Civilizations as Ontological Security?: Stories of the Russian Trauma
The study addresses the phenomenon of civilizational discourses in Russia from the perspective of ontological security theories. It argues that the discourse on "Russian civilization" or the "Russian world" is a form of establishment identity-building practices that marries a cul...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Problems of post-communism 2020-01, Vol.67 (1), p.24-36 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 36 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 24 |
container_title | Problems of post-communism |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Kazharski, Aliaksei |
description | The study addresses the phenomenon of civilizational discourses in Russia from the perspective of ontological security theories. It argues that the discourse on "Russian civilization" or the "Russian world" is a form of establishment identity-building practices that marries a culturalist vision of Russia to narratives of traumas or ruptures in its biographical narrative. Thus, the holistic notion of a civilization is an attempt to construct unity across ideological, spatial, and societal cleavages associated with the disintegration of the Soviet Union and earlier critical points in Russian history. The article further argues that much of the discourse on the "Russian world" produces a notably "securitized" or "closed" identity that resists change and inhibits Russia's adaptation to its postimperial circumstances. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10758216.2019.1591925 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>webofscience_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000469600700001</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>000469600700001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-45ef427705619abccf987aeed5580174d7f2d5fb2162652cefab215db7a4e1503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QejJi2ydZHc22ZPK4hcUelDBW8hmE4lsN5JsLfXXm9rqUTzNe3ifYZ4h5JTClIKACwocBaPllAGtphQrWjHcIyOKyDMu8pf9lFMn25QOyVGMbwCQF6IakbPafbjOfarB-T5OVJzM-8F3_tVp1U0ejV4GN6wvj8mBVV00J7s5Js-3N0_1fTab3z3U17NMMxRDVqCxBeMcsKSVarS2leDKmBZRAOVFyy1r0TbpDlYi08aqlLFtuCoMRcjHBLd7dfAxBmPle3ALFdaSgtzIyh9ZuZGVO9nEnW-5lWm8jdqZXptfNtkWZVUC8JSAprb4f7t2w_dzar_sh4RebVHXWx8WauVD18pBrTsfbFC9dlHmf9_6BSdAe54</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Civilizations as Ontological Security?: Stories of the Russian Trauma</title><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><creator>Kazharski, Aliaksei</creator><creatorcontrib>Kazharski, Aliaksei</creatorcontrib><description>The study addresses the phenomenon of civilizational discourses in Russia from the perspective of ontological security theories. It argues that the discourse on "Russian civilization" or the "Russian world" is a form of establishment identity-building practices that marries a culturalist vision of Russia to narratives of traumas or ruptures in its biographical narrative. Thus, the holistic notion of a civilization is an attempt to construct unity across ideological, spatial, and societal cleavages associated with the disintegration of the Soviet Union and earlier critical points in Russian history. The article further argues that much of the discourse on the "Russian world" produces a notably "securitized" or "closed" identity that resists change and inhibits Russia's adaptation to its postimperial circumstances.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1075-8216</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-783X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10758216.2019.1591925</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>ABINGDON: Routledge</publisher><subject>Government & Law ; Political Science ; Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>Problems of post-communism, 2020-01, Vol.67 (1), p.24-36</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>29</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000469600700001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-45ef427705619abccf987aeed5580174d7f2d5fb2162652cefab215db7a4e1503</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9782-7746</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,28254</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kazharski, Aliaksei</creatorcontrib><title>Civilizations as Ontological Security?: Stories of the Russian Trauma</title><title>Problems of post-communism</title><addtitle>PROBL POST-COMMUNISM</addtitle><description>The study addresses the phenomenon of civilizational discourses in Russia from the perspective of ontological security theories. It argues that the discourse on "Russian civilization" or the "Russian world" is a form of establishment identity-building practices that marries a culturalist vision of Russia to narratives of traumas or ruptures in its biographical narrative. Thus, the holistic notion of a civilization is an attempt to construct unity across ideological, spatial, and societal cleavages associated with the disintegration of the Soviet Union and earlier critical points in Russian history. The article further argues that much of the discourse on the "Russian world" produces a notably "securitized" or "closed" identity that resists change and inhibits Russia's adaptation to its postimperial circumstances.</description><subject>Government & Law</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><issn>1075-8216</issn><issn>1557-783X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ARHDP</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QejJi2ydZHc22ZPK4hcUelDBW8hmE4lsN5JsLfXXm9rqUTzNe3ifYZ4h5JTClIKACwocBaPllAGtphQrWjHcIyOKyDMu8pf9lFMn25QOyVGMbwCQF6IakbPafbjOfarB-T5OVJzM-8F3_tVp1U0ejV4GN6wvj8mBVV00J7s5Js-3N0_1fTab3z3U17NMMxRDVqCxBeMcsKSVarS2leDKmBZRAOVFyy1r0TbpDlYi08aqlLFtuCoMRcjHBLd7dfAxBmPle3ALFdaSgtzIyh9ZuZGVO9nEnW-5lWm8jdqZXptfNtkWZVUC8JSAprb4f7t2w_dzar_sh4RebVHXWx8WauVD18pBrTsfbFC9dlHmf9_6BSdAe54</recordid><startdate>20200102</startdate><enddate>20200102</enddate><creator>Kazharski, Aliaksei</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>ARHDP</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9782-7746</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200102</creationdate><title>Civilizations as Ontological Security?</title><author>Kazharski, Aliaksei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-45ef427705619abccf987aeed5580174d7f2d5fb2162652cefab215db7a4e1503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Government & Law</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kazharski, Aliaksei</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI & AHCI)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Problems of post-communism</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kazharski, Aliaksei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Civilizations as Ontological Security?: Stories of the Russian Trauma</atitle><jtitle>Problems of post-communism</jtitle><stitle>PROBL POST-COMMUNISM</stitle><date>2020-01-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>24-36</pages><issn>1075-8216</issn><eissn>1557-783X</eissn><abstract>The study addresses the phenomenon of civilizational discourses in Russia from the perspective of ontological security theories. It argues that the discourse on "Russian civilization" or the "Russian world" is a form of establishment identity-building practices that marries a culturalist vision of Russia to narratives of traumas or ruptures in its biographical narrative. Thus, the holistic notion of a civilization is an attempt to construct unity across ideological, spatial, and societal cleavages associated with the disintegration of the Soviet Union and earlier critical points in Russian history. The article further argues that much of the discourse on the "Russian world" produces a notably "securitized" or "closed" identity that resists change and inhibits Russia's adaptation to its postimperial circumstances.</abstract><cop>ABINGDON</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/10758216.2019.1591925</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9782-7746</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1075-8216 |
ispartof | Problems of post-communism, 2020-01, Vol.67 (1), p.24-36 |
issn | 1075-8216 1557-783X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_webofscience_primary_000469600700001 |
source | Political Science Complete; Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /> |
subjects | Government & Law Political Science Social Sciences |
title | Civilizations as Ontological Security?: Stories of the Russian Trauma |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T21%3A24%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-webofscience_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Civilizations%20as%20Ontological%20Security?:%20Stories%20of%20the%20Russian%20Trauma&rft.jtitle=Problems%20of%20post-communism&rft.au=Kazharski,%20Aliaksei&rft.date=2020-01-02&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=24-36&rft.issn=1075-8216&rft.eissn=1557-783X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10758216.2019.1591925&rft_dat=%3Cwebofscience_infor%3E000469600700001%3C/webofscience_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |