New Approaches for the Assimilation of LAI Measurements into a Crop Model Ensemble to Improve Wheat Biomass Estimations

The assimilation of LAI measurements, repeatedly taken at sub-field level, into dynamic crop simulation models could provide valuable information for precision farming applications. Commonly used updating methods such as the Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) rely on an ensemble of model runs to update a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agronomy (Basel) 2020-03, Vol.10 (3), p.446, Article 446
Hauptverfasser: Tewes, Andreas, Hoffmann, Holger, Krauss, Gunther, Schaefer, Fabian, Kerkhoff, Christian, Gaiser, Thomas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 446
container_title Agronomy (Basel)
container_volume 10
creator Tewes, Andreas
Hoffmann, Holger
Krauss, Gunther
Schaefer, Fabian
Kerkhoff, Christian
Gaiser, Thomas
description The assimilation of LAI measurements, repeatedly taken at sub-field level, into dynamic crop simulation models could provide valuable information for precision farming applications. Commonly used updating methods such as the Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) rely on an ensemble of model runs to update a limited set of state variables every time a new observation becomes available. This threatens the model's integrity, as not the entire table of model states is updated. In this study, we present the Weighted Mean (WM) approach that relies on a model ensemble that runs from simulation start to simulation end without compromising the consistency and integrity of the state variables. We measured LAI on 14 winter wheat fields across France, Germany and the Netherlands and assimilated these observations into the LINTUL5 crop model using the EnKF and WM approaches, where the ensembles were created using one set of crop component (CC) ensemble generation variables and one set of soil and crop component (SCC) ensemble generation variables. The model predictions for total aboveground biomass and grain yield at harvest were evaluated against measurements collected in the fields. Our findings showed that (a) the performance of the WM approach was very similar to the EnKF approach when SCC variables were used for the ensemble generation, but outperformed the EnKF approach when only CC variables were considered, (b) the difference in site-specific performance largely depended on the choice of the set of ensemble generation variables, with SCC outperforming CC with regard to both biomass and grain yield, and (c) both EnKF and WM improved accuracy of biomass and yield estimates over standard model runs or the ensemble mean. We conclude that the WM data assimilation approach is equally efficient to the improvement of model accuracy, compared to the updating methods, but it has the advantage that it does not compromise the integrity and consistency of the state variables.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/agronomy10030446
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000529377300132CitationCount</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_72bf83098588415f96191dafbbc1562b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2384083597</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-bce5b0f2466c48e51e85a7861d7a4858b68f051469c6ad6641a79eaba4e956ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtvGyEURkdRKzVKsu8SKcvKDQzvpTtyW0tOu2nV5QiYS4w1M7iAa-Xfl9hRFHVVNiC451zga5r3BH-kVOM785DiHKdHgjHFjImL5rLFki4Y1fzNq_W75ibnHa5DE6qwvGyO3-CIlvt9isZtISMfEypbQMucwxRGU0KcUfRos1yjezD5kGCCuWQU5hKRQV2Ke3QfBxjRas4w2RFQPVhP1fgH0K8tmII-hTiZnNEqlzCdlPm6eevNmOHmeb5qfn5e_ei-Ljbfv6y75WbhqNRlYR1wi33LhHBMASeguJFKkEEapriyQnnMCRPaCTMIwYiRGow1DDQXxtKrZn32DtHs-n2q_dNjH03oTxsxPfQmleBG6GVrvaJYV61ihHstiCaD8dY6wkX75Lo9u-rbfh8gl34XD2mu1-9bqhhWlGtZq_C5yqWYcwL_0pXg_imt_t-0KqLOyBFs9NkFmB28YDUt3moqJcWY0LYL5fSFXTzMpaIf_h-lfwExU6o0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2384083597</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>New Approaches for the Assimilation of LAI Measurements into a Crop Model Ensemble to Improve Wheat Biomass Estimations</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><creator>Tewes, Andreas ; Hoffmann, Holger ; Krauss, Gunther ; Schaefer, Fabian ; Kerkhoff, Christian ; Gaiser, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Tewes, Andreas ; Hoffmann, Holger ; Krauss, Gunther ; Schaefer, Fabian ; Kerkhoff, Christian ; Gaiser, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>The assimilation of LAI measurements, repeatedly taken at sub-field level, into dynamic crop simulation models could provide valuable information for precision farming applications. Commonly used updating methods such as the Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) rely on an ensemble of model runs to update a limited set of state variables every time a new observation becomes available. This threatens the model's integrity, as not the entire table of model states is updated. In this study, we present the Weighted Mean (WM) approach that relies on a model ensemble that runs from simulation start to simulation end without compromising the consistency and integrity of the state variables. We measured LAI on 14 winter wheat fields across France, Germany and the Netherlands and assimilated these observations into the LINTUL5 crop model using the EnKF and WM approaches, where the ensembles were created using one set of crop component (CC) ensemble generation variables and one set of soil and crop component (SCC) ensemble generation variables. The model predictions for total aboveground biomass and grain yield at harvest were evaluated against measurements collected in the fields. Our findings showed that (a) the performance of the WM approach was very similar to the EnKF approach when SCC variables were used for the ensemble generation, but outperformed the EnKF approach when only CC variables were considered, (b) the difference in site-specific performance largely depended on the choice of the set of ensemble generation variables, with SCC outperforming CC with regard to both biomass and grain yield, and (c) both EnKF and WM improved accuracy of biomass and yield estimates over standard model runs or the ensemble mean. We conclude that the WM data assimilation approach is equally efficient to the improvement of model accuracy, compared to the updating methods, but it has the advantage that it does not compromise the integrity and consistency of the state variables.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4395</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4395</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/agronomy10030446</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BASEL: Mdpi</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Agronomy ; Algorithms ; Biomass ; Computer simulation ; Consistency ; Crop yield ; Crops ; Cultivars ; Data assimilation ; Data collection ; dynamic crop simulation model ; Energy crops ; ensemble generation ; ensemble kalman filter ; Grain ; Integrity ; Kalman filters ; leaf area index ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Methods ; Model accuracy ; Phenology ; Plant Sciences ; Precision farming ; Remote sensing ; Science &amp; Technology ; Simulation ; State variable ; Variables ; weighted mean ; Wheat ; Winter wheat</subject><ispartof>Agronomy (Basel), 2020-03, Vol.10 (3), p.446, Article 446</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>22</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000529377300132</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-bce5b0f2466c48e51e85a7861d7a4858b68f051469c6ad6641a79eaba4e956ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-bce5b0f2466c48e51e85a7861d7a4858b68f051469c6ad6641a79eaba4e956ab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9811-5065 ; 0000-0002-5820-2364 ; 0000-0002-8899-0285</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,865,2103,2115,27929,27930,28253</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tewes, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krauss, Gunther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaefer, Fabian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerkhoff, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaiser, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>New Approaches for the Assimilation of LAI Measurements into a Crop Model Ensemble to Improve Wheat Biomass Estimations</title><title>Agronomy (Basel)</title><addtitle>AGRONOMY-BASEL</addtitle><description>The assimilation of LAI measurements, repeatedly taken at sub-field level, into dynamic crop simulation models could provide valuable information for precision farming applications. Commonly used updating methods such as the Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) rely on an ensemble of model runs to update a limited set of state variables every time a new observation becomes available. This threatens the model's integrity, as not the entire table of model states is updated. In this study, we present the Weighted Mean (WM) approach that relies on a model ensemble that runs from simulation start to simulation end without compromising the consistency and integrity of the state variables. We measured LAI on 14 winter wheat fields across France, Germany and the Netherlands and assimilated these observations into the LINTUL5 crop model using the EnKF and WM approaches, where the ensembles were created using one set of crop component (CC) ensemble generation variables and one set of soil and crop component (SCC) ensemble generation variables. The model predictions for total aboveground biomass and grain yield at harvest were evaluated against measurements collected in the fields. Our findings showed that (a) the performance of the WM approach was very similar to the EnKF approach when SCC variables were used for the ensemble generation, but outperformed the EnKF approach when only CC variables were considered, (b) the difference in site-specific performance largely depended on the choice of the set of ensemble generation variables, with SCC outperforming CC with regard to both biomass and grain yield, and (c) both EnKF and WM improved accuracy of biomass and yield estimates over standard model runs or the ensemble mean. We conclude that the WM data assimilation approach is equally efficient to the improvement of model accuracy, compared to the updating methods, but it has the advantage that it does not compromise the integrity and consistency of the state variables.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agronomy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Consistency</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Data assimilation</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>dynamic crop simulation model</subject><subject>Energy crops</subject><subject>ensemble generation</subject><subject>ensemble kalman filter</subject><subject>Grain</subject><subject>Integrity</subject><subject>Kalman filters</subject><subject>leaf area index</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Phenology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Precision farming</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>State variable</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>weighted mean</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><subject>Winter wheat</subject><issn>2073-4395</issn><issn>2073-4395</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtvGyEURkdRKzVKsu8SKcvKDQzvpTtyW0tOu2nV5QiYS4w1M7iAa-Xfl9hRFHVVNiC451zga5r3BH-kVOM785DiHKdHgjHFjImL5rLFki4Y1fzNq_W75ibnHa5DE6qwvGyO3-CIlvt9isZtISMfEypbQMucwxRGU0KcUfRos1yjezD5kGCCuWQU5hKRQV2Ke3QfBxjRas4w2RFQPVhP1fgH0K8tmII-hTiZnNEqlzCdlPm6eevNmOHmeb5qfn5e_ei-Ljbfv6y75WbhqNRlYR1wi33LhHBMASeguJFKkEEapriyQnnMCRPaCTMIwYiRGow1DDQXxtKrZn32DtHs-n2q_dNjH03oTxsxPfQmleBG6GVrvaJYV61ihHstiCaD8dY6wkX75Lo9u-rbfh8gl34XD2mu1-9bqhhWlGtZq_C5yqWYcwL_0pXg_imt_t-0KqLOyBFs9NkFmB28YDUt3moqJcWY0LYL5fSFXTzMpaIf_h-lfwExU6o0</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Tewes, Andreas</creator><creator>Hoffmann, Holger</creator><creator>Krauss, Gunther</creator><creator>Schaefer, Fabian</creator><creator>Kerkhoff, Christian</creator><creator>Gaiser, Thomas</creator><general>Mdpi</general><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9811-5065</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5820-2364</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8899-0285</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>New