Effects of soft tissue grafting prior to orthodontic treatment on preventing gingival recession in dogs

Purpose: This study was conducted to assess the efficacy of prophylactic gingival grafting in the mandibular anterior labial area for preventing orthodontically induced gingival recession. Methods: hods: Eight mongrel dogs received gingival graft surgery at the first (I1) and third (I3) mandibular i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of periodontal & implant science 2020, 50(4), , pp.226-237
Hauptverfasser: Song, Young Woo, Jung, Heekyu, Han, Seo Yeon, Paeng, Kyeong-Won, Kim, Myong Ji, Cha, Jae-Kook, Choi, Yoon Jeong, Jung, Ui-Won
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: This study was conducted to assess the efficacy of prophylactic gingival grafting in the mandibular anterior labial area for preventing orthodontically induced gingival recession. Methods: hods: Eight mongrel dogs received gingival graft surgery at the first (I1) and third (I3) mandibular incisors on both sides based on the following group allocation: AT group (autogenous connective tissue graft on I1), AT-control group (contralateral side in the AT group), CM group (xenogeneic cross-linked collagen matrix graft on I3) and CM-control group (contralateral side in the CM group). At 4 weeks after surgery, 6 incisors were splinted and proclined for 4 weeks, followed by 16 weeks of retention. At 24 weeks after surgery, casts were made and compared with those made before surgery, and radiographic and histomorphometric analyses were performed. Results: Despite the proclination of the incisal tip (by approximately 3 mm), labial gingival recession did not occur. The labial gingiva was thicker in the AT group (1.85 +/- 0.50 mm vs. 1.76 +/- 0.45 mm, A0.05) and CM group (1.90 +/- 0.33 mm vs. 1.79 +/- 0.20 mm, P>0.05) than in their respective control groups. Conclusions: The level of the labial gingival margin did not change following labial proclination of incisors in dogs. Both the AT and CM groups showed enhanced gingival thickness.
ISSN:2093-2278
2093-2286
DOI:10.5051/jpis.2000420021