Performance Measures Based on How Adults With Cancer Feel and Function: Stakeholder Recommendations and Feasibility Testing in Six Cancer Centers
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that assess how patients feel and function have potential for evaluating quality of care. Stakeholder recommendations for PRO-based performance measures (PMs) were elicited, and feasibility testing was conducted at six cancer centers. Interviews were conduct...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JCO oncology practice 2020-03, Vol.16 (3), p.e234-e250 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e250 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | e234 |
container_title | JCO oncology practice |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Stover, Angela M Urick, Benjamin Y Deal, Allison M Teal, Randall Vu, Maihan B Carda-Auten, Jessica Jansen, Jennifer Chung, Arlene E Bennett, Antonia V Chiang, Anne Cleeland, Charles Deutsch, Yehuda Tai, Edmund Zylla, Dylan Williams, Loretta A Pitzen, Collette Snyder, Claire Reeve, Bryce Smith, Tenbroeck McNiff, Kristen Cella, David Neuss, Michael N Miller, Robert Atkinson, Thomas M Spears, Patricia A Smith, Mary Lou Geoghegan, Cindy Basch, Ethan M |
description | Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that assess how patients feel and function have potential for evaluating quality of care. Stakeholder recommendations for PRO-based performance measures (PMs) were elicited, and feasibility testing was conducted at six cancer centers.
Interviews were conducted with 124 stakeholders to determine priority symptoms and risk adjustment variables for PRO-PMs and perceived acceptability. Stakeholders included patients and advocates, caregivers, clinicians, administrators, and thought leaders. Feasibility testing was conducted in six cancer centers. Patients completed PROMs at home 5-15 days into a chemotherapy cycle. Feasibility was operationalized as ≥ 75% completed PROMs and ≥ 75% patient acceptability.
Stakeholder priority PRO-PMs for systemic therapy were GI symptoms (diarrhea, constipation, nausea, vomiting), depression/anxiety, pain, insomnia, fatigue, dyspnea, physical function, and neuropathy. Recommended risk adjusters included demographics, insurance type, cancer type, comorbidities, emetic risk, and difficulty paying bills. In feasibility testing, 653 patients enrolled (approximately 110 per site), and 607 (93%) completed PROMs, which indicated high feasibility for home collection. The majority of patients (470 of 607; 77%) completed PROMs without a reminder call, and 137 (23%) of 607 completed them after a reminder call. Most patients (72%) completed PROMs through web, 17% paper, or 2% interactive voice response (automated call that verbally asked patient questions). For acceptability, > 95% of patients found PROM items to be easy to understand and complete.
Clinicians, patients, and other stakeholders agree that PMs that are based on how patients feel and function would be an important addition to quality measurement. This study also shows that PRO-PMs can be feasibly captured at home during systemic therapy and are acceptable to patients. PRO-PMs may add value to the portfolio of PMs as oncology transitions from fee-for-service payment models to performance-based care that emphasizes outcome measures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1200/JOP.19.00784 