological variation in an integrative context. How well does morphology predict ecology? Moreover, are there quantitatively supported ant ecomorphs? We investigated the links between trait morphology and ecology by assembling a morphometric dataset spanning over 160 species within 110 genera. As ants occupy a wide range of ecologies, we compiled natural history data on nesting microhabitat, foraging stratum and functional role into 35 defined niche combinations. This tripartite ecological classification and our morphological dataset were optimized under dimension reduction techniques including principal component analysis, principal coordinate analysis, linear discriminant analysis and random forest supervised machine learning. Our results describe ant ecomorphospace as comprising regions of shared, generalized morphology as well as unique phenotypic space associated with specialized ecologies. Dimension reduction and model‐based approaches predict ecology with 77%–85% accuracy and Random Forest analysis consistently outperforms LDA. While accounting for shared ancestry, we found eye, antennal scape and leg morphology to be most informative in differentiating among ecologies. We also note some heterogeneity between trait significance in each ecological aspect (nesting niche, foraging niche, functional role). To increase the utility of ecomorphological classification we simplified our 35 observed niche combinations into 10 ecomorph syndromes, which were also predicted by morphology. The predictive power of these machine learning methods underscores the strong role that ecology has in convergently shaping overall body plan morphology across ant lineages. We include a pipeline for predictive ecomorphological modelling using morphometric data, which may be expanded with additional specimen‐based and natural history data. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article. A free Plain Language Su
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2435.13697
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000581207700001CitationCount</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2476147617</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4227-f69892957c7ae70ea8721996072f8219890d3e8aea10f77b719e05a14f131f4c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1LAzEQxYMoWKtnrwseZdsk-5HNUZZWhYoXPYc0ndSU7WZNskj_e7Pd0qsOhHkM74XHD6F7gmckzpxkZZHSPCtmUXF2gSbnyyWaYFrytMrL7BrdeL_DGPOC0glavvVNMBuzh9Yb28omCU6akOyt675sY7eHpHOwMSr4BNR4kMpZ7xPZhqQxLcgt-Ft0pWXj4e60p-hzufioX9LV-_Nr_bRKVU4pS3XJK055wRSTwDDIilHCeYkZ1VVUFcebDCoJkmDN2JoRDriQJNckIzpX2RQ9jP92zn734IPY2d7F2l7QnJVkeCy65qPrWNSBFp0ze-kOgmAxwBIDGjGgEUdYMVGNiR9YW-2VgVbBORVpFRWhmLGoMKlNkCHCqm3fhhh9_H80uouT2zRw-KuXWC7qseAvCuaLhA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2476147617</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multidimensional trait morphology predicts ecology across ant lineages</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Sosiak, Christine E. ; Barden, Phillip ; Higham, Timothy</creator><contributor>Higham, Timothy</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sosiak, Christine E. ; Barden, Phillip ; Higham, Timothy ; Higham, Timothy</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding the link between ecology and morphology is a fundamental goal in biology. Ants are diverse terrestrial organisms, known to exhibit ecologically driven morphological variation. While relationships between individual traits and ecologies have been identified, multidimensional interactions among traits and their cumulative predictive power remain unknown. As selective pressures may generate convergent syndromes spanning multiple traits, we applied multivariate analyses across a wide sampling of taxa to assess ecomorphological variation in an integrative context. How well does morphology predict ecology? Moreover, are there quantitatively supported ant ecomorphs? We investigated the links between trait morphology and ecology by assembling a morphometric dataset spanning over 160 species within 110 genera. As ants occupy a wide range of ecologies, we compiled natural history data on nesting microhabitat, foraging stratum and functional role into 35 defined niche combinations. This tripartite ecological classification and our morphological dataset were optimized under dimension reduction techniques including principal component analysis, principal coordinate analysis, linear discriminant analysis and random forest supervised machine learning. Our results describe ant ecomorphospace as comprising regions of shared, generalized morphology as well as unique phenotypic space associated with specialized ecologies. Dimension reduction and model‐based approaches predict ecology with 77%–85% accuracy and Random Forest analysis consistently outperforms LDA. While accounting for shared ancestry, we found eye, antennal scape and leg morphology to be most informative in differentiating among ecologies. We also note some heterogeneity between trait significance in each ecological aspect (nesting niche, foraging niche, functional role). To increase the utility of ecomorphological classification we simplified our 35 observed niche combinations into 10 ecomorph syndromes, which were also predicted by morphology. The predictive power of these machine learning methods underscores the strong role that ecology has in convergently shaping overall body plan morphology across ant lineages. We include a pipeline for predictive ecomorphological modelling using morphometric data, which may be expanded with additional specimen‐based and natural history data. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-8463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.13697</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>HOBOKEN: Wiley</publisher><subject>Ants ; Classification ; Convergence ; Datasets ; Discriminant analysis ; Disorders ; Ecology ; ecomorphology ; Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology ; Genera ; Heterogeneity ; Learning algorithms ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Machine learning ; Microenvironments ; Microhabitats ; Morphology ; morphospace ; Nesting ; Niches ; Principal components analysis ; Reduction ; Science &amp; Technology ; Terrestrial environments ; trait morphology</subject><ispartof>Functional ecology, 2021-01, Vol.35 (1), p.139-152</ispartof><rights>2020 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2021 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>41</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000581207700001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4227-f69892957c7ae70ea8721996072f8219890d3e8aea10f77b719e05a14f131f4c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4227-f69892957c7ae70ea8721996072f8219890d3e8aea10f77b719e05a14f131f4c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9057-8636 ; 0000-0001-6277-320X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1365-2435.13697$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1365-2435.13697$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,1434,27929,27930,39263,45579,45580,46414,46838</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Higham, Timothy</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sosiak, Christine E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barden, Phillip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higham, Timothy</creatorcontrib><title>Multidimensional trait morphology predicts ecology across ant lineages</title><title>Functional ecology</title><addtitle>FUNCT ECOL</addtitle><description>Understanding the link between ecology and morphology is a fundamental goal in biology. Ants are diverse terrestrial organisms, known to exhibit ecologically driven morphological variation. While relationships between individual traits and ecologies have been identified, multidimensional interactions among traits and their cumulative predictive power remain unknown. As selective pressures may generate convergent syndromes spanning multiple traits, we applied multivariate analyses across a wide sampling of taxa to assess ecomorphological variation in an integrative context. How well does morphology predict ecology? Moreover, are there quantitatively supported ant ecomorphs? We investigated the links between trait morphology and ecology by assembling a morphometric dataset spanning over 160 species within 110 genera. As ants occupy a wide range of ecologies, we compiled natural history data on nesting microhabitat, foraging stratum and functional role into 35 defined niche combinations. This tripartite ecological classification and our morphological dataset were optimized under dimension reduction techniques including principal component analysis, principal coordinate analysis, linear discriminant analysis and random forest supervised machine learning. Our results describe ant ecomorphospace as comprising regions of shared, generalized morphology as well as unique phenotypic space associated with specialized ecologies. Dimension reduction and model‐based approaches predict ecology with 77%–85% accuracy and Random Forest analysis consistently outperforms LDA. While accounting for shared ancestry, we found eye, antennal scape and leg morphology to be most informative in differentiating among ecologies. We also note some heterogeneity between trait significance in each ecological aspect (nesting niche, foraging niche, functional role). To increase the utility of ecomorphological classification we simplified our 35 observed niche combinations into 10 ecomorph syndromes, which were also predicted by morphology. The predictive power of these machine learning methods underscores the strong role that ecology has in convergently shaping overall body plan morphology across ant lineages. We include a pipeline for predictive ecomorphological modelling using morphometric data, which may be expanded with additional specimen‐based and natural history data. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.</description><subject>Ants</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Convergence</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Disorders</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>ecomorphology</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology</subject><subject>Genera</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Microenvironments</subject><subject>Microhabitats</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>morphospace</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Niches</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><subject>trait morphology</subject><issn>0269-8463</issn><issn>1365-2435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM1LAzEQxYMoWKtnrwseZdsk-5HNUZZWhYoXPYc0ndSU7WZNskj_e7Pd0qsOhHkM74XHD6F7gmckzpxkZZHSPCtmUXF2gSbnyyWaYFrytMrL7BrdeL_DGPOC0glavvVNMBuzh9Yb28omCU6akOyt675sY7eHpHOwMSr4BNR4kMpZ7xPZhqQxLcgt-Ft0pWXj4e60p-hzufioX9LV-_Nr_bRKVU4pS3XJK055wRSTwDDIilHCeYkZ1VVUFcebDCoJkmDN2JoRDriQJNckIzpX2RQ9jP92zn734IPY2d7F2l7QnJVkeCy65qPrWNSBFp0ze-kOgmAxwBIDGjGgEUdYMVGNiR9YW-2VgVbBORVpFRWhmLGoMKlNkCHCqm3fhhh9_H80uouT2zRw-KuXWC7qseAvCuaLhA</recordid><startdate>202101</startdate><enddate>202101</enddate><creator>Sosiak, Christine E.