Baseline functional connectivity may predict placebo responses to accelerated rTMS treatment in major depression
Although in theory sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has no inherent therapeutic value, nonetheless, such placebo stimulations may have relevant therapeutic effects in clinically depressed patients. On the other hand, antidepressant responses to sham rTMS are quite heterogeneo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human brain mapping 2020-02, Vol.41 (3), p.632-639 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 639 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 632 |
container_title | Human brain mapping |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Wu, Guo‐Rong Wang, Xiaowan Baeken, Chris |
description | Although in theory sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has no inherent therapeutic value, nonetheless, such placebo stimulations may have relevant therapeutic effects in clinically depressed patients. On the other hand, antidepressant responses to sham rTMS are quite heterogeneous across individuals and its neural underpinnings have not been explored yet. The current brain imaging study aims to detect baseline neural fingerprints resulting in clinically beneficial placebo rTMS treatment responses. We collected resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging data prior to a registered randomized clinical trial of accelerated placebo stimulation protocol in patients documented with treatment‐resistant depression (http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01832805). In addition to global brain connectivity and rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC) seed‐based functional connectivity (FC), elastic‐net regression and cross‐validation procedures were used to identify baseline intrinsic brain connectivity biomarkers for sham‐rTMS responses. Placebo responses to accelerated sham rTMS were correlated with baseline global brain connectivity in the rACC/ventral medial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). Concerning the rACC seed‐based FC analysis, the placebo response was associated positively with the precuneus/posterior cingulate (PCun/PCC) cortex and negatively with the middle frontal gyrus. Our findings provide first brain imaging evidence for placebo responses to sham stimulation being predictable from rACC rsFC profiles, especially in brain areas implicated in (re)appraisal and self‐focus processes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/hbm.24828 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000491154100001</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A710623746</galeid><sourcerecordid>A710623746</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5108-7a3e6e416b3426891a53b29fa20cab89f9f67eafdac6a0bd460a2130704c6f3c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk9v1DAQxSMEoqVw4AsgS1xAaLf-kzjxBaldAUVqxYFythxn0nqV2MF2ivbbM8suC0UgoRycxL_3PON5RfGc0SWjlJ_etuOSlw1vHhTHjKp6QZkSD7fvslqosmZHxZOU1pQyVlH2uDgSTArBJTsupnOTYHAeSD97m13wZiA2eA_4cefyhoxmQ6YInbOZTIOx0AYSIU3BJ0gkB2KshQGiydCReH31meQIJo_gM3Ee5esQSQdokRLaPy0e9WZI8Gy_nhRf3r-7Xl0sLj99-Lg6u1zYitFmURsBEkomW1Fy2ShmKtFy1RtOrWkb1ate1mD6zlhpaNuVkhrOBK1paWUvrDgp3u58p7kdobNYTjSDnqIbTdzoYJy-v-Pdrb4Jd7rmsla8QoNXe4MYvs6Qsh5dwk4H4yHMSXM8TCjeSIroyz_QdZgj3uSWKpmqlGL1L-rGDKCd7wOea7em-qzGUXFRlxKp5V8ofDoYHQ4Geof_7wle7wQ2hpQi9IceGdXbeGiMh_4RD2Rf_H4pB_JnHhB4swO-4Zj7ZB14CweMUloqzFCJthgmpJv_p1cum22-VmH2GaWneym2s_l3yfri_GpX-3dRAuWe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2341959917</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Baseline functional connectivity may predict placebo responses to accelerated rTMS treatment in major depression</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><creator>Wu, Guo‐Rong ; Wang, Xiaowan ; Baeken, Chris</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Guo‐Rong ; Wang, Xiaowan ; Baeken, Chris</creatorcontrib><description>Although in theory sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has no inherent therapeutic value, nonetheless, such placebo stimulations may have relevant therapeutic effects in clinically depressed patients. On the other hand, antidepressant responses to sham rTMS are quite heterogeneous across individuals and its neural underpinnings have not been explored yet. The current brain imaging study aims to detect baseline neural fingerprints resulting in clinically beneficial placebo rTMS treatment responses. We collected resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging data prior to a registered randomized clinical trial of accelerated placebo stimulation protocol in patients documented with treatment‐resistant depression (http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01832805). In addition to global brain connectivity and rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC) seed‐based functional connectivity (FC), elastic‐net regression and cross‐validation procedures were used to identify baseline intrinsic brain connectivity biomarkers for sham‐rTMS responses. Placebo responses to accelerated sham rTMS were correlated with baseline global brain connectivity in the rACC/ventral medial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). Concerning the rACC seed‐based FC analysis, the placebo response was associated positively with the precuneus/posterior cingulate (PCun/PCC) cortex and negatively with the middle frontal gyrus. Our findings provide first brain imaging evidence for placebo responses to sham stimulation being predictable from rACC rsFC profiles, especially in brain areas implicated in (re)appraisal and self‐focus processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1065-9471</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0193</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24828</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31633261</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Antidepressants ; Biomarkers ; Brain ; Brain mapping ; Clinical trials ; Cortex (cingulate) ; Cortex (parietal) ; depression ; Depression, Mental ; Drug therapy ; Frontal gyrus ; functional connectivity ; Functional magnetic resonance imaging ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Magnetic fields ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Medical imaging ; Mental depression ; Neural networks ; Neuroimaging ; Neurosciences ; Neurosciences & Neurology ; Patients ; placebo responses ; Prefrontal cortex ; Protocol (computers) ; Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging ; Regression analysis ; rostral ACC ; Science & Technology ; sham iTBS ; sham rTMS ; Transcranial magnetic stimulation</subject><ispartof>Human brain mapping, 2020-02, Vol.41 (3), p.632-639</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2019 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>2019. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>16</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000491154100001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5108-7a3e6e416b3426891a53b29fa20cab89f9f67eafdac6a0bd460a2130704c6f3c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5108-7a3e6e416b3426891a53b29fa20cab89f9f67eafdac6a0bd460a2130704c6f3c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4918-3955 ; 0000-0001-9885-3041 ; 0000-0001-6760-8860</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7267925/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7267925/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,729,782,786,866,887,1419,2116,11569,27931,27932,28255,28256,45581,45582,46059,46483,53798,53800</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31633261$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Guo‐Rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaowan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baeken, Chris</creatorcontrib><title>Baseline functional connectivity may predict placebo responses to accelerated rTMS treatment in major depression</title><title>Human brain mapping</title><addtitle>HUM BRAIN MAPP</addtitle><addtitle>Hum Brain Mapp</addtitle><description>Although in theory sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has no inherent therapeutic value, nonetheless, such placebo stimulations may have relevant therapeutic effects in clinically depressed patients. On the other hand, antidepressant responses to sham rTMS are quite heterogeneous across individuals and its neural underpinnings have not been explored yet. The current brain imaging study aims to detect baseline neural fingerprints resulting in clinically beneficial placebo rTMS treatment responses. We collected resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging data prior to a registered randomized clinical trial of accelerated placebo stimulation protocol in patients documented with treatment‐resistant depression (http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01832805). In addition to global brain connectivity and rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC) seed‐based functional connectivity (FC), elastic‐net regression and cross‐validation procedures were used to identify baseline intrinsic brain connectivity biomarkers for sham‐rTMS responses. Placebo responses to accelerated sham rTMS were correlated with baseline global brain connectivity in the rACC/ventral medial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). Concerning the rACC seed‐based FC analysis, the placebo response was associated positively with the precuneus/posterior cingulate (PCun/PCC) cortex and negatively with the middle frontal gyrus. Our findings provide first brain imaging evidence for placebo responses to sham stimulation being predictable from rACC rsFC profiles, especially in brain areas implicated in (re)appraisal and self‐focus processes.</description><subject>Antidepressants</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain mapping</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cortex (cingulate)</subject><subject>Cortex (parietal)</subject><subject>depression</subject><subject>Depression, Mental</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Frontal gyrus</subject><subject>functional connectivity</subject><subject>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Neuroimaging</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Neurosciences & Neurology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>placebo responses</subject><subject>Prefrontal cortex</subject><subject>Protocol (computers)</subject><subject>Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>rostral ACC</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>sham iTBS</subject><subject>sham rTMS</subject><subject>Transcranial magnetic stimulation</subject><issn>1065-9471</issn><issn>1097-0193</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>ARHDP</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk9v1DAQxSMEoqVw4AsgS1xAaLf-kzjxBaldAUVqxYFythxn0nqV2MF2ivbbM8suC0UgoRycxL_3PON5RfGc0SWjlJ_etuOSlw1vHhTHjKp6QZkSD7fvslqosmZHxZOU1pQyVlH2uDgSTArBJTsupnOTYHAeSD97m13wZiA2eA_4cefyhoxmQ6YInbOZTIOx0AYSIU3BJ0gkB2KshQGiydCReH31meQIJo_gM3Ee5esQSQdokRLaPy0e9WZI8Gy_nhRf3r-7Xl0sLj99-Lg6u1zYitFmURsBEkomW1Fy2ShmKtFy1RtOrWkb1ate1mD6zlhpaNuVkhrOBK1paWUvrDgp3u58p7kdobNYTjSDnqIbTdzoYJy-v-Pdrb4Jd7rmsla8QoNXe4MYvs6Qsh5dwk4H4yHMSXM8TCjeSIroyz_QdZgj3uSWKpmqlGL1L-rGDKCd7wOea7em-qzGUXFRlxKp5V8ofDoYHQ4Geof_7wle7wQ2hpQi9IceGdXbeGiMh_4RD2Rf_H4pB_JnHhB4swO-4Zj7ZB14CweMUloqzFCJthgmpJv_p1cum22-VmH2GaWneym2s_l3yfri_GpX-3dRAuWe</recordid><startdate>20200215</startdate><enddate>20200215</enddate><creator>Wu, Guo‐Rong</creator><creator>Wang, Xiaowan</creator><creator>Baeken, Chris</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>17B</scope><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>ARHDP</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4918-3955</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9885-3041</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6760-8860</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200215</creationdate><title>Baseline