Performance Measures Based on How Adults With Cancer Feel and Function: Stakeholder Recommendations and Feasibility Testing in Six Cancer Centers

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that assess how patients feel and function have potential for evaluating quality of care. Stakeholder recommendations for PRO-based performance measures (PMs) were elicited, and feasibility testing was conducted at six cancer centers. Interviews were conduct...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JCO oncology practice 2020-03, Vol.16 (3), p.e234-e250
Hauptverfasser: Stover, Angela M, Urick, Benjamin Y, Deal, Allison M, Teal, Randall, Vu, Maihan B, Carda-Auten, Jessica, Jansen, Jennifer, Chung, Arlene E, Bennett, Antonia V, Chiang, Anne, Cleeland, Charles, Deutsch, Yehuda, Tai, Edmund, Zylla, Dylan, Williams, Loretta A, Pitzen, Collette, Snyder, Claire, Reeve, Bryce, Smith, Tenbroeck, McNiff, Kristen, Cella, David, Neuss, Michael N, Miller, Robert, Atkinson, Thomas M, Spears, Patricia A, Smith, Mary Lou, Geoghegan, Cindy, Basch, Ethan M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e250
container_issue 3
container_start_page e234
container_title JCO oncology practice
container_volume 16
creator Stover, Angela M
Urick, Benjamin Y
Deal, Allison M
Teal, Randall
Vu, Maihan B
Carda-Auten, Jessica
Jansen, Jennifer
Chung, Arlene E
Bennett, Antonia V
Chiang, Anne
Cleeland, Charles
Deutsch, Yehuda
Tai, Edmund
Zylla, Dylan
Williams, Loretta A
Pitzen, Collette
Snyder, Claire
Reeve, Bryce
Smith, Tenbroeck
McNiff, Kristen
Cella, David
Neuss, Michael N
Miller, Robert
Atkinson, Thomas M
Spears, Patricia A
Smith, Mary Lou
Geoghegan, Cindy
Basch, Ethan M
description Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that assess how patients feel and function have potential for evaluating quality of care. Stakeholder recommendations for PRO-based performance measures (PMs) were elicited, and feasibility testing was conducted at six cancer centers. Interviews were conducted with 124 stakeholders to determine priority symptoms and risk adjustment variables for PRO-PMs and perceived acceptability. Stakeholders included patients and advocates, caregivers, clinicians, administrators, and thought leaders. Feasibility testing was conducted in six cancer centers. Patients completed PROMs at home 5-15 days into a chemotherapy cycle. Feasibility was operationalized as ≥ 75% completed PROMs and ≥ 75% patient acceptability. Stakeholder priority PRO-PMs for systemic therapy were GI symptoms (diarrhea, constipation, nausea, vomiting), depression/anxiety, pain, insomnia, fatigue, dyspnea, physical function, and neuropathy. Recommended risk adjusters included demographics, insurance type, cancer type, comorbidities, emetic risk, and difficulty paying bills. In feasibility testing, 653 patients enrolled (approximately 110 per site), and 607 (93%) completed PROMs, which indicated high feasibility for home collection. The majority of patients (470 of 607; 77%) completed PROMs without a reminder call, and 137 (23%) of 607 completed them after a reminder call. Most patients (72%) completed PROMs through web, 17% paper, or 2% interactive voice response (automated call that verbally asked patient questions). For acceptability, > 95% of patients found PROM items to be easy to understand and complete. Clinicians, patients, and other stakeholders agree that PMs that are based on how patients feel and function would be an important addition to quality measurement. This study also shows that PRO-PMs can be feasibly captured at home during systemic therapy and are acceptable to patients. PRO-PMs may add value to the portfolio of PMs as oncology transitions from fee-for-service payment models to performance-based care that emphasizes outcome measures.
