It's the fiber, not the fat: significant effects of dietary challenge on the gut microbiome
Background Dietary effects on the gut microbiome play key roles in the pathophysiology of inflammatory disorders, metabolic syndrome, obesity, and behavioral dysregulation. Often overlooked in such studies is the consideration that experimental diets vary significantly in the proportion and source o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Microbiome 2020-02, Vol.8 (1), p.15-11, Article 15 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 11 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 15 |
container_title | Microbiome |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Morrison, Kathleen E. Jasarevic, Eldin Howard, Christopher D. Bale, Tracy L. |
description | Background Dietary effects on the gut microbiome play key roles in the pathophysiology of inflammatory disorders, metabolic syndrome, obesity, and behavioral dysregulation. Often overlooked in such studies is the consideration that experimental diets vary significantly in the proportion and source of their dietary fiber. Commonly, treatment comparisons are made between animals fed a purchased refined diet that lacks soluble fiber and animals fed a standard vivarium-provided chow diet that contains a rich source of soluble fiber. Despite the well-established critical role of soluble fiber as the source of short chain fatty acid production via the gut microbiome, the extent to which measured outcomes are driven by differences in dietary fiber is unclear. Further, the interaction between sex and age in response to dietary transition is likely important and should also be considered. Results We compared the impact of transitioning young adult and 1-year aged male and female mice from their standard chow diet to a refined low soluble fiber diet on gut microbiota community composition. Then, to determine the contribution of dietary fat, we also examined the impact of transitioning a subset of animals from refined low-fat to refined high-fat diet. We used a serial sampling strategy coupled with 16S rRNA marker gene sequencing to examine consequences of recurrent dietary switching on gut microbiota community dynamics. Analysis revealed that the transition from a chow diet to a refined diet that lacks soluble fiber accounted for most of the variance in community structure, diversity, and composition across all groups. This dietary transition was characterized by a loss of taxa within the phylum Bacteroidetes and expansion of Clostridia and Proteobacteria in a sex- and age-specific manner. Most notably, no changes to gut microbiota community structure and composition were observed between mice consuming either refined low- or high-fat diet, suggesting that transition to the refined diet that lacks soluble fiber is the primary driver of gut microbiota alterations, with limited additional impact of dietary fat on gut microbiota. Conclusion Collectively, our results show that the choice of control diet has a significant impact on outcomes and interpretation related to diet effects on gut microbiota. As the reduction of soluble fiber may influence synthesis of microbial metabolites that are important for regulating metabolic, immune, behavioral, and neurobiological outc |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s40168-020-0791-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000514586000001CitationCount</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b69230c3241348d884de607da22ddeee</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2357215797</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-d04b3e6b60d894847d1e96331ca10c2556cb8d3549bfd55e67b8f6683f08a0593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkktv1DAUhSMEolXpD2CDIrEACQJ-x-kCqRrxGKkSG1ixsBz7OuNRxi6xA-q_x2nKqGWFN37c7xzZ16eqnmP0DmMp3ieGsJANIqhBbYcb8ag6JYh1DRFYPr63PqnOU9qjMjrMWiafVie0FEUr-Wn1Y5tfpTrvoHa-h-ltHWJetzpf1MkPwTtvdMg1OAcmpzq62nrIerqpzU6PI4QB6hhuRcOc64M3U-x9PMCz6onTY4Lzu_ms-v7p47fNl-bq6-ft5vKqMayjubGI9RREL5CVHZOstRg6QSk2GiNDOBeml5Zy1vXOcg6i7aUTQlKHpEa8o2fVdvW1Ue_V9eQP5XIqaq9uD-I0KD1lb0ZQvegIRYYShimTVkpmQaDWakKsBYDi9WH1up77A1gDIU96fGD6sBL8Tg3xl2oRZoKgYvD6zmCKP2dIWR18MjCOOkCckyLlIVhwzNuCvvwH3cd5CqVVC9WSwnQLhVeqtDWlCdzxMhipJQlqTYIqSVBLEpQomhf3X3FU_P33AsgV-A19dMl4CAaOWIkKx4xLsYQG4Y3POvsYNnEOuUjf_L-U_gGQL82_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2357215797</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>It's the fiber, not the fat: significant effects of dietary challenge on the gut microbiome</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</source><creator>Morrison, Kathleen E. ; Jasarevic, Eldin ; Howard, Christopher D. ; Bale, Tracy L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Morrison, Kathleen E. ; Jasarevic, Eldin ; Howard, Christopher D. ; Bale, Tracy L.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Dietary effects on the gut microbiome play key roles in the pathophysiology of inflammatory disorders, metabolic syndrome, obesity, and behavioral dysregulation. Often overlooked in such studies is the consideration that experimental diets vary significantly in the proportion and source of their dietary fiber. Commonly, treatment comparisons are made between animals fed a purchased refined diet that lacks soluble fiber and animals fed a standard vivarium-provided chow diet that contains a rich source of soluble fiber. Despite the well-established critical role of soluble fiber as the source of short chain fatty acid production via the gut microbiome, the extent to which measured outcomes are driven by differences in dietary fiber is unclear. Further, the interaction between sex and age in response to dietary transition is likely important and should also be considered. Results We compared the impact of transitioning young adult and 1-year aged male and female mice from their standard chow diet to a refined low soluble fiber diet on gut microbiota community composition. Then, to determine the contribution of dietary fat, we also examined the impact of transitioning a subset of animals from refined low-fat to refined high-fat diet. We used a serial sampling strategy coupled with 16S rRNA marker gene sequencing to examine consequences of recurrent dietary switching on gut microbiota community dynamics. Analysis revealed that the transition from a chow diet to a refined diet that lacks soluble fiber accounted for most of the variance in community structure, diversity, and composition across all groups. This dietary transition was characterized by a loss of taxa within the phylum Bacteroidetes and expansion of Clostridia and Proteobacteria in a sex- and age-specific manner. Most notably, no changes to gut microbiota community structure and composition were observed between mice consuming either refined low- or high-fat diet, suggesting that transition to the refined diet that lacks soluble fiber is the primary driver of gut microbiota alterations, with limited additional impact of dietary fat on gut microbiota. Conclusion Collectively, our results show that the choice of control diet has a significant impact on outcomes and interpretation related to diet effects on gut microbiota. As the reduction of soluble fiber may influence synthesis of microbial metabolites that are important for regulating metabolic, immune, behavioral, and neurobiological outcomes, additional studies are now needed to fully delineate the contribution of fat and fiber on the gut microbiome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2049-2618</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-2618</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s40168-020-0791-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32046785</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>LONDON: Springer Nature</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Acid production ; Age ; Age Factors ; Aging ; Animals ; Bacteria - classification ; Bacteria - isolation & purification ; Bacteria - metabolism ; Bacteroidetes - classification ; Cellulose ; Community composition ; Community structure ; Diet ; Diet, High-Fat ; Dietary Fats - administration & dosage ; Dietary fiber ; Dietary Fiber - administration & dosage ; Digestive system ; Feces ; Female ; Females ; Firmicutes - classification ; Gastrointestinal Microbiome ; Gender differences ; High fat diet ; Hypotheses ; Inflammatory diseases ; Ingredients ; Intestinal microflora ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Low fat diet ; Male ; Males ; Metabolic syndrome ; Metabolism ; Metabolites ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred C57BL ; Microbiology ; Microbiome ; Microbiomes ; Microbiota ; Nutrient deficiency ; Obesity ; Oils & fats ; Proteobacteria - classification ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics ; rRNA 16S ; Science & Technology ; Sex differences ; Sex Factors ; Short Report ; Transitions ; Young adults]]></subject><ispartof>Microbiome, 2020-02, Vol.8 (1), p.15-11, Article 15</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s). 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>76</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000514586000001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-d04b3e6b60d894847d1e96331ca10c2556cb8d3549bfd55e67b8f6683f08a0593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-d04b3e6b60d894847d1e96331ca10c2556cb8d3549bfd55e67b8f6683f08a0593</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5555-1382 ; 0000-0002-3665-4757 ; 0000-0001-8174-0710</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7014620/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7014620/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,2103,2115,27929,27930,28253,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32046785$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morrison, Kathleen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jasarevic, Eldin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, Christopher D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bale, Tracy L.</creatorcontrib><title>It's the fiber, not the fat: significant effects of dietary challenge on the gut microbiome</title><title>Microbiome</title><addtitle>MICROBIOME</addtitle><addtitle>Microbiome</addtitle><description>Background Dietary effects on the gut microbiome play key roles in the pathophysiology of inflammatory disorders, metabolic syndrome, obesity, and behavioral dysregulation. Often overlooked in such studies is the consideration that experimental diets vary significantly in the proportion and source of their dietary fiber. Commonly, treatment comparisons are made between animals fed a purchased refined diet that lacks soluble fiber and animals fed a standard vivarium-provided chow diet that contains a rich source of soluble fiber. Despite the well-established critical role of soluble fiber as the source of short chain fatty acid production via the gut microbiome, the extent to which measured outcomes are driven by differences in dietary fiber is unclear. Further, the interaction between sex and age in response to dietary transition is likely important and should also be considered. Results We compared the impact of transitioning young adult and 1-year aged male and female mice from their standard chow diet to a refined low soluble fiber diet on gut microbiota community composition. Then, to determine the contribution of dietary fat, we also examined the impact of transitioning a subset of animals from refined low-fat to refined high-fat diet. We used a serial sampling strategy coupled with 16S rRNA marker gene sequencing to examine consequences of recurrent dietary switching on gut microbiota community dynamics. Analysis revealed that the transition from a chow diet to a refined diet that lacks soluble fiber accounted for most of the variance in