Approaches for the Assimilation of LAI Measurements into a Crop Model Ensemble to Improve Wheat Biomass Estimations</title><author>Tewes, Andreas ; Hoffmann, Holger ; Krauss, Gunther ; Schaefer, Fabian ; Kerkhoff, Christian ; Gaiser, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-bce5b0f2466c48e51e85a7861d7a4858b68f051469c6ad6641a79eaba4e956ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agronomy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Consistency</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Data assimilation</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>dynamic crop simulation model</topic><topic>Energy crops</topic><topic>ensemble generation</topic><topic>ensemble kalman filter</topic><topic>Grain</topic><topic>Integrity</topic><topic>Kalman filters</topic><topic>leaf area index</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Phenology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Precision farming</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>State variable</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>weighted mean</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><topic>Winter wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tewes, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krauss, Gunther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaefer, Fabian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerkhoff, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaiser, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Agronomy (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tewes, Andreas</au><au>Hoffmann, Holger</au><au>Krauss, Gunther</au><au>Schaefer, Fabian</au><au>Kerkhoff, Christian</au><au>Gaiser, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New Approaches for the Assimilation of LAI Measurements into a Crop Model Ensemble to Improve Wheat Biomass Estimations</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy (Basel)</jtitle><stitle>AGRONOMY-BASEL</stitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>446</spage><pages>446-</pages><artnum>446</artnum><issn>2073-4395</issn><eissn>2073-4395</eissn><abstract>The assimilation of LAI measurements, repeatedly taken at sub-field level, into dynamic crop simulation models could provide valuable information for precision farming applications. Commonly used updating methods such as the Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) rely on an ensemble of model runs to update a limited set of state variables every time a new observation becomes available. This threatens the model's integrity, as not the entire table of model states is updated. In this study, we present the Weighted Mean (WM) approach that relies on a model ensemble that runs from simulation start to simulation end without compromising the consistency and integrity of the state variables. We measured LAI on 14 winter wheat fields across France, Germany and the Netherlands and assimilated these observations into the LINTUL5 crop model using the EnKF and WM approaches, where the ensembles were created using one set of crop component (CC) ensemble generation variables and one set of soil and crop component (SCC) ensemble generation variables. The model predictions for total aboveground biomass and grain yield at harvest were evaluated against measurements collected in the fields. Our findings showed that (a) the performance of the WM approach was very similar to the EnKF approach when SCC variables were used for the ensemble generation, but outperformed the EnKF approach when only CC variables were considered, (b) the difference in site-specific performance largely depended on the choice of the set of ensemble generation variables, with SCC outperforming CC with regard to both biomass and grain yield, and (c) both EnKF and WM improved accuracy of biomass and yield estimates over standard model runs or the ensemble mean. We conclude that the WM data assimilation approach is equally efficient to the improvement of model accuracy, compared to the updating methods, but it has the advantage that it does not compromise the integrity and consistency of the state variables.</abstract><cop>BASEL</cop><pub>Mdpi</pub><doi>10.3390/agronomy10030446</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9811-5065</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5820-2364</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8899-0285</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2073-4395
ispartof Agronomy (Basel), 2020-03, Vol.10 (3), p.446, Article 446
issn 2073-4395
2073-4395
language eng
recordid cdi_webofscience_primary_000529377300132CitationCount
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />
subjects Agricultural production
Agriculture
Agronomy
Algorithms
Biomass
Computer simulation
Consistency
Crop yield
Crops
Cultivars
Data assimilation
Data collection
dynamic crop simulation model
Energy crops
ensemble generation
ensemble kalman filter
Grain
Integrity
Kalman filters
leaf area index
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Methods
Model accuracy
Phenology
Plant Sciences
Precision farming
Remote sensing
Science & Technology
Simulation
State variable
Variables
weighted mean
Wheat
Winter wheat
title New Approaches for the Assimilation of LAI Measurements into a Crop Model Ensemble to Improve Wheat Biomass Estimations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T18%3A25%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20Approaches%20for%20the%20Assimilation%20of%20LAI%20Measurements%20into%20a%20Crop%20Model%20Ensemble%20to%20Improve%20Wheat%20Biomass%20Estimations&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20(Basel)&rft.au=Tewes,%20Andreas&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=446&rft.pages=446-&rft.artnum=446&rft.issn=2073-4395&rft.eissn=2073-4395&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/agronomy10030446&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2384083597%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2384083597&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_72bf83098588415f96191dafbbc1562b&rfr_iscdi=true