Twitter and academic Urology in the United States and Canada: a comprehensive assessment of the Twitterverse in 2019
Objective To provide the first comprehensive analysis of the Twitterverse amongst academic urologists and programmes in North America. Methods Using national accreditation and individual programme websites, all active urology residency programmes (USA and Canada) and academic Urology faculty at thes...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BJU international 2020-01, Vol.125 (1), p.173-181 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective
To provide the first comprehensive analysis of the Twitterverse amongst academic urologists and programmes in North America.
Methods
Using national accreditation and individual programme websites, all active urology residency programmes (USA and Canada) and academic Urology faculty at these programmes were identified. Demographic data for each programme American Urological Association [AUA] section, resident class size) and physician (title, fellowship training, Scopus Hirsch index [H‐index] and citations) were documented. Twitter metrics (Twitter handle, date joined, # tweets, # followers, # following, likes) for programmes and physicians were catalogued (data capture: March–April 2019). Descriptive analyses and temporal trends in Twitter utilisation amongst programmes and physicians were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of Twitter use.
Results
In all, 156 academic programmes (143 USA, 13 Canada) and 2214 academic faculty (2015 USA, 199 Canada) were identified. Twitter utilisation is currently 49.3% and 34.1% amongst programmes and physicians, respectively, and continues to increase. On multivariable analysis, programmes with 3–5 residents/year and programmes with a higher percentage of faculty Twitter engagement were more likely to have Twitter accounts. From a physician perspective, those with fellowship training, lower academic rank (Clinical Instructor, Assistant Professor, Associate Professor vs Professor) and higher H‐indices were more likely to have individual Twitter accounts.
Conclusion
There is a steady increase in Twitter engagement amongst Urology programmes and academic physicians. Faculty Twitter utilisation is an important driver of programme Twitter engagement. Twitter social media activity is strongly associated with academic productivity, and may in fact drive academic metrics. Within Urology, social media presence appears to be proportional to academic activity. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1464-4096 1464-410X |
DOI: | 10.1111/bju.14920 |