A comparison of the Trojan Y Chromosome strategy to harvesting models for eradication of nonnative species

The Trojan Y Chromosome strategy (TYC) is a promising eradication method for biological control of nonnative species. The strategy works by manipulating the sex ratio of a population through the introduction of supermales that guarantee male offspring. In the current study, we compare the TYC method...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Natural resource modeling 2020-05, Vol.33 (2), p.n/a, Article 12252
Hauptverfasser: Lyu, Jingjing, Schofield, Pamela J., Reaver, Kristen M., Beauregard, Matthew, Parshad, Rana D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title Natural resource modeling
container_volume 33
creator Lyu, Jingjing
Schofield, Pamela J.
Reaver, Kristen M.
Beauregard, Matthew
Parshad, Rana D.
description The Trojan Y Chromosome strategy (TYC) is a promising eradication method for biological control of nonnative species. The strategy works by manipulating the sex ratio of a population through the introduction of supermales that guarantee male offspring. In the current study, we compare the TYC method with a pure harvesting strategy. We also analyze a hybrid harvesting model that mirrors the TYC strategy. The dynamic analysis leads to results on stability of solutions and bifurcations of the model. Several conclusions about the different strategies are established via optimal control methods. In particular, the results affirm that either a pure harvesting or hybrid strategy may work better than the TYC method at controlling a nonnative species population. Recommendations for resource managers Where harvesting is feasible, it is as effective if not more effective than the classical TYC method. Therein managers may attempt harvesting female fish while stocking males or harvesting both male and female fishes. Managers may attempt linear harvesting, saturating density‐dependent harvesting, and unbounded density‐dependent harvesting. Linear harvesting is seen to be the most effective. We caution against the outright use of harvesting due to various density‐dependent effects that may arise. To this end hybrid models that involve a combination of harvesting and TYC‐type methods might be a better strategy. One may also use harvesting as a tool in mesocosm settings to predict the efficacy of the TYC strategy in the wild.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/nrm.12252
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000502696900001CitationCount</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2404252773</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3302-a62c615e2e176cc4d1ea8f91379ff5902bf2d707bcace0c23bf74940f874348e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtL9DAUhoMoOF4W_oOAK5HqSZo0zVLK5wW8gOjCVclkTpwO02RMOsr8e6OVbyeYTRJ43pM3DyFHDM5YXuc-9meMc8m3yITpUhdKCLlNJlBrKGqp5C7ZS2kBwITUckIWF9SGfmVil4KnwdFhjvQphoXx9IU28xj6kEKPNA3RDPi6oUOgcxPfMQ2df6V9mOEyURcixWhmnTVDNw7ywft8ec_RFdoO0wHZcWaZ8PBn3yfPl_-emuvi9uHqprm4LWxZAi9MxW3FJHJkqrJWzBia2mlWKu2c1MCnjs8UqKk1FsHycuqU0AJcrUQpaiz3yfE4dxXD2zr3bBdhHX1-suUCRHajVJmpk5GyMaQU0bWr2PUmbloG7ZfKNqtsv1Vmth7ZD5wGl_JnvMX_PABI4JWudD4Ba7rh20ET1n7I0dO_RzN9_kN3S9z83qi9f7wbq30CIwCXMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2404252773</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of the Trojan Y Chromosome strategy to harvesting models for eradication of nonnative species</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><creator>Lyu, Jingjing ; Schofield, Pamela J. ; Reaver, Kristen M. ; Beauregard, Matthew ; Parshad, Rana D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lyu, Jingjing ; Schofield, Pamela J. ; Reaver, Kristen M. ; Beauregard, Matthew ; Parshad, Rana D.</creatorcontrib><description>The Trojan Y Chromosome strategy (TYC) is a promising eradication method for biological control of nonnative species. The strategy works by manipulating the sex ratio of a population through the introduction of supermales that guarantee male offspring. In the current study, we compare the TYC method with a pure harvesting strategy. We also analyze a hybrid harvesting model that mirrors the TYC strategy. The dynamic analysis leads to results on stability of solutions and bifurcations of the model. Several conclusions about the different strategies are established via optimal control methods. In particular, the results affirm that either a pure harvesting or hybrid strategy may work better than the TYC method at controlling a nonnative species population. Recommendations for resource managers Where harvesting is feasible, it is as effective if not more effective than the classical TYC method. Therein managers may attempt harvesting female fish while stocking males or harvesting both male and female fishes. Managers may attempt linear harvesting, saturating density‐dependent harvesting, and unbounded density‐dependent harvesting. Linear harvesting is seen to be the most effective. We caution against the outright use of harvesting due to various density‐dependent effects that may arise. To this end hybrid models that involve a combination of harvesting and TYC‐type methods might be a better strategy. One may also use harvesting as a tool in mesocosm settings to predict the efficacy of the TYC strategy in the wild.