PTEN and ERG expression in MRI‐ultrasound guided fusion biopsy correlated with radical prostatectomy findings in men with prostate cancer

Background Conventional systematic prostate biopsies (SBx) have multiple limitations, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐ultrasound fusion targeting is increasingly applied (fusion biopsies [FBx]). In our previous studies, we have shown that loss of the tumor suppressor gene phosphatase and tensin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Prostate 2020-09, Vol.80 (13), p.1118-1127
Hauptverfasser: Erickson, Andrew M., Lokman, Utku, Lahdensuo, Kanerva, Tornberg, Sara, Visapaa, Harri, Bergroth, Robin, Santti, Henrikki, Petas, Anssi, Rannikko, Antti S., Mirtti, Tuomas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1127
container_issue 13
container_start_page 1118
container_title The Prostate
container_volume 80
creator Erickson, Andrew M.
Lokman, Utku
Lahdensuo, Kanerva
Tornberg, Sara
Visapaa, Harri
Bergroth, Robin
Santti, Henrikki
Petas, Anssi
Rannikko, Antti S.
Mirtti, Tuomas
description Background Conventional systematic prostate biopsies (SBx) have multiple limitations, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐ultrasound fusion targeting is increasingly applied (fusion biopsies [FBx]). In our previous studies, we have shown that loss of the tumor suppressor gene phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) in radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens predicts poor disease‐specific survival, and in active surveillance (AS), PTEN loss in SBx predicts an adverse AS outcome, although SBx PTEN status does not correlate well with the corresponding RP status. Here, we have hypothesized that PTEN and erythroblast transformation‐specific related gene (ERG) status in FBx correlate better with RP than they would in SBx. Methods A total of 106 men, who had undergone FBx and subsequent RP in a single center between June 2015 and May 2017 were included. Fifty‐three of the men had concomitant or previous SBx's. All biopsy and RP specimens were collected, and tissue microarrays (TMA) were constructed from RP specimens. Immunohistochemical stainings for PTEN and ERG expression were conducted on biopsies and RP TMAs and results were compared by using Fisher's exact test. Results The immunohistochemical predictive power of FBx, determined by the concordance of biopsy PTEN and ERG status with RP, is superior to SBx (77.6% vs 66.7% in PTEN, 92.4% vs 66.6% in ERG). FBx was superior to SBx in correlation with RP Gleason Grade Groups and MRI prostate imaging reporting and data system scores. Conclusion FBx grading correlates with RP histology and MRI findings and predicts the biomarker status in the RP specimens more accurately than SBx. A longer follow‐up is needed to evaluate if this translates to better prediction of disease outcomes, especially in AS and radiation therapy where prostatectomy specimens are not available for prognostication.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pros.24040
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2434379153</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2434379153</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3700-53901938287e2788d7517f1558213cacc788d935259658e27261e893562339ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1PwjAYB_DGaCKiFz9BE28mw6ftSrejIYgkKATxvJSuw5KxYbtFd_Puxc_oJ7FjevXU5N_f85IHoUsCAwJAb_a2dAMaQghHqEcgFgFAyI9RD6iAICRMnKIz57YAngPtoc_FavyIZZHi8XKC9fveaudMWWBT4Ifl9Pvjq84rK11Ze7KpTapTnNUHsTbl3jVYldbqXFb-481UL9jK1CiZ43aVyseqKncNzkyRmmLj2r47XXT0j2AlC6XtOTrJZO70xe_bR89349XoPpjNJ9PR7SxQTAAEnMVAYhbRSGgqoigVnIiMcB5RwpRUqs1iximPhzzyhA6JjnwwpIzFcs366Krr6-e_1tpVybasbeFHJjRkIRMx4cyr604pv6WzOkv21uykbRICSXvspF0_ORzbY9LhN5Pr5h-ZLJbzp67mB30_gvM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2434379153</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PTEN and ERG expression in MRI‐ultrasound guided fusion biopsy correlated with radical prostatectomy findings in men with prostate cancer</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Erickson, Andrew M. ; Lokman, Utku ; Lahdensuo, Kanerva ; Tornberg, Sara ; Visapaa, Harri ; Bergroth, Robin ; Santti, Henrikki ; Petas, Anssi ; Rannikko, Antti S. ; Mirtti, Tuomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Erickson, Andrew M. ; Lokman, Utku ; Lahdensuo, Kanerva ; Tornberg, Sara ; Visapaa, Harri ; Bergroth, Robin ; Santti, Henrikki ; Petas, Anssi ; Rannikko, Antti S. ; Mirtti, Tuomas</creatorcontrib><description>Background Conventional systematic prostate biopsies (SBx) have multiple