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7069703</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2359415439</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-4131f8e11558b17351b619e25b299e68902bd52bc58b82e372ef4d37e92f50873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1O3DAUhS1EBYiyY115yYKZ-ieObRZIdNQpVFQgfsTScpIbxiWxqZ205TH6xvUwMILVtXQ-ffdaB6F9SqaUEfL5-8XllOopIVIVG2iHlUpNqOBic_1mchvtpfSTEMJYKbXWW2ibMyILQosd9O8SYhtib30N-AfYNEZI-ItN0ODg8Wn4g0-asRsSvnPDAs-WXMRzgA5b3-D56OvBBX-Erwf7AIvQNTm-gjr0PfjGLrO0IrPbVa5zwxO-gTQ4f4-dx9fu76t0Bn6AmD6iD63tEuy9zF10O_96MzudnF98O5udnE9qrophUlBOWwWUCqEqKrmgVUk1MFExraFUmrCqEayqc6wYcMmgLRouQbNWECX5LjpeeR_Hqoemztuj7cxjdL2NTyZYZ94n3i3MffhtJCm1JDwLDl4EMfwa85dM71INXWc9hDEZxoUuqCi4zujhCq1jSClCu15DiVkWaXKRhmrzXGTGP709bQ2_1sb_AzJmmic</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2359415439</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance Measures Based on How Adults With Cancer Feel and Function: Stakeholder Recommendations and Feasibility Testing in Six Cancer Centers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Stover, Angela M ; Urick, Benjamin Y ; Deal, Allison M ; Teal, Randall ; Vu, Maihan B ; Carda-Auten, Jessica ; Jansen, Jennifer ; Chung, Arlene E ; Bennett, Antonia V ; Chiang, Anne ; Cleeland, Charles ; Deutsch, Yehuda ; Tai, Edmund ; Zylla, Dylan ; Williams, Loretta A ; Pitzen, Collette ; Snyder, Claire ; Reeve, Bryce ; Smith, Tenbroeck ; McNiff, Kristen ; Cella, David ; Neuss, Michael N ; Miller, Robert ; Atkinson, Thomas M ; Spears, Patricia A ; Smith, Mary Lou ; Geoghegan, Cindy ; Basch, Ethan M</creator><creatorcontrib>Stover, Angela M ; Urick, Benjamin Y ; Deal, Allison M ; Teal, Randall ; Vu, Maihan B ; Carda-Auten, Jessica ; Jansen, Jennifer ; Chung, Arlene E ; Bennett, Antonia V ; Chiang, Anne ; Cleeland, Charles ; Deutsch, Yehuda ; Tai, Edmund ; Zylla, Dylan ; Williams, Loretta A ; Pitzen, Collette ; Snyder, Claire ; Reeve, Bryce ; Smith, Tenbroeck ; McNiff, Kristen ; Cella, David ; Neuss, Michael N ; Miller, Robert ; Atkinson, Thomas M ; Spears, Patricia A ; Smith, Mary Lou ; Geoghegan, Cindy ; Basch, Ethan M</creatorcontrib><description>Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that assess how patients feel and function have potential for evaluating quality of care. Stakeholder recommendations for PRO-based performance measures (PMs) were elicited, and feasibility testing was conducted at six cancer centers.
Interviews were conducted with 124 stakeholders to determine priority symptoms and risk adjustment variables for PRO-PMs and perceived acceptability. Stakeholders included patients and advocates, caregivers, clinicians, administrators, and thought leaders. Feasibility testing was conducted in six cancer centers. Patients completed PROMs at home 5-15 days into a chemotherapy cycle. Feasibility was operationalized as ≥ 75% completed PROMs and ≥ 75% patient acceptability.
Stakeholder priority PRO-PMs for systemic therapy were GI symptoms (diarrhea, constipation, nausea, vomiting), depression/anxiety, pain, insomnia, fatigue, dyspnea, physical function, and neuropathy. Recommended risk adjusters included demographics, insurance type, cancer type, comorbidities, emetic risk, and difficulty paying bills. In feasibility testing, 653 patients enrolled (approximately 110 per site), and 607 (93%) completed PROMs, which indicated high feasibility for home collection. The majority of patients (470 of 607; 77%) completed PROMs without a reminder call, and 137 (23%) of 607 completed them after a reminder call. Most patients (72%) completed PROMs through web, 17% paper, or 2% interactive voice response (automated call that verbally asked patient questions). For acceptability, > 95% of patients found PROM items to be easy to understand and complete.
Clinicians, patients, and other stakeholders agree that PMs that are based on how patients feel and function would be an important addition to quality measurement. This study also shows that PRO-PMs can be feasibly captured at home during systemic therapy and are acceptable to patients. PRO-PMs may add value to the portfolio of PMs as oncology transitions from fee-for-service payment models to performance-based care that emphasizes outcome measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2688-1527</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2688-1535</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1200/JOP.19.00784</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32074014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of Clinical Oncology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Neoplasms - psychology ; Neoplasms - therapy ; ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Stakeholder Participation</subject><ispartof>JCO oncology practice, 2020-03, Vol.16 (3), p.e234-e250</ispartof><rights>2020 by American Society of Clinical Oncology 2020 American Society of Clinical Oncology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-4131f8e11558b17351b619e25b299e68902bd52bc58b82e372ef4d37e92f50873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-4131f8e11558b17351b619e25b299e68902bd52bc58b82e372ef4d37e92f50873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32074014$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stover, Angela M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urick, Benjamin Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deal, Allison M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teal, Randall</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vu, Maihan B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carda-Auten, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Arlene E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Antonia V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiang, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cleeland, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deutsch, Yehuda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tai, Edmund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zylla, Dylan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Loretta A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitzen, Collette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeve, Bryce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Tenbroeck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNiff, Kristen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cella, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neuss, Michael N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atkinson, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spears, Patricia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Mary Lou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geoghegan, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basch, Ethan M</creatorcontrib><title>Performance Measures Based on How Adults With Cancer Feel and Function: Stakeholder Recommendations and Feasibility Testing in Six Cancer Centers</title><title>JCO oncology practice</title><addtitle>JCO Oncol Pract</addtitle><description>Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that assess how patients feel and function have potential for evaluating quality of care. Stakeholder recommendations for PRO-based performance measures (PMs) were elicited, and feasibility testing was conducted at six cancer centers.
Interviews were conducted with 124 stakeholders to determine priority symptoms and risk adjustment variables for PRO-PMs and perceived acceptability. Stakeholders included patients and advocates, caregivers, clinicians, administrators, and thought leaders. Feasibility testing was conducted in six cancer centers. Patients completed PROMs at home 5-15 days into a chemotherapy cycle. Feasibility was operationalized as ≥ 75% completed PROMs and ≥ 75% patient acceptability.
Stakeholder priority PRO-PMs for systemic therapy were GI symptoms (diarrhea, constipation, nausea, vomiting), depression/anxiety, pain, insomnia, fatigue, dyspnea, physical function, and neuropathy. Recommended risk adjusters included demographics, insurance type, cancer type, comorbidities, emetic risk, and difficulty paying bills. In feasibility testing, 653 patients enrolled (approximately 110 per site), and 607 (93%) completed PROMs, which indicated high feasibility for home collection. The majority of patients (470 of 607; 77%) completed PROMs without a reminder call, and 137 (23%) of 607 completed them after a reminder call. Most patients (72%) completed PROMs through web, 17% paper, or 2% interactive voice response (automated call that verbally asked patient questions). For acceptability, > 95% of patients found PROM items to be easy to understand and complete.
Clinicians, patients, and other stakeholders agree that PMs that are based on how patients feel and function would be an important addition to quality measurement. This study also shows that PRO-PMs can be feasibly captured at home during systemic therapy and are acceptable to patients. PRO-PMs may add value to the portfolio of PMs as oncology transitions from fee-for-service payment models to performance-based care that emphasizes outcome measures.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS</subject><subject>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Stakeholder Participation</subject><issn>2688-1527</issn><issn>2688-1535</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1O3DAUhS1EBYiyY115yYKZ-ieObRZIdNQpVFQgfsTScpIbxiWxqZ205TH6xvUwMILVtXQ-ffdaB6F9SqaUEfL5-8XllOopIVIVG2iHlUpNqOBic_1mchvtpfSTEMJYKbXWW2ibMyILQosd9O8SYhtib30N-AfYNEZI-ItN0ODg8Wn4g0-asRsSvnPDAs-WXMRzgA5b3-D56OvBBX-Erwf7AIvQNTm-gjr0PfjGLrO0IrPbVa5zwxO-gTQ4f4-dx9fu76t0Bn6AmD6iD63tEuy9zF10O_96MzudnF98O5udnE9qrophUlBOWwWUCqEqKrmgVUk1MFExraFUmrCqEayqc6wYcMmgLRouQbNWECX5LjpeeR_Hqoemztuj7cxjdL2NTyZYZ94n3i3MffhtJCm1JDwLDl4EMfwa85dM71INXWc9hDEZxoUuqCi4zujhCq1jSClCu15DiVkWaXKRhmrzXGTGP709bQ2_1sb_AzJmmic</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Stover, Angela M</creator><creator>Urick, Benjamin Y</creator><creator>Deal, Allison M</creator><creator>Teal, Randall</creator><creator>Vu, Maihan B</creator><creator>Carda-Auten, Jessica</creator><creator>Jansen, Jennifer</creator><creator>Chung, Arlene E</creator><creator>Bennett, Antonia V</creator><creator>Chiang, Anne</creator><creator>Cleeland, Charles</creator><creator>Deutsch, Yehuda</creator><creator>Tai, Edmund</creator><creator>Zylla, Dylan</creator><creator>Williams, Loretta A</creator><creator>Pitzen, Collette</creator><creator>Snyder, Claire</creator><creator>Reeve, Bryce</creator><creator>Smith, Tenbroeck</creator><creator>McNiff, Kristen</creator><creator>Cella, David</creator><creator>Neuss, Michael N</creator><creator>Miller, Robert</creator><creator>Atkinson, Thomas M</creator><creator>Spears, Patricia A</creator><creator>Smith, Mary Lou</creator><creator>Geoghegan, Cindy</creator><creator>Basch, Ethan M</creator><general>American Society of Clinical Oncology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Performance Measures Based on How Adults With Cancer Feel and Function: Stakeholder Recommendations and Feasibility Testing in Six Cancer Centers</title><author>Stover, Angela M ; Urick, Benjamin Y ; Deal, Allison M ; Teal, Randall ; Vu, Maihan B ; Carda-Auten, Jessica ; Jansen, Jennifer ; Chung, Arlene E ; Bennett, Antonia V ; Chiang, Anne ; Cleeland, Charles ; Deutsch, Yehuda ; Tai, Edmund ; Zylla, Dylan ; Williams, Loretta A ; Pitzen, Collette ; Snyder, Claire ; Reeve, Bryce ; Smith, Tenbroeck ; McNiff, Kristen ; Cella, David ; Neuss, Michael N ; Miller, Robert ; Atkinson, Thomas M ; Spears, Patricia A ; Smith, Mary Lou ; Geoghegan, Cindy ; Basch, Ethan M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-4131f8e11558b17351b619e25b299e68902bd52bc58b82e372ef4d37e92f50873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS</topic><topic>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Stakeholder Participation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stover, Angela M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urick, Benjamin Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deal, Allison M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teal, Randall</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vu, Maihan B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carda-Auten, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Arlene E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Antonia V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiang, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cleeland, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deutsch, Yehuda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tai, Edmund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zylla, Dylan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Loretta A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitzen, Collette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeve, Bryce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Tenbroeck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNiff, Kristen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cella, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neuss, Michael N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atkinson, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spears, Patricia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Mary Lou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geoghegan, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basch, Ethan M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>JCO oncology practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stover, Angela M</au><au>Urick, Benjamin Y</au><au>Deal, Allison M</au><au>Teal, Randall</au><au>Vu, Maihan B</au><au>Carda-Auten, Jessica</au><au>Jansen, Jennifer</au><au>Chung, Arlene E</au><au>Bennett, Antonia V</au><au>Chiang, Anne</au><au>Cleeland, Charles</au><au>Deutsch, Yehuda</au><au>Tai, Edmund</au><au>Zylla, Dylan</au><au>Williams, Loretta A</au><au>Pitzen, Collette</au><au>Snyder, Claire</au><au>Reeve, Bryce</au><au>Smith, Tenbroeck</au><au>McNiff, Kristen</au><au>Cella, David</au><au>Neuss, Michael N</au><au>Miller, Robert</au><au>Atkinson, Thomas M</au><au>Spears, Patricia A</au><au>Smith, Mary Lou</au><au>Geoghegan, Cindy</au><au>Basch, Ethan M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance Measures Based on How Adults With Cancer Feel and Function: Stakeholder Recommendations and Feasibility Testing in Six Cancer Centers</atitle><jtitle>JCO oncology practice</jtitle><addtitle>JCO Oncol Pract</addtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e234</spage><epage>e250</epage><pages>e234-e250</pages><issn>2688-1527</issn><eissn>2688-1535</eissn><abstract>Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that assess how patients feel and function have potential for evaluating quality of care. Stakeholder recommendations for PRO-based performance measures (PMs) were elicited, and feasibility testing was conducted at six cancer centers.