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-8575</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-7445</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/nrm.12252</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>HOBOKEN: Wiley</publisher><subject>Bifurcations ; Biological control ; biological invasions ; Chromosomes ; Control methods ; Density ; Dynamic stability ; Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology ; Fish harvest ; Fish stocking ; Introduced species ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Mathematics ; Mathematics, Interdisciplinary Applications ; mating system ; Nonnative species ; Offspring ; Optimal control ; Physical Sciences ; Science &amp; Technology ; Sex ratio ; Stability analysis ; stability and bifurcation ; Strategy ; Y chromosomes</subject><ispartof>Natural resource modeling, 2020-05, Vol.33 (2), p.n/a, Article 12252</ispartof><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>11</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000502696900001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3302-a62c615e2e176cc4d1ea8f91379ff5902bf2d707bcace0c23bf74940f874348e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3302-a62c615e2e176cc4d1ea8f91379ff5902bf2d707bcace0c23bf74940f874348e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4434-0034 ; 0000-0003-2304-4674</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fnrm.12252$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fnrm.12252$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27931,27932,28255,45581,45582</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lyu, Jingjing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schofield, Pamela J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reaver, Kristen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beauregard, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parshad, Rana D.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of the Trojan Y Chromosome strategy to harvesting models for eradication of nonnative species</title><title>Natural resource modeling</title><addtitle>NAT RESOUR MODEL</addtitle><description>The Trojan Y Chromosome strategy (TYC) is a promising eradication method for biological control of nonnative species. The strategy works by manipulating the sex ratio of a population through the introduction of supermales that guarantee male offspring. In the current study, we compare the TYC method with a pure harvesting strategy. We also analyze a hybrid harvesting model that mirrors the TYC strategy. The dynamic analysis leads to results on stability of solutions and bifurcations of the model. Several conclusions about the different strategies are established via optimal control methods. In particular, the results affirm that either a pure harvesting or hybrid strategy may work better than the TYC method at controlling a nonnative species population. Recommendations for resource managers Where harvesting is feasible, it is as effective if not more effective than the classical TYC method. Therein managers may attempt harvesting female fish while stocking males or harvesting both male and female fishes. Managers may attempt linear harvesting, saturating density‐dependent harvesting, and unbounded density‐dependent harvesting. Linear harvesting is seen to be the most effective. We caution against the outright use of harvesting due to various density‐dependent effects that may arise. To this end hybrid models that involve a combination of harvesting and TYC‐type methods might be a better strategy. One may also use harvesting as a tool in mesocosm settings to predict the efficacy of the TYC strategy in the wild.</description><subject>Bifurcations</subject><subject>Biological control</subject><subject>biological invasions</subject><subject>Chromosomes</subject><subject>Control methods</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Dynamic stability</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology</subject><subject>Fish harvest</subject><subject>Fish stocking</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Mathematics, Interdisciplinary Applications</subject><subject>mating system</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>Optimal control</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Sex ratio</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>stability and bifurcation</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Y chromosomes</subject><issn>0890-8575</issn><issn>1939-7445</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtL9DAUhoMoOF4W_oOAK5HqSZo0zVLK5wW8gOjCVclkTpwO02RMOsr8e6OVbyeYTRJ43pM3DyFHDM5YXuc-9meMc8m3yITpUhdKCLlNJlBrKGqp5C7ZS2kBwITUckIWF9SGfmVil4KnwdFhjvQphoXx9IU28xj6kEKPNA3RDPi6oUOgcxPfMQ2df6V9mOEyURcixWhmnTVDNw7ywft8ec_RFdoO0wHZcWaZ8PBn3yfPl_-emuvi9uHqprm4LWxZAi9MxW3FJHJkqrJWzBia2mlWKu2c1MCnjs8UqKk1FsHycuqU0AJcrUQpaiz3yfE4dxXD2zr3bBdhHX1-suUCRHajVJmpk5GyMaQU0bWr2PUmbloG7ZfKNqtsv1Vmth7ZD5wGl_JnvMX_PABI4JWudD4Ba7rh20ET1n7I0dO_RzN9_kN3S9z83qi9f7wbq30CIwCXMA</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Lyu, Jingjing</creator><creator>Schofield, Pamela J.</creator><creator>Reaver, Kristen M.</creator><creator>Beauregard, Matthew</creator><creator>Parshad, Rana D.