Best Practices in Robotic-assisted Repair of Vesicovaginal Fistula: A Consensus Report from the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group for Reconstructive Urology

Surgical repair of a vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) has been described extensively in the literature for several decades. Advances in robotic repair have been adopted since 2005. A consensus review of existing data based on published case series, expert opinion, and a survey monkey. This document summa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:EUROPEAN UROLOGY 2020-09, Vol.78 (3), p.432-442
Hauptverfasser: Randazzo, Marco, Lengauer, Linda, Rochat, Charles-Henry, Ploumidis, Achilles, Kröpfl, Darko, Rassweiler, Jens, Buffi, Nicolo Maria, Wiklund, Peter, Mottrie, Alexandre, John, Hubert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 442
container_issue 3
container_start_page 432
container_title EUROPEAN UROLOGY
container_volume 78
creator Randazzo, Marco
Lengauer, Linda
Rochat, Charles-Henry
Ploumidis, Achilles
Kröpfl, Darko
Rassweiler, Jens
Buffi, Nicolo Maria
Wiklund, Peter
Mottrie, Alexandre
John, Hubert
description Surgical repair of a vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) has been described extensively in the literature for several decades. Advances in robotic repair have been adopted since 2005. A consensus review of existing data based on published case series, expert opinion, and a survey monkey. This document summarizes the consensus group meeting and survey monkey results convened by the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section (ERUS) relating to the robotic management of VVF. Current data underline the successful robotic repair of supratrigonal nonobstetric VVF. The panel recommends preoperative marking of the fistula by a guidewire or ureteral catheter, and placement of a protective ureteral JJ stent. An extravesical robotic approach usually provides a good anatomic view for adequate and wide dissection of the vesicovaginal space, as well as bladder and vaginal mobilization. Careful sharp dissection of fistula edges should be performed. Tension-free closure of the bladder is of utmost importance. Tissue interposition seems to be beneficial. The success rate of published series often reaches near 100%. An indwelling bladder catheter should be placed for about 10 d postoperatively. When considering robotic repair for VVF, it is essential to establish the size, number, location, and etiology of the VVF. Robotic assistance facilitates dissection of the vesicovaginal space, harvesting of a well-vascularized tissue flap, and a tension-free closure of the bladder with low morbidity for the patient being operated in the deep pelvis with delicate anatomical structures. Robotic repair of a vesicovaginal fistula can be applied safely with an excellent success rate and very low morbidity. This confirms the use of robotic surgery for vesicovaginal fistula repair, which is recommended in a consensus by the European Association of Urology Robotic Section Scientific Working Group for reconstructive urology. Robotic repair of vesicovaginal fistula can be applied safely, with low morbidity for the patient. The excellent view allows precise preparation with a high success rate, which underlines the use of robotic surgery for vesicovaginal fistula repair.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.029
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000560493400041</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0302283820304589</els_id><sourcerecordid>2423515470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-30fe46644b274146e39075e9d487470fa518c842619fd7e0e809cf28b080d3003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt9u0zAUhyMEYmXwBgj5Egml-F8ShwukUm0DaRJoY3BpOc5JcZfGwU467Rl5KU6XtlyBuLIdf5-P4_NLkpeMzhll-dv1HMYwBj_nlNM5zeeUl4-SGVOFSIssp4-TGRWUp1wJdZI8i3FNKRVZKZ4mJ4LnmRCcz5JfHyAO5EswdnAWInEdufKVx0VqYnRxgJpcQW9cIL4h3yA667dm5TrTknPcHlvzjizI0ncRujjGHezDQJrgN2T4AeQMr9iD6cgiRm-dGZzvdkfdBN_61f2h2nF9DfYBubYOusE1uPXdh1vXrchF8GNPGh-wiMWCQxiR3cLBfZ48aUwb4cV-PE1uzs--Lj-ml58vPi0Xl6mVGR1SQRuQeS5lxQvJZA6ipEUGZS1VIQvamIwpqyTPWdnUBVBQtLQNVxVVtBb4hqdJOp0b76AfK90HtzHhXnvj9P7TLc5Ay7xULEO-_CvfB1__kQ4ik1IW2CuF7uvJRfDniL3SGxcttK3pwI9Rc8lFxjK8N6JyQm3wMQZojoUY1bvI6LWeIqN3kdE01xgZ1F7tK4zVBuqjdMgIAm8m4A4q38RdXywcMQwVhk2WQuJMMqTV_9NLNzwEYunHbkD1_aQCNm_rIOi9XruAqdC1d__-ld97PPp7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2423515470</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Best Practices in Robotic-assisted Repair of Vesicovaginal Fistula: A Consensus Report from the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group for Reconstructive Urology</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><creator>Randazzo, Marco ; Lengauer, Linda ; Rochat, Charles-Henry ; Ploumidis, Achilles ; Kröpfl, Darko ; Rassweiler, Jens ; Buffi, Nicolo Maria ; Wiklund, Peter ; Mottrie, Alexandre ; John, Hubert</creator><creatorcontrib>Randazzo, Marco ; Lengauer, Linda ; Rochat, Charles-Henry ; Ploumidis, Achilles ; Kröpfl, Darko ; Rassweiler, Jens ; Buffi, Nicolo Maria ; Wiklund, Peter ; Mottrie, Alexandre ; John, Hubert</creatorcontrib><description>Surgical repair of a vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) has been described extensively in the literature for several decades. Advances in robotic repair have been adopted since 2005. A consensus review of existing data based on published case series, expert opinion, and a survey monkey. This document summarizes the consensus group meeting and survey monkey results convened by the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section (ERUS) relating to the robotic management of VVF. Current data underline the successful robotic repair of supratrigonal nonobstetric VVF. The panel recommends preoperative marking of the fistula by a guidewire or ureteral catheter, and placement of a protective ureteral JJ stent. An extravesical robotic approach usually provides a good anatomic view for adequate and wide dissection of the vesicovaginal space, as well as bladder and vaginal mobilization. Careful sharp dissection of fistula edges should be performed. Tension-free closure of the bladder is of utmost importance. Tissue interposition seems to be beneficial. The success rate of published series often reaches near 100%. An indwelling bladder catheter should be placed for about 10 d postoperatively. When considering robotic repair for VVF, it is essential to establish the size, number, location, and etiology of the VVF. Robotic assistance facilitates dissection of the vesicovaginal space, harvesting of a well-vascularized tissue flap, and a tension-free closure of the bladder with low morbidity for the patient being operated in the deep pelvis with delicate anatomical structures. Robotic repair of a vesicovaginal fistula can be applied safely with an excellent success rate and very low morbidity. This confirms the use of robotic surgery for vesicovaginal fistula repair, which is recommended in a consensus by the European Association of Urology Robotic Section Scientific Working Group for reconstructive urology. Robotic repair of vesicovaginal fistula can be applied safely, with low morbidity for the patient. The excellent view allows precise preparation with a high success rate, which underlines the use of robotic surgery for vesicovaginal fistula repair.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-2838</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1873-7560</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32653322</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>AMSTERDAM: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Consensus statement ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Medicin och hälsovetenskap ; Robotic reconstruction ; Science &amp; Technology ; Urology &amp; Nephrology ; Vesicovaginal fistula</subject><ispartof>EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020-09, Vol.78 (3), p.432-442</ispartof><rights>2020</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>15</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000560493400041</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-30fe46644b274146e39075e9d487470fa518c842619fd7e0e809cf28b080d3003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-30fe46644b274146e39075e9d487470fa518c842619fd7e0e809cf28b080d3003</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6775-2114 ; 0000-0003-2436-9091</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.029$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,310,311,315,781,785,790,791,886,3551,23935,23936,25145,27929,27930,28253,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32653322$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:144473598$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Randazzo, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lengauer, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rochat, Charles-Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ploumidis, Achilles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kröpfl, Darko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rassweiler, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffi, Nicolo Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiklund, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mottrie, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>John, Hubert</creatorcontrib><title>Best Practices in Robotic-assisted Repair of Vesicovaginal Fistula: A Consensus Report from the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group for Reconstructive Urology</title><title>EUROPEAN UROLOGY</title><addtitle>EUR UROL</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><description>Surgical repair of a vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) has been described