Interviews were conducted with 124 stakeholders to determine priority symptoms and risk adjustment variables for PRO-PMs and perceived acceptability. Stakeholders included patients and advocates, caregivers, clinicians, administrators, and thought leaders. Feasibility testing was conducted in six cancer centers. Patients completed PROMs at home 5-15 days into a chemotherapy cycle. Feasibility was operationalized as ≥ 75% completed PROMs and ≥ 75% patient acceptability.
Stakeholder priority PRO-PMs for systemic therapy were GI symptoms (diarrhea, constipation, nausea, vomiting), depression/anxiety, pain, insomnia, fatigue, dyspnea, physical function, and neuropathy. Recommended risk adjusters included demographics, insurance type, cancer type, comorbidities, emetic risk, and difficulty paying bills. In feasibility testing, 653 patients enrolled (approximately 110 per site), and 607 (93%) completed PROMs, which indicated high feasibility for home collection. The majority of patients (470 of 607; 77%) completed PROMs without a reminder call, and 137 (23%) of 607 completed them after a reminder call. Most patients (72%) completed PROMs through web, 17% paper, or 2% interactive voice response (automated call that verbally asked patient questions). For acceptability, > 95% of patients found PROM items to be easy to understand and complete.
Clinicians, patients, and other stakeholders agree that PMs that are based on how patients feel and function would be an important addition to quality measurement. This study also shows that PRO-PMs can be feasibly captured at home during systemic therapy and are acceptable to patients. PRO-PMs may add value to the portfolio of PMs as oncology transitions from fee-for-service payment models to performance-based care that emphasizes outcome measures.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of Clinical Oncology</pub><pmid>32074014</pmid><doi>10.1200/JOP.19.00784</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2688-1527 |
ispartof | JCO oncology practice, 2020-03, Vol.16 (3), p.e234-e250 |
issn | 2688-1527 2688-1535 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7069703 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Feasibility Studies Female Humans Male Neoplasms - psychology Neoplasms - therapy ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS Patient Reported Outcome Measures Stakeholder Participation |
title | Performance Measures Based on How Adults With Cancer Feel and Function: Stakeholder Recommendations and Feasibility Testing in Six Cancer Centers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T22%3A15%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20Measures%20Based%20on%20How%20Adults%20With%20Cancer%20Feel%20and%20Function:%20Stakeholder%20Recommendations%20and%20Feasibility%20Testing%20in%20Six%20Cancer%20Centers&rft.jtitle=JCO%20oncology%20practice&rft.au=Stover,%20Angela%20M&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e234&rft.epage=e250&rft.pages=e234-e250&rft.issn=2688-1527&rft.eissn=2688-1535&rft_id=info:doi/10.1200/JOP.19.00784&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2359415439%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2359415439&rft_id=info:pmid/32074014&rfr_iscdi=true |