Pre‐ and post‐earthquake regional loss assessment using deep learning

Summary As urban systems become more highly sophisticated and interdependent, their vulnerability to earthquake events exhibits a significant level of uncertainties. Thus, community‐level seismic risk assessments are indispensable to facilitate decision making for effective hazard mitigation and dis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics 2020-06, Vol.49 (7), p.657-678
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Taeyong, Song, Junho, Kwon, Oh‐Sung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 678
container_issue 7
container_start_page 657
container_title Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics
container_volume 49
creator Kim, Taeyong
Song, Junho
Kwon, Oh‐Sung
description Summary As urban systems become more highly sophisticated and interdependent, their vulnerability to earthquake events exhibits a significant level of uncertainties. Thus, community‐level seismic risk assessments are indispensable to facilitate decision making for effective hazard mitigation and disaster responses. To this end, new frameworks for pre‐ and post‐earthquake regional loss assessments are proposed using deep learning methods. First, to improve the accuracy of the response prediction of individual structures during the pre‐earthquake loss assessment, a widely used nonlinear static procedure is replaced by the recently developed probabilistic deep neural network model. The variabilities of the nonlinear responses of a structural system given the seismic intensity can be quantified during the loss assessment process. Second, to facilitate near‐real‐time post‐earthquake loss assessments, an adaptive algorithm, which identifies the optimal number and locations of sensors in a given urban area, is proposed. Using a deep neural network that estimates area‐wide structural damage given the spatial distribution of the seismic intensity levels as a surrogate model, the algorithm adaptively places additional sensors at property lots at which errors from surrogate estimations of the structural damage are the greatest. Note that the surrogate model is constructed before earthquake events using simulated datasets. To test and demonstrate the proposed frameworks, the paper introduces thorough numerical investigations of two hypothetical urban communities. The proposed frameworks using the deep learning methods are expected to make critical advances in pre‐ and post‐earthquake regional loss assessments.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/eqe.3258
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000526797500002</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2392020681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3168-c6273fbff104b410aab09c5c190ed1acfc81c2378d5bac556d8871d4c7ca1a663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMFKw0AQhhdRsFbBR1jwIkjq7CbZbI4SqhYKKuh52WwmNTVN0t0E6c1H8Bl9Ere2eBM8zQx8__DzEXLOYMIA-DWucRLyWB6QEYNUBKmM4kMyAkhlIGWUHJMT55YAEApIRmT2aPHr45PqpqBd63q_o7b963rQb0gtLqq20TWtW-eodg6dW2HT08FVzYIWiB2tPd_465Qclbp2eLafY_JyO33O7oP5w90su5kHOmRCBkbwJCzzsmQQ5REDrXNITWxYClgwbUojmeFhIos41yaORSFlworIJEYzLUQ4Jhe7v51t1wO6Xi3bwfqSTvEw5cBBSOapyx1lrK9usVSdrVbabhQDtRWlvCi1FeXRqx36jnlbOlNhY_AX96ZiLpI0if0G3NPy_3RW9br3BrN2aHofDfbRqsbNn4XU9Gn6U-wbUOmMZQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2392020681</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pre‐ and post‐earthquake regional loss assessment using deep learning</title><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Kim, Taeyong ; Song, Junho ; Kwon, Oh‐Sung</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Taeyong ; Song, Junho ; Kwon, Oh‐Sung</creatorcontrib><description>Summary As urban systems become more highly sophisticated and interdependent, their vulnerability to earthquake events exhibits a significant level of uncertainties. Thus, community‐level seismic risk assessments are indispensable to facilitate decision making for effective hazard mitigation and disaster responses. To this end, new frameworks for pre‐ and post‐earthquake regional loss assessments are proposed using deep learning methods. First, to improve the accuracy of the response prediction of individual structures during the pre‐earthquake loss assessment, a widely used nonlinear static procedure is replaced by the recently developed probabilistic deep neural network model. The variabilities of the nonlinear responses of a structural system given the seismic intensity can be quantified during the loss assessment process. Second, to facilitate near‐real‐time post‐earthquake loss assessments, an adaptive algorithm, which identifies the optimal number and locations of sensors in a given urban area, is proposed. Using a deep neural network that estimates area‐wide structural damage given the spatial distribution of the seismic intensity levels as a surrogate model, the algorithm adaptively places additional sensors at property lots at which errors from surrogate estimations of the structural damage are the greatest. Note that the surrogate model is constructed before earthquake events using simulated datasets. To test and demonstrate the proposed frameworks, the paper introduces thorough numerical investigations of two hypothetical urban communities. The proposed frameworks using the deep learning methods are expected to make critical advances in pre‐ and post‐earthquake regional loss