functional connectivity may predict placebo responses to accelerated rTMS treatment in major depression</title><author>Wu, Guo‐Rong ; Wang, Xiaowan ; Baeken, Chris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5108-7a3e6e416b3426891a53b29fa20cab89f9f67eafdac6a0bd460a2130704c6f3c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Antidepressants</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain mapping</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cortex (cingulate)</topic><topic>Cortex (parietal)</topic><topic>depression</topic><topic>Depression, Mental</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Frontal gyrus</topic><topic>functional connectivity</topic><topic>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Neuroimaging</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Neurosciences & Neurology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>placebo responses</topic><topic>Prefrontal cortex</topic><topic>Protocol (computers)</topic><topic>Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>rostral ACC</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>sham iTBS</topic><topic>sham rTMS</topic><topic>Transcranial magnetic stimulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Guo‐Rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaowan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baeken, Chris</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI & AHCI)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Human brain mapping</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Guo‐Rong</au><au>Wang, Xiaowan</au><au>Baeken, Chris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Baseline functional connectivity may predict placebo responses to accelerated rTMS treatment in major depression</atitle><jtitle>Human brain mapping</jtitle><stitle>HUM BRAIN MAPP</stitle><addtitle>Hum Brain Mapp</addtitle><date>2020-02-15</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>632</spage><epage>639</epage><pages>632-639</pages><issn>1065-9471</issn><eissn>1097-0193</eissn><abstract>Although in theory sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has no inherent therapeutic value, nonetheless, such placebo stimulations may have relevant therapeutic effects in clinically depressed patients. On the other hand, antidepressant responses to sham rTMS are quite heterogeneous across individuals and its neural underpinnings have not been explored yet. The current brain imaging study aims to detect baseline neural fingerprints resulting in clinically beneficial placebo rTMS treatment responses. We collected resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging data prior to a registered randomized clinical trial of accelerated placebo stimulation protocol in patients documented with treatment‐resistant depression (http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01832805). In addition to global brain connectivity and rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC) seed‐based functional connectivity (FC), elastic‐net regression and cross‐validation procedures were used to identify baseline intrinsic brain connectivity biomarkers for sham‐rTMS responses. Placebo responses to accelerated sham rTMS were correlated with baseline global brain connectivity in the rACC/ventral medial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). Concerning the rACC seed‐based FC analysis, the placebo response was associated positively with the precuneus/posterior cingulate (PCun/PCC) cortex and negatively with the middle frontal gyrus. Our findings provide first brain imaging evidence for placebo responses to sham stimulation being predictable from rACC rsFC profiles, especially in brain areas implicated in (re)appraisal and self‐focus processes.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>31633261</pmid><doi>10.1002/hbm.24828</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4918-3955</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9885-3041</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6760-8860</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1065-9471 |
ispartof | Human brain mapping, 2020-02, Vol.41 (3), p.632-639 |
issn | 1065-9471 1097-0193 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_webofscience_primary_000491154100001 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); PubMed Central; Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /> |
subjects | Antidepressants Biomarkers Brain Brain mapping Clinical trials Cortex (cingulate) Cortex (parietal) depression Depression, Mental Drug therapy Frontal gyrus functional connectivity Functional magnetic resonance imaging Life Sciences & Biomedicine Magnetic fields Magnetic resonance imaging Medical imaging Mental depression Neural networks Neuroimaging Neurosciences Neurosciences & Neurology Patients placebo responses Prefrontal cortex Protocol (computers) Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging Regression analysis rostral ACC Science & Technology sham iTBS sham rTMS Transcranial magnetic stimulation |
title | Baseline functional connectivity may predict placebo responses to accelerated rTMS treatment in major depression |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T22%3A20%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Baseline%20functional%20connectivity%20may%20predict%20placebo%20responses%20to%20accelerated%20rTMS%20treatment%20in%20major%20depression&rft.jtitle=Human%20brain%20mapping&rft.au=Wu,%20Guo%E2%80%90Rong&rft.date=2020-02-15&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=632&rft.epage=639&rft.pages=632-639&rft.issn=1065-9471&rft.eissn=1097-0193&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hbm.24828&rft_dat=%3Cgale_webof%3EA710623746%3C/gale_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2341959917&rft_id=info:pmid/31633261&rft_galeid=A710623746&rfr_iscdi=true |