道德和法律的内在性与外在性辨正--从康德动机论伦理学谈起
关于道德和法律的内在性与外在性问题,历来占主导的观点是:"道德的内在性、法的外在性".我认为,断言道德只具有内在性,法律只具有外在性,是片面的.实际上,道德和法律两者都既具有内在性又具有外在性.
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | 中共济南市委党校学报 2003-06 (3), p.117-118 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Magazinearticle |
| Sprache: | chi |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 118 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 117 |
| container_title | 中共济南市委党校学报 |
| container_volume | |
| creator | 谭德贵 |
| description | 关于道德和法律的内在性与外在性问题,历来占主导的观点是:"道德的内在性、法的外在性".我认为,断言道德只具有内在性,法律只具有外在性,是片面的.实际上,道德和法律两者都既具有内在性又具有外在性. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6359.2003.03.034 |
| format | Magazinearticle |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>cass_wanfa</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wanfang_journals_zgjnswdxxb200303034</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cass_id>1001330358</cass_id><wanfj_id>zgjnswdxxb200303034</wanfj_id><sourcerecordid>1001330358</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564-fd19cdf78391e8ff07be33f898b8d2ee53b4c5df50f1990ca7df0cabc4ccaf9c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UE1Lw0AQ3YOCpfYXePUmibvZbLJ7lOIXFPTQe0h2s6VFIrhIiycFLaJSRNGD9KbUXCqCSKVKf002jf_CxIrMY95j5s0MDADLCJqYOWy1ZTaVikzkuJbhYMJMC0Js_sKeA6X_-gKoKNUMIEHYocgiJbD7fXKrJyN9c5W-3enJ5fThVHfPdD9Oj5-Tj55-up_pbBKnw0fDSD57ejwqJi7itD_OXsbJ12B63dXDQfZ6nr2PFsG89PdUWPnjMqhvrNerW0ZtZ3O7ulYzOHFsQwrEuJAuxQyFVEroBiHGkjIaUGGFIcGBzYmQBErEGOS-K2SeA25z7kvGcRmszNa2_Uj6UcNr7R8eRPlB76jRilRbdDpB8YQi7Ny9NHNzXykvUkp4CEKE8yah-AfDWXsN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>道德和法律的内在性与外在性辨正--从康德动机论伦理学谈起</title><source>国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库 (National Social Sciences Database)</source><creator>谭德贵</creator><creatorcontrib>谭德贵</creatorcontrib><description>关于道德和法律的内在性与外在性问题,历来占主导的观点是:"道德的内在性、法的外在性".我认为,断言道德只具有内在性,法律只具有外在性,是片面的.实际上,道德和法律两者都既具有内在性又具有外在性.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1672-6359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6359.2003.03.034</identifier><language>chi</language><publisher>中共济南市委党校</publisher><ispartof>中共济南市委党校学报, 2003-06 (3), p.117-118</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/images/PeriodicalImages/zgjnswdxxb/zgjnswdxxb.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>谭德贵</creatorcontrib><title>道德和法律的内在性与外在性辨正--从康德动机论伦理学谈起</title><title>中共济南市委党校学报</title><description>关于道德和法律的内在性与外在性问题,历来占主导的观点是:"道德的内在性、法的外在性".我认为,断言道德只具有内在性,法律只具有外在性,是片面的.实际上,道德和法律两者都既具有内在性又具有外在性.</description><issn>1672-6359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><recordid>eNo9UE1Lw0AQ3YOCpfYXePUmibvZbLJ7lOIXFPTQe0h2s6VFIrhIiycFLaJSRNGD9KbUXCqCSKVKf002jf_CxIrMY95j5s0MDADLCJqYOWy1ZTaVikzkuJbhYMJMC0Js_sKeA6X_-gKoKNUMIEHYocgiJbD7fXKrJyN9c5W-3enJ5fThVHfPdD9Oj5-Tj55-up_pbBKnw0fDSD57ejwqJi7itD_OXsbJ12B63dXDQfZ6nr2PFsG89PdUWPnjMqhvrNerW0ZtZ3O7ulYzOHFsQwrEuJAuxQyFVEroBiHGkjIaUGGFIcGBzYmQBErEGOS-K2SeA25z7kvGcRmszNa2_Uj6UcNr7R8eRPlB76jRilRbdDpB8YQi7Ny9NHNzXykvUkp4CEKE8yah-AfDWXsN</recordid><startdate>20030601</startdate><enddate>20030601</enddate><creator>谭德贵</creator><general>中共济南市委党校</general><general>济南市社会主义学院</general><general>济南行政学院</general><general>山东社会科学院</general><scope>NSCOK</scope><scope>2B.</scope><scope>4A8</scope><scope>92I</scope><scope>93N</scope><scope>PSX</scope><scope>TCJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030601</creationdate><title>道德和法律的内在性与外在性辨正--从康德动机论伦理学谈起</title><author>谭德贵</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564-fd19cdf78391e8ff07be33f898b8d2ee53b4c5df50f1990ca7df0cabc4ccaf9c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>chi</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>谭德贵</creatorcontrib><collection>国家哲学社会科学文献中心 (National Center for Philosophy and Social Sciences Documentation)</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong</collection><collection>WANFANG Data Centre</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals</collection><collection>万方数据期刊 - 香港版</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><jtitle>中共济南市委党校学报</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>谭德贵</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>道德和法律的内在性与外在性辨正--从康德动机论伦理学谈起</atitle><jtitle>中共济南市委党校学报</jtitle><date>2003-06-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><issue>3</issue><spage>117</spage><epage>118</epage><pages>117-118</pages><issn>1672-6359</issn><abstract>关于道德和法律的内在性与外在性问题,历来占主导的观点是:"道德的内在性、法的外在性".我认为,断言道德只具有内在性,法律只具有外在性,是片面的.实际上,道德和法律两者都既具有内在性又具有外在性.</abstract><pub>中共济南市委党校</pub><doi>10.3969/j.issn.1672-6359.2003.03.034</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1672-6359 |
| ispartof | 中共济南市委党校学报, 2003-06 (3), p.117-118 |
| issn | 1672-6359 |
| language | chi |
| recordid | cdi_wanfang_journals_zgjnswdxxb200303034 |
| source | 国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库 (National Social Sciences Database) |
| title | 道德和法律的内在性与外在性辨正--从康德动机论伦理学谈起 |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T01%3A56%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cass_wanfa&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E9%81%93%E5%BE%B7%E5%92%8C%E6%B3%95%E5%BE%8B%E7%9A%84%E5%86%85%E5%9C%A8%E6%80%A7%E4%B8%8E%E5%A4%96%E5%9C%A8%E6%80%A7%E8%BE%A8%E6%AD%A3--%E4%BB%8E%E5%BA%B7%E5%BE%B7%E5%8A%A8%E6%9C%BA%E8%AE%BA%E4%BC%A6%E7%90%86%E5%AD%A6%E8%B0%88%E8%B5%B7&rft.jtitle=%E4%B8%AD%E5%85%B1%E6%B5%8E%E5%8D%97%E5%B8%82%E5%A7%94%E5%85%9A%E6%A0%A1%E5%AD%A6%E6%8A%A5&rft.au=%E8%B0%AD%E5%BE%B7%E8%B4%B5&rft.date=2003-06-01&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=117&rft.epage=118&rft.pages=117-118&rft.issn=1672-6359&rft_id=info:doi/10.3969/j.issn.1672-6359.2003.03.034&rft_dat=%3Ccass_wanfa%3E1001330358%3C/cass_wanfa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cass_id=1001330358&rft_wanfj_id=zgjnswdxxb200303034&rfr_iscdi=true |