MIT OCW 项目与网易公开课运营模式比较研究
网络公开课的兴起为教育供给缺口问题的解决开辟了新途径。在北美高校发起的网络公开课以及国家精品课程的助推下，中国网络公开课代表——网易公开课也获得了迅速的发展。对中美两个网络公开课领域的典范项目——MIC OCW与网易公开课进行比较分析，有利于探索适合中国特色的开放教育资源的共享机制。通过对两个项目进行案例对比分析，发现两者在资源来源、参与方动机及运行机制等方面均具有显著的差异；网易公开课作为目前中国网络公开课的主要模式之一，其对中国未来教育资源共享机制的探索会有深远的影响...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | 现代教育技术 2013-09, Vol.23 (9), p.021-024 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | chi |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 024 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 021 |
| container_title | 现代教育技术 |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | 邓康桥(Deng, Kang-qiao) 阙澄宇(Lv, Zuo-liang) |
| description | 网络公开课的兴起为教育供给缺口问题的解决开辟了新途径。在北美高校发起的网络公开课以及国家精品课程的助推下，中国网络公开课代表——网易公开课也获得了迅速的发展。对中美两个网络公开课领域的典范项目——MIC OCW与网易公开课进行比较分析，有利于探索适合中国特色的开放教育资源的共享机制。通过对两个项目进行案例对比分析，发现两者在资源来源、参与方动机及运行机制等方面均具有显著的差异；网易公开课作为目前中国网络公开课的主要模式之一，其对中国未来教育资源共享机制的探索会有深远的影响 |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8097.2013.09.004 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wanfang_jour_hyweb</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wanfang_journals_xdjyjs201309004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><wanfj_id>xdjyjs201309004</wanfj_id><sourcerecordid>xdjyjs201309004</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h514-e4a55d506e14a5779f16c7111e974aefbd470482ff47132bc37a16106ab8a6573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j01Lw0AYhPegYKn9A556EDwlvm92s5s9SvCjUOml4DFsmo1tkAgNUnsTxKtW7EHwYg-CgtibKNT6Z8yH_8JIxdMMw8MMQ8g6gkkll5uR2UuS2EQAaTgghWkBUhOkCcCWSOU_XyG1JOn5AIhgWZJViLPfaNdb7kH9e_Ke3718vV3mH9fZ7U168ZzOzorpvPgcFaOH7HGSzq6y6biYn-f34_zpdZUsh-oo0bU_rZL2znbb3TOard2Gu9U0ujYyQzNl24ENXGPphJAh8o5ARC0FUzr0AyaAOVYYMoHU8jtUKOQIXPmO4ragVbKxqB2oOFTxoRcdn_TjctA7DaJhlPweBVneLMm1BdkdDrTv6X6v4wFQsBzB6Q9SiWMH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>MIT OCW 项目与网易公开课运营模式比较研究</title><source>国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库 (National Social Sciences Database)</source><creator>邓康桥(Deng, Kang-qiao) ; 阙澄宇(Lv, Zuo-liang)</creator><creatorcontrib>邓康桥(Deng, Kang-qiao) ; 阙澄宇(Lv, Zuo-liang)</creatorcontrib><description>网络公开课的兴起为教育供给缺口问题的解决开辟了新途径。在北美高校发起的网络公开课以及国家精品课程的助推下，中国网络公开课代表——网易公开课也获得了迅速的发展。对中美两个网络公开课领域的典范项目——MIC OCW与网易公开课进行比较分析，有利于探索适合中国特色的开放教育资源的共享机制。通过对两个项目进行案例对比分析，发现两者在资源来源、参与方动机及运行机制等方面均具有显著的差异；网易公开课作为目前中国网络公开课的主要模式之一，其对中国未来教育资源共享机制的探索会有深远的影响</description><description>There is a huge gap between the need of social development and high education supply, which the traditional education cannot fill, and also it’s economical un-feasible to build more college. ICT brings e-learning whose development provides a new way to even people’s rights to be educated. Since 2001, MIT launched the OWC project and the international campaign of ORE. NETEASE is a Chinese NASDAQ listed Company which is also a reprehensive of Chinese OCW. To study the different operational mode is profound for Chinese ORE program. We put MIT and NETEASE together and do a Sino-U.S. case-level comparison, and find out that there are obvious differences in the OCW source, participants, motivation and organizational mechanism. We believe that the NETEASE maybe a prosperous way to d</description><identifier>ISSN: 1009-8097</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8097.2013.09.004</identifier><language>chi</language><publisher>大陸: 中國清華大學/電教中心</publisher><ispartof>现代教育技术, 2013-09, Vol.23 (9), p.021-024</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/images/PeriodicalImages/xdjyjs/xdjyjs.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>邓康桥(Deng, Kang-qiao)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>阙澄宇(Lv, Zuo-liang)</creatorcontrib><title>MIT OCW 项目与网易公开课运营模式比较研究</title><title>现代教育技术</title><addtitle>Modern Educational Technology</addtitle><description>网络公开课的兴起为教育供给缺口问题的解决开辟了新途径。在北美高校发起的网络公开课以及国家精品课程的助推下，中国网络公开课代表——网易公开课也获得了迅速的发展。对中美两个网络公开课领域的典范项目——MIC OCW与网易公开课进行比较分析，有利于探索适合中国特色的开放教育资源的共享机制。