Suitability of pulverised coal testing facilities for blast furnace applications
Identifying coals suitable for blast furnace injection has become increasingly important due to rising injection rates. This review of traditional pulverised coal reactivity testing equipment reveals that no agreed-upon evaluation standard exists and that different reactor types are employed for tes...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Ironmaking & steelmaking 2020-05, Vol.47 (5), p.574-585 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 585 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 574 |
| container_title | Ironmaking & steelmaking |
| container_volume | 47 |
| creator | Bösenhofer, Markus Wartha, Eva-Maria Jordan, Christian Feilmayr, Christoph Stocker, Hugo Hauzenberger, Franz Rieger, Johannes Tjaden, Stefan Walk, Arleen Harasek, Michael |
| description | Identifying coals suitable for blast furnace injection has become increasingly important due to rising injection rates. This review of traditional pulverised coal reactivity testing equipment reveals that no agreed-upon evaluation standard exists and that different reactor types are employed for testing. Therefore, reference blast furnace conversion conditions are defined, followed by a discussion of their influence on the coal conversion process as illustrated by conceptual conversion models. Critical process parameters are temperature, heating rate and pressure, while other effects can be calibrated. Evaluating the currently employed test equipment with regard to these process parameters shows that only specially designed drop-tube furnaces and flow reactors provide conversion conditions near to blast furnace conditions. For consistent injection coal testing, special reactors complying with the previously defined critical process parameters must be established. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/03019233.2019.1565152 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000556336400016CitationCount</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1080_03019233.2019.1565152</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1080_03019233.2019.1565152</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-8438124854ec1fad4c4d44d07524419a18891a2671fb9eb88bc5b0283a6f881e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1KJDEURoOMYI_6CEL2Um1-q9K4UZqZURAU1HW4lUokEitNkh7ptzdFty5cqKu7-c6Xm3MROqFkTokiZ4QTumCcz1mdcypbSSXbQzPaCd4wRdkvNJsyzRQ6QL9zfiaEdB3rZujufu0L9D74ssHR4dU6_LfJZztgEyHgYnPx4xN2YKaMtxm7mHAfIBfs1mkEYzGsVsEbKD6O-QjtOwjZHu_mIXr8--dhedXc3P67Xl7eNEYQUholeF1MKCmsoQ4GYcQgxEA6yYSgC6BKLSiwtqOuX9heqd7InjDFoXVKUcsPkdz2mhRzTtbpVfIvkDaaEj1p0e9a9KRF77RU7vwTZ6qAafWSwIdvabWlX20fXTbejsZ-vFytStly3tYvEtoud8XLuB5LRU9_jtY026YzPFn9HCfTIX-73cUW8mM90gu8xhQGXWATYnIJRuOz5l9XvAHqCar5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Suitability of pulverised coal testing facilities for blast furnace applications</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><creator>Bösenhofer, Markus ; Wartha, Eva-Maria ; Jordan, Christian ; Feilmayr, Christoph ; Stocker, Hugo ; Hauzenberger, Franz ; Rieger, Johannes ; Tjaden, Stefan ; Walk, Arleen ; Harasek, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Bösenhofer, Markus ; Wartha, Eva-Maria ; Jordan, Christian ; Feilmayr, Christoph ; Stocker, Hugo ; Hauzenberger, Franz ; Rieger, Johannes ; Tjaden, Stefan ; Walk, Arleen ; Harasek, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Identifying coals suitable for blast furnace injection has become increasingly important due to rising injection rates. This review of traditional pulverised coal reactivity testing equipment reveals that no agreed-upon evaluation standard exists and that different reactor types are employed for testing. Therefore, reference blast furnace conversion conditions are defined, followed by a discussion of their influence on the coal conversion process as illustrated by conceptual conversion models. Critical process parameters are temperature, heating rate and pressure, while other effects can be calibrated. Evaluating the currently employed test equipment with regard to these process parameters shows that only specially designed drop-tube furnaces and flow reactors provide conversion conditions near to blast furnace conditions. For consistent injection coal testing, special reactors complying with the previously defined critical process parameters must be established.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-9233</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1743-2812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-2812</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/03019233.2019.1565152</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>auxiliary reducing agents ; blast furnace ; coal conversion ; coal reactivity characterisation ; design criteria ; iron making ; Metallurgy & Metallurgical Engineering ; Pulverised coal injection (PCI) ; Science & Technology ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Ironmaking & steelmaking, 2020-05, Vol.47 (5), p.574-585</ispartof><rights>2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2019</rights><rights>2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>5</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000556336400016</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-8438124854ec1fad4c4d44d07524419a18891a2671fb9eb88bc5b0283a6f881e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-8438124854ec1fad4c4d44d07524419a18891a2671fb9eb88bc5b0283a6f881e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5564-8440 ; 0000-0003-3412-2113 ; 0000-0002-6490-5840</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03019233.2019.1565152$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/03019233.2019.1565152$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,21824,27929,27930,28253,43626,43627</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bösenhofer, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wartha, Eva-Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feilmayr, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stocker, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauzenberger, Franz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rieger, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tjaden, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walk, Arleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harasek, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Suitability of pulverised coal testing facilities for blast furnace applications</title><title>Ironmaking & steelmaking</title><addtitle>IRONMAK STEELMAK</addtitle><description>Identifying coals suitable for blast furnace injection has become increasingly important due to rising injection rates. This review of traditional pulverised coal reactivity testing equipment reveals that no agreed-upon evaluation standard exists and that different reactor types are employed for testing. Therefore, reference blast furnace conversion conditions are defined, followed by a discussion of their influence on the coal conversion process as illustrated by conceptual conversion models. Critical process parameters are temperature, heating rate and pressure, while other effects can be calibrated. Evaluating the currently employed test equipment with regard to these process parameters shows that only specially designed drop-tube furnaces and flow reactors provide conversion conditions near to blast furnace conditions. For consistent injection coal testing, special reactors complying with the previously defined critical process parameters must be established.</description><subject>auxiliary reducing agents</subject><subject>blast furnace</subject><subject>coal conversion</subject><subject>coal reactivity characterisation</subject><subject>design criteria</subject><subject>iron making</subject><subject>Metallurgy & Metallurgical Engineering</subject><subject>Pulverised coal injection (PCI)</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>0301-9233</issn><issn>1743-2812</issn><issn>1743-2812</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1KJDEURoOMYI_6CEL2Um1-q9K4UZqZURAU1HW4lUokEitNkh7ptzdFty5cqKu7-c6Xm3MROqFkTokiZ4QTumCcz1mdcypbSSXbQzPaCd4wRdkvNJsyzRQ6QL9zfiaEdB3rZujufu0L9D74ssHR4dU6_LfJZztgEyHgYnPx4xN2YKaMtxm7mHAfIBfs1mkEYzGsVsEbKD6O-QjtOwjZHu_mIXr8--dhedXc3P67Xl7eNEYQUholeF1MKCmsoQ4GYcQgxEA6yYSgC6BKLSiwtqOuX9heqd7InjDFoXVKUcsPkdz2mhRzTtbpVfIvkDaaEj1p0e9a9KRF77RU7vwTZ6qAafWSwIdvabWlX20fXTbejsZ-vFytStly3tYvEtoud8XLuB5LRU9_jtY026YzPFn9HCfTIX-73cUW8mM90gu8xhQGXWATYnIJRuOz5l9XvAHqCar5</recordid><startdate>20200527</startdate><enddate>20200527</enddate><creator>Bösenhofer, Markus</creator><creator>Wartha, Eva-Maria</creator><creator>Jordan, Christian</creator><creator>Feilmayr, Christoph</creator><creator>Stocker, Hugo</creator><creator>Hauzenberger, Franz</creator><creator>Rieger, Johannes</creator><creator>Tjaden, Stefan</creator><creator>Walk, Arleen</creator><creator>Harasek, Michael</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5564-8440</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3412-2113</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6490-5840</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200527</creationdate><title>Suitability of pulverised coal testing facilities for blast furnace