Multi-Decadal Changes in Mangrove Extent, Age and Species in the Red River Estuaries of Viet Nam

This research investigated the performance of four different machine learning supervised image classifiers: artificial neural network (ANN), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) using SPOT-7 and Sentinel-1 images to classify mangrove age and species in 2019 in a R...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2020-07, Vol.12 (14), p.2289
Hauptverfasser: Quang, Nguyen Hong, Quinn, Claire H., Stringer, Lindsay C., Carrie, Rachael, Hackney, Christopher R., Van Hue, Le Thi, Van Tan, Dao, Nga, Pham Thi Thanh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 14
container_start_page 2289
container_title Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)
container_volume 12
creator Quang, Nguyen Hong
Quinn, Claire H.
Stringer, Lindsay C.
Carrie, Rachael
Hackney, Christopher R.
Van Hue, Le Thi
Van Tan, Dao
Nga, Pham Thi Thanh
description This research investigated the performance of four different machine learning supervised image classifiers: artificial neural network (ANN), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) using SPOT-7 and Sentinel-1 images to classify mangrove age and species in 2019 in a Red River estuary, typical of others found in northern Viet Nam. The four classifiers were chosen because they are considered to have high accuracy, however, their use in mangrove age and species classifications has thus far been limited. A time-series of Landsat images from 1975 to 2019 was used to map mangrove extent changes using the unsupervised classification method of iterative self-organizing data analysis technique (ISODATA) and a comparison with accuracy of K-means classification, which found that mangrove extent has increased, despite a fall in the 1980s, indicating the success of mangrove plantation and forest protection efforts by local people in the study area. To evaluate the supervised image classifiers, 183 in situ training plots were assessed, 70% of them were used to train the supervised algorithms, with 30% of them employed to validate the results. In order to improve mangrove species separations, Gram–Schmidt and principal component analysis image fusion techniques were applied to generate better quality images. All supervised and unsupervised (2019) results of mangrove age, species, and extent were mapped and accuracy was evaluated. Confusion matrices were calculated showing that the classified layers agreed with the ground-truth data where most producer and user accuracies were greater than 80%. The overall accuracy and Kappa coefficients (around 0.9) indicated that the image classifications were very good. The test showed that SVM was the most accurate, followed by DT, ANN, and RF in this case study. The changes in mangrove extent identified in this study and the methods tested for using remotely sensed data will be valuable to monitoring and evaluation assessments of mangrove plantation projects.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/rs12142289
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a246775a0f964f869e8c8aece0a7d302</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a246775a0f964f869e8c8aece0a7d302</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2425488847</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-68ddc9cbf6585cbdd0ccc1c0b44da9a3d574c2a006f72ca1ff2a8caa668ddda93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkU1PwzAMhisEEgi48AsicUMU0iRt0-M0BkwaII2Pa_AcZ3Ta2pFkE_x7OoYAX_zKfvzakpPkJOMXUlb80odMZEoIXe0kB4KXIlWiErv_9H5yHMKMdyFlVnF1kLzereaxTq8IwcKc9d-gmVJgdcPuOuXbNbHBR6QmnrPelBg0lj0uCestE9-Ijcmycb0mzwYhrsBvWq1jLzVFdg-Lo2TPwTzQ8U8-TJ6vB0_923T0cDPs90YpyiKLaaGtxQonrsh1jhNrOSJmyCdKWahA2rxUKIDzwpUCIXNOgEaAYjPYEfIwGW59bQszs_T1AvynaaE234XWTw34WOOcDAhVlGUO3FWFcrqoSKMGQuJQWslF53W69Vr69n1FIZpZu_JNd74RSuRKa63KjjrbUujbEDy5360ZN5uHmL-HyC_otnzY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2425488847</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multi-Decadal Changes in Mangrove Extent, Age and Species in the Red River Estuaries of Viet Nam</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Quang, Nguyen Hong ; Quinn, Claire H. ; Stringer, Lindsay C. ; Carrie, Rachael ; Hackney, Christopher R. ; Van Hue, Le Thi ; Van Tan, Dao ; Nga, Pham Thi Thanh</creator><creatorcontrib>Quang, Nguyen Hong ; Quinn, Claire H. ; Stringer, Lindsay C. ; Carrie, Rachael ; Hackney, Christopher R. ; Van Hue, Le Thi ; Van Tan, Dao ; Nga, Pham Thi Thanh</creatorcontrib><description>This research investigated the performance of four different machine learning supervised image classifiers: artificial neural network (ANN), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) using SPOT-7 and Sentinel-1 images to classify mangrove age and species in 2019 in a Red River estuary, typical of