doi_str_mv 10.1200/JOP.19.00784
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7069703</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2359415439</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-4131f8e11558b17351b619e25b299e68902bd52bc58b82e372ef4d37e92f50873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1O3DAUhS1EBYiyY115yYKZ-ieObRZIdNQpVFQgfsTScpIbxiWxqZ205TH6xvUwMILVtXQ-ffdaB6F9SqaUEfL5-8XllOopIVIVG2iHlUpNqOBic_1mchvtpfSTEMJYKbXWW2ibMyILQosd9O8SYhtib30N-AfYNEZI-ItN0ODg8Wn4g0-asRsSvnPDAs-WXMRzgA5b3-D56OvBBX-Erwf7AIvQNTm-gjr0PfjGLrO0IrPbVa5zwxO-gTQ4f4-dx9fu76t0Bn6AmD6iD63tEuy9zF10O_96MzudnF98O5udnE9qrophUlBOWwWUCqEqKrmgVUk1MFExraFUmrCqEayqc6wYcMmgLRouQbNWECX5LjpeeR_Hqoemztuj7cxjdL2NTyZYZ94n3i3MffhtJCm1JDwLDl4EMfwa85dM71INXWc9hDEZxoUuqCi4zujhCq1jSClCu15DiVkWaXKRhmrzXGTGP709bQ2_1sb_AzJmmic</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2359415439</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance Measures Based on How Adults With Cancer Feel and Function: Stakeholder Recommendations and Feasibility Testing in Six Cancer Centers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Stover, Angela M ; Urick, Benjamin Y ; Deal, Allison M ; Teal, Randall ; Vu, Maihan B ; Carda-Auten, Jessica ; Jansen, Jennifer ; Chung, Arlene E ; Bennett, Antonia V ; Chiang, Anne ; Cleeland, Charles ; Deutsch, Yehuda ; Tai, Edmund ; Zylla, Dylan ; Williams, Loretta A ; Pitzen, Collette ; Snyder, Claire ; Reeve, Bryce ; Smith, Tenbroeck ; McNiff, Kristen ; Cella, David ; Neuss, Michael N ; Miller, Robert ; Atkinson, Thomas M ; Spears, Patricia A ; Smith, Mary Lou ; Geoghegan, Cindy ; Basch, Ethan M</creator><creatorcontrib>Stover, Angela M ; Urick, Benjamin Y ; Deal, Allison M ; Teal, Randall ; Vu, Maihan B ; Carda-Auten, Jessica ; Jansen, Jennifer ; Chung, Arlene E ; Bennett, Antonia V ; Chiang, Anne ; Cleeland, Charles ; Deutsch, Yehuda ; Tai, Edmund ; Zylla, Dylan ; Williams, Loretta A ; Pitzen, Collette ; Snyder, Claire ; Reeve, Bryce ; Smith, Tenbroeck ; McNiff, Kristen ; Cella, David ; Neuss, Michael N ; Miller, Robert ; Atkinson, Thomas M ; Spears, Patricia A ; Smith, Mary Lou ; Geoghegan, Cindy ; Basch, Ethan M</creatorcontrib><description>Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that assess how patients feel and function have potential for evaluating quality of care. Stakeholder recommendations for PRO-based performance measures (PMs) were elicited, and feasibility testing was conducted at six cancer centers. Interviews were conducted with 124 stakeholders to determine priority symptoms and risk adjustment variables for PRO-PMs and perceived acceptability. Stakeholders included patients and advocates, caregivers, clinicians, administrators, and thought leaders. Feasibility testing was conducted in six cancer centers. Patients completed PROMs at home 5-15 days into a chemotherapy cycle. Feasibility was operationalized as ≥ 75% completed PROMs and ≥ 75% patient acceptability. Stakeholder priority PRO-PMs for systemic therapy were GI symptoms (diarrhea, constipation, nausea, vomiting), depression/anxiety, pain, insomnia, fatigue, dyspnea, physical function, and neuropathy. Recommended risk adjusters included demographics, insurance type, cancer type, comorbidities, emetic risk, and difficulty paying bills. In feasibility testing, 653 patients enrolled (approximately 110 per site), and 607 (93%) completed PROMs, which indicated high feasibility for home collection. The majority of patients (470 of 607; 77%) completed PROMs without a reminder call, and 137 (23%) of 607 completed them after a reminder call. Most patients (72%) completed PROMs through web, 17% paper, or 2% interactive voice response (automated call that verbally asked patient questions). For acceptability, &gt; 95% of patients found PROM items to be easy to understand and complete. Clinicians, patients, and other stakeholders agree that PMs that are based on how patients feel and function would be an important addition to quality measurement. This study also shows that PRO-PMs can be feasibly captured at home during systemic therapy and are acceptable to patients. PRO-PMs may add value to the portfolio of PMs as oncology transitions from fee-for-service payment models to performance-based care that emphasizes outcome measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2688-1527</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2688-1535</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1200/JOP.19.00784</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32074014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of