Do morphological adaptations for gliding in frogs influence clinging and jumping?

The ability to glide has evolved in multiple taxa and is usually associated with highly specialized morphological adaptations. Traits that evolve for one reason, can, however, influence other traits and abilities. In this study, we examined the influence of adaptations for gliding on the jumping and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of zoology (1987) 2020-01, Vol.310 (1), p.55-63
Hauptverfasser: McKnight, D. T., Nordine, J., Jerrett, B., Murray, M., Murray, P., Moss, R., Northey, M., Simard, N., Alford, R. A., Schwarzkopf, L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 63
container_issue 1
container_start_page 55
container_title Journal of zoology (1987)
container_volume 310
creator McKnight, D. T.
Nordine, J.
Jerrett, B.
Murray, M.
Murray, P.
Moss, R.
Northey, M.
Simard, N.
Alford, R. A.
Schwarzkopf, L.
description The ability to glide has evolved in multiple taxa and is usually associated with highly specialized morphological adaptations. Traits that evolve for one reason, can, however, influence other traits and abilities. In this study, we examined the influence of adaptations for gliding on the jumping and clinging abilities of frogs by comparing specialized flying frogs (Rhacophorus) and unspecialized non‐flying frogs (Polypedates) from the family Rhacophoridae. Flying frogs had more webbing, longer legs, and greater clinging abilities than non‐flying frogs. Clinging abilities, jumping distance, and gliding distance all correlated positively with body size for both flying and non‐flying frogs. We did not, however, find any significant differences between the two groups in horizontal jumping distance or glide distance from a low starting point of 1.56 m. The morphological adaptations that evolved for gliding have not significantly influenced the flying frogs’ short‐distance jumping abilities, but may have influenced their clinging abilities. Alternatively, there may have been direct selection for clinging ability because of flying frogs’ increased need, compared with other frogs, to land on vertical surfaces without slipping off. The ability to glide has evolved in multiple taxa and is associated with specialized morphological adaptations. In this study, we examined the influence of adaptations for gliding on the jumping and clinging abilities of frogs, and we found that flying frogs had greater clinging ability than non‐flying frogs. There may have been direct selection for clinging ability because of flying frog's increased need to land on vertical surfaces without slipping.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jzo.12725
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000507588400006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2339532931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2975-d14a75c94526351d7067fd1e54f389bd9e397fe1612da94811895102f56a54163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtKxDAUhoMoOI4ufIOCK5GOuTRNsxKpdwYGQTduQqZNakqnqUmLjE9vagd3gmdzfjjfuf0AnCK4QCEu6y-7QJhhugdmKEl5zDjP9sEMcorjjKT8EBx5X0OIUcLoDDzf2GhjXfduG1uZQjaRLGXXy97Y1kfauqhqTGnaKjJtpJ2tfBC6GVRbqKhoQmGsybaM6mHTBX11DA60bLw62eU5eL27fckf4uXq_jG_XsYF5ozGJUokowVPKE4JRSWDKdMlUjTRJOPrkivCmVYoRbiUPMkQyjhFEGuaSpqglMzB2TS3c_ZjUL4XtR1cG1YKTAinBHOCAnU-UYWz3julRefMRrqtQFCMjongmPhxLLAXE_up1lb7woxP_vIQQgoZzbIkKDjuz_5P52ayNLdD24fWy12radT274vE09tqOu0bxyeMtA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2339532931</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do morphological adaptations for gliding in frogs influence clinging and jumping?</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><creator>McKnight, D. T. ; Nordine, J. ; Jerrett, B. ; Murray, M. ; Murray, P. ; Moss, R. ; Northey, M. ; Simard, N. ; Alford, R. A. ; Schwarzkopf, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>McKnight, D. T. ; Nordine, J. ; Jerrett, B. ; Murray, M. ; Murray, P. ; Moss, R. ; Northey, M. ; Simard, N. ; Alford, R. A. ; Schwarzkopf, L.</creatorcontrib><description>The ability to glide has evolved in multiple taxa and is usually associated with highly specialized morphological adaptations. Traits that evolve for one reason, can, however, influence other traits and abilities. In this study, we examined the influence of adaptations for gliding on the jumping and clinging abilities of frogs by comparing specialized flying frogs (Rhacophorus) and unspecialized non‐flying frogs (Polypedates) from the family Rhacophoridae. Flying frogs had more webbing, longer legs, and greater clinging abilities than non‐flying frogs. Clinging abilities, jumping distance, and gliding distance all correlated positively with body size for both flying and non‐flying frogs. We did not, however, find any significant differences between the two groups in horizontal jumping distance or glide distance from a low starting point of 1.56 m. The morphological adaptations that evolved for gliding have not significantly influenced the flying frogs’ short‐distance jumping abilities, but may have influenced their clinging abilities. Alternatively, there may have been direct selection for clinging ability because of flying frogs’ increased need, compared with other frogs, to land on vertical surfaces without slipping off. The ability to glide has evolved in multiple taxa and is associated with specialized morphological adaptations. In this study, we examined the influence of adaptations for gliding on the jumping and clinging abilities of frogs, and we found that flying frogs had greater clinging ability than non‐flying frogs. There may have been direct selection for clinging ability because of flying frog's increased need to land on vertical surfaces without slipping.