others found in northern Viet Nam. The four classifiers were chosen because they are considered to have high accuracy, however, their use in mangrove age and species classifications has thus far been limited. A time-series of Landsat images from 1975 to 2019 was used to map mangrove extent changes using the unsupervised classification method of iterative self-organizing data analysis technique (ISODATA) and a comparison with accuracy of K-means classification, which found that mangrove extent has increased, despite a fall in the 1980s, indicating the success of mangrove plantation and forest protection efforts by local people in the study area. To evaluate the supervised image classifiers, 183 in situ training plots were assessed, 70% of them were used to train the supervised algorithms, with 30% of them employed to validate the results. In order to improve mangrove species separations, Gram–Schmidt and principal component analysis image fusion techniques were applied to generate better quality images. All supervised and unsupervised (2019) results of mangrove age, species, and extent were mapped and accuracy was evaluated. Confusion matrices were calculated showing that the classified layers agreed with the ground-truth data where most producer and user accuracies were greater than 80%. The overall accuracy and Kappa coefficients (around 0.9) indicated that the image classifications were very good. The test showed that SVM was the most accurate, followed by DT, ANN, and RF in this case study. The changes in mangrove extent identified in this study and the methods tested for using remotely sensed data will be valuable to monitoring and evaluation assessments of mangrove plantation projects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-4292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-4292</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/rs12142289</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Age ; Algorithms ; Artificial neural networks ; Classification ; Classifiers ; Climate change ; Coasts ; Computer vision ; Data analysis ; Data collection ; Datasets ; Decision making ; Decision trees ; Estuaries ; Forest protection ; Identification methods ; Image classification ; Image processing ; Image quality ; Landsat ; Landsat satellites ; Learning algorithms ; Learning theory ; Machine learning ; mangrove condition ; mangrove development ; mangrove plantation ; Neural networks ; Plantations ; Principal components analysis ; Remote sensing ; Rivers ; Satellite imagery ; Species ; Species classification ; Support vector machines</subject><ispartof>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland), 2020-07, Vol.12 (14), p.2289</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-68ddc9cbf6585cbdd0ccc1c0b44da9a3d574c2a006f72ca1ff2a8caa668ddda93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-68ddc9cbf6585cbdd0ccc1c0b44da9a3d574c2a006f72ca1ff2a8caa668ddda93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5390-9136 ; 0000-0001-7657-624X ; 0000-0002-2085-0446 ; 0000-0003-0017-1654</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,865,2103,27926,27927</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Quang, Nguyen Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Claire H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stringer, Lindsay C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrie, Rachael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hackney, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Hue, Le Thi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Tan, Dao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nga, Pham Thi Thanh</creatorcontrib><title>Multi-Decadal Changes in Mangrove Extent, Age and Species in the Red River Estuaries of Viet Nam</title><title>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</title><description>This research investigated the performance of four different machine learning supervised image classifiers: artificial neural network (ANN), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) using SPOT-7 and Sentinel-1 images to classify mangrove age and species in 2019 in a Red River estuary, typical of others found in northern Viet Nam. The four classifiers were chosen because they are considered to have high accuracy, however, their use in mangrove age and species classifications has thus far been limited. A time-series of Landsat images from 1975 to 2019 was used to map mangrove extent changes using the unsupervised classification method of iterative self-organizing data analysis technique (ISODATA) and a comparison with accuracy of K-means classification, which found that mangrove extent has increased, despite a fall in the 1980s, indicating the success of mangrove plantation and forest protection efforts by local people in the study area. To evaluate