Civilizations as Ontological Security?: Stories of the Russian Trauma

The study addresses the phenomenon of civilizational discourses in Russia from the perspective of ontological security theories. It argues that the discourse on "Russian civilization" or the "Russian world" is a form of establishment identity-building practices that marries a cul...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Problems of post-communism 2020-01, Vol.67 (1), p.24-36
1. Verfasser: Kazharski, Aliaksei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 36
container_issue 1
container_start_page 24
container_title Problems of post-communism
container_volume 67
creator Kazharski, Aliaksei
description The study addresses the phenomenon of civilizational discourses in Russia from the perspective of ontological security theories. It argues that the discourse on "Russian civilization" or the "Russian world" is a form of establishment identity-building practices that marries a culturalist vision of Russia to narratives of traumas or ruptures in its biographical narrative. Thus, the holistic notion of a civilization is an attempt to construct unity across ideological, spatial, and societal cleavages associated with the disintegration of the Soviet Union and earlier critical points in Russian history. The article further argues that much of the discourse on the "Russian world" produces a notably "securitized" or "closed" identity that resists change and inhibits Russia's adaptation to its postimperial circumstances.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10758216.2019.1591925
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>webofscience_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000469600700001</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>000469600700001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-45ef427705619abccf987aeed5580174d7f2d5fb2162652cefab215db7a4e1503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QejJi2ydZHc22ZPK4hcUelDBW8hmE4lsN5JsLfXXm9rqUTzNe3ifYZ4h5JTClIKACwocBaPllAGtphQrWjHcIyOKyDMu8pf9lFMn25QOyVGMbwCQF6IakbPafbjOfarB-T5OVJzM-8F3_tVp1U0ejV4GN6wvj8mBVV00J7s5Js-3N0_1fTab3z3U17NMMxRDVqCxBeMcsKSVarS2leDKmBZRAOVFyy1r0TbpDlYi08aqlLFtuCoMRcjHBLd7dfAxBmPle3ALFdaSgtzIyh9ZuZGVO9nEnW-5lWm8jdqZXptfNtkWZVUC8JSAprb4f7t2w_dzar_sh4RebVHXWx8WauVD18pBrTsfbFC9dlHmf9_6BSdAe54</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Civilizations as Ontological Security?: Stories of the Russian Trauma</title><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><creator>Kazharski, Aliaksei</creator><creatorcontrib>Kazharski, Aliaksei</creatorcontrib><description>The study addresses the phenomenon of civilizational discourses in Russia from the perspective of ontological security theories. It argues that the discourse on "Russian civilization" or the "Russian world" is a form of establishment identity-building practices that marries a culturalist vision of Russia to narratives of traumas or ruptures in its biographical narrative. Thus, the holistic notion of a civilization is an attempt to construct unity across ideological, spatial, and societal cleavages associated with the disintegration of the Soviet Union and earlier critical points in Russian history. The article further argues that much of the discourse on the "Russian world" produces a notably "securitized" or "closed" identity that resists change and inhibits Russia's adaptation to its postimperial circumstances.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1075-8216</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-783X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10758216.2019.1591925</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>ABINGDON: Routledge</publisher><subject>Government &amp; Law ; Political Science ; Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>Problems of post-communism, 2020-01, Vol.67 (1), p.24-36</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019 Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>29</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000469600700001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-45ef427705619abccf987aeed5580174d7f2d5fb2162652cefab215db7a4e1503</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9782-7746</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,28254</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kazharski, Aliaksei</creatorcontrib><title>Civilizations as Ontological Security?: Stories of the Russian Trauma</title><title>Problems of post-communism</title><addtitle>PROBL POST-COMMUNISM</addtitle><description>The study addresses the phenomenon of civilizational discourses in Russia from the perspective of ontological security theories. It argues that the discourse on "Russian civilization" or the "Russian world" is a form of establishment identity-building practices that marries a culturalist vision of Russia to narratives of traumas or ruptures in its biographical narrative. Thus, the holistic notion of a civilization is an attempt to construct unity across ideological, spatial, and societal cleavages associated with the disintegration of the Soviet Union and earlier critical points in Russian history. The article further argues that much of the discourse on the "Russian world" produces a notably "securitized" or "closed" identity that resists change and inhibits Russia's adaptation to its postimperial circumstances.</description><subject>Government &amp; Law</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><issn>1075-8216</issn><issn>1557-783X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ARHDP</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QejJi2ydZHc22ZPK4hcUelDBW8hmE4lsN5JsLfXXm9rqUTzNe3ifYZ4h5JTClIKACwocBaPllAGtphQrWjHcIyOKyDMu8pf9lFMn25QOyVGMbwCQF6IakbPafbjOfarB-T5OVJzM-8F3_tVp1U0ejV4GN6wvj8mBVV00J7s5Js-3N0_1fTab3z3U17NMMxRDVqCxBeMcsKSVarS2leDKmBZRAOVFyy1r0TbpDlYi08aqlLFtuCoMRcjHBLd7dfAxBmPle3ALFdaSgtzIyh9ZuZGVO9nEnW-5lWm8jdqZXptfNtkWZVUC8JSAprb4f7t2w_dzar_sh4RebVHXWx8WauVD18pBrTsfbFC9dlHmf9_6BSdAe54</recordid><startdate>20200102</startdate><enddate>20200102</enddate><creator>Kazharski, Aliaksei</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>ARHDP</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9782-7746</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200102</creationdate><title>Civilizations as Ontological Security?</title><author>Kazharski, Aliaksei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-45ef427705619abccf987aeed5580174d7f2d5fb2162652cefab215db7a4e1503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Government &amp; Law</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kazharski, Aliaksei</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI &amp; AHCI)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Problems of post-communism</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kazharski, Aliaksei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Civilizations as Ontological Security?: Stories of the Russian Trauma</atitle><jtitle>Problems of post-communism</jtitle><stitle>PROBL POST-COMMUNISM</stitle><date>2020-01-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>24-36</pages><issn>1075-8216</issn><eissn>1557-783X</eissn><abstract>The study addresses the phenomenon of civilizational discourses in Russia from the perspective of ontological security theories. It argues that the discourse on "Russian civilization" or the "Russian world" is a form of establishment identity-building practices that marries a culturalist vision of Russia to narratives of traumas or ruptures in its biographical narrative. Thus, the holistic notion of a civilization is an attempt to construct unity across ideological, spatial, and societal cleavages associated with the disintegration of the Soviet Union and earlier critical points in Russian history. The article further argues that much of the discourse on the "Russian world" produces a notably "securitized" or "closed" identity that resists change and inhibits Russia's adaptation to its postimperial circumstances.</abstract><cop>ABINGDON</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/10758216.2019.1591925</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9782-7746</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1075-8216
ispartof Problems of post-communism, 2020-01, Vol.67 (1), p.24-36
issn 1075-8216
1557-783X
language eng
recordid cdi_webofscience_primary_000469600700001
source Political Science Complete; Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />
subjects Government & Law
Political Science
Social Sciences
title Civilizations as Ontological Security?: Stories of the Russian Trauma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T21%3A24%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-webofscience_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Civilizations%20as%20Ontological%20Security?:%20Stories%20of%20the%20Russian%20Trauma&rft.jtitle=Problems%20of%20post-communism&rft.au=Kazharski,%20Aliaksei&rft.date=2020-01-02&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=24-36&rft.issn=1075-8216&rft.eissn=1557-783X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10758216.2019.1591925&rft_dat=%3Cwebofscience_infor%3E000469600700001%3C/webofscience_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true