Concordance of Clinical Alzheimer Diagnosis and Neuropathological Features at Autopsy

Abstract It remains unclear what clinical features inform the accuracy of a clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer disease (AD). Data were obtained from the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center to compare clinical and neuropathologic features among participants who did or did not have Alzheimer disease...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology 2020-05, Vol.79 (5), p.465-473
Hauptverfasser: Gauthreaux, Kathryn, Bonnett, Tyler A, Besser, Lilah M, Brenowitz, Willa D, Teylan, Merilee, Mock, Charles, Chen, Yen-Chi, Chan, Kwun C G, Keene, C Dirk, Zhou, Xiao-Hua, Kukull, Walter A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract It remains unclear what clinical features inform the accuracy of a clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer disease (AD). Data were obtained from the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center to compare clinical and neuropathologic features among participants who did or did not have Alzheimer disease neuropathologic changes (ADNC) at autopsy. Participants (1854) had a clinical Alzheimer dementia diagnosis and ADNC at autopsy (Confirmed-AD), 204 participants had an AD diagnosis and no ADNC (AD-Mimics), and 253 participants had no AD diagnosis and ADNC (Unidentified-AD). Compared to Confirmed-AD participants, AD-Mimics had less severe cognitive impairment, while Unidentified-AD participants displayed more parkinsonian signs, depression, and behavioral problems. This study highlights the importance of developing a complete panel of biomarkers as a tool to inform clinical diagnoses, as clinical phenotypes that are typically associated with diseases other than AD may result in inaccurate diagnoses.
ISSN:0022-3069
1554-6578
1554-6578
DOI:10.1093/jnen/nlaa014