the supervised image classifiers, 183 in situ training plots were assessed, 70% of them were used to train the supervised algorithms, with 30% of them employed to validate the results. In order to improve mangrove species separations, Gram–Schmidt and principal component analysis image fusion techniques were applied to generate better quality images. All supervised and unsupervised (2019) results of mangrove age, species, and extent were mapped and accuracy was evaluated. Confusion matrices were calculated showing that the classified layers agreed with the ground-truth data where most producer and user accuracies were greater than 80%. The overall accuracy and Kappa coefficients (around 0.9) indicated that the image classifications were very good. The test showed that SVM was the most accurate, followed by DT, ANN, and RF in this case study. The changes in mangrove extent identified in this study and the methods tested for using remotely sensed data will be valuable to monitoring and evaluation assessments of mangrove plantation projects.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Classifiers</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Coasts</subject><subject>Computer vision</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision trees</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Forest protection</subject><subject>Identification methods</subject><subject>Image classification</subject><subject>Image processing</subject><subject>Image quality</subject><subject>Landsat</subject><subject>Landsat satellites</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Learning theory</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>mangrove condition</subject><subject>mangrove development</subject><subject>mangrove plantation</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Plantations</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Satellite imagery</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Species classification</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><issn>2072-4292</issn><issn>2072-4292</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkU1PwzAMhisEEgi48AsicUMU0iRt0-M0BkwaII2Pa_AcZ3Ta2pFkE_x7OoYAX_zKfvzakpPkJOMXUlb80odMZEoIXe0kB4KXIlWiErv_9H5yHMKMdyFlVnF1kLzereaxTq8IwcKc9d-gmVJgdcPuOuXbNbHBR6QmnrPelBg0lj0uCestE9-Ijcmycb0mzwYhrsBvWq1jLzVFdg-Lo2TPwTzQ8U8-TJ6vB0_923T0cDPs90YpyiKLaaGtxQonrsh1jhNrOSJmyCdKWahA2rxUKIDzwpUCIXNOgEaAYjPYEfIwGW59bQszs_T1AvynaaE234XWTw34WOOcDAhVlGUO3FWFcrqoSKMGQuJQWslF53W69Vr69n1FIZpZu_JNd74RSuRKa63KjjrbUujbEDy5360ZN5uHmL-HyC_otnzY</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Quang, Nguyen Hong</creator><creator>Quinn, Claire H.</creator><creator>Stringer, Lindsay C.</creator><creator>Carrie, Rachael</creator><creator>Hackney, Christopher R.</creator><creator>Van Hue, Le Thi</creator><creator>Van Tan, Dao</creator><creator>Nga, Pham Thi Thanh</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5390-9136</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7657-624X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2085-0446</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0017-1654</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>Multi-Decadal Changes in Mangrove Extent, Age and Species in the Red River Estuaries of Viet Nam</title><author>Quang, Nguyen Hong ; Quinn, Claire H. ; Stringer, Lindsay C. ; Carrie, Rachael ; Hackney, Christopher R. ; Van Hue, Le Thi ; Van Tan, Dao ; Nga, Pham Thi Thanh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-68ddc9cbf6585cbdd0ccc1c0b44da9a3d574c2a006f72ca1ff2a8caa668ddda93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Classifiers</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Coasts</topic><topic>Computer vision</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision trees</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Forest protection</topic><topic>Identification methods</topic><topic>Image classification</topic><topic>Image processing</topic><topic>Image quality</topic><topic>Landsat</topic><topic>Landsat satellites</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Learning theory</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>mangrove condition</topic><topic>mangrove development</topic><topic>mangrove plantation</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Plantations</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Satellite imagery</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Species classification</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quang, Nguyen Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Claire H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stringer, Lindsay C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrie, Rachael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hackney, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Hue, Le Thi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Tan, Dao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nga, Pham Thi Thanh</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quang, Nguyen Hong</au><au>Quinn, Claire H.