Impact of medication reconciliation on health outcomes: An overview of systematic reviews
Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest that medication reconciliation (MR) is effective in decreasing the risk of medication discrepancies. Nevertheless, the association between MR and subsequent improved healthcare outcomes is not well established. This systematic review of reviews set...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Research in social and administrative pharmacy 2020-08, Vol.16 (8), p.995-1002 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest that medication reconciliation (MR) is effective in decreasing the risk of medication discrepancies. Nevertheless, the association between MR and subsequent improved healthcare outcomes is not well established.
This systematic review of reviews set out to identify published systematic reviews on the impact of MR programs on health outcomes and to describe key components of the intervention, the health outcomes assessed and any associations between MR and health outcomes.
PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and SCOPUS were searched from inception to May 2019. Systematic reviews of all study designs, populations, intervention providers and settings that measured patient-related outcomes or healthcare utilization were considered. Methodological quality was assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2). Two investigators performed study selection, quality assessment and data collection independently.
Five systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria: 2 were rated as low quality and 3 as critically low quality. Reviews included primary studies in different settings (hospitals, the community and residential aged care facilities) that reported the impact of MR on mortality, length of stay, Emergency Department (ED) visits, readmissions, physician visits and healthcare utilization. Only one review reported results on mortality. However, healthcare utilization, which usually included ED visits and readmissions, was communicated in all reviews. Meta-analyses were conducted in all reviews except one. Medication reconciliation was not consistently found to be associated with improvements in health outcomes.
Few systematic reviews support the value of MR in achieving good patient-related outcomes and healthcare utilization improvements. The quality of the systematic reviews was low and the primary studies included commonly involved additional activities related to MR. There was no clear evidence in favor of intervention in mortality, length of stay, ED visits, unplanned readmissions, physician visits and healthcare utilization. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1551-7411 1934-8150 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.10.011 |