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4434-0034</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2304-4674</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>A comparison of the Trojan Y Chromosome strategy to harvesting models for eradication of nonnative species</title><author>Lyu, Jingjing ; Schofield, Pamela J. ; Reaver, Kristen M. ; Beauregard, Matthew ; Parshad, Rana D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3302-a62c615e2e176cc4d1ea8f91379ff5902bf2d707bcace0c23bf74940f874348e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bifurcations</topic><topic>Biological control</topic><topic>biological invasions</topic><topic>Chromosomes</topic><topic>Control methods</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Dynamic stability</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology</topic><topic>Fish harvest</topic><topic>Fish stocking</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Mathematics, Interdisciplinary Applications</topic><topic>mating system</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>Optimal control</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Sex ratio</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>stability and bifurcation</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Y chromosomes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lyu, Jingjing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schofield, Pamela J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reaver, Kristen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beauregard, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parshad, Rana D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Natural resource modeling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lyu, Jingjing</au><au>Schofield, Pamela J.</au><au>Reaver, Kristen M.</au><au>Beauregard, Matthew</au><au>Parshad, Rana D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of the Trojan Y Chromosome strategy to harvesting models for eradication of nonnative species</atitle><jtitle>Natural resource modeling</jtitle><stitle>NAT RESOUR MODEL</stitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><epage>n/a</epage><artnum>12252</artnum><issn>0890-8575</issn><eissn>1939-7445</eissn><abstract>The Trojan Y Chromosome strategy (TYC) is a promising eradication method for biological control of nonnative species. The strategy works by manipulating the sex ratio of a population through the introduction of supermales that guarantee male offspring. In the current study, we compare the TYC method with a pure harvesting strategy. We also analyze a hybrid harvesting model that mirrors the TYC strategy. The dynamic analysis leads to results on stability of solutions and bifurcations of the model. Several conclusions about the different strategies are established via optimal control methods. In particular, the results affirm that either a pure harvesting or hybrid strategy may work better than the TYC method at controlling a nonnative species population. Recommendations for resource managers Where harvesting is feasible, it is as effective if not more effective than the classical TYC method. Therein managers may attempt harvesting female fish while stocking males or harvesting both male and female fishes. Managers may attempt linear harvesting, saturating density‐dependent harvesting, and unbounded density‐dependent harvesting. Linear harvesting is seen to be the most effective. We caution against the outright use of harvesting due to various density‐dependent effects that may arise. To this end hybrid models that involve a combination of harvesting and TYC‐type methods might be a better strategy. One may also use harvesting as a tool in mesocosm settings to predict the efficacy of the TYC strategy in the wild.</abstract><cop>HOBOKEN</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/nrm.12252</doi><tpages>43</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4434-0034</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2304-4674</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-8575
ispartof Natural resource modeling, 2020-05, Vol.33 (2), p.n/a, Article 12252
issn 0890-8575
1939-7445
language eng
recordid cdi_webofscience_primary_000502696900001CitationCount
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />
subjects Bifurcations
Biological control
biological invasions
Chromosomes
Control methods
Density
Dynamic stability
Environmental Sciences
Environmental Sciences & Ecology
Fish harvest
Fish stocking
Introduced species
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Mathematics
Mathematics, Interdisciplinary Applications
mating system
Nonnative species
Offspring
Optimal control
Physical Sciences
Science & Technology
Sex ratio
Stability analysis
stability and bifurcation
Strategy
Y chromosomes
title A comparison of the Trojan Y Chromosome strategy to harvesting models for eradication of nonnative species
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T02%3A49%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20the%20Trojan%20Y%20Chromosome%20strategy%20to%20harvesting%20models%20for%20eradication%20of%20nonnative%20species&rft.jtitle=Natural%20resource%20modeling&rft.au=Lyu,%20Jingjing&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=2&rft.epage=n/a&rft.artnum=12252&rft.issn=0890-8575&rft.eissn=1939-7445&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/nrm.12252&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2404252773%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2404252773&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true