Does eco‐innovation drive sales and technology investment? Focusing on eco‐label in Korea
As environmental problems worsen, eco‐innovation research has received increased attention. Korea is implementing an eco‐label policy to induce eco‐innovation. Eco‐labeling is a type of voluntary eco‐innovation. There are few empirical studies on the economic performance of eco‐labels in Korea and e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Business strategy and the environment 2020-12, Vol.29 (8), p.3174-3186 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3186 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 3174 |
container_title | Business strategy and the environment |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Oh, Myoungjin Shin, Jungwoo Park, Pil‐Ju Kim, Sunmee |
description | As environmental problems worsen, eco‐innovation research has received increased attention. Korea is implementing an eco‐label policy to induce eco‐innovation. Eco‐labeling is a type of voluntary eco‐innovation. There are few empirical studies on the economic performance of eco‐labels in Korea and even fewer on the additional investment in the technology used for eco‐labeling. The present study quantitatively measured the effect of eco‐labels on additionally generated sales and research and development (R&D) investment through propensity score matching. The results revealed that eco‐labeling has a positive impact on sales over the following 2 years, which is the expiration date of certification; moreover, investment in R&D typically increased for 3 years before certification. Interestingly, no additional R&D investment was made after certification. This study is mainly a basis for the introduction of environmental certification to government policymakers or product strategists who have yet to implement a certification system. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/bse.2565 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2466756101</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2466756101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3265-6e63a4a7358ace39f1efef1b9f99247c59e9f20707d44a2d1b7faba6107325f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKAzEUBuAgCtYq-AgBN26m5jKTNCvR2qpYcGG3EjIzJ3XKNKlJW-nOR_AZfRJTx62rwMl3LvwInVMyoISwqzLCgBWiOEA9SpTKyJCLQ9QjSuRZLjk_RicxLghJBTbsodc7DxFD5b8_vxrn_NasG-9wHZot4Gja9GlcjddQvTnf-vkON24Lcb0Et77GE19tYuPmOLV0M1pTQpsMfvIBzCk6sqaNcPb39tFsMp6NHrLp8_3j6GaaVZyJIhMguMmN5MXQVMCVpWDB0lJZpVguq0KBsoxIIus8N6ympbSmNIISyVlheR9ddGNXwb9v0nV64TfBpY2a5ULIIkma1GWnquBjDGD1KjRLE3aaEr3PTqfs9D67RLOOfjQt7P51-vZl_Ot_ADdrcig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2466756101</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does eco‐innovation drive sales and technology investment? Focusing on eco‐label in Korea</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Oh, Myoungjin ; Shin, Jungwoo ; Park, Pil‐Ju ; Kim, Sunmee</creator><creatorcontrib>Oh, Myoungjin ; Shin, Jungwoo ; Park, Pil‐Ju ; Kim, Sunmee</creatorcontrib><description>As environmental problems worsen, eco‐innovation research has received increased attention. Korea is implementing an eco‐label policy to induce eco‐innovation. Eco‐labeling is a type of voluntary eco‐innovation. There are few empirical studies on the economic performance of eco‐labels in Korea and even fewer on the additional investment in the technology used for eco‐labeling. The present study quantitatively measured the effect of eco‐labels on additionally generated sales and research and development (R&D) investment through propensity score matching. The results revealed that eco‐labeling has a positive impact on sales over the following 2 years, which is the expiration date of certification; moreover, investment in R&D typically increased for 3 years before certification. Interestingly, no additional R&D investment was made after certification. This study is mainly a basis for the introduction of environmental certification to government policymakers or product strategists who have yet to implement a certification system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-4733</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0836</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bse.2565</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Certification ; Economic performance ; economic performance evaluation ; eco‐innovation ; eco‐label ; Environmental certification ; Environmental degradation ; Environmental impact ; environmental policy ; Innovations ; Investment ; Investments ; Labeling ; Labels ; Policy making ; Propensity ; propensity score matching ; R&D ; Research & development ; Sales ; Technology ; technology investment</subject><ispartof>Business strategy and the environment, 2020-12, Vol.29 (8), p.3174-3186</ispartof><rights>2020 ERP Environment and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3265-6e63a4a7358ace39f1efef1b9f99247c59e9f20707d44a2d1b7faba6107325f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3265-6e63a4a7358ace39f1efef1b9f99247c59e9f20707d44a2d1b7faba6107325f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7772-8636</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fbse.2565$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fbse.2565$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27866,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oh, Myoungjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Jungwoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Pil‐Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sunmee</creatorcontrib><title>Does eco‐innovation drive sales and technology investment? Focusing on eco‐label in Korea</title><title>Business strategy and the environment</title><description>As environmental problems worsen, eco‐innovation research has received increased attention. Korea is implementing an eco‐label policy to induce eco‐innovation. Eco‐labeling is a type of voluntary eco‐innovation. There are few empirical studies on the economic performance of eco‐labels in Korea and even fewer on the additional investment in the technology used for eco‐labeling. The present study quantitatively measured the effect of eco‐labels on additionally generated sales and research and development (R&D) investment through propensity score matching. The results revealed that eco‐labeling has a positive impact on sales over the following 2 years, which is the expiration date of certification; moreover, investment in R&D typically increased for 3 years before certification. Interestingly, no additional R&D investment was made after certification. This study is mainly a basis for the introduction of environmental certification to government policymakers or product strategists who have yet to implement a certification system.