Best Practices in Robotic-assisted Repair of Vesicovaginal Fistula: A Consensus Report from the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group for Reconstructive Urology
Surgical repair of a vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) has been described extensively in the literature for several decades. Advances in robotic repair have been adopted since 2005. A consensus review of existing data based on published case series, expert opinion, and a survey monkey. This document summa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | EUROPEAN UROLOGY 2020-09, Vol.78 (3), p.432-442 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 442 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 432 |
container_title | EUROPEAN UROLOGY |
container_volume | 78 |
creator | Randazzo, Marco Lengauer, Linda Rochat, Charles-Henry Ploumidis, Achilles Kröpfl, Darko Rassweiler, Jens Buffi, Nicolo Maria Wiklund, Peter Mottrie, Alexandre John, Hubert |
description | Surgical repair of a vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) has been described extensively in the literature for several decades. Advances in robotic repair have been adopted since 2005.
A consensus review of existing data based on published case series, expert opinion, and a survey monkey.
This document summarizes the consensus group meeting and survey monkey results convened by the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section (ERUS) relating to the robotic management of VVF.
Current data underline the successful robotic repair of supratrigonal nonobstetric VVF. The panel recommends preoperative marking of the fistula by a guidewire or ureteral catheter, and placement of a protective ureteral JJ stent. An extravesical robotic approach usually provides a good anatomic view for adequate and wide dissection of the vesicovaginal space, as well as bladder and vaginal mobilization. Careful sharp dissection of fistula edges should be performed. Tension-free closure of the bladder is of utmost importance. Tissue interposition seems to be beneficial. The success rate of published series often reaches near 100%. An indwelling bladder catheter should be placed for about 10 d postoperatively.
When considering robotic repair for VVF, it is essential to establish the size, number, location, and etiology of the VVF. Robotic assistance facilitates dissection of the vesicovaginal space, harvesting of a well-vascularized tissue flap, and a tension-free closure of the bladder with low morbidity for the patient being operated in the deep pelvis with delicate anatomical structures.
Robotic repair of a vesicovaginal fistula can be applied safely with an excellent success rate and very low morbidity. This confirms the use of robotic surgery for vesicovaginal fistula repair, which is recommended in a consensus by the European Association of Urology Robotic Section Scientific Working Group for reconstructive urology.
Robotic repair of vesicovaginal fistula can be applied safely, with low morbidity for the patient. The excellent view allows precise preparation with a high success rate, which underlines the use of robotic surgery for vesicovaginal fistula repair. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.029 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000560493400041</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0302283820304589</els_id><sourcerecordid>2423515470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-30fe46644b274146e39075e9d487470fa518c842619fd7e0e809cf28b080d3003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt9u0zAUhyMEYmXwBgj5Egml-F8ShwukUm0DaRJoY3BpOc5JcZfGwU467Rl5KU6XtlyBuLIdf5-P4_NLkpeMzhll-dv1HMYwBj_nlNM5zeeUl4-SGVOFSIssp4-TGRWUp1wJdZI8i3FNKRVZKZ4mJ4LnmRCcz5JfHyAO5EswdnAWInEdufKVx0VqYnRxgJpcQW9cIL4h3yA667dm5TrTknPcHlvzjizI0ncRujjGHezDQJrgN2T4AeQMr9iD6cgiRm-dGZzvdkfdBN_61f2h2nF9DfYBubYOusE1uPXdh1vXrchF8GNPGh-wiMWCQxiR3cLBfZ48aUwb4cV-PE1uzs--Lj-ml58vPi0Xl6mVGR1SQRuQeS5lxQvJZA6ipEUGZS1VIQvamIwpqyTPWdnUBVBQtLQNVxVVtBb4hqdJOp0b76AfK90HtzHhXnvj9P7TLc5Ay7xULEO-_CvfB1__kQ4ik1IW2CuF7uvJRfDniL3SGxcttK3pwI9Rc8lFxjK8N6JyQm3wMQZojoUY1bvI6LWeIqN3kdE01xgZ1F7tK4zVBuqjdMgIAm8m4A4q38RdXywcMQwVhk2WQuJMMqTV_9NLNzwEYunHbkD1_aQCNm_rIOi9XruAqdC1d__-ld97PPp7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2423515470</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Best Practices in Robotic-assisted Repair of Vesicovaginal Fistula: A Consensus Report from the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group for Reconstructive Urology</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><creator>Randazzo, Marco ; Lengauer, Linda ; Rochat, Charles-Henry ; Ploumidis, Achilles ; Kröpfl, Darko ; Rassweiler, Jens ; Buffi, Nicolo Maria ; Wiklund, Peter ; Mottrie, Alexandre ; John, Hubert</creator><creatorcontrib>Randazzo, Marco ; Lengauer, Linda ; Rochat, Charles-Henry ; Ploumidis, Achilles ; Kröpfl, Darko ; Rassweiler, Jens ; Buffi, Nicolo Maria ; Wiklund, Peter ; Mottrie, Alexandre ; John, Hubert</creatorcontrib><description>Surgical repair of a vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) has been described extensively in the literature for several decades. Advances in robotic repair have been adopted since 2005.
A consensus review of existing data based on published case series, expert opinion, and a survey monkey.
This document summarizes the consensus group meeting and survey monkey results convened by the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section (ERUS) relating to the robotic management of VVF.
Current data underline the successful robotic repair of supratrigonal nonobstetric VVF. The panel recommends preoperative marking of the fistula by a guidewire or ureteral catheter, and placement of a protective ureteral JJ stent. An extravesical robotic approach usually provides a good anatomic view for adequate and wide dissection of the vesicovaginal space, as well as bladder and vaginal mobilization. Careful sharp dissection of fistula edges should be performed. Tension-free closure of the bladder is of utmost importance. Tissue interposition seems to be beneficial. The success rate of published series often reaches near 100%. An indwelling bladder catheter should be placed for about 10 d postoperatively.
When considering robotic repair for VVF, it is essential to establish the size, number, location, and etiology of the VVF. Robotic assistance facilitates dissection of the vesicovaginal space, harvesting of a well-vascularized tissue flap, and a tension-free closure of the bladder with low morbidity for the patient being operated in the deep pelvis with delicate anatomical structures.
Robotic repair of a vesicovaginal fistula can be applied safely with an excellent success rate and very low morbidity. This confirms the use of robotic surgery for vesicovaginal fistula repair, which is recommended in a consensus by the European Association of Urology Robotic Section Scientific Working Group for reconstructive urology.
Robotic repair of vesicovaginal fistula can be applied safely, with low morbidity for the patient. The excellent view allows precise preparation with a high success rate, which underlines the use of robotic surgery for vesicovaginal fistula repair.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-2838</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1873-7560</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32653322</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>AMSTERDAM: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Consensus statement ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Medicin och hälsovetenskap ; Robotic reconstruction ; Science & Technology ; Urology & Nephrology ; Vesicovaginal fistula</subject><ispartof>EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020-09, Vol.78 (3), p.432-442</ispartof><rights>2020</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>15</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000560493400041</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-30fe46644b274146e39075e9d487470fa518c842619fd7e0e809cf28b080d3003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-30fe46644b274146e39075e9d487470fa518c842619fd7e0e809cf28b080d3003</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6775-2114 ; 0000-0003-2436-9091</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.029$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,310,311,315,781,785,790,791,886,3551,23935,23936,25145,27929,27930,28253,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32653322$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:144473598$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Randazzo, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lengauer, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rochat, Charles-Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ploumidis, Achilles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kröpfl, Darko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rassweiler, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffi, Nicolo Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiklund, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mottrie, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>John, Hubert</creatorcontrib><title>Best Practices in Robotic-assisted Repair of Vesicovaginal Fistula: A Consensus Report from the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group for Reconstructive Urology</title><title>EUROPEAN UROLOGY</title><addtitle>EUR UROL</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><description>Surgical repair of a vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) has been described extensively in the literature for several decades. Advances in robotic repair have been adopted since 2005.
A consensus review of existing data based on published case series, expert opinion, and a survey monkey.
This document summarizes the consensus group meeting and survey monkey results convened by the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section (ERUS) relating to the robotic management of VVF.
