Public Views of the U.S. Supreme Court in the Aftermath of the Kavanaugh Confirmation

Objective We analyze public views of the Supreme Court following the confirmation hearings of Brett M. Kavanaugh. Methods We distributed an online survey days after the Senate confirmed Kavanaugh's appointment. Results Supreme Court legitimacy was weak following the hearings and perceptions of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social science quarterly 2020-07, Vol.101 (4), p.1430-1441
Hauptverfasser: Krewson, Christopher N., Schroedel, Jean R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective We analyze public views of the Supreme Court following the confirmation hearings of Brett M. Kavanaugh. Methods We distributed an online survey days after the Senate confirmed Kavanaugh's appointment. Results Supreme Court legitimacy was weak following the hearings and perceptions of legitimacy varied based on partisanship, gender, and race. However, legitimacy was not strongly related to support for Kavanaugh. Furthermore, respondents consistently ranked political characteristics as the least important attributes of a nominee. Still, those satisfied with the Senate confirmation process ranked political attributes as more important. Conclusion Our findings portend some challenges for the Court in the wake of the Kavanaugh confirmation. At the same time, Supreme Court legitimacy was only weakly tied to Kavanaugh, and legal qualities and moral character were more important to the public than a nominee's political attributes.
ISSN:0038-4941
1540-6237
DOI:10.1111/ssqu.12820