The influence of honor threats on goal delay and goal derailment: A comparison of Turkey, Southern US, and Northern US

Honor means having a good reputation (e.g., being known as an honest person) and self-respect (e.g., being proud of one's own competence). In honor cultures (e.g., Turkey, Southern U.S.), people are more sensitive to threats to their moral reputation (e.g., being called a liar) than in dignity...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental social psychology 2020-05, Vol.88, p.103974, Article 103974
Hauptverfasser: Günsoy, Ceren, Joo, Minjoo, Cross, Susan E., Uskul, Ayse K., Gul, Pelin, Wasti, S. Arzu, Salter, Phia, Haugen, Andrea, Erdaş, K. Duygu, Yegin, Afşar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 103974
container_title Journal of experimental social psychology
container_volume 88
creator Günsoy, Ceren
Joo, Minjoo
Cross, Susan E.
Uskul, Ayse K.
Gul, Pelin
Wasti, S. Arzu
Salter, Phia
Haugen, Andrea
Erdaş, K. Duygu
Yegin, Afşar
description Honor means having a good reputation (e.g., being known as an honest person) and self-respect (e.g., being proud of one's own competence). In honor cultures (e.g., Turkey, Southern U.S.), people are more sensitive to threats to their moral reputation (e.g., being called a liar) than in dignity cultures (e.g., Northern U.S.), and they respond more strongly to these threats to restore their damaged reputation. Taking a goal conflict approach, we propose that among members of honor cultures, restoration of honor in response to a morality threat can become a superordinate goal, and can result in the neglect or derailment of other goals. In two experiments (n = 941), participants from Turkey (a non-Western honor culture), the U.S. South (a Western honor culture), and the U.S. North (a dignity culture) received a morality threat (accusation of dishonesty), a competence threat (accusation of poor writing ability), or neutral feedback. As predicted, participants from honor cultures, but not the dignity culture, were more likely to delay their subsequent goals after receiving a threat to their moral reputation (vs. competence threat or neutral conditions; Study 1). Moreover, Turkish participants were more likely to display goal derailment after receiving a morality threat compared to a competence threat, but there was no difference in responses to the two types of threat among the U.S. Northerners or Southerners (Study 2). This research is the first to examine honor using a goal conflict framework and to conduct laboratory experiments in two honor cultures. •People from honor cultures are sensitive to threats to their moral reputation such as insults.•Protection of honor becomes a superordinate goal in honor cultures after insults.•Members of honor cultures delay and derail from other goals after morality threats.•This effect on goal pursuit is weaker or non-existent in dignity cultures.•Threats less central to honor have weaker effects on goal pursuit in honor cultures.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103974
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jesp_2020_103974</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022103119305359</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0022103119305359</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-d1ec06c2bd0e62f57732fb62232a419694ff71b1e744167efa4461a6d40944b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9OwzAMhyMEEmPwApzyAOtw0ixVEZdp4p80wWHbOUpTh6Z0zZR0k_b2tIxdOVn-2Z9lfYTcM5gyYPKhntYYd1MOfAjSPBMXZMQglwkIObskIwDOk37CrslNjDUA5MDZiBzWFVLX2maPrUHqLa186wPtqoC6i9S39MvrhpbY6CPVbXlug3bNFtvukc6p8dudDi72y_2B9T5843FCV37fVRhaullNfskPH87BLbmyuol491fHZPPyvF68JcvP1_fFfJmYVIguKRkakIYXJaDkdpZlKbeF5DzlWrBc5sLajBUMMyGYzNBqISTTshSQC1GIdEz46a4JPsaAVu2C2-pwVAzUYE7VajCnBnPqZK6Hnk4Q9p8dHAYVjRv0lC6g6VTp3X_4D6L1dwI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The influence of honor threats on goal delay and goal derailment: A comparison of Turkey, Southern US, and Northern US</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Günsoy, Ceren ; Joo, Minjoo ; Cross, Susan E. ; Uskul, Ayse K. ; Gul, Pelin ; Wasti, S. Arzu ; Salter, Phia ; Haugen, Andrea ; Erdaş, K. Duygu ; Yegin, Afşar</creator><creatorcontrib>Günsoy, Ceren ; Joo, Minjoo ; Cross, Susan E. ; Uskul, Ayse K. ; Gul, Pelin ; Wasti, S. Arzu ; Salter, Phia ; Haugen, Andrea ; Erdaş, K. Duygu ; Yegin, Afşar</creatorcontrib><description>Honor means having a good reputation (e.g., being known as an honest person) and self-respect (e.g., being proud of one's own competence). In honor cultures (e.g., Turkey, Southern U.S.), people are more sensitive to threats to their moral reputation (e.g., being called a liar) than in dignity cultures (e.g., Northern U.S.), and they respond more strongly to these threats to restore their damaged reputation. Taking a goal conflict approach, we propose that among members of honor cultures, restoration of honor in response to a morality threat can become a superordinate goal, and can result in the neglect or derailment of other goals. In two experiments (n = 941), participants from Turkey (a non-Western honor culture), the U.S. South (a Western honor culture), and the U.S. North (a dignity culture) received a morality threat (accusation of dishonesty), a competence threat (accusation of poor writing ability), or neutral feedback. As predicted, participants from honor cultures, but not the dignity culture, were more likely to delay their subsequent goals after receiving a threat to their moral reputation (vs. competence threat or neutral conditions; Study 1). Moreover, Turkish participants were more likely to display goal derailment after receiving a morality threat compared to a competence threat, but there was no difference in responses to the two types of threat among the U.S. Northerners or Southerners (Study 2). This research is the first to examine honor using a goal conflict framework and to conduct laboratory experiments in two honor cultures. •People from honor cultures are sensitive to threats to their moral reputation such as insults.