Current data underline the successful robotic repair of supratrigonal nonobstetric VVF. The panel recommends preoperative marking of the fistula by a guidewire or ureteral catheter, and placement of a protective ureteral JJ stent. An extravesical robotic approach usually provides a good anatomic view for adequate and wide dissection of the vesicovaginal space, as well as bladder and vaginal mobilization. Careful sharp dissection of fistula edges should be performed. Tension-free closure of the bladder is of utmost importance. Tissue interposition seems to be beneficial. The success rate of published series often reaches near 100%. An indwelling bladder catheter should be placed for about 10 d postoperatively.
When considering robotic repair for VVF, it is essential to establish the size, number, location, and etiology of the VVF. Robotic assistance facilitates dissection of the vesicovaginal space, harvesting of a well-vascularized tissue flap, and a tension-free closure of the bladder with low morbidity for the patient being operated in the deep pelvis with delicate anatomical structures.
Robotic repair of a vesicovaginal fistula can be applied safely with an excellent success rate and very low morbidity. This confirms the use of robotic surgery for vesicovaginal fistula repair, which is recommended in a consensus by the European Association of Urology Robotic Section Scientific Working Group for reconstructive urology.
Robotic repair of vesicovaginal fistula can be applied safely, with low morbidity for the patient. The excellent view allows precise preparation with a high success rate, which underlines the use of robotic surgery for vesicovaginal fistula repair.</description><subject>Consensus statement</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>Robotic reconstruction</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Urology & Nephrology</subject><subject>Vesicovaginal fistula</subject><issn>0302-2838</issn><issn>1873-7560</issn><issn>1873-7560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkt9u0zAUhyMEYmXwBgj5Egml-F8ShwukUm0DaRJoY3BpOc5JcZfGwU467Rl5KU6XtlyBuLIdf5-P4_NLkpeMzhll-dv1HMYwBj_nlNM5zeeUl4-SGVOFSIssp4-TGRWUp1wJdZI8i3FNKRVZKZ4mJ4LnmRCcz5JfHyAO5EswdnAWInEdufKVx0VqYnRxgJpcQW9cIL4h3yA667dm5TrTknPcHlvzjizI0ncRujjGHezDQJrgN2T4AeQMr9iD6cgiRm-dGZzvdkfdBN_61f2h2nF9DfYBubYOusE1uPXdh1vXrchF8GNPGh-wiMWCQxiR3cLBfZ48aUwb4cV-PE1uzs--Lj-ml58vPi0Xl6mVGR1SQRuQeS5lxQvJZA6ipEUGZS1VIQvamIwpqyTPWdnUBVBQtLQNVxVVtBb4hqdJOp0b76AfK90HtzHhXnvj9P7TLc5Ay7xULEO-_CvfB1__kQ4ik1IW2CuF7uvJRfDniL3SGxcttK3pwI9Rc8lFxjK8N6JyQm3wMQZojoUY1bvI6LWeIqN3kdE01xgZ1F7tK4zVBuqjdMgIAm8m4A4q38RdXywcMQwVhk2WQuJMMqTV_9NLNzwEYunHbkD1_aQCNm_rIOi9XruAqdC1d__-ld97PPp7</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Randazzo, Marco</creator><creator>Lengauer, Linda</creator><creator>Rochat, Charles-Henry</creator><creator>Ploumidis, Achilles</creator><creator>Kröpfl, Darko</creator><creator>Rassweiler, Jens</creator><creator>Buffi, Nicolo Maria</creator><creator>Wiklund, Peter</creator><creator>Mottrie, Alexandre</creator><creator>John, Hubert</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6775-2114</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2436-9091</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Best Practices in Robotic-assisted Repair of Vesicovaginal Fistula: A Consensus Report from the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group for Reconstructive Urology</title><author>Randazzo, Marco ; Lengauer, Linda ; Rochat, Charles-Henry ; Ploumidis, Achilles ; Kröpfl, Darko ; Rassweiler, Jens ; Buffi, Nicolo Maria ; Wiklund, Peter ; Mottrie, Alexandre ; John, Hubert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-30fe46644b274146e39075e9d487470fa518c842619fd7e0e809cf28b080d3003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Consensus statement</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>Robotic reconstruction</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Urology & Nephrology</topic><topic>Vesicovaginal fistula</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Randazzo, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lengauer, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rochat, Charles-Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ploumidis, Achilles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kröpfl, Darko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rassweiler, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffi, Nicolo Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiklund, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mottrie, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>John, Hubert</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>EUROPEAN UROLOGY</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Randazzo, Marco</au><au>Lengauer, Linda</au><au>Rochat, Charles-Henry</au><au>Ploumidis, Achilles</au><au>Kröpfl, Darko</au><au>Rassweiler, Jens</au><au>Buffi, Nicolo Maria</au><au>Wiklund, Peter</au><au>Mottrie, Alexandre</au><au>John, Hubert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Best Practices in Robotic-assisted Repair of Vesicovaginal Fistula: A Consensus Report from the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group for Reconstructive Urology</atitle><jtitle>EUROPEAN UROLOGY</jtitle><stitle>EUR UROL</stitle><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>432</spage><epage>442</epage><pages>432-442</pages><issn>0302-2838</issn><issn>1873-7560</issn><eissn>1873-7560</eissn><abstract>Surgical repair of a vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) has been described extensively in the literature for several decades. Advances in robotic repair have been adopted since 2005.