Clinical Oncology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Neoplasms - psychology ; Neoplasms - therapy ; ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Stakeholder Participation</subject><ispartof>JCO oncology practice, 2020-03, Vol.16 (3), p.e234-e250</ispartof><rights>2020 by American Society of Clinical Oncology 2020 American Society of Clinical Oncology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-4131f8e11558b17351b619e25b299e68902bd52bc58b82e372ef4d37e92f50873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-4131f8e11558b17351b619e25b299e68902bd52bc58b82e372ef4d37e92f50873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32074014$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stover, Angela M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urick, Benjamin Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deal, Allison M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teal, Randall</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vu, Maihan B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carda-Auten, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Arlene E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Antonia V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiang, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cleeland, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deutsch, Yehuda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tai, Edmund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zylla, Dylan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Loretta A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitzen, Collette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeve, Bryce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Tenbroeck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNiff, Kristen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cella, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neuss, Michael N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atkinson, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spears, Patricia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Mary Lou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geoghegan, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basch, Ethan M</creatorcontrib><title>Performance Measures Based on How Adults With Cancer Feel and Function: Stakeholder Recommendations and Feasibility Testing in Six Cancer Centers</title><title>JCO oncology practice</title><addtitle>JCO Oncol Pract</addtitle><description>Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that assess how patients feel and function have potential for evaluating quality of care. Stakeholder recommendations for PRO-based performance measures (PMs) were elicited, and feasibility testing was conducted at six cancer centers. Interviews were conducted with 124 stakeholders to determine priority symptoms and risk adjustment variables for PRO-PMs and perceived acceptability. Stakeholders included patients and advocates, caregivers, clinicians, administrators, and thought leaders. Feasibility testing was conducted in six cancer centers. Patients completed PROMs at home 5-15 days into a chemotherapy cycle. Feasibility was operationalized as ≥ 75% completed PROMs and ≥ 75% patient acceptability. Stakeholder priority PRO-PMs for systemic therapy were GI symptoms (diarrhea, constipation, nausea, vomiting), depression/anxiety, pain, insomnia, fatigue, dyspnea, physical function, and neuropathy. Recommended risk adjusters included demographics, insurance type, cancer type, comorbidities, emetic risk, and difficulty paying bills. In feasibility testing, 653 patients enrolled (approximately 110 per site), and 607 (93%) completed PROMs, which indicated high feasibility for home collection. The majority of patients (470 of 607; 77%) completed PROMs without a reminder call, and 137 (23%) of 607 completed them after a reminder call. Most patients (72%) completed PROMs through web, 17% paper, or 2% interactive voice response (automated call that verbally asked patient questions). For acceptability, &gt; 95% of patients found PROM items to be easy to understand and complete. Clinicians, patients, and other stakeholders agree that PMs that are based on how patients feel and function would be an important addition to quality measurement. This study also shows that PRO-PMs can be feasibly captured at home during systemic therapy and are acceptable to patients. PRO-PMs may add value to the portfolio of PMs as oncology transitions from fee-for-service payment models to performance-based care that emphasizes outcome measures.