3D xRAGE simulation of inertial confinement fusion implosion with imposed mode 2 laser drive asymmetry
•Comprehensive comparisons between 3D-simulated and measured observables.•Interference between imposed mode 2 asymmetry and stalk mount confirmed in simulation.•Simulation is overestimating shock burn, suggesting overestimated shock ion heating. Low-mode asymmetries represent an important obstacle t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | High energy density physics 2020-08, Vol.36, p.100825, Article 100825 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Comprehensive comparisons between 3D-simulated and measured observables.•Interference between imposed mode 2 asymmetry and stalk mount confirmed in simulation.•Simulation is overestimating shock burn, suggesting overestimated shock ion heating.
Low-mode asymmetries represent an important obstacle to achieving high-gain inertial confinement fusion implosions. As a step in learning how to control such effects, an OMEGA experiment with imposed mode 2 laser drive asymmetries was done to study the expected signatures of this type of asymmetry [M. Gatu Johnson et al., PRE 2018]. In the present work, a 3D xRAGE simulation including the stalk mount has been brought to bear on the data from that experiment. Comprehensive comparisons between simulated and measured observables are made. Good agreement between simulated and measured x-ray image-inferred shell trajectories, bang times and neutron emission widths are seen, showing that the hydrodynamics are well captured in the simulation. Asymmetries seen in simulated and measured time-resolved and time-integrated x-ray images and areal densities also compare well, showing impact of both stalk and mode 2. On the other hand, important differences in measured and simulated neutron emission histories, yield, and ion temperature (Tion) asymmetries are seen, suggesting that the simulation is overestimating shock yield. The results clearly demonstrate the importance of considering all asymmetry sources when interpreting measured signatures of asymmetry. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1574-1818 1878-0563 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.hedp.2020.100825 |