•Protection of honor becomes a superordinate goal in honor cultures after insults.•Members of honor cultures delay and derail from other goals after morality threats.•This effect on goal pursuit is weaker or non-existent in dignity cultures.•Threats less central to honor have weaker effects on goal pursuit in honor cultures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1031</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0465</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103974</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Culture of honor ; Goal conflict ; Morality ; Reputation</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental social psychology, 2020-05, Vol.88, p.103974, Article 103974</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-d1ec06c2bd0e62f57732fb62232a419694ff71b1e744167efa4461a6d40944b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-d1ec06c2bd0e62f57732fb62232a419694ff71b1e744167efa4461a6d40944b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103974$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Günsoy, Ceren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joo, Minjoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cross, Susan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uskul, Ayse K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gul, Pelin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasti, S. Arzu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salter, Phia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haugen, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdaş, K. Duygu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yegin, Afşar</creatorcontrib><title>The influence of honor threats on goal delay and goal derailment: A comparison of Turkey, Southern US, and Northern US</title><title>Journal of experimental social psychology</title><description>Honor means having a good reputation (e.g., being known as an honest person) and self-respect (e.g., being proud of one's own competence). In honor cultures (e.g., Turkey, Southern U.S.), people are more sensitive to threats to their moral reputation (e.g., being called a liar) than in dignity cultures (e.g., Northern U.S.), and they respond more strongly to these threats to restore their damaged reputation. Taking a goal conflict approach, we propose that among members of honor cultures, restoration of honor in response to a morality threat can become a superordinate goal, and can result in the neglect or derailment of other goals. In two experiments (n = 941), participants from Turkey (a non-Western honor culture), the U.S. South (a Western honor culture), and the U.S. North (a dignity culture) received a morality threat (accusation of dishonesty), a competence threat (accusation of poor writing ability), or neutral feedback. As predicted, participants from honor cultures, but not the dignity culture, were more likely to delay their subsequent goals after receiving a threat to their moral reputation (vs. competence threat or neutral conditions; Study 1). Moreover, Turkish participants were more likely to display goal derailment after receiving a morality threat compared to a competence threat, but there was no difference in responses to the two types of threat among the U.S. Northerners or Southerners (Study 2). This research is the first to examine honor using a goal conflict framework and to conduct laboratory experiments in two honor cultures. •People from honor cultures are sensitive to threats to their moral reputation such as insults.•Protection of honor becomes a superordinate goal in honor cultures after insults.•Members of honor cultures delay and derail from other goals after morality threats.•This effect on goal pursuit is weaker or non-existent in dignity cultures.•Threats less central to honor have weaker effects on goal pursuit in honor cultures.</description><subject>Culture of honor</subject><subject>Goal conflict</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Reputation</subject><issn>0022-1031</issn><issn>1096-0465</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9OwzAMhyMEEmPwApzyAOtw0ixVEZdp4p80wWHbOUpTh6Z0zZR0k_b2tIxdOVn-2Z9lfYTcM5gyYPKhntYYd1MOfAjSPBMXZMQglwkIObskIwDOk37CrslNjDUA5MDZiBzWFVLX2maPrUHqLa186wPtqoC6i9S39MvrhpbY6CPVbXlug3bNFtvukc6p8dudDi72y_2B9T5843FCV37fVRhaullNfskPH87BLbmyuol491fHZPPyvF68JcvP1_fFfJmYVIguKRkakIYXJaDkdpZlKbeF5DzlWrBc5sLajBUMMyGYzNBqISTTshSQC1GIdEz46a4JPsaAVu2C2-pwVAzUYE7VajCnBnPqZK6Hnk4Q9p8dHAYVjRv0lC6g6VTp3X_4D6L1dwI</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Günsoy, Ceren</creator><creator>Joo, Minjoo</creator><creator>Cross, Susan E.</creator><creator>Uskul, Ayse K.