Baseline functional connectivity may predict placebo responses to accelerated rTMS treatment in major depression

Although in theory sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has no inherent therapeutic value, nonetheless, such placebo stimulations may have relevant therapeutic effects in clinically depressed patients. On the other hand, antidepressant responses to sham rTMS are quite heterogeneo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human brain mapping 2020-02, Vol.41 (3), p.632-639
Hauptverfasser: Wu, Guo‐Rong, Wang, Xiaowan, Baeken, Chris
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 639
container_issue 3
container_start_page 632
container_title Human brain mapping
container_volume 41
creator Wu, Guo‐Rong
Wang, Xiaowan
Baeken, Chris
description Although in theory sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has no inherent therapeutic value, nonetheless, such placebo stimulations may have relevant therapeutic effects in clinically depressed patients. On the other hand, antidepressant responses to sham rTMS are quite heterogeneous across individuals and its neural underpinnings have not been explored yet. The current brain imaging study aims to detect baseline neural fingerprints resulting in clinically beneficial placebo rTMS treatment responses. We collected resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging data prior to a registered randomized clinical trial of accelerated placebo stimulation protocol in patients documented with treatment‐resistant depression (http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01832805). In addition to global brain connectivity and rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC) seed‐based functional connectivity (FC), elastic‐net regression and cross‐validation procedures were used to identify baseline intrinsic brain connectivity biomarkers for sham‐rTMS responses. Placebo responses to accelerated sham rTMS were correlated with baseline global brain connectivity in the rACC/ventral medial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). Concerning the rACC seed‐based FC analysis, the placebo response was associated positively with the precuneus/posterior cingulate (PCun/PCC) cortex and negatively with the middle frontal gyrus. Our findings provide first brain imaging evidence for placebo responses to sham stimulation being predictable from rACC rsFC profiles, especially in brain areas implicated in (re)appraisal and self‐focus processes.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hbm.24828
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000491154100001</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A710623746</galeid><sourcerecordid>A710623746</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5108-7a3e6e416b3426891a53b29fa20cab89f9f67eafdac6a0bd460a2130704c6f3c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk9v1DAQxSMEoqVw4AsgS1xAaLf-kzjxBaldAUVqxYFythxn0nqV2MF2ivbbM8suC0UgoRycxL_3PON5RfGc0SWjlJ_etuOSlw1vHhTHjKp6QZkSD7fvslqosmZHxZOU1pQyVlH2uDgSTArBJTsupnOTYHAeSD97m13wZiA2eA_4cefyhoxmQ6YInbOZTIOx0AYSIU3BJ0gkB2KshQGiydCReH31meQIJo_gM3Ee5esQSQdokRLaPy0e9WZI8Gy_nhRf3r-7Xl0sLj99-Lg6u1zYitFmURsBEkomW1Fy2ShmKtFy1RtOrWkb1ate1mD6zlhpaNuVkhrOBK1paWUvrDgp3u58p7kdobNYTjSDnqIbTdzoYJy-v-Pdrb4Jd7rmsla8QoNXe4MYvs6Qsh5dwk4H4yHMSXM8TCjeSIroyz_QdZgj3uSWKpmqlGL1L-rGDKCd7wOea7em-qzGUXFRlxKp5V8ofDoYHQ4Geof_7wle7wQ2hpQi9IceGdXbeGiMh_4RD2Rf_H4pB_JnHhB4swO-4Zj7ZB14CweMUloqzFCJthgmpJv_p1cum22-VmH2GaWneym2s_l3yfri_GpX-3dRAuWe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2341959917</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Baseline functional connectivity may predict placebo responses to accelerated rTMS treatment in major depression</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><creator>Wu, Guo‐Rong ; Wang, Xiaowan ; Baeken, Chris</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Guo‐Rong ; Wang, Xiaowan ; Baeken, Chris</creatorcontrib><description>Although in theory sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has no inherent therapeutic value, nonetheless, such placebo stimulations may have relevant therapeutic effects in clinically depressed patients. On the other hand, antidepressant responses to sham rTMS are quite heterogeneous across individuals and its neural underpinnings have not been explored yet. The current brain imaging study aims to detect baseline neural fingerprints resulting in clinically beneficial placebo rTMS treatment responses. We collected resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging data prior to a registered randomized clinical trial of accelerated placebo stimulation protocol in patients documented with treatment‐resistant depression (http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01832805). In addition to global brain connectivity and rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC) seed‐based functional connectivity (FC), elastic‐net regression and cross‐validation procedures were used to identify baseline intrinsic brain connectivity biomarkers for sham‐rTMS responses. Placebo responses to accelerated sham rTMS were correlated with baseline global brain connectivity in the rACC/ventral medial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). Concerning the rACC seed‐based FC analysis, the placebo response was associated positively with the precuneus/posterior cingulate (PCun/PCC) cortex and negatively with the middle frontal gyrus. Our findings provide first brain imaging evidence for placebo responses to sham stimulation being predictable from rACC rsFC profiles, especially in brain areas implicated in (re)appraisal and self‐focus processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1065-9471</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0193</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24828</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31633261</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Antidepressants ; Biomarkers ; Brain ; Brain mapping ; Clinical trials ; Cortex (cingulate) ; Cortex (parietal) ; depression ; Depression, Mental ; Drug therapy ; Frontal gyrus ; functional connectivity ; Functional magnetic resonance imaging ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Magnetic fields ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Medical imaging ; Mental depression ; Neural networks ; Neuroimaging ; Neurosciences ; Neurosciences &amp; Neurology ; Patients ; placebo responses ; Prefrontal cortex ; Protocol (computers) ; Radiology, Nuclear Medicine &amp; Medical Imaging ; Regression analysis ; rostral ACC ; Science &amp; Technology ; sham iTBS ; sham rTMS ; Transcranial magnetic stimulation</subject><ispartof>Human brain mapping, 2020-02, Vol.41 (3), p.632-639</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2019 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>2019. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>16</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000491154100001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5108-7a3e6e416b3426891a53b29fa20cab89f9f67eafdac6a0bd460a2130704c6f3c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5108-7a3e6e416b3426891a53b29fa20cab89f9f67eafdac6a0bd460a2130704c6f3c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4918-3955 ; 0000-0001-9885-3041 ; 0000-0001-6760-8860</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7267925/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7267925/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,729,782,786,866,887,1419,2116,11569,27931,27932,28255,28256,45581,45582,46059,46483,53798,53800</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31633261$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Guo‐Rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaowan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baeken, Chris</creatorcontrib><title>Baseline functional connectivity may predict placebo responses to accelerated rTMS treatment in major depression</title><title>Human brain mapping</title><addtitle>HUM BRAIN MAPP</addtitle><addtitle>Hum Brain Mapp</addtitle><description>Although in theory sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has no inherent therapeutic value, nonetheless, such placebo stimulations may have relevant therapeutic effects in clinically depressed patients. On the other hand, antidepressant responses to sham rTMS are quite heterogeneous across individuals and its neural underpinnings have not been explored yet. The current brain imaging study aims to detect baseline neural fingerprints resulting in clinically beneficial placebo rTMS treatment responses. We collected resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging data prior to a registered randomized clinical trial of accelerated placebo stimulation protocol in patients documented with treatment‐resistant depression (http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01832805). In addition to global brain connectivity and rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC) seed‐based functional connectivity (FC), elastic‐net regression and cross‐validation procedures were used to identify baseline intrinsic brain connectivity biomarkers for sham‐rTMS responses. Placebo responses to accelerated sham rTMS were correlated with baseline global brain connectivity in the rACC/ventral medial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). Concerning the rACC seed‐based FC analysis, the placebo response was associated positively with the precuneus/posterior cingulate (PCun/PCC) cortex and negatively with the middle frontal gyrus. Our findings provide first brain imaging evidence for placebo responses to sham stimulation being predictable from rACC rsFC profiles, especially in brain areas implicated in (re)appraisal and self‐focus processes.</description><subject>Antidepressants</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain mapping</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cortex (cingulate)</subject><subject>Cortex (parietal)</subject><subject>depression</subject><subject>Depression, Mental</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Frontal gyrus</subject><subject>functional connectivity</subject><subject>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Neuroimaging</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Neurosciences &amp; Neurology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>placebo responses</subject><subject>Prefrontal cortex</subject><subject>Protocol (computers)</subject><subject>Radiology, Nuclear Medicine &amp; Medical Imaging</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>rostral ACC</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>sham iTBS</subject><subject>sham rTMS</subject><subject>Transcranial magnetic stimulation</subject><issn>1065-9471</issn><issn>1097-0193</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>ARHDP</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk9v1DAQxSMEoqVw4AsgS1xAaLf-kzjxBaldAUVqxYFythxn0nqV2MF2ivbbM8suC0UgoRycxL_3PON5RfGc0SWjlJ_etuOSlw1vHhTHjKp6QZkSD7fvslqosmZHxZOU1pQyVlH2uDgSTArBJTsupnOTYHAeSD97m13wZiA2eA_4cefyhoxmQ6YInbOZTIOx0AYSIU3BJ0gkB2KshQGiydCReH31meQIJo_gM3Ee5esQSQdokRLaPy0e9WZI8Gy_nhRf3r-7Xl0sLj99-Lg6u1zYitFmURsBEkomW1Fy2ShmKtFy1RtOrWkb1ate1mD6zlhpaNuVkhrOBK1paWUvrDgp3u58p7kdobNYTjSDnqIbTdzoYJy-v-Pdrb4Jd7rmsla8QoNXe4MYvs6Qsh5dwk4H4yHMSXM8TCjeSIroyz_QdZgj3uSWKpmqlGL1L-rGDKCd7wOea7em-qzGUXFRlxKp5V8ofDoYHQ4Geof_7wle7wQ2hpQi9IceGdXbeGiMh_4RD2Rf_H4pB_JnHhB4swO-4Zj7ZB14CweMUloqzFCJthgmpJv_p1cum22-VmH2GaWneym2s_l3yfri_GpX-3dRAuWe</recordid><startdate>20200215</startdate><enddate>20200215</enddate><creator>Wu, Guo‐Rong</creator><creator>Wang, Xiaowan</creator><creator>Baeken, Chris</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>17B</scope><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>ARHDP</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4918-3955</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9885-3041</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6760-8860</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200215</creationdate><title>Baseline