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS</subject><subject>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Stakeholder Participation</subject><issn>2688-1527</issn><issn>2688-1535</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1O3DAUhS1EBYiyY115yYKZ-ieObRZIdNQpVFQgfsTScpIbxiWxqZ205TH6xvUwMILVtXQ-ffdaB6F9SqaUEfL5-8XllOopIVIVG2iHlUpNqOBic_1mchvtpfSTEMJYKbXWW2ibMyILQosd9O8SYhtib30N-AfYNEZI-ItN0ODg8Wn4g0-asRsSvnPDAs-WXMRzgA5b3-D56OvBBX-Erwf7AIvQNTm-gjr0PfjGLrO0IrPbVa5zwxO-gTQ4f4-dx9fu76t0Bn6AmD6iD63tEuy9zF10O_96MzudnF98O5udnE9qrophUlBOWwWUCqEqKrmgVUk1MFExraFUmrCqEayqc6wYcMmgLRouQbNWECX5LjpeeR_Hqoemztuj7cxjdL2NTyZYZ94n3i3MffhtJCm1JDwLDl4EMfwa85dM71INXWc9hDEZxoUuqCi4zujhCq1jSClCu15DiVkWaXKRhmrzXGTGP709bQ2_1sb_AzJmmic</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Stover, Angela M</creator><creator>Urick, Benjamin Y</creator><creator>Deal, Allison M</creator><creator>Teal, Randall</creator><creator>Vu, Maihan B</creator><creator>Carda-Auten, Jessica</creator><creator>Jansen, Jennifer</creator><creator>Chung, Arlene E</creator><creator>Bennett, Antonia V</creator><creator>Chiang, Anne</creator><creator>Cleeland, Charles</creator><creator>Deutsch, Yehuda</creator><creator>Tai, Edmund</creator><creator>Zylla, Dylan</creator><creator>Williams, Loretta A</creator><creator>Pitzen, Collette</creator><creator>Snyder, Claire</creator><creator>Reeve, Bryce</creator><creator>Smith, Tenbroeck</creator><creator>McNiff, Kristen</creator><creator>Cella, David</creator><creator>Neuss, Michael N</creator><creator>Miller, Robert</creator><creator>Atkinson, Thomas M</creator><creator>Spears, Patricia A</creator><creator>Smith, Mary Lou</creator><creator>Geoghegan, Cindy</creator><creator>Basch, Ethan M</creator><general>American Society of Clinical Oncology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Performance Measures Based on How Adults With Cancer Feel and Function: Stakeholder Recommendations and Feasibility Testing in Six Cancer Centers</title><author>Stover, Angela M ; Urick, Benjamin Y ; Deal, Allison M ; Teal, Randall ; Vu, Maihan B ; Carda-Auten, Jessica ; Jansen, Jennifer ; Chung, Arlene E ; Bennett, Antonia V ; Chiang, Anne ; Cleeland, Charles ; Deutsch, Yehuda ; Tai, Edmund ; Zylla, Dylan ; Williams, Loretta A ; Pitzen, Collette ; Snyder, Claire ; Reeve, Bryce ; Smith, Tenbroeck ; McNiff, Kristen ; Cella, David ; Neuss, Michael N ; Miller, Robert ; Atkinson, Thomas M ; Spears, Patricia A ; Smith, Mary Lou ; Geoghegan, Cindy ; Basch, Ethan M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-4131f8e11558b17351b619e25b299e68902bd52bc58b82e372ef4d37e92f50873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS</topic><topic>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Stakeholder Participation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stover, Angela M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urick, Benjamin Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deal, Allison M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teal, Randall</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vu, Maihan B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carda-Auten, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Arlene E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Antonia V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiang, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cleeland, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deutsch, Yehuda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tai, Edmund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zylla, Dylan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Loretta A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitzen, Collette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeve, Bryce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Tenbroeck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNiff, Kristen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cella, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neuss, Michael N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atkinson, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spears, Patricia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Mary Lou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geoghegan, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basch, Ethan M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>JCO oncology practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stover, Angela