assessments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-8847</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9845</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/eqe.3258</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>HOBOKEN: Wiley</publisher><subject>adaptive algorithm ; Adaptive algorithms ; Algorithms ; Artificial neural networks ; Computer simulation ; Decision making ; Deep learning ; Disaster management ; earthquake ; Earthquake damage ; Earthquake prediction ; Earthquakes ; Engineering ; Engineering, Civil ; Engineering, Geological ; Hazard mitigation ; Machine learning ; Mitigation ; Neural networks ; optimal sensor placement ; probabilistic seismic risk assessment ; Regional analysis ; Risk assessment ; Science &amp; Technology ; Seismic activity ; Seismic hazard ; Sensors ; Spatial distribution ; Structural damage ; surrogate model ; Teaching methods ; Technology ; Urban areas ; Vulnerability</subject><ispartof>Earthquake engineering &amp; structural dynamics, 2020-06, Vol.49 (7), p.657-678</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>41</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000526797500002</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3168-c6273fbff104b410aab09c5c190ed1acfc81c2378d5bac556d8871d4c7ca1a663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3168-c6273fbff104b410aab09c5c190ed1acfc81c2378d5bac556d8871d4c7ca1a663</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3292-9194 ; 0000-0003-4205-1829 ; 0000-0001-8464-8231</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Feqe.3258$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Feqe.3258$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,28253,45579,45580</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Taeyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Junho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Oh‐Sung</creatorcontrib><title>Pre‐ and post‐earthquake regional loss assessment using deep learning</title><title>Earthquake engineering &amp; structural dynamics</title><addtitle>EARTHQ ENG STRUCT D</addtitle><description>Summary As urban systems become more highly sophisticated and interdependent, their vulnerability to earthquake events exhibits a significant level of uncertainties. Thus, community‐level seismic risk assessments are indispensable to facilitate decision making for effective hazard mitigation and disaster responses. To this end, new frameworks for pre‐ and post‐earthquake regional loss assessments are proposed using deep learning methods. First, to improve the accuracy of the response prediction of individual structures during the pre‐earthquake loss assessment, a widely used nonlinear static procedure is replaced by the recently developed probabilistic deep neural network model. The variabilities of the nonlinear responses of a structural system given the seismic intensity can be quantified during the loss assessment process. Second, to facilitate near‐real‐time post‐earthquake loss assessments, an adaptive algorithm, which identifies the optimal number and locations of sensors in a given urban area, is proposed. Using a deep neural network that estimates area‐wide structural damage given the spatial distribution of the seismic intensity levels as a surrogate model, the algorithm adaptively places additional sensors at property lots at which errors from surrogate estimations of the structural damage are the greatest. Note that the surrogate model is constructed before earthquake events using simulated datasets. To test and demonstrate the proposed frameworks, the paper introduces thorough numerical investigations of two hypothetical urban communities. The proposed frameworks using the deep learning methods are expected to make critical advances in pre‐ and post‐earthquake regional loss assessments.</description><subject>adaptive algorithm</subject><subject>Adaptive algorithms</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>Disaster management</subject><subject>earthquake</subject><subject>Earthquake damage</subject><subject>Earthquake prediction</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering, Civil</subject><subject>Engineering, Geological</subject><subject>Hazard mitigation</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>optimal sensor placement</subject><subject>probabilistic seismic risk assessment</subject><subject>Regional analysis</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic hazard</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Structural damage</subject><subject>surrogate model</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Vulnerability</subject><issn>0098-8847</issn><issn>1096-9845</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMFKw0AQhhdRsFbBR1jwIkjq7CbZbI4SqhYKKuh52WwmNTVN0t0E6c1H8Bl9Ere2eBM8zQx8__DzEXLOYMIA-DWucRLyWB6QEYNUBKmM4kMyAkhlIGWUHJMT55YAEApIRmT2aPHr45PqpqBd63q_o7b963rQb0gtLqq20TWtW-eodg6dW2HT08FVzYIWiB2tPd_465Qclbp2eLafY_JyO33O7oP5w90su5kHOmRCBkbwJCzzsmQQ5REDrXNITWxYClgwbUojmeFhIos41yaORSFlworIJEYzLUQ4Jhe7v51t1wO6Xi3bwfqSTvEw5cBBSOapyx1lrK9usVSdrVbabhQDtRWlvCi1FeXRqx36jnlbOlNhY_AX96ZiLpI0if0G3NPy_3RW9br3BrN2aHofDfbRqsbNn4XU9Gn6U-wbUOmMZQ</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Kim, Taeyong</creator><creator>Song, Junho</creator><creator>Kwon, Oh‐Sung</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3292-9194</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4205-1829</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8464-8231</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>Pre‐ and post‐earthquake regional loss assessment using deep learning</title><author>Kim, Taeyong ; Song, Junho ; Kwon, Oh‐Sung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3168-c6273fbff104b410aab09c5c190ed1acfc81c2378d5bac556d8871d4c7ca1a663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>adaptive algorithm</topic><topic>Adaptive algorithms</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>Disaster management</topic><topic>earthquake</topic><topic>Earthquake damage</topic><topic>Earthquake prediction</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering, Civil</topic><topic>Engineering, Geological</topic><topic>Hazard mitigation</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>optimal sensor placement</topic><topic>probabilistic seismic risk assessment</topic><topic>Regional analysis</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic hazard</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Structural damage</topic><topic>surrogate model</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Vulnerability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Taeyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Junho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Oh‐Sung</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Earthquake engineering &amp; structural dynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Taeyong</au><au>Song, Junho</au><au>Kwon, Oh‐Sung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pre‐ and post‐earthquake regional loss assessment using deep learning</atitle><jtitle>Earthquake engineering &amp; structural dynamics</jtitle><stitle>EARTHQ ENG STRUCT D</stitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>657</spage><epage>678</epage><pages>657-678</pages><issn>0098-8847</issn><eissn>1096-9845</eissn><abstract>Summary As urban systems become more highly sophisticated and interdependent, their vulnerability to earthquake events exhibits a significant level of uncertainties. Thus, community‐level seismic risk assessments are indispensable to facilitate decision making for effective hazard mitigation and disaster responses. To this end, new frameworks for pre‐ and post‐earthquake regional loss assessments are proposed using deep learning methods. First, to improve the accuracy of the response prediction of individual structures during the pre‐earthquake loss assessment, a widely used nonlinear static procedure is replaced by the recently developed probabilistic deep neural network model. The variabilities of the nonlinear responses of a structural system given the seismic intensity can be quantified during the loss assessment process. Second, to facilitate near‐real‐time post‐earthquake loss assessments, an adaptive algorithm, which identifies the optimal number and locations of sensors in a given urban area, is proposed. Using a deep neural network that estimates area‐wide structural damage given the spatial distribution of the seismic intensity levels as a surrogate model, the algorithm adaptively places additional sensors at property lots at which errors from surrogate estimations of the structural damage are the greatest. Note that the surrogate model is constructed before earthquake events using simulated datasets. To test and demonstrate the proposed frameworks, the paper introduces thorough numerical investigations of two hypothetical urban communities. The proposed frameworks using the deep learning methods are expected to make critical advances in pre‐ and post‐earthquake regional loss assessments.</abstract><cop>HOBOKEN</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/eqe.3258</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3292-9194</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4205-1829</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8464-8231</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0098-8847
ispartof Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 2020-06, Vol.49 (7), p.657-678
issn 0098-8847
1096-9845
language eng
recordid cdi_webofscience_primary_000526797500002
source Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects adaptive algorithm
Adaptive algorithms
Algorithms
Artificial neural networks
Computer simulation
Decision making
Deep learning
Disaster management
earthquake
Earthquake damage
Earthquake prediction
Earthquakes
Engineering
Engineering, Civil
Engineering, Geological
Hazard mitigation
Machine learning
Mitigation
Neural networks
optimal sensor placement
probabilistic seismic risk assessment
Regional analysis
Risk assessment
Science & Technology
Seismic activity
Seismic hazard
Sensors
Spatial distribution
Structural damage
surrogate model
Teaching methods
Technology
Urban areas
Vulnerability
title Pre‐ and post‐earthquake regional loss assessment using deep learning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T12%3A22%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pre%E2%80%90%20and%20post%E2%80%90earthquake%20regional%20loss%20assessment%20using%20deep%20learning&rft.jtitle=Earthquake%20engineering%20&%20structural%20dynamics&rft.au=Kim,%20Taeyong&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=657&rft.epage=678&rft.pages=657-678&rft.issn=0098-8847&rft.eissn=1096-9845&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/eqe.3258&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2392020681%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2392020681&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true