</au><au>Stringer, Lindsay C.</au><au>Carrie, Rachael</au><au>Hackney, Christopher R.</au><au>Van Hue, Le Thi</au><au>Van Tan, Dao</au><au>Nga, Pham Thi Thanh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multi-Decadal Changes in Mangrove Extent, Age and Species in the Red River Estuaries of Viet Nam</atitle><jtitle>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>2289</spage><pages>2289-</pages><issn>2072-4292</issn><eissn>2072-4292</eissn><abstract>This research investigated the performance of four different machine learning supervised image classifiers: artificial neural network (ANN), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) using SPOT-7 and Sentinel-1 images to classify mangrove age and species in 2019 in a Red River estuary, typical of others found in northern Viet Nam. The four classifiers were chosen because they are considered to have high accuracy, however, their use in mangrove age and species classifications has thus far been limited. A time-series of Landsat images from 1975 to 2019 was used to map mangrove extent changes using the unsupervised classification method of iterative self-organizing data analysis technique (ISODATA) and a comparison with accuracy of K-means classification, which found that mangrove extent has increased, despite a fall in the 1980s, indicating the success of mangrove plantation and forest protection efforts by local people in the study area. To evaluate the supervised image classifiers, 183 in situ training plots were assessed, 70% of them were used to train the supervised algorithms, with 30% of them employed to validate the results. In order to improve mangrove species separations, Gram–Schmidt and principal component analysis image fusion techniques were applied to generate better quality images. All supervised and unsupervised (2019) results of mangrove age, species, and extent were mapped and accuracy was evaluated. Confusion matrices were calculated showing that the classified layers agreed with the ground-truth data where most producer and user accuracies were greater than 80%. The overall accuracy and Kappa coefficients (around 0.9) indicated that the image classifications were very good. The test showed that SVM was the most accurate, followed by DT, ANN, and RF in this case study. The changes in mangrove extent identified in this study and the methods tested for using remotely sensed data will be valuable to monitoring and evaluation assessments of mangrove plantation projects.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/rs12142289</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5390-9136</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7657-624X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2085-0446</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0017-1654</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2072-4292
ispartof Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland), 2020-07, Vol.12 (14), p.2289
issn 2072-4292
2072-4292
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a246775a0f964f869e8c8aece0a7d302
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Accuracy
Age
Algorithms
Artificial neural networks
Classification
Classifiers
Climate change
Coasts
Computer vision
Data analysis
Data collection
Datasets
Decision making
Decision trees
Estuaries
Forest protection
Identification methods
Image classification
Image processing
Image quality
Landsat
Landsat satellites
Learning algorithms
Learning theory
Machine learning
mangrove condition
mangrove development
mangrove plantation
Neural networks
Plantations
Principal components analysis
Remote sensing
Rivers
Satellite imagery
Species
Species classification
Support vector machines
title Multi-Decadal Changes in Mangrove Extent, Age and Species in the Red River Estuaries of Viet Nam
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T18%3A18%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi-Decadal%20Changes%20in%20Mangrove%20Extent,%20Age%20and%20Species%20in%20the%20Red%20River%20Estuaries%20of%20Viet%20Nam&rft.jtitle=Remote%20sensing%20(Basel,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=Quang,%20Nguyen%20Hong&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=2289&rft.pages=2289-&rft.issn=2072-4292&rft.eissn=2072-4292&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/rs12142289&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2425488847%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2425488847&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_a246775a0f964f869e8c8aece0a7d302&rfr_iscdi=true