Survey on Wireless Technology Trade-Offs for the Industrial Internet of Things
Aside from vast deployment cost reduction, Industrial Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks (IWSAN) introduce a new level of industrial connectivity. Wireless connection of sensors and actuators in industrial environments not only enables wireless monitoring and actuation, it also enables coordinati...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2020-01, Vol.20 (2), p.488, Article 488 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 488 |
| container_title | Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) |
| container_volume | 20 |
| creator | Seferagic, Amina Famaey, Jeroen De Poorter, Eli Hoebeke, Jeroen |
| description | Aside from vast deployment cost reduction, Industrial Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks (IWSAN) introduce a new level of industrial connectivity. Wireless connection of sensors and actuators in industrial environments not only enables wireless monitoring and actuation, it also enables coordination of production stages, connecting mobile robots and autonomous transport vehicles, as well as localization and tracking of assets. All these opportunities already inspired the development of many wireless technologies in an effort to fully enable Industry 4.0. However, different technologies significantly differ in performance and capabilities, none being capable of supporting all industrial use cases. When designing a network solution, one must be aware of the capabilities and the trade-offs that prospective technologies have. This paper evaluates the technologies potentially suitable for IWSAN solutions covering an entire industrial site with limited infrastructure cost and discusses their trade-offs in an effort to provide information for choosing the most suitable technology for the use case of interest. The comparative discussion presented in this paper aims to enable engineers to choose the most suitable wireless technology for their specific IWSAN deployment. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/s20020488 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000517790100162CitationCount</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4f2f192137754ec4aca81f65f7b05382</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2550297426</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-f69f6bbc05c9d98743db0449431481ae91301985f294a0e112511c46431a64fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhhtR3HX14B-QBi-KtKby0d25CDL4MbC4B0c8hnS6MpOhJ1mT9Mr8ezPOOux68pQi9dRDUW9VPQfyljFJ3iVKCCW87x9U58Apb3pKycM79Vn1JKVtgRhj_ePqjIEUlAI_r75-m-MN7uvg6x8u4oQp1Ss0Gx-msN7Xq6hHbK6sTbUNsc4brJd-nFOOTk-lzBg95jrYerVxfp2eVo-snhI-u30vqu-fPq4WX5rLq8_LxYfLxvBW5sa20rbDYIgwcpR9x9k4EM4lZ8B70CiBEZC9sFRyTRCACoAyWvq65Vazi2p59I5Bb9V1dDsd9ypop_58hLhWOmZnJlTcUguSAus6wdFwbXQPthW2G4hgPS2u90fX9TzscDToc9TTPen9jncbtQ43qiPA2q4tgle3ghh-zpiy2rlkcJq0xzAnRRmHFgRnB_TlP-g2zNGXUykqBKGy4_RAvT5SJoaUItrTMkDUIXF1SrywL-5ufyL_RlyA_gj8wiHYZBx6gyeMECKg6yQBQqClC5d1dsEvwuxzGX3z_6PsN7BbxDQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2550297426</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Survey on Wireless Technology Trade-Offs for the Industrial Internet of Things</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Seferagic, Amina ; Famaey, Jeroen ; De Poorter, Eli ; Hoebeke, Jeroen</creator><creatorcontrib>Seferagic, Amina ; Famaey, Jeroen ; De Poorter, Eli ; Hoebeke, Jeroen</creatorcontrib><description>Aside from vast deployment cost reduction, Industrial Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks (IWSAN) introduce a new level of industrial connectivity. Wireless connection of sensors and actuators in industrial environments not only enables wireless monitoring and actuation, it also enables coordination of production stages, connecting mobile robots and autonomous transport vehicles, as well as localization and tracking of assets. All these opportunities already inspired the development of many wireless technologies in an effort to fully enable Industry 4.0. However, different technologies significantly differ in performance and capabilities, none being capable of supporting all industrial use cases. When designing a network solution, one must be aware of the capabilities and the trade-offs that prospective technologies have. This paper evaluates the technologies potentially suitable for IWSAN solutions covering an entire industrial site with limited infrastructure cost and discusses their trade-offs in an effort to provide information for choosing the most suitable technology for the use case of interest. The comparative discussion presented in this paper aims to enable engineers to choose the most suitable wireless technology for their specific IWSAN deployment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1424-8220</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1424-8220</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/s20020488</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31952214</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BASEL: Mdpi</publisher><subject>Actuators ; Automation ; ble long range ; bluetooth low energy (ble) ; Business metrics ; Chemistry ; Chemistry, Analytical ; Communication ; Energy consumption ; Engineering ; Engineering, Electrical & Electronic ; ieee 802.11ah ; Industrial applications ; Industrial Internet of Things ; industrial internet of things (iiot) ; Infrastructure ; Instruments & Instrumentation ; Internet of Things ; isa100.11a ; lora ; narrowband iot (nb-iot) ; Physical Sciences ; Review ; Science & Technology ; Sensors ; Technology ; time slotted channel hopping (tsch) ; Tradeoffs ; Transport vehicles ; wifi halow ; Wireless networks ; wirelesshart</subject><ispartof>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020-01, Vol.20 (2), p.488, Article 488</ispartof><rights>2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 by the authors. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>67</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000517790100162</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-f69f6bbc05c9d98743db0449431481ae91301985f294a0e112511c46431a64fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-f69f6bbc05c9d98743db0449431481ae91301985f294a0e112511c46431a64fa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2039-007X ; 0000-0003-1567-3403 ; 0000-0002-3587-1354 ; 0000-0002-0214-5751</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7013676/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7013676/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,2103,2115,27929,27930,28253,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31952214$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seferagic, Amina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Famaey, Jeroen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Poorter, Eli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoebeke, Jeroen</creatorcontrib><title>Survey on Wireless Technology Trade-Offs for the Industrial Internet of Things</title><title>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)</title><addtitle>SENSORS-BASEL</addtitle><addtitle>Sensors (Basel)</addtitle><description>Aside from vast deployment cost reduction, Industrial Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks (IWSAN) introduce a new level of industrial connectivity. Wireless connection of sensors and actuators in industrial environments not only enables wireless monitoring and actuation, it also enables coordination of production stages, connecting mobile robots and autonomous transport vehicles, as well as localization and tracking of assets. All these opportunities already inspired the development of many wireless technologies in an effort to fully enable Industry 4.0. However, different technologies significantly differ in performance and capabilities, none being capable of supporting all industrial use cases. When designing a network solution, one must be aware of the capabilities and the trade-offs that prospective technologies have. This paper evaluates the technologies potentially suitable for IWSAN solutions covering an entire industrial site with limited infrastructure cost and discusses their trade-offs in an effort to provide information for choosing the most suitable technology for the use case of interest. The comparative discussion presented in this paper aims to enable engineers to choose the most suitable wireless technology for their specific IWSAN deployment.</description><subject>Actuators</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>ble long range</subject><subject>bluetooth low energy (ble)</subject><subject>Business metrics</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry, Analytical</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering, Electrical & Electronic</subject><subject>ieee 802.11ah</subject><subject>Industrial applications</subject><subject>Industrial Internet of Things</subject><subject>industrial internet of things (iiot)</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Instruments & Instrumentation</subject><subject>Internet of Things</subject><subject>isa100.11a</subject><subject>lora</subject><subject>narrowband iot (nb-iot)</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>time slotted channel hopping (tsch)</subject><subject>Tradeoffs</subject><subject>Transport vehicles</subject><subject>wifi halow</subject><subject>Wireless networks</subject><subject>wirelesshart</subject><issn>1424-8220</issn><issn>1424-8220</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhhtR3HX14B-QBi-KtKby0d25CDL4MbC4B0c8hnS6MpOhJ1mT9Mr8ezPOOux68pQi9dRDUW9VPQfyljFJ3iVKCCW87x9U58Apb3pKycM79Vn1JKVtgRhj_ePqjIEUlAI_r75-m-MN7uvg6x8u4oQp1Ss0Gx-msN7Xq6hHbK6sTbUNsc4brJd-nFOOTk-lzBg95jrYerVxfp2eVo-snhI-u30vqu-fPq4WX5rLq8_LxYfLxvBW5sa20rbDYIgwcpR9x9k4EM4lZ8B70CiBEZC9sFRyTRCACoAyWvq65Vazi2p59I5Bb9V1dDsd9ypop_58hLhWOmZnJlTcUguSAus6wdFwbXQPthW2G4hgPS2u90fX9TzscDToc9TTPen9jncbtQ43qiPA2q4tgle3ghh-zpiy2rlkcJq0xzAnRRmHFgRnB_TlP-g2zNGXUykqBKGy4_RAvT5SJoaUItrTMkDUIXF1SrywL-5ufyL_RlyA_gj8wiHYZBx6gyeMECKg6yQBQqClC5d1dsEvwuxzGX3z_6PsN7BbxDQ</recordid><startdate>20200115</startdate><enddate>20200115</enddate><creator>Seferagic, Amina</creator><creator>Famaey, Jeroen</creator><creator>De Poorter, Eli</creator><creator>Hoebeke, Jeroen</creator><general>Mdpi</general><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2039-007X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1567-3403</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3587-1354</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0214-5751</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200115</creationdate><title>Survey on Wireless Technology Trade-Offs for the Industrial Internet of Things</title><author>Seferagic, Amina ; Famaey, Jeroen ; De Poorter, Eli ; Hoebeke, Jeroen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-f69f6bbc05c9d98743db0449431481ae91301985f294a0e112511c46431a64fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Actuators</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>ble long range</topic><topic>bluetooth low energy (ble)</topic><topic>Business metrics</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry, Analytical</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering, Electrical & Electronic</topic><topic>ieee 802.11ah</topic><topic>Industrial applications</topic><topic>Industrial Internet of Things</topic><topic>industrial internet of things (iiot)</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Instruments & Instrumentation</topic><topic>Internet of Things</topic><topic>isa100.11a</topic><topic>lora</topic><topic>narrowband iot (nb-iot)</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>time slotted channel hopping (tsch)</topic><topic>Tradeoffs</topic><topic>Transport vehicles</topic><topic>wifi halow</topic><topic>Wireless networks</topic><topic>wirelesshart</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seferagic, Amina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Famaey, Jeroen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Poorter, Eli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoebeke, Jeroen</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seferagic, Amina</au><au>Famaey, Jeroen</au><au>De Poorter, Eli</au><au>Hoebeke, Jeroen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Survey on Wireless Technology Trade-Offs for the Industrial Internet of Things</atitle><jtitle>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle><stitle>SENSORS-BASEL</stitle><addtitle>Sensors (Basel)</addtitle><date>2020-01-15</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>488</spage><pages>488-</pages><artnum>488</artnum><issn>1424-8220</issn><eissn>1424-8220</eissn><abstract>Aside from vast deployment cost reduction, Industrial Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks (IWSAN) introduce a new level of industrial connectivity. Wireless connection of sensors and actuators in industrial environments not only enables wireless monitoring and actuation, it also enables coordination of production stages, connecting mobile robots and autonomous transport vehicles, as well as localization and tracking of assets. All these opportunities already inspired the development of many wireless technologies in an effort to fully enable Industry 4.0. However, different technologies significantly differ in performance and capabilities, none being capable of supporting all industrial use cases. When designing a network solution, one must be aware of the capabilities and the trade-offs that prospective technologies have. This paper evaluates the technologies potentially suitable for IWSAN solutions covering an entire industrial site with limited infrastructure cost and discusses their trade-offs in an effort to provide information for choosing the most suitable technology for the use case of interest. The comparative discussion presented in this paper aims to enable engineers to choose the most suitable wireless technology for their specific IWSAN deployment.</abstract><cop>BASEL</cop><pub>Mdpi</pub><pmid>31952214</pmid><doi>10.3390/s20020488</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2039-007X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1567-3403</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3587-1354</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0214-5751</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1424-8220 |
| ispartof | Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020-01, Vol.20 (2), p.488, Article 488 |
| issn | 1424-8220 1424-8220 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_webofscience_primary_000517790100162CitationCount |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
| subjects | Actuators Automation ble long range bluetooth low energy (ble) Business metrics Chemistry Chemistry, Analytical Communication Energy consumption Engineering Engineering, Electrical & Electronic ieee 802.11ah Industrial applications Industrial Internet of Things industrial internet of things (iiot) Infrastructure Instruments & Instrumentation Internet of Things isa100.11a lora narrowband iot (nb-iot) Physical Sciences Review Science & Technology Sensors Technology time slotted channel hopping (tsch) Tradeoffs Transport vehicles wifi halow Wireless networks wirelesshart |
| title | Survey on Wireless Technology Trade-Offs for the Industrial Internet of Things |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T20%3A08%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survey%20on%20Wireless%20Technology%20Trade-Offs%20for%20the%20Industrial%20Internet%20of%20Things&rft.jtitle=Sensors%20(Basel,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=Seferagic,%20Amina&rft.date=2020-01-15&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=488&rft.pages=488-&rft.artnum=488&rft.issn=1424-8220&rft.eissn=1424-8220&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/s20020488&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2550297426%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2550297426&rft_id=info:pmid/31952214&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_4f2f192137754ec4aca81f65f7b05382&rfr_iscdi=true |