</description><subject>Certification</subject><subject>Economic performance</subject><subject>economic performance evaluation</subject><subject>eco‐innovation</subject><subject>eco‐label</subject><subject>Environmental certification</subject><subject>Environmental degradation</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>environmental policy</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Investment</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Labeling</subject><subject>Labels</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Propensity</subject><subject>propensity score matching</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Sales</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>technology investment</subject><issn>0964-4733</issn><issn>1099-0836</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MtKAzEUBuAgCtYq-AgBN26m5jKTNCvR2qpYcGG3EjIzJ3XKNKlJW-nOR_AZfRJTx62rwMl3LvwInVMyoISwqzLCgBWiOEA9SpTKyJCLQ9QjSuRZLjk_RicxLghJBTbsodc7DxFD5b8_vxrn_NasG-9wHZot4Gja9GlcjddQvTnf-vkON24Lcb0Et77GE19tYuPmOLV0M1pTQpsMfvIBzCk6sqaNcPb39tFsMp6NHrLp8_3j6GaaVZyJIhMguMmN5MXQVMCVpWDB0lJZpVguq0KBsoxIIus8N6ympbSmNIISyVlheR9ddGNXwb9v0nV64TfBpY2a5ULIIkma1GWnquBjDGD1KjRLE3aaEr3PTqfs9D67RLOOfjQt7P51-vZl_Ot_ADdrcig</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Oh, Myoungjin</creator><creator>Shin, Jungwoo</creator><creator>Park, Pil‐Ju</creator><creator>Kim, Sunmee</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7772-8636</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Does eco‐innovation drive sales and technology investment? Focusing on eco‐label in Korea</title><author>Oh, Myoungjin ; Shin, Jungwoo ; Park, Pil‐Ju ; Kim, Sunmee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3265-6e63a4a7358ace39f1efef1b9f99247c59e9f20707d44a2d1b7faba6107325f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Certification</topic><topic>Economic performance</topic><topic>economic performance evaluation</topic><topic>eco‐innovation</topic><topic>eco‐label</topic><topic>Environmental certification</topic><topic>Environmental degradation</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>environmental policy</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Investment</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Labeling</topic><topic>Labels</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Propensity</topic><topic>propensity score matching</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Sales</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>technology investment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oh, Myoungjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Jungwoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Pil‐Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sunmee</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Business strategy and the environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oh, Myoungjin</au><au>Shin, Jungwoo</au><au>Park, Pil‐Ju</au><au>Kim, Sunmee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does eco‐innovation drive sales and technology investment? Focusing on eco‐label in Korea</atitle><jtitle>Business strategy and the environment</jtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>3174</spage><epage>3186</epage><pages>3174-3186</pages><issn>0964-4733</issn><eissn>1099-0836</eissn><abstract>As environmental problems worsen, eco‐innovation research has received increased attention. Korea is implementing an eco‐label policy to induce eco‐innovation. Eco‐labeling is a type of voluntary eco‐innovation. There are few empirical studies on the economic performance of eco‐labels in Korea and even fewer on the additional investment in the technology used for eco‐labeling. The present study quantitatively measured the effect of eco‐labels on additionally generated sales and research and development (R&D) investment through propensity score matching. The results revealed that eco‐labeling has a positive impact on sales over the following 2 years, which is the expiration date of certification; moreover, investment in R&D typically increased for 3 years before certification. Interestingly, no additional R&D investment was made after certification. This study is mainly a basis for the introduction of environmental certification to government policymakers or product strategists who have yet to implement a certification system.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/bse.2565</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7772-8636</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0964-4733 |
ispartof | Business strategy and the environment, 2020-12, Vol.29 (8), p.3174-3186 |
issn | 0964-4733 1099-0836 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2466756101 |
source | PAIS Index; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Certification Economic performance economic performance evaluation eco‐innovation eco‐label Environmental certification Environmental degradation Environmental impact environmental policy Innovations Investment Investments Labeling Labels Policy making Propensity propensity score matching R&D Research & development Sales Technology technology investment |
title | Does eco‐innovation drive sales and technology investment? Focusing on eco‐label in Korea |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T19%3A53%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20eco%E2%80%90innovation%20drive%20sales%20and%20technology%20investment?%20Focusing%20on%20eco%E2%80%90label%20in%20Korea&rft.jtitle=Business%20strategy%20and%20the%20environment&rft.au=Oh,%20Myoungjin&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=3174&rft.epage=3186&rft.pages=3174-3186&rft.issn=0964-4733&rft.eissn=1099-0836&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bse.2565&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2466756101%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2466756101&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |