论受贿罪、“斡旋受贿”与利用影响力受贿罪的异同
受贿罪、“斡旋受贿”与利用影响力受贿罪之间既有联系又有区别。三者主观方面都是故意，交易的对象也都是财物。但三者在客体、客观方面、主体方面存在较大区别。认清三者的联系和区别有助于正确地定罪量刑，更好地指导司法实践。...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | 学理论 2011 (23), p.91-92 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | chi |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 92 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 23 |
| container_start_page | 91 |
| container_title | 学理论 |
| container_volume | |
| creator | 黄枭燕 |
| description | 受贿罪、“斡旋受贿”与利用影响力受贿罪之间既有联系又有区别。三者主观方面都是故意，交易的对象也都是财物。但三者在客体、客观方面、主体方面存在较大区别。认清三者的联系和区别有助于正确地定罪量刑，更好地指导司法实践。 |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2589.2011.23.044 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wanfang_jour_chong</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wanfang_journals_xll201123044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>38885884</cqvip_id><wanfj_id>xll201123044</wanfj_id><sourcerecordid>xll201123044</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c554-e44c500b7a7c62960c774c7109767dd5f9df3c6e281935e2414f7e2b68bfcd573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j8tKw0AARWehYKn9CKHbxHlmZpZS6gMKbroPySSpKTHVBFF3UVyIb1As-Fi4UxeC4ELE4r9Up-lnGIl0deFwuJcLQB1Bk0hLznfNME1jE0GIDcyENDFEyMTEhJROgcqEz4BamoYuhBQjRAWqgOb45UOf98dvX_ng-TvbG2Z3o-uHUf-4hMPs_uf9TB8-5VePevCqL0_10e3Ez28O9Oe-vjiZBdOBE6V-7T-roL3YbDeWjdbq0kpjoWUoxqjhU6oYhC53uLKwtKDinCqOoOQW9zwWSC8gyvKxQJIwH1NEA-5j1xJuoDzGSRXUy9ptJw6cuGN3e1tJXAzaO1H0dxmT4nChzZWaWuvFnc2wEDeScN1Jdm0ihGBCUPILEXBxTQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>论受贿罪、“斡旋受贿”与利用影响力受贿罪的异同</title><source>国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库 (National Social Sciences Database)</source><creator>黄枭燕</creator><creatorcontrib>黄枭燕</creatorcontrib><description>受贿罪、“斡旋受贿”与利用影响力受贿罪之间既有联系又有区别。三者主观方面都是故意，交易的对象也都是财物。但三者在客体、客观方面、主体方面存在较大区别。认清三者的联系和区别有助于正确地定罪量刑，更好地指导司法实践。</description><identifier>ISSN: 1002-2589</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2589.2011.23.044</identifier><language>chi</language><publisher>华东政法大学,上海,200042</publisher><subject>利用影响力受贿罪 ; 受贿罪 ; 斡旋受贿</subject><ispartof>学理论, 2011 (23), p.91-92</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/81248X/81248X.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4014,27914,27915,27916</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>黄枭燕</creatorcontrib><title>论受贿罪、“斡旋受贿”与利用影响力受贿罪的异同</title><title>学理论</title><description>受贿罪、“斡旋受贿”与利用影响力受贿罪之间既有联系又有区别。三者主观方面都是故意，交易的对象也都是财物。但三者在客体、客观方面、主体方面存在较大区别。认清三者的联系和区别有助于正确地定罪量刑，更好地指导司法实践。</description><subject>利用影响力受贿罪</subject><subject>受贿罪</subject><subject>斡旋受贿</subject><issn>1002-2589</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9j8tKw0AARWehYKn9CKHbxHlmZpZS6gMKbroPySSpKTHVBFF3UVyIb1As-Fi4UxeC4ELE4r9Up-lnGIl0deFwuJcLQB1Bk0hLznfNME1jE0GIDcyENDFEyMTEhJROgcqEz4BamoYuhBQjRAWqgOb45UOf98dvX_ng-TvbG2Z3o-uHUf-4hMPs_uf9TB8-5VePevCqL0_10e3Ez28O9Oe-vjiZBdOBE6V-7T-roL3YbDeWjdbq0kpjoWUoxqjhU6oYhC53uLKwtKDinCqOoOQW9zwWSC8gyvKxQJIwH1NEA-5j1xJuoDzGSRXUy9ptJw6cuGN3e1tJXAzaO1H0dxmT4nChzZWaWuvFnc2wEDeScN1Jdm0ihGBCUPILEXBxTQ</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>黄枭燕</creator><general>华东政法大学,上海,200042</general><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>W93</scope><scope>~WA</scope><scope>2B.</scope><scope>4A8</scope><scope>92I</scope><scope>93N</scope><scope>PSX</scope><scope>TCJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>论受贿罪、“斡旋受贿”与利用影响力受贿罪的异同</title><author>黄枭燕</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c554-e44c500b7a7c62960c774c7109767dd5f9df3c6e281935e2414f7e2b68bfcd573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>chi</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>利用影响力受贿罪</topic><topic>受贿罪</topic><topic>斡旋受贿</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>黄枭燕</creatorcontrib><collection>中文科技期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-社会科学</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong</collection><collection>WANFANG Data Centre</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals</collection><collection>万方数据期刊 - 香港版</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><jtitle>学理论</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>黄枭燕</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>论受贿罪、“斡旋受贿”与利用影响力受贿罪的异同</atitle><jtitle>学理论</jtitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><issue>23</issue><spage>91</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>91-92</pages><issn>1002-2589</issn><abstract>受贿罪、“斡旋受贿”与利用影响力受贿罪之间既有联系又有区别。三者主观方面都是故意，交易的对象也都是财物。但三者在客体、客观方面、主体方面存在较大区别。认清三者的联系和区别有助于正确地定罪量刑，更好地指导司法实践。</abstract><pub>华东政法大学,上海,200042</pub><doi>10.3969/j.issn.1002-2589.2011.23.044</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1002-2589 |
| ispartof | 学理论, 2011 (23), p.91-92 |
| issn | 1002-2589 |
| language | chi |
| recordid | cdi_wanfang_journals_xll201123044 |
| source | 国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库 (National Social Sciences Database) |
| subjects | 利用影响力受贿罪 受贿罪 斡旋受贿 |
| title | 论受贿罪、“斡旋受贿”与利用影响力受贿罪的异同 |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T07%3A03%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wanfang_jour_chong&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E8%AE%BA%E5%8F%97%E8%B4%BF%E7%BD%AA%E3%80%81%E2%80%9C%E6%96%A1%E6%97%8B%E5%8F%97%E8%B4%BF%E2%80%9D%E4%B8%8E%E5%88%A9%E7%94%A8%E5%BD%B1%E5%93%8D%E5%8A%9B%E5%8F%97%E8%B4%BF%E7%BD%AA%E7%9A%84%E5%BC%82%E5%90%8C&rft.jtitle=%E5%AD%A6%E7%90%86%E8%AE%BA&rft.au=%E9%BB%84%E6%9E%AD%E7%87%95&rft.date=2011&rft.issue=23&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=91-92&rft.issn=1002-2589&rft_id=info:doi/10.3969/j.issn.1002-2589.2011.23.044&rft_dat=%3Cwanfang_jour_chong%3Exll201123044%3C/wanfang_jour_chong%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cqvip_id=38885884&rft_wanfj_id=xll201123044&rfr_iscdi=true |