Effect of flavophospholipol on fecal microbiota in weaned pigs challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium

Background The heightened prevalence of Salmonella Typhimurium remains a public health and food safety concern. Studies have reported antibiotic, flavophospholipol, may have the ability to reduce Salmonella in swine, as well as alter the gut microbiota in favour of beneficial bacteria by inhibiting...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Porcine Health Management 2020-05, Vol.6 (1), p.14-14, Article 14
Hauptverfasser: Nair, Saranya, Farzan, Abdolvahab, Weese, J. Scott, Poljak, Zvonimir, Friendship, Robert M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 14
container_issue 1
container_start_page 14
container_title Porcine Health Management
container_volume 6
creator Nair, Saranya
Farzan, Abdolvahab
Weese, J. Scott
Poljak, Zvonimir
Friendship, Robert M.
description Background The heightened prevalence of Salmonella Typhimurium remains a public health and food safety concern. Studies have reported antibiotic, flavophospholipol, may have the ability to reduce Salmonella in swine, as well as alter the gut microbiota in favour of beneficial bacteria by inhibiting pathogenic bacteria. Thus, the objective of this study was to investigate the fecal microbiota of weaned pigs receiving in-feed flavophospholipol and challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium. Results Twenty-one weaned pigs were fed either a diet containing 4 ppm of flavophospholipol (treatment group) or a non-medicated feed (control group) for 36 days post-weaning (Day 1 to Day 36). The pigs were orally challenged with a 2 mL dose of 10(8) CFU/mL of S. Typhimurium at Day 7 and Day 8. Community bacterial DNA extracted from fecal samples collected at Day 6 (before challenge) and Day 36 (28 days after challenge) were used to assess the fecal microbiota using the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene with Illumina MiSeq next-generation sequencing. Sequencing data were visualized using mothur and analyzed in JMP and R software. The fecal microbiota of pigs in the treatment group had differences in abundance of phyla (Firmicutes, Proteobacteria) and genera (Lactobacillus, Roseburia, Treponema, unclassified Ruminococcaceae, Blautia, Streptococcus, Megasphaera, Dorea, Sporobacter, Peptococcus, unclassified Firmicutes, Clostridium IV and Campylobacter) when compared to pigs that were controls, 28 days after challenge with Salmonella (P < 0.05). Specifically, results demonstrated a significant increase in phylum Proteobacteria (P = 0.001) and decrease in Firmicutes (P = 0.012) and genus Roseburia (P = 0.003) in the treated pigs suggestive of possible microbial dysbiosis. An increased abundance of genera Lactobacillus (P = 0.012) was also noted in the treated group in comparison to the control. Conclusion Based on these findings, it is difficult to conclude whether treatment with 4 ppm of flavophospholipol is promoting favorable indigenous bacteria in the pig microbiota as previous literature has suggested.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s40813-020-00151-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000534303700001CitationCount</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A623586170</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_170ddc4dcbdf45a78d68d0b574439dbf</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A623586170</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-31ff47c981576ad94072cba963f0988e8712732a47ba662980e29b595b0106013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUklr3DAYNaWlCWn-QA9F0EuhONUu-1IIQ5oGAj00PQtZy4wGWXItO0P-fTTjZEh6KkJoe-_pW15VfUTwAqGGf8sUNojUEMMaQsRQzd5UpxgyVjPO4dsX-5PqPOctLCguCBPofXVCMMUcMXZa2SvnrJ5AcsAFdZ-GTcplBj-kAFIE5VEF0Hs9ps6nSQEfwc6qaA0Y_DoDvVEh2Lgu552fNuC3Cn2KNgQF7h6Gje_n0c_9h-qdUyHb86f1rPrz4-pu9bO-_XV9s7q8rTUjbKoJco4K3TaICa5MS6HAulMtJw62TWMbgbAgWFHRKc5x20CL2461rIMIcojIWXWz6JqktnIYfa_GB5mUl4eLNK6lGievg5VIQGM0NbozjjIlGsMbAzsmKCWt6VzR-r5oDXPXW6NtnEYVXom-fol-I9fpXgqMOGlZEfjyJDCmv7PNk-x91vvSRJvmLDGFlNPSCVKgn_-BbtM8xlKqA4qyFrX77C4W1FqVBHx0qfyryzC2NKhU3flyf8kxYQ0v-RUCXgilezmP1h2jR1DuXSQXF8niInlwkdyH_ell3kfKs2cKoFkAO9sll7W3UdsjrPiMEUogEXBvuZWf1ORTXKU5ToX69f-p5BGT4OKu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2404459191</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of flavophospholipol on fecal microbiota in weaned pigs challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium</title><source>Springer Online Journals Complete</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</source><creator>Nair, Saranya ; Farzan, Abdolvahab ; Weese, J. Scott ; Poljak, Zvonimir ; Friendship, Robert M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nair, Saranya ; Farzan, Abdolvahab ; Weese, J. Scott ; Poljak, Zvonimir ; Friendship, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background The heightened prevalence of Salmonella Typhimurium remains a public health and food safety concern. Studies have reported antibiotic, flavophospholipol, may have the ability to reduce Salmonella in swine, as well as alter the gut microbiota in favour of beneficial bacteria by inhibiting pathogenic bacteria. Thus, the objective of this study was to investigate the fecal microbiota of weaned pigs receiving in-feed flavophospholipol and challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium. Results Twenty-one weaned pigs were fed either a diet containing 4 ppm of flavophospholipol (treatment group) or a non-medicated feed (control group) for 36 days post-weaning (Day 1 to Day 36). The pigs were orally challenged with a 2 mL dose of 10(8) CFU/mL of S. Typhimurium at Day 7 and Day 8. Community bacterial DNA extracted from fecal samples collected at Day 6 (before challenge) and Day 36 (28 days after challenge) were used to assess the fecal microbiota using the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene with Illumina MiSeq next-generation sequencing. Sequencing data were visualized using mothur and analyzed in JMP and R software. The fecal microbiota of pigs in the treatment group had differences in abundance of phyla (Firmicutes, Proteobacteria) and genera (Lactobacillus, Roseburia, Treponema, unclassified Ruminococcaceae, Blautia, Streptococcus, Megasphaera, Dorea, Sporobacter, Peptococcus, unclassified Firmicutes, Clostridium IV and Campylobacter) when compared to pigs that were controls, 28 days after challenge with Salmonella (P &lt; 0.05). Specifically, results demonstrated a significant increase in phylum Proteobacteria (P = 0.001) and decrease in Firmicutes (P = 0.012) and genus Roseburia (P = 0.003) in the treated pigs suggestive of possible microbial dysbiosis. An increased abundance of genera Lactobacillus (P = 0.012) was also noted in the treated group in comparison to the control. Conclusion Based on these findings, it is difficult to conclude whether treatment with 4 ppm of flavophospholipol is promoting favorable indigenous bacteria in the pig microbiota as previous literature has suggested.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2055-5660</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2055-5660</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s40813-020-00151-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32426155</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>LONDON: Springer Nature</publisher><subject>Antibiotics ; Antibodies ; Bacteria ; Bacterial genetics ; Contamination ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; Feces ; Genes ; Genetic testing ; Gram-positive bacteria ; Hogs ; Legal fees ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Microbiota ; Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms) ; Pathogens ; Public health ; Public health movements ; RNA ; Salmonella ; Salmonella typhimurium ; Science &amp; Technology ; Swine ; Variance analysis ; Veterinary Sciences ; Weaning</subject><ispartof>Porcine Health Management, 2020-05, Vol.6 (1), p.14-14, Article 14</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>2</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000534303700001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-31ff47c981576ad94072cba963f0988e8712732a47ba662980e29b595b0106013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-31ff47c981576ad94072cba963f0988e8712732a47ba662980e29b595b0106013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7216395/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7216395/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,2103,2115,27929,27930,28253,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32426155$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nair, Saranya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farzan, Abdolvahab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weese, J. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poljak, Zvonimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friendship, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of flavophospholipol on fecal microbiota in weaned pigs challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium</title><title>Porcine Health Management</title><addtitle>PORCINE HEALTH MANAG</addtitle><addtitle>Porcine Health Manag</addtitle><description>Background The heightened prevalence of Salmonella Typhimurium remains a public health and food safety concern. Studies have reported antibiotic, flavophospholipol, may have the ability to reduce Salmonella in swine, as well as alter the gut microbiota in favour of beneficial bacteria by inhibiting pathogenic bacteria. Thus, the objective of this study was to investigate the fecal microbiota of weaned pigs receiving in-feed flavophospholipol and challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium. Results Twenty-one weaned pigs were fed either a diet containing 4 ppm of flavophospholipol (treatment group) or a non-medicated feed (control group) for 36 days post-weaning (Day 1 to Day 36). The pigs were orally challenged with a 2 mL dose of 10(8) CFU/mL of S. Typhimurium at Day 7 and Day 8. Community bacterial DNA extracted from fecal samples collected at Day 6 (before challenge) and Day 36 (28 days after challenge) were used to assess the fecal microbiota using the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene with Illumina MiSeq next-generation sequencing. Sequencing data were visualized using mothur and analyzed in JMP and R software. The fecal microbiota of pigs in the treatment group had differences in abundance of phyla (Firmicutes, Proteobacteria) and genera (Lactobacillus, Roseburia, Treponema, unclassified Ruminococcaceae, Blautia, Streptococcus, Megasphaera, Dorea, Sporobacter, Peptococcus, unclassified Firmicutes, Clostridium IV and Campylobacter) when compared to pigs that were controls, 28 days after challenge with Salmonella (P &lt; 0.05). Specifically, results demonstrated a significant increase in phylum Proteobacteria (P = 0.001) and decrease in Firmicutes (P = 0.012) and genus Roseburia (P = 0.003) in the treated pigs suggestive of possible microbial dysbiosis. An increased abundance of genera Lactobacillus (P = 0.012) was also noted in the treated group in comparison to the control. Conclusion Based on these findings, it is difficult to conclude whether treatment with 4 ppm of flavophospholipol is promoting favorable indigenous bacteria in the pig microbiota as previous literature has suggested.</description><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacterial genetics</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Genetic testing</subject><subject>Gram-positive bacteria</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Legal fees</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public health movements</subject><subject>RNA</subject><subject>Salmonella</subject><subject>Salmonella typhimurium</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Veterinary Sciences</subject><subject>Weaning</subject><issn>2055-5660</issn><issn>2055-5660</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUklr3DAYNaWlCWn-QA9F0EuhONUu-1IIQ5oGAj00PQtZy4wGWXItO0P-fTTjZEh6KkJoe-_pW15VfUTwAqGGf8sUNojUEMMaQsRQzd5UpxgyVjPO4dsX-5PqPOctLCguCBPofXVCMMUcMXZa2SvnrJ5AcsAFdZ-GTcplBj-kAFIE5VEF0Hs9ps6nSQEfwc6qaA0Y_DoDvVEh2Lgu552fNuC3Cn2KNgQF7h6Gje_n0c_9h-qdUyHb86f1rPrz4-pu9bO-_XV9s7q8rTUjbKoJco4K3TaICa5MS6HAulMtJw62TWMbgbAgWFHRKc5x20CL2461rIMIcojIWXWz6JqktnIYfa_GB5mUl4eLNK6lGievg5VIQGM0NbozjjIlGsMbAzsmKCWt6VzR-r5oDXPXW6NtnEYVXom-fol-I9fpXgqMOGlZEfjyJDCmv7PNk-x91vvSRJvmLDGFlNPSCVKgn_-BbtM8xlKqA4qyFrX77C4W1FqVBHx0qfyryzC2NKhU3flyf8kxYQ0v-RUCXgilezmP1h2jR1DuXSQXF8niInlwkdyH_ell3kfKs2cKoFkAO9sll7W3UdsjrPiMEUogEXBvuZWf1ORTXKU5ToX69f-p5BGT4OKu</recordid><startdate>20200512</startdate><enddate>20200512</enddate><creator>Nair, Saranya</creator><creator>Farzan, Abdolvahab</creator><creator>Weese, J. Scott</creator><creator>Poljak, Zvonimir</creator><creator>Friendship, Robert M.</creator><general>Springer Nature</general><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200512</creationdate><title>Effect of flavophospholipol on fecal microbiota in weaned pigs challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium</title><author>Nair, Saranya ; Farzan, Abdolvahab ; Weese, J. Scott ; Poljak, Zvonimir ; Friendship, Robert M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-31ff47c981576ad94072cba963f0988e8712732a47ba662980e29b595b0106013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacterial genetics</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Genetic testing</topic><topic>Gram-positive bacteria</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Legal fees</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public health movements</topic><topic>RNA</topic><topic>Salmonella</topic><topic>Salmonella typhimurium</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Veterinary Sciences</topic><topic>Weaning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nair, Saranya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farzan, Abdolvahab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weese, J. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poljak, Zvonimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friendship, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Porcine Health Management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nair, Saranya</au><au>Farzan, Abdolvahab</au><au>Weese, J. Scott</au><au>Poljak, Zvonimir</au><au>Friendship, Robert M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of flavophospholipol on fecal microbiota in weaned pigs challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium</atitle><jtitle>Porcine Health Management</jtitle><stitle>PORCINE HEALTH MANAG</stitle><addtitle>Porcine Health Manag</addtitle><date>2020-05-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>14</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>14-14</pages><artnum>14</artnum><issn>2055-5660</issn><eissn>2055-5660</eissn><abstract>Background The heightened prevalence of Salmonella Typhimurium remains a public health and food safety concern. Studies have reported antibiotic, flavophospholipol, may have the ability to reduce Salmonella in swine, as well as alter the gut microbiota in favour of beneficial bacteria by inhibiting pathogenic bacteria. Thus, the objective of this study was to investigate the fecal microbiota of weaned pigs receiving in-feed flavophospholipol and challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium. Results Twenty-one weaned pigs were fed either a diet containing 4 ppm of flavophospholipol (treatment group) or a non-medicated feed (control group) for 36 days post-weaning (Day 1 to Day 36). The pigs were orally challenged with a 2 mL dose of 10(8) CFU/mL of S. Typhimurium at Day 7 and Day 8. Community bacterial DNA extracted from fecal samples collected at Day 6 (before challenge) and Day 36 (28 days after challenge) were used to assess the fecal microbiota using the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene with Illumina MiSeq next-generation sequencing. Sequencing data were visualized using mothur and analyzed in JMP and R software. The fecal microbiota of pigs in the treatment group had differences in abundance of phyla (Firmicutes, Proteobacteria) and genera (Lactobacillus, Roseburia, Treponema, unclassified Ruminococcaceae, Blautia, Streptococcus, Megasphaera, Dorea, Sporobacter, Peptococcus, unclassified Firmicutes, Clostridium IV and Campylobacter) when compared to pigs that were controls, 28 days after challenge with Salmonella (P &lt; 0.05). Specifically, results demonstrated a significant increase in phylum Proteobacteria (P = 0.001) and decrease in Firmicutes (P = 0.012) and genus Roseburia (P = 0.003) in the treated pigs suggestive of possible microbial dysbiosis. An increased abundance of genera Lactobacillus (P = 0.012) was also noted in the treated group in comparison to the control. Conclusion Based on these findings, it is difficult to conclude whether treatment with 4 ppm of flavophospholipol is promoting favorable indigenous bacteria in the pig microbiota as previous literature has suggested.</abstract><cop>LONDON</cop><pub>Springer Nature</pub><pmid>32426155</pmid><doi>10.1186/s40813-020-00151-5</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2055-5660
ispartof Porcine Health Management, 2020-05, Vol.6 (1), p.14-14, Article 14
issn 2055-5660
2055-5660
language eng
recordid cdi_webofscience_primary_000534303700001CitationCount
source Springer Online Journals Complete; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; PubMed Central; Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
subjects Antibiotics
Antibodies
Bacteria
Bacterial genetics
Contamination
Deoxyribonucleic acid
DNA
Feces
Genes
Genetic testing
Gram-positive bacteria
Hogs
Legal fees
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Microbiota
Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)
Pathogens
Public health
Public health movements
RNA
Salmonella
Salmonella typhimurium
Science & Technology
Swine
Variance analysis
Veterinary Sciences
Weaning
title Effect of flavophospholipol on fecal microbiota in weaned pigs challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T14%3A39%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20flavophospholipol%20on%20fecal%20microbiota%20in%20weaned%20pigs%20challenged%20with%20Salmonella%20Typhimurium&rft.jtitle=Porcine%20Health%20Management&rft.au=Nair,%20Saranya&rft.date=2020-05-12&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=14&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=14-14&rft.artnum=14&rft.issn=2055-5660&rft.eissn=2055-5660&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s40813-020-00151-5&rft_dat=%3Cgale_webof%3EA623586170%3C/gale_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2404459191&rft_id=info:pmid/32426155&rft_galeid=A623586170&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_170ddc4dcbdf45a78d68d0b574439dbf&rfr_iscdi=true