extensively in the literature for several decades. Advances in robotic repair have been adopted since 2005. A consensus review of existing data based on published case series, expert opinion, and a survey monkey. This document summarizes the consensus group meeting and survey monkey results convened by the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section (ERUS) relating to the robotic management of VVF. Current data underline the successful robotic repair of supratrigonal nonobstetric VVF. The panel recommends preoperative marking of the fistula by a guidewire or ureteral catheter, and placement of a protective ureteral JJ stent. An extravesical robotic approach usually provides a good anatomic view for adequate and wide dissection of the vesicovaginal space, as well as bladder and vaginal mobilization. Careful sharp dissection of fistula edges should be performed. Tension-free closure of the bladder is of utmost importance. Tissue interposition seems to be beneficial. The success rate of published series often reaches near 100%. An indwelling bladder catheter should be placed for about 10 d postoperatively. When considering robotic repair for VVF, it is essential to establish the size, number, location, and etiology of the VVF. Robotic assistance facilitates dissection of the vesicovaginal space, harvesting of a well-vascularized tissue flap, and a tension-free closure of the bladder with low morbidity for the patient being operated in the deep pelvis with delicate anatomical structures. Robotic repair of a vesicovaginal fistula can be applied safely with an excellent success rate and very low morbidity. This confirms the use of robotic surgery for vesicovaginal fistula repair, which is recommended in a consensus by the European Association of Urology Robotic Section Scientific Working Group for reconstructive urology. Robotic repair of vesicovaginal fistula can be applied safely, with low morbidity for the patient. The excellent view allows precise preparation with a high success rate, which underlines the use of robotic surgery for vesicovaginal fistula repair.</description><subject>Consensus statement</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>Robotic reconstruction</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Urology &amp; Nephrology</subject><subject>Vesicovaginal fistula</subject><issn>0302-2838</issn><issn>1873-7560</issn><issn>1873-7560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkt9u0zAUhyMEYmXwBgj5Egml-F8ShwukUm0DaRJoY3BpOc5JcZfGwU467Rl5KU6XtlyBuLIdf5-P4_NLkpeMzhll-dv1HMYwBj_nlNM5zeeUl4-SGVOFSIssp4-TGRWUp1wJdZI8i3FNKRVZKZ4mJ4LnmRCcz5JfHyAO5EswdnAWInEdufKVx0VqYnRxgJpcQW9cIL4h3yA667dm5TrTknPcHlvzjizI0ncRujjGHezDQJrgN2T4AeQMr9iD6cgiRm-dGZzvdkfdBN_61f2h2nF9DfYBubYOusE1uPXdh1vXrchF8GNPGh-wiMWCQxiR3cLBfZ48aUwb4cV-PE1uzs--Lj-ml58vPi0Xl6mVGR1SQRuQeS5lxQvJZA6ipEUGZS1VIQvamIwpqyTPWdnUBVBQtLQNVxVVtBb4hqdJOp0b76AfK90HtzHhXnvj9P7TLc5Ay7xULEO-_CvfB1__kQ4ik1IW2CuF7uvJRfDniL3SGxcttK3pwI9Rc8lFxjK8N6JyQm3wMQZojoUY1bvI6LWeIqN3kdE01xgZ1F7tK4zVBuqjdMgIAm8m4A4q38RdXywcMQwVhk2WQuJMMqTV_9NLNzwEYunHbkD1_aQCNm_rIOi9XruAqdC1d__-ld97PPp7</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Randazzo, Marco</creator><creator>Lengauer, Linda</creator><creator>Rochat, Charles-Henry</creator><creator>Ploumidis, Achilles</creator><creator>Kröpfl, Darko</creator><creator>Rassweiler, Jens</creator><creator>Buffi, Nicolo Maria</creator><creator>Wiklund, Peter</creator><creator>Mottrie, Alexandre</creator><creator>John, Hubert</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6775-2114</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2436-9091</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Best Practices in Robotic-assisted Repair of Vesicovaginal Fistula: A Consensus Report from the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group for Reconstructive Urology</title><author>Randazzo, Marco ; Lengauer, Linda ; Rochat, Charles-Henry ; Ploumidis, Achilles ; Kröpfl, Darko ; Rassweiler, Jens ; Buffi, Nicolo Maria ; Wiklund, Peter ; Mottrie, Alexandre ; John, Hubert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-30fe46644b274146e39075e9d487470fa518c842619fd7e0e809cf28b080d3003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Consensus statement</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>Robotic reconstruction</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Urology &amp; Nephrology</topic><topic>Vesicovaginal fistula</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Randazzo, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lengauer, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rochat, Charles-Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ploumidis, Achilles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kröpfl, Darko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rassweiler, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffi, Nicolo Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiklund, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mottrie, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>John, Hubert</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>EUROPEAN UROLOGY</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Randazzo, Marco</au><au>Lengauer, Linda</au><au>Rochat, Charles-Henry</au><au>Ploumidis, Achilles</au><au>Kröpfl, Darko</au><au>Rassweiler, Jens</au><au>Buffi, Nicolo Maria</au><au>Wiklund, Peter</au><au>Mottrie, Alexandre</au><au>John, Hubert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Best Practices in Robotic-assisted Repair of Vesicovaginal Fistula: A Consensus Report from the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group for Reconstructive Urology</atitle><jtitle>EUROPEAN UROLOGY</jtitle><stitle>EUR UROL</stitle><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>432</spage><epage>442</epage><pages>432-442</pages><issn>0302-2838</issn><issn>1873-7560</issn><eissn>1873-7560</eissn><abstract>Surgical repair of a vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) has been described extensively in the literature for several decades. Advances in robotic repair have been adopted since 2005. A consensus review of existing data based on published case series, expert opinion, and a survey monkey. This document summarizes the consensus group meeting and survey monkey results convened by the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section (ERUS) relating to the robotic management of VVF. Current data underline the successful robotic repair of supratrigonal nonobstetric VVF. The panel recommends preoperative marking of the fistula by a guidewire or ureteral catheter, and placement of a protective ureteral JJ stent. An extravesical robotic approach usually provides a good anatomic view for adequate and wide dissection of the vesicovaginal space, as well as bladder and vaginal mobilization. Careful sharp dissection of fistula edges should be performed. Tension-free closure of the bladder is of utmost importance. Tissue interposition seems to be beneficial. The success rate of published series often reaches near 100%. An indwelling bladder catheter should be placed for about 10 d postoperatively. When considering robotic repair for VVF, it is essential to establish the size, number, location, and etiology of the VVF. Robotic assistance facilitates dissection of the vesicovaginal space, harvesting of a well-vascularized tissue flap, and a tension-free closure of the bladder with low morbidity for the patient being operated in the deep pelvis with delicate anatomical structures. Robotic repair of a vesicovaginal fistula can be applied safely with an excellent success rate and very low morbidity. This confirms the use of robotic surgery for vesicovaginal fistula repair, which is recommended in a consensus by the European Association of Urology Robotic Section Scientific Working Group for reconstructive urology. Robotic repair of vesicovaginal fistula can be applied safely, with low morbidity for the patient. The excellent view allows precise preparation with a high success rate, which underlines the use of robotic surgery for vesicovaginal fistula repair.</abstract><cop>AMSTERDAM</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>32653322</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.029</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6775-2114</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2436-9091</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0302-2838
ispartof EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020-09, Vol.78 (3), p.432-442
issn 0302-2838
1873-7560
1873-7560
language eng
recordid cdi_webofscience_primary_000560493400041
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />
subjects Consensus statement
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Medicin och hälsovetenskap
Robotic reconstruction
Science & Technology
Urology & Nephrology
Vesicovaginal fistula
title Best Practices in Robotic-assisted Repair of Vesicovaginal Fistula: A Consensus Report from the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group for Reconstructive Urology
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T03%3A37%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Best%20Practices%20in%20Robotic-assisted%20Repair%20of%20Vesicovaginal%20Fistula:%20A%20Consensus%20Report%20from%20the%20European%20Association%20of%20Urology%20Robotic%20Urology%20Section%20Scientific%20Working%20Group%20for%20Reconstructive%20Urology&rft.jtitle=EUROPEAN%20UROLOGY&rft.au=Randazzo,%20Marco&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=432&rft.epage=442&rft.pages=432-442&rft.issn=0302-2838&rft.eissn=1873-7560&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2423515470%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2423515470&rft_id=info:pmid/32653322&rft_els_id=S0302283820304589&rfr_iscdi=true