</creator><creator>Barden, Phillip</creator><creator>Higham, Timothy</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9057-8636</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6277-320X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202101</creationdate><title>Multidimensional trait morphology predicts ecology across ant lineages</title><author>Sosiak, Christine E. ; Barden, Phillip ; Higham, Timothy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4227-f69892957c7ae70ea8721996072f8219890d3e8aea10f77b719e05a14f131f4c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ants</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Convergence</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Disorders</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>ecomorphology</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology</topic><topic>Genera</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Microenvironments</topic><topic>Microhabitats</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>morphospace</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Niches</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><topic>trait morphology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sosiak, Christine E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barden, Phillip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higham, Timothy</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sosiak, Christine E.</au><au>Barden, Phillip</au><au>Higham, Timothy</au><au>Higham, Timothy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multidimensional trait morphology predicts ecology across ant lineages</atitle><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle><stitle>FUNCT ECOL</stitle><date>2021-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>139</spage><epage>152</epage><pages>139-152</pages><issn>0269-8463</issn><eissn>1365-2435</eissn><abstract>Understanding the link between ecology and morphology is a fundamental goal in biology. Ants are diverse terrestrial organisms, known to exhibit ecologically driven morphological variation. While relationships between individual traits and ecologies have been identified, multidimensional interactions among traits and their cumulative predictive power remain unknown. As selective pressures may generate convergent syndromes spanning multiple traits, we applied multivariate analyses across a wide sampling of taxa to assess ecomorphological variation in an integrative context. How well does morphology predict ecology? Moreover, are there quantitatively supported ant ecomorphs? We investigated the links between trait morphology and ecology by assembling a morphometric dataset spanning over 160 species within 110 genera. As ants occupy a wide range of ecologies, we compiled natural history data on nesting microhabitat, foraging stratum and functional role into 35 defined niche combinations. This tripartite ecological classification and our morphological dataset were optimized under dimension reduction techniques including principal component analysis, principal coordinate analysis, linear discriminant analysis and random forest supervised machine learning. Our results describe ant ecomorphospace as comprising regions of shared, generalized morphology as well as unique phenotypic space associated with specialized ecologies. Dimension reduction and model‐based approaches predict ecology with 77%–85% accuracy and Random Forest analysis consistently outperforms LDA. While accounting for shared ancestry, we found eye, antennal scape and leg morphology to be most informative in differentiating among ecologies. We also note some heterogeneity between trait significance in each ecological aspect (nesting niche, foraging niche, functional role). To increase the utility of ecomorphological classification we simplified our 35 observed niche combinations into 10 ecomorph syndromes, which were also predicted by morphology. The predictive power of these machine learning methods underscores the strong role that ecology has in convergently shaping overall body plan morphology across ant lineages. We include a pipeline for predictive ecomorphological modelling using morphometric data, which may be expanded with additional specimen‐based and natural history data. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.</abstract><cop>HOBOKEN</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2435.13697</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9057-8636</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6277-320X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-8463
ispartof Functional ecology, 2021-01, Vol.35 (1), p.139-152
issn 0269-8463
1365-2435
language eng
recordid cdi_webofscience_primary_000581207700001CitationCount
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)
subjects Ants
Classification
Convergence
Datasets
Discriminant analysis
Disorders
Ecology
ecomorphology
Environmental Sciences & Ecology
Genera
Heterogeneity
Learning algorithms
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Machine learning
Microenvironments
Microhabitats
Morphology
morphospace
Nesting
Niches
Principal components analysis
Reduction
Science & Technology
Terrestrial environments
trait morphology
title Multidimensional trait morphology predicts ecology across ant lineages
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T22%3A43%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multidimensional%20trait%20morphology%20predicts%20ecology%20across%20ant%20lineages&rft.jtitle=Functional%20ecology&rft.au=Sosiak,%20Christine%20E.&rft.date=2021-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=152&rft.pages=139-152&rft.issn=0269-8463&rft.eissn=1365-2435&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2435.13697&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2476147617%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2476147617&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true