functional connectivity may predict placebo responses to accelerated rTMS treatment in major depression</title><author>Wu, Guo‐Rong ; Wang, Xiaowan ; Baeken, Chris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5108-7a3e6e416b3426891a53b29fa20cab89f9f67eafdac6a0bd460a2130704c6f3c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Antidepressants</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain mapping</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cortex (cingulate)</topic><topic>Cortex (parietal)</topic><topic>depression</topic><topic>Depression, Mental</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Frontal gyrus</topic><topic>functional connectivity</topic><topic>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Neuroimaging</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Neurosciences &amp; Neurology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>placebo responses</topic><topic>Prefrontal cortex</topic><topic>Protocol (computers)</topic><topic>Radiology, Nuclear Medicine &amp; Medical Imaging</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>rostral ACC</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>sham iTBS</topic><topic>sham rTMS</topic><topic>Transcranial magnetic stimulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Guo‐Rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaowan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baeken, Chris</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI &amp; AHCI)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Human brain mapping</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Guo‐Rong</au><au>Wang, Xiaowan</au><au>Baeken, Chris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Baseline functional connectivity may predict placebo responses to accelerated rTMS treatment in major depression</atitle><jtitle>Human brain mapping</jtitle><stitle>HUM BRAIN MAPP</stitle><addtitle>Hum Brain Mapp</addtitle><date>2020-02-15</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>632</spage><epage>639</epage><pages>632-639</pages><issn>1065-9471</issn><eissn>1097-0193</eissn><abstract>Although in theory sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has no inherent therapeutic value, nonetheless, such placebo stimulations may have relevant therapeutic effects in clinically depressed patients. On the other hand, antidepressant responses to sham rTMS are quite heterogeneous across individuals and its neural underpinnings have not been explored yet. The current brain imaging study aims to detect baseline neural fingerprints resulting in clinically beneficial placebo rTMS treatment responses. We collected resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging data prior to a registered randomized clinical trial of accelerated placebo stimulation protocol in patients documented with treatment‐resistant depression (http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01832805). In addition to global brain connectivity and rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC) seed‐based functional connectivity (FC), elastic‐net regression and cross‐validation procedures were used to identify baseline intrinsic brain connectivity biomarkers for sham‐rTMS responses. Placebo responses to accelerated sham rTMS were correlated with baseline global brain connectivity in the rACC/ventral medial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). Concerning the rACC seed‐based FC analysis, the placebo response was associated positively with the precuneus/posterior cingulate (PCun/PCC) cortex and negatively with the middle frontal gyrus. Our findings provide first brain imaging evidence for placebo responses to sham stimulation being predictable from rACC rsFC profiles, especially in brain areas implicated in (re)appraisal and self‐focus processes.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>31633261</pmid><doi>10.1002/hbm.24828</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4918-3955</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9885-3041</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6760-8860</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1065-9471
ispartof Human brain mapping, 2020-02, Vol.41 (3), p.632-639
issn 1065-9471
1097-0193
language eng
recordid cdi_webofscience_primary_000491154100001
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); PubMed Central; Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />
subjects Antidepressants
Biomarkers
Brain
Brain mapping
Clinical trials
Cortex (cingulate)
Cortex (parietal)
depression
Depression, Mental
Drug therapy
Frontal gyrus
functional connectivity
Functional magnetic resonance imaging
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Magnetic fields
Magnetic resonance imaging
Medical imaging
Mental depression
Neural networks
Neuroimaging
Neurosciences
Neurosciences & Neurology
Patients
placebo responses
Prefrontal cortex
Protocol (computers)
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Regression analysis
rostral ACC
Science & Technology
sham iTBS
sham rTMS
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
title Baseline functional connectivity may predict placebo responses to accelerated rTMS treatment in major depression
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T22%3A20%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Baseline%20functional%20connectivity%20may%20predict%20placebo%20responses%20to%20accelerated%20rTMS%20treatment%20in%20major%20depression&rft.jtitle=Human%20brain%20mapping&rft.au=Wu,%20Guo%E2%80%90Rong&rft.date=2020-02-15&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=632&rft.epage=639&rft.pages=632-639&rft.issn=1065-9471&rft.eissn=1097-0193&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hbm.24828&rft_dat=%3Cgale_webof%3EA710623746%3C/gale_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2341959917&rft_id=info:pmid/31633261&rft_galeid=A710623746&rfr_iscdi=true