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-8369</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jzo.12725</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>HOBOKEN: Wiley</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; adhesion ; Amphibians ; Animal morphology ; Body size ; borneo ; Distance ; evolution ; Flight ; Frogs ; Gliding ; Jumping ; jumping ability ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; morphological adaptations ; Morphology ; Rhacophoridae ; Science &amp; Technology ; size ; Webbing ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Journal of zoology (1987), 2020-01, Vol.310 (1), p.55-63</ispartof><rights>2019 The Zoological Society of London</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Zoological Society of London</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>2</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000507588400006</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2975-d14a75c94526351d7067fd1e54f389bd9e397fe1612da94811895102f56a54163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2975-d14a75c94526351d7067fd1e54f389bd9e397fe1612da94811895102f56a54163</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1009-670X ; 0000-0001-8543-098X ; 0000-0002-0770-2406 ; 0000-0001-8541-9086 ; 0000-0002-3010-6768 ; 0000-0003-0933-8430</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjzo.12725$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjzo.12725$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,28253,45579,45580</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McKnight, D. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordine, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jerrett, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moss, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Northey, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simard, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alford, R. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarzkopf, L.</creatorcontrib><title>Do morphological adaptations for gliding in frogs influence clinging and jumping?</title><title>Journal of zoology (1987)</title><addtitle>J ZOOL</addtitle><description>The ability to glide has evolved in multiple taxa and is usually associated with highly specialized morphological adaptations. Traits that evolve for one reason, can, however, influence other traits and abilities. In this study, we examined the influence of adaptations for gliding on the jumping and clinging abilities of frogs by comparing specialized flying frogs (Rhacophorus) and unspecialized non‐flying frogs (Polypedates) from the family Rhacophoridae. Flying frogs had more webbing, longer legs, and greater clinging abilities than non‐flying frogs. Clinging abilities, jumping distance, and gliding distance all correlated positively with body size for both flying and non‐flying frogs. We did not, however, find any significant differences between the two groups in horizontal jumping distance or glide distance from a low starting point of 1.56 m. The morphological adaptations that evolved for gliding have not significantly influenced the flying frogs’ short‐distance jumping abilities, but may have influenced their clinging abilities. Alternatively, there may have been direct selection for clinging ability because of flying frogs’ increased need, compared with other frogs, to land on vertical surfaces without slipping off. The ability to glide has evolved in multiple taxa and is associated with specialized morphological adaptations. In this study, we examined the influence of adaptations for gliding on the jumping and clinging abilities of frogs, and we found that flying frogs had greater clinging ability than non‐flying frogs. There may have been direct selection for clinging ability because of flying frog's increased need to land on vertical surfaces without slipping.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>adhesion</subject><subject>Amphibians</subject><subject>Animal morphology</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>borneo</subject><subject>Distance</subject><subject>evolution</subject><subject>Flight</subject><subject>Frogs</subject><subject>Gliding</subject><subject>Jumping</subject><subject>jumping ability</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>morphological adaptations</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Rhacophoridae</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>size</subject><subject>Webbing</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0952-8369</issn><issn>1469-7998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtKxDAUhoMoOI4ufIOCK5GOuTRNsxKpdwYGQTduQqZNakqnqUmLjE9vagd3gmdzfjjfuf0AnCK4QCEu6y-7QJhhugdmKEl5zDjP9sEMcorjjKT8EBx5X0OIUcLoDDzf2GhjXfduG1uZQjaRLGXXy97Y1kfauqhqTGnaKjJtpJ2tfBC6GVRbqKhoQmGsybaM6mHTBX11DA60bLw62eU5eL27fckf4uXq_jG_XsYF5ozGJUokowVPKE4JRSWDKdMlUjTRJOPrkivCmVYoRbiUPMkQyjhFEGuaSpqglMzB2TS3c_ZjUL4XtR1cG1YKTAinBHOCAnU-UYWz3julRefMRrqtQFCMjongmPhxLLAXE_up1lb7woxP_vIQQgoZzbIkKDjuz_5P52ayNLdD24fWy12radT274vE09tqOu0bxyeMtA</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>McKnight, D. T.</creator><creator>Nordine, J.</creator><creator>Jerrett, B.</creator><creator>Murray, M.</creator><creator>Murray, P.</creator><creator>Moss, R.</creator><creator>Northey, M.</creator><creator>Simard, N.</creator><creator>Alford, R. A.</creator><creator>Schwarzkopf, L.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1009-670X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8543-098X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0770-2406</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8541-9086</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3010-6768</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0933-8430</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Do morphological adaptations for gliding in frogs influence clinging and jumping?