M</au><au>Urick, Benjamin Y</au><au>Deal, Allison M</au><au>Teal, Randall</au><au>Vu, Maihan B</au><au>Carda-Auten, Jessica</au><au>Jansen, Jennifer</au><au>Chung, Arlene E</au><au>Bennett, Antonia V</au><au>Chiang, Anne</au><au>Cleeland, Charles</au><au>Deutsch, Yehuda</au><au>Tai, Edmund</au><au>Zylla, Dylan</au><au>Williams, Loretta A</au><au>Pitzen, Collette</au><au>Snyder, Claire</au><au>Reeve, Bryce</au><au>Smith, Tenbroeck</au><au>McNiff, Kristen</au><au>Cella, David</au><au>Neuss, Michael N</au><au>Miller, Robert</au><au>Atkinson, Thomas M</au><au>Spears, Patricia A</au><au>Smith, Mary Lou</au><au>Geoghegan, Cindy</au><au>Basch, Ethan M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance Measures Based on How Adults With Cancer Feel and Function: Stakeholder Recommendations and Feasibility Testing in Six Cancer Centers</atitle><jtitle>JCO oncology practice</jtitle><addtitle>JCO Oncol Pract</addtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e234</spage><epage>e250</epage><pages>e234-e250</pages><issn>2688-1527</issn><eissn>2688-1535</eissn><abstract>Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that assess how patients feel and function have potential for evaluating quality of care. Stakeholder recommendations for PRO-based performance measures (PMs) were elicited, and feasibility testing was conducted at six cancer centers. Interviews were conducted with 124 stakeholders to determine priority symptoms and risk adjustment variables for PRO-PMs and perceived acceptability. Stakeholders included patients and advocates, caregivers, clinicians, administrators, and thought leaders. Feasibility testing was conducted in six cancer centers. Patients completed PROMs at home 5-15 days into a chemotherapy cycle. Feasibility was operationalized as ≥ 75% completed PROMs and ≥ 75% patient acceptability. Stakeholder priority PRO-PMs for systemic therapy were GI symptoms (diarrhea, constipation, nausea, vomiting), depression/anxiety, pain, insomnia, fatigue, dyspnea, physical function, and neuropathy. Recommended risk adjusters included demographics, insurance type, cancer type, comorbidities, emetic risk, and difficulty paying bills. In feasibility testing, 653 patients enrolled (approximately 110 per site), and 607 (93%) completed PROMs, which indicated high feasibility for home collection. The majority of patients (470 of 607; 77%) completed PROMs without a reminder call, and 137 (23%) of 607 completed them after a reminder call. Most patients (72%) completed PROMs through web, 17% paper, or 2% interactive voice response (automated call that verbally asked patient questions). For acceptability, &gt; 95% of patients found PROM items to be easy to understand and complete. Clinicians, patients, and other stakeholders agree that PMs that are based on how patients feel and function would be an important addition to quality measurement. This study also shows that PRO-PMs can be feasibly captured at home during systemic therapy and are acceptable to patients. PRO-PMs may add value to the portfolio of PMs as oncology transitions from fee-for-service payment models to performance-based care that emphasizes outcome measures.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of Clinical Oncology</pub><pmid>32074014</pmid><doi>10.1200/JOP.19.00784</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2688-1527
ispartof JCO oncology practice, 2020-03, Vol.16 (3), p.e234-e250
issn 2688-1527
2688-1535
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7069703
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Feasibility Studies
Female
Humans
Male
Neoplasms - psychology
Neoplasms - therapy
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Stakeholder Participation
title Performance Measures Based on How Adults With Cancer Feel and Function: Stakeholder Recommendations and Feasibility Testing in Six Cancer Centers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T22%3A15%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20Measures%20Based%20on%20How%20Adults%20With%20Cancer%20Feel%20and%20Function:%20Stakeholder%20Recommendations%20and%20Feasibility%20Testing%20in%20Six%20Cancer%20Centers&rft.jtitle=JCO%20oncology%20practice&rft.au=Stover,%20Angela%20M&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e234&rft.epage=e250&rft.pages=e234-e250&rft.issn=2688-1527&rft.eissn=2688-1535&rft_id=info:doi/10.1200/JOP.19.00784&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2359415439%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2359415439&rft_id=info:pmid/32074014&rfr_iscdi=true