applications</title><author>Bösenhofer, Markus ; Wartha, Eva-Maria ; Jordan, Christian ; Feilmayr, Christoph ; Stocker, Hugo ; Hauzenberger, Franz ; Rieger, Johannes ; Tjaden, Stefan ; Walk, Arleen ; Harasek, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-8438124854ec1fad4c4d44d07524419a18891a2671fb9eb88bc5b0283a6f881e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>auxiliary reducing agents</topic><topic>blast furnace</topic><topic>coal conversion</topic><topic>coal reactivity characterisation</topic><topic>design criteria</topic><topic>iron making</topic><topic>Metallurgy & Metallurgical Engineering</topic><topic>Pulverised coal injection (PCI)</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bösenhofer, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wartha, Eva-Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feilmayr, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stocker, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauzenberger, Franz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rieger, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tjaden, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walk, Arleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harasek, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access</collection><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Ironmaking & steelmaking</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bösenhofer, Markus</au><au>Wartha, Eva-Maria</au><au>Jordan, Christian</au><au>Feilmayr, Christoph</au><au>Stocker, Hugo</au><au>Hauzenberger, Franz</au><au>Rieger, Johannes</au><au>Tjaden, Stefan</au><au>Walk, Arleen</au><au>Harasek, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Suitability of pulverised coal testing facilities for blast furnace applications</atitle><jtitle>Ironmaking & steelmaking</jtitle><stitle>IRONMAK STEELMAK</stitle><date>2020-05-27</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>574</spage><epage>585</epage><pages>574-585</pages><issn>0301-9233</issn><issn>1743-2812</issn><eissn>1743-2812</eissn><abstract>Identifying coals suitable for blast furnace injection has become increasingly important due to rising injection rates. This review of traditional pulverised coal reactivity testing equipment reveals that no agreed-upon evaluation standard exists and that different reactor types are employed for testing. Therefore, reference blast furnace conversion conditions are defined, followed by a discussion of their influence on the coal conversion process as illustrated by conceptual conversion models. Critical process parameters are temperature, heating rate and pressure, while other effects can be calibrated. Evaluating the currently employed test equipment with regard to these process parameters shows that only specially designed drop-tube furnaces and flow reactors provide conversion conditions near to blast furnace conditions. For consistent injection coal testing, special reactors complying with the previously defined critical process parameters must be established.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/03019233.2019.1565152</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5564-8440</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3412-2113</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6490-5840</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0301-9233 |
| ispartof | Ironmaking & steelmaking, 2020-05, Vol.47 (5), p.574-585 |
| issn | 0301-9233 1743-2812 1743-2812 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_webofscience_primary_000556336400016CitationCount |
| source | SAGE Complete A-Z List; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /> |
| subjects | auxiliary reducing agents blast furnace coal conversion coal reactivity characterisation design criteria iron making Metallurgy & Metallurgical Engineering Pulverised coal injection (PCI) Science & Technology Technology |
| title | Suitability of pulverised coal testing facilities for blast furnace applications |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T09%3A34%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Suitability%20of%20pulverised%20coal%20testing%20facilities%20for%20blast%20furnace%20applications&rft.jtitle=Ironmaking%20&%20steelmaking&rft.au=B%C3%B6senhofer,%20Markus&rft.date=2020-05-27&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=574&rft.epage=585&rft.pages=574-585&rft.issn=0301-9233&rft.eissn=1743-2812&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/03019233.2019.1565152&rft_dat=%3Csage_webof%3E10.1080_03019233.2019.1565152%3C/sage_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1080_03019233.2019.1565152&rfr_iscdi=true |