limitations, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐ultrasound fusion targeting is increasingly applied (fusion biopsies [FBx]). In our previous studies, we have shown that loss of the tumor suppressor gene phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) in radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens predicts poor disease‐specific survival, and in active surveillance (AS), PTEN loss in SBx predicts an adverse AS outcome, although SBx PTEN status does not correlate well with the corresponding RP status. Here, we have hypothesized that PTEN and erythroblast transformation‐specific related gene (ERG) status in FBx correlate better with RP than they would in SBx. Methods A total of 106 men, who had undergone FBx and subsequent RP in a single center between June 2015 and May 2017 were included. Fifty‐three of the men had concomitant or previous SBx's. All biopsy and RP specimens were collected, and tissue microarrays (TMA) were constructed from RP specimens. Immunohistochemical stainings for PTEN and ERG expression were conducted on biopsies and RP TMAs and results were compared by using Fisher's exact test. Results The immunohistochemical predictive power of FBx, determined by the concordance of biopsy PTEN and ERG status with RP, is superior to SBx (77.6% vs 66.7% in PTEN, 92.4% vs 66.6% in ERG). FBx was superior to SBx in correlation with RP Gleason Grade Groups and MRI prostate imaging reporting and data system scores. Conclusion FBx grading correlates with RP histology and MRI findings and predicts the biomarker status in the RP specimens more accurately than SBx. A longer follow‐up is needed to evaluate if this translates to better prediction of disease outcomes, especially in AS and radiation therapy where prostatectomy specimens are not available for prognostication.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-4137</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0045</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pros.24040</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>biomarkers ; Biopsy ; Cancer surgery ; DNA microarrays ; Gleason grade group ; immunohistochemistry ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; PI‐RADS ; Prostate ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatectomy ; PTEN protein ; Radiation therapy ; Tensin ; Tumor suppressor genes ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasound ; Urological surgery</subject><ispartof>The Prostate, 2020-09, Vol.80 (13), p.1118-1127</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3700-53901938287e2788d7517f1558213cacc788d935259658e27261e893562339ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3700-53901938287e2788d7517f1558213cacc788d935259658e27261e893562339ab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4261-3484 ; 0000-0003-0510-3546 ; 0000-0002-1727-3182 ; 0000-0002-5370-2378 ; 0000-0003-0772-3319 ; 0000-0003-0455-9891</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpros.24040$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpros.24040$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Erickson, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lokman, Utku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lahdensuo, Kanerva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tornberg, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visapaa, Harri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergroth, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santti, Henrikki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petas, Anssi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rannikko, Antti S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirtti, Tuomas</creatorcontrib><title>PTEN and ERG expression in MRI‐ultrasound guided fusion biopsy correlated with radical prostatectomy findings in men with prostate cancer</title><title>The Prostate</title><description>Background Conventional systematic prostate biopsies (SBx) have multiple limitations, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐ultrasound fusion targeting is increasingly applied (fusion biopsies [FBx]). In our previous studies, we have shown that loss of the tumor suppressor gene phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) in radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens predicts poor disease‐specific survival, and in active surveillance (AS), PTEN loss in SBx predicts an adverse AS outcome, although SBx PTEN status does not correlate well with the corresponding RP status. Here, we have hypothesized that PTEN and erythroblast transformation‐specific related gene (ERG) status in FBx correlate better with RP than they would in SBx. Methods A total of 106 men, who had undergone FBx and subsequent RP in a single center between June 2015 and May 2017 were included. Fifty‐three of the men had concomitant or previous SBx's. All biopsy and RP specimens were collected, and tissue microarrays (TMA) were constructed from RP specimens. Immunohistochemical stainings for PTEN and ERG expression were conducted on biopsies and RP TMAs and results were compared by using Fisher's exact test. Results The immunohistochemical predictive power of FBx, determined by the concordance of biopsy PTEN and ERG status with RP, is superior to SBx (77.6% vs 66.7% in PTEN, 92.4% vs 66.6% in ERG). FBx was superior to SBx in correlation with RP Gleason Grade Groups and MRI prostate imaging reporting and data system scores. Conclusion FBx grading correlates with RP histology and MRI findings and predicts the biomarker status in the RP specimens more accurately than SBx. A longer follow‐up is needed to evaluate if this translates to better prediction of disease outcomes, especially in AS and radiation therapy where prostatectomy specimens are not available for prognostication.</description><subject>biomarkers</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Cancer surgery</subject><subject>DNA microarrays</subject><subject>Gleason grade group</subject><subject>immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>PI‐RADS</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatectomy</subject><subject>PTEN protein</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Tensin</subject><subject>Tumor suppressor genes</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Urological surgery</subject><issn>0270-4137</issn><issn>1097-0045</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E1PwjAYB_DGaCKiFz9BE28mw6ftSrejIYgkKATxvJSuw5KxYbtFd_Puxc_oJ7FjevXU5N_f85IHoUsCAwJAb_a2dAMaQghHqEcgFgFAyI9RD6iAICRMnKIz57YAngPtoc_FavyIZZHi8XKC9fveaudMWWBT4Ifl9Pvjq84rK11Ze7KpTapTnNUHsTbl3jVYldbqXFb-481UL9jK1CiZ43aVyseqKncNzkyRmmLj2r47XXT0j2AlC6XtOTrJZO70xe_bR89349XoPpjNJ9PR7SxQTAAEnMVAYhbRSGgqoigVnIiMcB5RwpRUqs1iximPhzzyhA6JjnwwpIzFcs366Krr6-e_1tpVybasbeFHJjRkIRMx4cyr604pv6WzOkv21uykbRICSXvspF0_ORzbY9LhN5Pr5h-ZLJbzp67mB30_gvM</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Erickson, Andrew M.</creator><creator>Lokman, Utku</creator><creator>Lahdensuo, Kanerva</creator><creator>Tornberg, Sara</creator><creator>Visapaa, Harri</creator><creator>Bergroth, Robin</creator><creator>Santti, Henrikki</creator><creator>Petas, Anssi</creator><creator>Rannikko, Antti S.</creator><creator>Mirtti, Tuomas</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4261-3484</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0510-3546</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1727-3182</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5370-2378</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0772-3319</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0455-9891</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>PTEN and ERG expression in MRI‐ultrasound guided fusion biopsy correlated with radical prostatectomy findings in men with prostate cancer</title><author>Erickson, Andrew M. ; Lokman, Utku ; Lahdensuo, Kanerva ; Tornberg, Sara ; Visapaa, Harri ; Bergroth, Robin ; Santti, Henrikki ; Petas, Anssi ; Rannikko, Antti S. ; Mirtti, Tuomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3700-53901938287e2788d7517f1558213cacc788d935259658e27261e893562339ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>biomarkers</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Cancer surgery</topic><topic>DNA microarrays</topic><topic>Gleason grade group</topic><topic>immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>PI‐RADS</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatectomy</topic><topic>PTEN protein</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Tensin</topic><topic>Tumor suppressor genes</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Urological surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Erickson, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lokman, Utku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lahdensuo, Kanerva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tornberg, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visapaa, Harri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergroth, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santti, Henrikki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petas, Anssi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rannikko, Antti S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirtti, Tuomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Prostate</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Erickson, Andrew M.</au><au>Lokman, Utku</au><au>Lahdensuo, Kanerva</au><au>Tornberg, Sara</au><au>Visapaa, Harri</au><au>Bergroth, Robin</au><au>Santti, Henrikki</au><au>Petas, Anssi</au><au>Rannikko, Antti S.</au><au>Mirtti, Tuomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PTEN and ERG expression in MRI‐ultrasound guided fusion biopsy correlated with radical prostatectomy findings in men with prostate cancer</atitle><jtitle>The Prostate</jtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>1118</spage><epage>1127</epage><pages>1118-1127</pages><issn>0270-4137</issn><eissn>1097-0045</eissn><abstract>Background Conventional systematic prostate biopsies (SBx) have multiple limitations, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐ultrasound fusion targeting is increasingly applied (fusion biopsies [FBx]). In our previous studies, we have shown that loss of the tumor suppressor gene phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) in radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens predicts poor disease‐specific survival, and in active surveillance (AS), PTEN loss in SBx predicts an adverse AS outcome, although SBx PTEN status does not correlate well with the corresponding RP status. Here, we have hypothesized that PTEN and erythroblast transformation‐specific related gene (ERG) status in FBx correlate better with RP than they would in SBx. Methods A total of 106 men, who had undergone FBx and subsequent RP in a single center between June 2015 and May 2017 were included. Fifty‐three of the men had concomitant or previous SBx's. All biopsy and RP specimens were collected, and tissue microarrays (TMA) were constructed from RP specimens. Immunohistochemical stainings for PTEN and ERG expression were conducted on biopsies and RP TMAs and results were compared by using Fisher's exact test. Results The immunohistochemical predictive power of FBx, determined by the concordance of biopsy PTEN and ERG status with RP, is superior to SBx (77.6% vs 66.7% in PTEN, 92.4% vs 66.6% in ERG). FBx was superior to SBx in correlation with RP Gleason Grade Groups and MRI prostate imaging reporting and data system scores. Conclusion FBx grading correlates with RP histology and MRI findings and predicts the biomarker status in the RP specimens more accurately than SBx. A longer follow‐up is needed to evaluate if this translates to better prediction of disease outcomes, especially in AS and radiation therapy where prostatectomy specimens are not available for prognostication.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/pros.24040</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4261-3484</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0510-3546</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1727-3182</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5370-2378</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0772-3319</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0455-9891</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0270-4137
ispartof The Prostate, 2020-09, Vol.80 (13), p.1118-1127
issn 0270-4137
1097-0045
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2434379153
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects biomarkers
Biopsy
Cancer surgery
DNA microarrays
Gleason grade group
immunohistochemistry
Magnetic resonance imaging
PI‐RADS
Prostate
Prostate cancer
Prostatectomy
PTEN protein
Radiation therapy
Tensin
Tumor suppressor genes
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasound
Urological surgery
title PTEN and ERG expression in MRI‐ultrasound guided fusion biopsy correlated with radical prostatectomy findings in men with prostate cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T03%3A14%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PTEN%20and%20ERG%20expression%20in%20MRI%E2%80%90ultrasound%20guided%20fusion%20biopsy%20correlated%20with%20radical%20prostatectomy%20findings%20in%20men%20with%20prostate%20cancer&rft.jtitle=The%20Prostate&rft.au=Erickson,%20Andrew%20M.&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=1118&rft.epage=1127&rft.pages=1118-1127&rft.issn=0270-4137&rft.eissn=1097-0045&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pros.24040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2434379153%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2434379153&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true