通过对两个项目进行案例对比分析，发现两者在资源来源、参与方动机及运行机制等方面均具有显著的差异；网易公开课作为目前中国网络公开课的主要模式之一，其对中国未来教育资源共享机制的探索会有深远的影响</description><description>There is a huge gap between the need of social development and high education supply, which the traditional education cannot fill, and also it’s economical un-feasible to build more college. ICT brings e-learning whose development provides a new way to even people’s rights to be educated. Since 2001, MIT launched the OWC project and the international campaign of ORE. NETEASE is a Chinese NASDAQ listed Company which is also a reprehensive of Chinese OCW. To study the different operational mode is profound for Chinese ORE program. We put MIT and NETEASE together and do a Sino-U.S. case-level comparison, and find out that there are obvious differences in the OCW source, participants, motivation and organizational mechanism. We believe that the NETEASE maybe a prosperous way to d</description><issn>1009-8097</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9j01Lw0AYhPegYKn9A556EDwlvm92s5s9SvCjUOml4DFsmo1tkAgNUnsTxKtW7EHwYg-CgtibKNT6Z8yH_8JIxdMMw8MMQ8g6gkkll5uR2UuS2EQAaTgghWkBUhOkCcCWSOU_XyG1JOn5AIhgWZJViLPfaNdb7kH9e_Ke3718vV3mH9fZ7U168ZzOzorpvPgcFaOH7HGSzq6y6biYn-f34_zpdZUsh-oo0bU_rZL2znbb3TOard2Gu9U0ujYyQzNl24ENXGPphJAh8o5ARC0FUzr0AyaAOVYYMoHU8jtUKOQIXPmO4ragVbKxqB2oOFTxoRcdn_TjctA7DaJhlPweBVneLMm1BdkdDrTv6X6v4wFQsBzB6Q9SiWMH</recordid><startdate>201309</startdate><enddate>201309</enddate><creator>邓康桥(Deng, Kang-qiao)</creator><creator>阙澄宇(Lv, Zuo-liang)</creator><general>中國清華大學/電教中心</general><general>江西财经大学 统计学院,江西南昌330013</general><general>东北财经大学,辽宁大连116025%东北财经大学,辽宁大连,116025</general><scope>DT-</scope><scope>2B.</scope><scope>4A8</scope><scope>92I</scope><scope>93N</scope><scope>PSX</scope><scope>TCJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201309</creationdate><title>MIT OCW 项目与网易公开课运营模式比较研究</title><author>邓康桥(Deng, Kang-qiao) ; 阙澄宇(Lv, Zuo-liang)</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h514-e4a55d506e14a5779f16c7111e974aefbd470482ff47132bc37a16106ab8a6573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>chi</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>邓康桥(Deng, Kang-qiao)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>阙澄宇(Lv, Zuo-liang)</creatorcontrib><collection>Ericdata Higher Education Knowledge Database</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong</collection><collection>WANFANG Data Centre</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals</collection><collection>万方数据期刊 - 香港版</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><jtitle>现代教育技术</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>邓康桥(Deng, Kang-qiao)</au><au>阙澄宇(Lv, Zuo-liang)</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MIT OCW 项目与网易公开课运营模式比较研究</atitle><jtitle>现代教育技术</jtitle><addtitle>Modern Educational Technology</addtitle><date>2013-09</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>021</spage><epage>024</epage><pages>021-024</pages><issn>1009-8097</issn><abstract>网络公开课的兴起为教育供给缺口问题的解决开辟了新途径。在北美高校发起的网络公开课以及国家精品课程的助推下，中国网络公开课代表——网易公开课也获得了迅速的发展。对中美两个网络公开课领域的典范项目——MIC OCW与网易公开课进行比较分析，有利于探索适合中国特色的开放教育资源的共享机制。通过对两个项目进行案例对比分析，发现两者在资源来源、参与方动机及运行机制等方面均具有显著的差异；网易公开课作为目前中国网络公开课的主要模式之一，其对中国未来教育资源共享机制的探索会有深远的影响</abstract><abstract>There is a huge gap between the need of social development and high education supply, which the traditional education cannot fill, and also it’s economical un-feasible to build more college. ICT brings e-learning whose development provides a new way to even people’s rights to be educated. Since 2001, MIT launched the OWC project and the international campaign of ORE. NETEASE is a Chinese NASDAQ listed Company which is also a reprehensive of Chinese OCW. To study the different operational mode is profound for Chinese ORE program. We put MIT and NETEASE together and do a Sino-U.S. case-level comparison, and find out that there are obvious differences in the OCW source, participants, motivation and organizational mechanism. We believe that the NETEASE maybe a prosperous way to d</abstract><cop>大陸</cop><pub>中國清華大學/電教中心</pub><doi>10.3969/j.issn.1009-8097.2013.09.004</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1009-8097 |
| ispartof | 现代教育技术, 2013-09, Vol.23 (9), p.021-024 |
| issn | 1009-8097 |
| language | chi |
| recordid | cdi_wanfang_journals_xdjyjs201309004 |
| source | 国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库 (National Social Sciences Database) |
| title | MIT OCW 项目与网易公开课运营模式比较研究 |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T22%3A48%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wanfang_jour_hyweb&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MIT%20OCW%20%E9%A1%B9%E7%9B%AE%E4%B8%8E%E7%BD%91%E6%98%93%E5%85%AC%E5%BC%80%E8%AF%BE%E8%BF%90%E8%90%A5%E6%A8%A1%E5%BC%8F%E6%AF%94%E8%BE%83%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6&rft.jtitle=%E7%8E%B0%E4%BB%A3%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF&rft.au=%E9%82%93%E5%BA%B7%E6%A1%A5(Deng,%20Kang-qiao)&rft.date=2013-09&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=021&rft.epage=024&rft.pages=021-024&rft.issn=1009-8097&rft_id=info:doi/10.3969/j.issn.1009-8097.2013.09.004&rft_dat=%3Cwanfang_jour_hyweb%3Exdjyjs201309004%3C/wanfang_jour_hyweb%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_wanfj_id=xdjyjs201309004&rfr_iscdi=true |