CPA同业互查制度何去何从
产生于'诉讼浪潮'时代的CPA同业互查制度,是注册会计师行业内部监管的一项重要措施,自产生以来,同业互查制度起到了积极的作用.然而,众多会计丑闻的发生,使人们对同业互查的有效性产生了质疑,同业互查制度遭到了众多的批评.应该如何评价这种制度,中国是否需要这样的制度,它将何去何从,本文就此作了探讨....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | 中南财经政法大学学报 2004-12 (6), p.103-106 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | chi |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 106 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 103 |
container_title | 中南财经政法大学学报 |
container_volume | |
creator | 李效梅 彭伟 |
description | 产生于'诉讼浪潮'时代的CPA同业互查制度,是注册会计师行业内部监管的一项重要措施,自产生以来,同业互查制度起到了积极的作用.然而,众多会计丑闻的发生,使人们对同业互查的有效性产生了质疑,同业互查制度遭到了众多的批评.应该如何评价这种制度,中国是否需要这样的制度,它将何去何从,本文就此作了探讨. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5230.2004.06.018 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>cass_wanfa</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wanfang_journals_zncjzfdxxb200406018</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cass_id>10762479</cass_id><wanfj_id>zncjzfdxxb200406018</wanfj_id><sourcerecordid>10762479</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c548-4b62bd51695038f916c3ced5983a72f5dd768e6aee230ed8a7052eabcfe7a273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9T0tKA0EU7IWCIeYALgV3Mu3r7unfMgx-AgEDcT_09EcySAs2YsgJXEgQwY0bV3oEkQRvM-M5HIm4qYKiqA9CBwQw00If1XiWUsQEgGWcMsAUIMcgMBC1hXr_-g4apDSrAEBLAor00H4xGbaPD83nS7N6-n59a-8_2tV78_XcLtcdNuvlLtoO5ir5wR_30fTk-KI4y8bnp6NiOM4sz1WWV4JWjhOhOTAVNBGWWe-4VsxIGrhzUigvjPfdDO-UkcCpN5UNXhoqWR8dblLvTAwmXpb19e1N7PrKRbT1Irj5vPo9BaK71Ln3Nm5rUipjSq4kIAXNpWY_52tWqQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>CPA同业互查制度何去何从</title><source>国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库 (National Social Sciences Database)</source><creator>李效梅 ; 彭伟</creator><creatorcontrib>李效梅 ; 彭伟</creatorcontrib><description>产生于'诉讼浪潮'时代的CPA同业互查制度,是注册会计师行业内部监管的一项重要措施,自产生以来,同业互查制度起到了积极的作用.然而,众多会计丑闻的发生,使人们对同业互查的有效性产生了质疑,同业互查制度遭到了众多的批评.应该如何评价这种制度,中国是否需要这样的制度,它将何去何从,本文就此作了探讨.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1003-5230</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5230.2004.06.018</identifier><language>chi</language><publisher>中南财经政法大学</publisher><ispartof>中南财经政法大学学报, 2004-12 (6), p.103-106</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/images/PeriodicalImages/zncjzfdxxb/zncjzfdxxb.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>李效梅</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>彭伟</creatorcontrib><title>CPA同业互查制度何去何从</title><title>中南财经政法大学学报</title><description>产生于'诉讼浪潮'时代的CPA同业互查制度,是注册会计师行业内部监管的一项重要措施,自产生以来,同业互查制度起到了积极的作用.然而,众多会计丑闻的发生,使人们对同业互查的有效性产生了质疑,同业互查制度遭到了众多的批评.应该如何评价这种制度,中国是否需要这样的制度,它将何去何从,本文就此作了探讨.</description><issn>1003-5230</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9T0tKA0EU7IWCIeYALgV3Mu3r7unfMgx-AgEDcT_09EcySAs2YsgJXEgQwY0bV3oEkQRvM-M5HIm4qYKiqA9CBwQw00If1XiWUsQEgGWcMsAUIMcgMBC1hXr_-g4apDSrAEBLAor00H4xGbaPD83nS7N6-n59a-8_2tV78_XcLtcdNuvlLtoO5ir5wR_30fTk-KI4y8bnp6NiOM4sz1WWV4JWjhOhOTAVNBGWWe-4VsxIGrhzUigvjPfdDO-UkcCpN5UNXhoqWR8dblLvTAwmXpb19e1N7PrKRbT1Irj5vPo9BaK71Ln3Nm5rUipjSq4kIAXNpWY_52tWqQ</recordid><startdate>20041201</startdate><enddate>20041201</enddate><creator>李效梅</creator><creator>彭伟</creator><general>中南财经政法大学</general><general>中南财经政法大学,学报编辑部%中南财经政法大学,会计学院,湖北,武汉,430060</general><scope>NSCOK</scope><scope>2B.</scope><scope>4A8</scope><scope>92I</scope><scope>93N</scope><scope>PSX</scope><scope>TCJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041201</creationdate><title>CPA同业互查制度何去何从</title><author>李效梅 ; 彭伟</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c548-4b62bd51695038f916c3ced5983a72f5dd768e6aee230ed8a7052eabcfe7a273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>chi</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>李效梅</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>彭伟</creatorcontrib><collection>国家哲学社会科学文献中心 (National Center for Philosophy and Social Sciences Documentation)</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong</collection><collection>WANFANG Data Centre</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals</collection><collection>万方数据期刊 - 香港版</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><jtitle>中南财经政法大学学报</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>李效梅</au><au>彭伟</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CPA同业互查制度何去何从</atitle><jtitle>中南财经政法大学学报</jtitle><date>2004-12-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><issue>6</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>106</epage><pages>103-106</pages><issn>1003-5230</issn><abstract>产生于'诉讼浪潮'时代的CPA同业互查制度,是注册会计师行业内部监管的一项重要措施,自产生以来,同业互查制度起到了积极的作用.然而,众多会计丑闻的发生,使人们对同业互查的有效性产生了质疑,同业互查制度遭到了众多的批评.应该如何评价这种制度,中国是否需要这样的制度,它将何去何从,本文就此作了探讨.</abstract><pub>中南财经政法大学</pub><doi>10.3969/j.issn.1003-5230.2004.06.018</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1003-5230 |
ispartof | 中南财经政法大学学报, 2004-12 (6), p.103-106 |
issn | 1003-5230 |
language | chi |
recordid | cdi_wanfang_journals_zncjzfdxxb200406018 |
source | 国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库 (National Social Sciences Database) |
title | CPA同业互查制度何去何从 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T01%3A27%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cass_wanfa&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CPA%E5%90%8C%E4%B8%9A%E4%BA%92%E6%9F%A5%E5%88%B6%E5%BA%A6%E4%BD%95%E5%8E%BB%E4%BD%95%E4%BB%8E&rft.jtitle=%E4%B8%AD%E5%8D%97%E8%B4%A2%E7%BB%8F%E6%94%BF%E6%B3%95%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%A6%E5%AD%A6%E6%8A%A5&rft.au=%E6%9D%8E%E6%95%88%E6%A2%85&rft.date=2004-12-01&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=106&rft.pages=103-106&rft.issn=1003-5230&rft_id=info:doi/10.3969/j.issn.1003-5230.2004.06.018&rft_dat=%3Ccass_wanfa%3E10762479%3C/cass_wanfa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cass_id=10762479&rft_wanfj_id=zncjzfdxxb200406018&rfr_iscdi=true |