A consensus review of existing data based on published case series, expert opinion, and a survey monkey.
This document summarizes the consensus group meeting and survey monkey results convened by the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section (ERUS) relating to the robotic management of VVF.
Current data underline the successful robotic repair of supratrigonal nonobstetric VVF. The panel recommends preoperative marking of the fistula by a guidewire or ureteral catheter, and placement of a protective ureteral JJ stent. An extravesical robotic approach usually provides a good anatomic view for adequate and wide dissection of the vesicovaginal space, as well as bladder and vaginal mobilization. Careful sharp dissection of fistula edges should be performed. Tension-free closure of the bladder is of utmost importance. Tissue interposition seems to be beneficial. The success rate of published series often reaches near 100%. An indwelling bladder catheter should be placed for about 10 d postoperatively.
When considering robotic repair for VVF, it is essential to establish the size, number, location, and etiology of the VVF. Robotic assistance facilitates dissection of the vesicovaginal space, harvesting of a well-vascularized tissue flap, and a tension-free closure of the bladder with low morbidity for the patient being operated in the deep pelvis with delicate anatomical structures.
Robotic repair of a vesicovaginal fistula can be applied safely with an excellent success rate and very low morbidity. This confirms the use of robotic surgery for vesicovaginal fistula repair, which is recommended in a consensus by the European Association of Urology Robotic Section Scientific Working Group for reconstructive urology.
Robotic repair of vesicovaginal fistula can be applied safely, with low morbidity for the patient. The excellent view allows precise preparation with a high success rate, which underlines the use of robotic surgery for vesicovaginal fistula repair.</abstract><cop>AMSTERDAM</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>32653322</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.029</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6775-2114</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2436-9091</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0302-2838 |
ispartof | EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020-09, Vol.78 (3), p.432-442 |
issn | 0302-2838 1873-7560 1873-7560 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_webofscience_primary_000560493400041 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /> |
subjects | Consensus statement Life Sciences & Biomedicine Medicin och hälsovetenskap Robotic reconstruction Science & Technology Urology & Nephrology Vesicovaginal fistula |
title | Best Practices in Robotic-assisted Repair of Vesicovaginal Fistula: A Consensus Report from the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group for Reconstructive Urology |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T03%3A37%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Best%20Practices%20in%20Robotic-assisted%20Repair%20of%20Vesicovaginal%20Fistula:%20A%20Consensus%20Report%20from%20the%20European%20Association%20of%20Urology%20Robotic%20Urology%20Section%20Scientific%20Working%20Group%20for%20Reconstructive%20Urology&rft.jtitle=EUROPEAN%20UROLOGY&rft.au=Randazzo,%20Marco&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=432&rft.epage=442&rft.pages=432-442&rft.issn=0302-2838&rft.eissn=1873-7560&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2423515470%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2423515470&rft_id=info:pmid/32653322&rft_els_id=S0302283820304589&rfr_iscdi=true |