</title><author>McKnight, D. T. ; Nordine, J. ; Jerrett, B. ; Murray, M. ; Murray, P. ; Moss, R. ; Northey, M. ; Simard, N. ; Alford, R. A. ; Schwarzkopf, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2975-d14a75c94526351d7067fd1e54f389bd9e397fe1612da94811895102f56a54163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>adhesion</topic><topic>Amphibians</topic><topic>Animal morphology</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>borneo</topic><topic>Distance</topic><topic>evolution</topic><topic>Flight</topic><topic>Frogs</topic><topic>Gliding</topic><topic>Jumping</topic><topic>jumping ability</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>morphological adaptations</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Rhacophoridae</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>size</topic><topic>Webbing</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McKnight, D. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordine, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jerrett, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moss, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Northey, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simard, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alford, R. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarzkopf, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of zoology (1987)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McKnight, D. T.</au><au>Nordine, J.</au><au>Jerrett, B.</au><au>Murray, M.</au><au>Murray, P.</au><au>Moss, R.</au><au>Northey, M.</au><au>Simard, N.</au><au>Alford, R. A.</au><au>Schwarzkopf, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do morphological adaptations for gliding in frogs influence clinging and jumping?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of zoology (1987)</jtitle><stitle>J ZOOL</stitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>310</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>55</spage><epage>63</epage><pages>55-63</pages><issn>0952-8369</issn><eissn>1469-7998</eissn><abstract>The ability to glide has evolved in multiple taxa and is usually associated with highly specialized morphological adaptations. Traits that evolve for one reason, can, however, influence other traits and abilities. In this study, we examined the influence of adaptations for gliding on the jumping and clinging abilities of frogs by comparing specialized flying frogs (Rhacophorus) and unspecialized non‐flying frogs (Polypedates) from the family Rhacophoridae. Flying frogs had more webbing, longer legs, and greater clinging abilities than non‐flying frogs. Clinging abilities, jumping distance, and gliding distance all correlated positively with body size for both flying and non‐flying frogs. We did not, however, find any significant differences between the two groups in horizontal jumping distance or glide distance from a low starting point of 1.56 m. The morphological adaptations that evolved for gliding have not significantly influenced the flying frogs’ short‐distance jumping abilities, but may have influenced their clinging abilities. Alternatively, there may have been direct selection for clinging ability because of flying frogs’ increased need, compared with other frogs, to land on vertical surfaces without slipping off. The ability to glide has evolved in multiple taxa and is associated with specialized morphological adaptations. In this study, we examined the influence of adaptations for gliding on the jumping and clinging abilities of frogs, and we found that flying frogs had greater clinging ability than non‐flying frogs. There may have been direct selection for clinging ability because of flying frog's increased need to land on vertical surfaces without slipping.</abstract><cop>HOBOKEN</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/jzo.12725</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1009-670X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8543-098X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0770-2406</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8541-9086</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3010-6768</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0933-8430</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0952-8369
ispartof Journal of zoology (1987), 2020-01, Vol.310 (1), p.55-63
issn 0952-8369
1469-7998
language eng
recordid cdi_webofscience_primary_000507588400006
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />
subjects Adaptation
adhesion
Amphibians
Animal morphology
Body size
borneo
Distance
evolution
Flight
Frogs
Gliding
Jumping
jumping ability
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
morphological adaptations
Morphology
Rhacophoridae
Science & Technology
size
Webbing
Zoology
title Do morphological adaptations for gliding in frogs influence clinging and jumping?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T13%3A39%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20morphological%20adaptations%20for%20gliding%20in%20frogs%20influence%20clinging%20and%20jumping?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20zoology%20(1987)&rft.au=McKnight,%20D.%20T.&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=310&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=55&rft.epage=63&rft.pages=55-63&rft.issn=0952-8369&rft.eissn=1469-7998&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jzo.12725&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2339532931%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2339532931&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true