community structure, diversity, and composition across all groups. This dietary transition was characterized by a loss of taxa within the phylum Bacteroidetes and expansion of Clostridia and Proteobacteria in a sex- and age-specific manner. Most notably, no changes to gut microbiota community structure and composition were observed between mice consuming either refined low- or high-fat diet, suggesting that transition to the refined diet that lacks soluble fiber is the primary driver of gut microbiota alterations, with limited additional impact of dietary fat on gut microbiota. Conclusion Collectively, our results show that the choice of control diet has a significant impact on outcomes and interpretation related to diet effects on gut microbiota. As the reduction of soluble fiber may influence synthesis of microbial metabolites that are important for regulating metabolic, immune, behavioral, and neurobiological outcomes, additional studies are now needed to fully delineate the contribution of fat and fiber on the gut microbiome.</description><subject>Acid production</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacteria - classification</subject><subject>Bacteria - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Bacteria - metabolism</subject><subject>Bacteroidetes - classification</subject><subject>Cellulose</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diet, High-Fat</subject><subject>Dietary Fats - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Dietary fiber</subject><subject>Dietary Fiber - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Digestive system</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Firmicutes - classification</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Microbiome</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>High fat diet</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Inflammatory diseases</subject><subject>Ingredients</subject><subject>Intestinal microflora</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Low fat diet</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Metabolic syndrome</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Metabolites</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred C57BL</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Microbiome</subject><subject>Microbiomes</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Nutrient deficiency</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Oils & fats</subject><subject>Proteobacteria - classification</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</subject><subject>rRNA 16S</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Short Report</subject><subject>Transitions</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>2049-2618</issn><issn>2049-2618</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkktv1DAUhSMEolXpD2CDIrEACQJ-x-kCqRrxGKkSG1ixsBz7OuNRxi6xA-q_x2nKqGWFN37c7xzZ16eqnmP0DmMp3ieGsJANIqhBbYcb8ag6JYh1DRFYPr63PqnOU9qjMjrMWiafVie0FEUr-Wn1Y5tfpTrvoHa-h-ltHWJetzpf1MkPwTtvdMg1OAcmpzq62nrIerqpzU6PI4QB6hhuRcOc64M3U-x9PMCz6onTY4Lzu_ms-v7p47fNl-bq6-ft5vKqMayjubGI9RREL5CVHZOstRg6QSk2GiNDOBeml5Zy1vXOcg6i7aUTQlKHpEa8o2fVdvW1Ue_V9eQP5XIqaq9uD-I0KD1lb0ZQvegIRYYShimTVkpmQaDWakKsBYDi9WH1up77A1gDIU96fGD6sBL8Tg3xl2oRZoKgYvD6zmCKP2dIWR18MjCOOkCckyLlIVhwzNuCvvwH3cd5CqVVC9WSwnQLhVeqtDWlCdzxMhipJQlqTYIqSVBLEpQomhf3X3FU_P33AsgV-A19dMl4CAaOWIkKx4xLsYQG4Y3POvsYNnEOuUjf_L-U_gGQL82_</recordid><startdate>20200211</startdate><enddate>20200211</enddate><creator>Morrison, Kathleen E.</creator><creator>Jasarevic, Eldin</creator><creator>Howard, Christopher D.</creator><creator>Bale, Tracy L.</creator><general>Springer Nature</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5555-1382</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3665-4757</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8174-0710</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200211</creationdate><title>It's the fiber, not the fat: significant effects of dietary challenge on the gut microbiome</title><author>Morrison, Kathleen E. ; Jasarevic, Eldin ; Howard, Christopher D. ; Bale, Tracy L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-d04b3e6b60d894847d1e96331ca10c2556cb8d3549bfd55e67b8f6683f08a0593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acid production</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacteria - classification</topic><topic>Bacteria - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Bacteria - metabolism</topic><topic>Bacteroidetes - classification</topic><topic>Cellulose</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diet, High-Fat</topic><topic>Dietary Fats - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Dietary fiber</topic><topic>Dietary Fiber - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Digestive system</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Firmicutes - classification</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Microbiome</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>High fat diet</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Inflammatory diseases</topic><topic>Ingredients</topic><topic>Intestinal microflora</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Low fat diet</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Metabolic syndrome</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Metabolites</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred C57BL</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Microbiome</topic><topic>Microbiomes</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Nutrient deficiency</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Oils & fats</topic><topic>Proteobacteria - classification</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</topic><topic>rRNA 16S</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Short Report</topic><topic>Transitions</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morrison, Kathleen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jasarevic, Eldin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, Christopher D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bale, Tracy L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Microbiome</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morrison, Kathleen E.</au><au>Jasarevic, Eldin</au><au>Howard, Christopher D.</au><au>Bale, Tracy L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>It's the fiber, not the fat: significant effects of dietary challenge on the gut microbiome</atitle><jtitle>Microbiome</jtitle><stitle>MICROBIOME</stitle><addtitle>Microbiome</addtitle><date>2020-02-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>15-11</pages><artnum>15</artnum><issn>2049-2618</issn><eissn>2049-2618</eissn><abstract>Background Dietary effects on the gut microbiome play key roles in the pathophysiology of inflammatory disorders, metabolic syndrome, obesity, and behavioral dysregulation. Often overlooked in such studies is the consideration that experimental diets vary significantly in the proportion and source of their dietary fiber. Commonly, treatment comparisons are made between animals fed a purchased refined diet that lacks soluble fiber and animals fed a standard vivarium-provided chow diet that contains a rich source of soluble fiber. Despite the well-established critical role of soluble fiber as the source of short chain fatty acid production via the gut microbiome, the extent to which measured outcomes are driven by differences in dietary fiber is unclear. Further, the interaction between sex and age in response to dietary transition is likely important and should also be considered. Results We compared the impact of transitioning young adult and 1-year aged male and female mice from their standard chow diet to a refined low soluble fiber diet on gut microbiota community composition. Then, to determine the contribution of dietary fat, we also examined the impact of transitioning a subset of animals from refined low-fat to refined high-fat diet. We used a serial sampling strategy coupled with 16S rRNA marker gene sequencing to examine consequences of recurrent dietary switching on gut microbiota community dynamics. Analysis revealed that the transition from a chow diet to a refined diet that lacks soluble fiber accounted for most of the variance in community structure, diversity, and composition across all groups. This dietary transition was characterized by a loss of taxa within the phylum Bacteroidetes and expansion of Clostridia and Proteobacteria in a sex- and age-specific manner. Most notably, no changes to gut microbiota community structure and composition were observed between mice consuming either refined low- or high-fat diet, suggesting that transition to the refined diet that lacks soluble fiber is the primary driver of gut microbiota alterations, with limited additional impact of dietary fat on gut microbiota. Conclusion Collectively, our results show that the choice of control diet has a significant impact on outcomes and interpretation related to diet effects on gut microbiota. As the reduction of soluble fiber may influence synthesis of microbial metabolites that are important for regulating metabolic, immune, behavioral, and neurobiological outcomes, additional studies are now needed to fully delineate the contribution of fat and fiber on the gut microbiome.</abstract><cop>LONDON</cop><pub>Springer Nature</pub><pmid>32046785</pmid><doi>10.1186/s40168-020-0791-6</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5555-1382</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3665-4757</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8174-0710</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2049-2618 |
ispartof | Microbiome, 2020-02, Vol.8 (1), p.15-11, Article 15 |
issn | 2049-2618 2049-2618 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_webofscience_primary_000514586000001CitationCount |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; SpringerNature Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Springer Nature OA/Free Journals |
subjects | Acid production Age Age Factors Aging Animals Bacteria - classification Bacteria - isolation & purification Bacteria - metabolism Bacteroidetes - classification Cellulose Community composition Community structure Diet Diet, High-Fat Dietary Fats - administration & dosage Dietary fiber Dietary Fiber - administration & dosage Digestive system Feces Female Females Firmicutes - classification Gastrointestinal Microbiome Gender differences High fat diet Hypotheses Inflammatory diseases Ingredients Intestinal microflora Life Sciences & Biomedicine Low fat diet Male Males Metabolic syndrome Metabolism Metabolites Mice Mice, Inbred C57BL Microbiology Microbiome Microbiomes Microbiota Nutrient deficiency Obesity Oils & fats Proteobacteria - classification RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics rRNA 16S Science & Technology Sex differences Sex Factors Short Report Transitions Young adults |
title | It's the fiber, not the fat: significant effects of dietary challenge on the gut microbiome |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T00%3A32%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=It's%20the%20fiber,%20not%20the%20fat:%20significant%20effects%20of%20dietary%20challenge%20on%20the%20gut%20microbiome&rft.jtitle=Microbiome&rft.au=Morrison,%20Kathleen%20E.&rft.date=2020-02-11&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=15-11&rft.artnum=15&rft.issn=2049-2618&rft.eissn=2049-2618&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s40168-020-0791-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2357215797%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2357215797&rft_id=info:pmid/32046785&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_b69230c3241348d884de607da22ddeee&rfr_iscdi=true |