</creator><creator>Gul, Pelin</creator><creator>Wasti, S. Arzu</creator><creator>Salter, Phia</creator><creator>Haugen, Andrea</creator><creator>Erdaş, K. Duygu</creator><creator>Yegin, Afşar</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>The influence of honor threats on goal delay and goal derailment: A comparison of Turkey, Southern US, and Northern US</title><author>Günsoy, Ceren ; Joo, Minjoo ; Cross, Susan E. ; Uskul, Ayse K. ; Gul, Pelin ; Wasti, S. Arzu ; Salter, Phia ; Haugen, Andrea ; Erdaş, K. Duygu ; Yegin, Afşar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-d1ec06c2bd0e62f57732fb62232a419694ff71b1e744167efa4461a6d40944b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Culture of honor</topic><topic>Goal conflict</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Reputation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Günsoy, Ceren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joo, Minjoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cross, Susan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uskul, Ayse K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gul, Pelin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasti, S. Arzu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salter, Phia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haugen, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdaş, K. Duygu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yegin, Afşar</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Günsoy, Ceren</au><au>Joo, Minjoo</au><au>Cross, Susan E.</au><au>Uskul, Ayse K.</au><au>Gul, Pelin</au><au>Wasti, S. Arzu</au><au>Salter, Phia</au><au>Haugen, Andrea</au><au>Erdaş, K. Duygu</au><au>Yegin, Afşar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The influence of honor threats on goal delay and goal derailment: A comparison of Turkey, Southern US, and Northern US</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental social psychology</jtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>88</volume><spage>103974</spage><pages>103974-</pages><artnum>103974</artnum><issn>0022-1031</issn><eissn>1096-0465</eissn><abstract>Honor means having a good reputation (e.g., being known as an honest person) and self-respect (e.g., being proud of one's own competence). In honor cultures (e.g., Turkey, Southern U.S.), people are more sensitive to threats to their moral reputation (e.g., being called a liar) than in dignity cultures (e.g., Northern U.S.), and they respond more strongly to these threats to restore their damaged reputation. Taking a goal conflict approach, we propose that among members of honor cultures, restoration of honor in response to a morality threat can become a superordinate goal, and can result in the neglect or derailment of other goals. In two experiments (n = 941), participants from Turkey (a non-Western honor culture), the U.S. South (a Western honor culture), and the U.S. North (a dignity culture) received a morality threat (accusation of dishonesty), a competence threat (accusation of poor writing ability), or neutral feedback. As predicted, participants from honor cultures, but not the dignity culture, were more likely to delay their subsequent goals after receiving a threat to their moral reputation (vs. competence threat or neutral conditions; Study 1). Moreover, Turkish participants were more likely to display goal derailment after receiving a morality threat compared to a competence threat, but there was no difference in responses to the two types of threat among the U.S. Northerners or Southerners (Study 2). This research is the first to examine honor using a goal conflict framework and to conduct laboratory experiments in two honor cultures. •People from honor cultures are sensitive to threats to their moral reputation such as insults.•Protection of honor becomes a superordinate goal in honor cultures after insults.•Members of honor cultures delay and derail from other goals after morality threats.•This effect on goal pursuit is weaker or non-existent in dignity cultures.•Threats less central to honor have weaker effects on goal pursuit in honor cultures.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103974</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1031
ispartof Journal of experimental social psychology, 2020-05, Vol.88, p.103974, Article 103974
issn 0022-1031
1096-0465
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jesp_2020_103974
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Culture of honor
Goal conflict
Morality
Reputation
title The influence of honor threats on goal delay and goal derailment: A comparison of Turkey, Southern US, and Northern US
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T21%3A52%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20influence%20of%20honor%20threats%20on%20goal%20delay%20and%20goal%20derailment:%20A%20comparison%20of%20Turkey,%20Southern%20US,%20and%20Northern%20US&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20social%20psychology&rft.au=G%C3%BCnsoy,%20Ceren&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=88&rft.spage=103974&rft.pages=103974-&rft.artnum=103974&rft.issn=0022-1031&rft.eissn=1096-0465&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103974&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0022103119305359%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022103119305359&rfr_iscdi=true