A fundamental look at electrocatalytic sulfur reduction reaction
The fundamental kinetics of the electrocatalytic sulfur reduction reaction (SRR), a complex 16-electron conversion process in lithium–sulfur batteries, is so far insufficiently explored. Here, by directly profiling the activation energies in the multistep SRR, we reveal that the initial reduction of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nature catalysis 2020-09, Vol.3 (9), p.762-770 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The fundamental kinetics of the electrocatalytic sulfur reduction reaction (SRR), a complex 16-electron conversion process in lithium–sulfur batteries, is so far insufficiently explored. Here, by directly profiling the activation energies in the multistep SRR, we reveal that the initial reduction of sulfur to the soluble polysulfides is relatively easy owing to the low activation energy, whereas the subsequent conversion of the polysulfides into the insoluble Li
2
S
2
/Li
2
S has a much higher activation energy, contributing to the accumulation of polysulfides and exacerbating the polysulfide shuttling effect. We use heteroatom-doped graphene as a model system to explore electrocatalytic SRR. We show that nitrogen and sulfur dual-doped graphene considerably reduces the activation energy to improve SRR kinetics. Density functional calculations confirm that the doping tunes the
p
-band centre of the active carbons for an optimal adsorption strength of intermediates and electroactivity. This study establishes electrocatalysis as a promising pathway to tackle the fundamental challenges facing lithium–sulfur batteries.
The fundamental kinetics of the electrocatalytic sulfur reduction reaction, a complex 16-electron conversion process in lithium–sulfur batteries, is a topic that remains largely unexplored. Here, by directly profiling the activation energies in the multi-step reaction, the authors establish how the conversion kinetics differ for each step. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2520-1158 2520-1158 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41929-020-0498-x |