违宪审查司法化之民主逻辑

国内外学界一直存在着对违完审查司法化是否符合民主这一宪政基本原则的质疑。从政治学、法理学、宪法学的角度来认识，本文提出了自己的看法。

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	天水行政学院学报 2006-02 (1), p.103-106
1. Verfasser:	万巍
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	chi
Schlagworte:	民主违宪审查
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	106
container_issue	1
container_start_page	103
container_title	天水行政学院学报
container_volume
creator	万巍
description	国内外学界一直存在着对违完审查司法化是否符合民主这一宪政基本原则的质疑。从政治学、法理学、宪法学的角度来认识，本文提出了自己的看法。
doi_str_mv	10.3969/j.issn.1009-6566.2006.01.028
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>cass_wanfa</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wanfang_journals_tsxzxyxb200601028</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cass_id>21010705</cass_id><cqvip_id>21010705</cqvip_id><wanfj_id>tsxzxyxb200601028</wanfj_id><sourcerecordid>21010705</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c798-91ffd063a45b7b8e7640879fada0fb6c5b7cf2a1a8a2dcad771948429fca792e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFjz9Lw0AYxm9QsNR-AFfp4pD43iW5y41S_AcFl-7hzSVXU0uKnmJ0cleQDnUTcXBxKIJLpaBfpgn1W3jSotMLz-_H8_IQ0qTgepLL7Z6bGZO7FEA6PODcZQDcBeoCC1dI7S9fIw1jshiAMe5RSmukOf96LMev5fi5enop7yfV-6i8e5h93FZvw9lk-n0znX8O18mqxr5JG8tbJ5293U7rwGkf7R-2dtqOEjJ0JNU6Ae6hH8QiDlPBfQiF1Jgg6JgrmyrNkGKILFGYCEGlH_pMaoVCstSrk61F7SXmGvNu1BtcnOX2YXRuiuviqoh_ZwG1o6y7sXAVGhPlxiQRoxYJCCzbXLLjQd49zWxTjOpEZ_30X_oB6ghlhA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>违宪审查司法化之民主逻辑</title><source>国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库 (National Social Sciences Database)</source><creator>万巍</creator><creatorcontrib>万巍</creatorcontrib><description>国内外学界一直存在着对违完审查司法化是否符合民主这一宪政基本原则的质疑。从政治学、法理学、宪法学的角度来认识，本文提出了自己的看法。</description><identifier>ISSN: 1009-6566</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6566.2006.01.028</identifier><language>chi</language><publisher>天水市行政学院</publisher><subject>民主 ; 违宪审查</subject><ispartof>天水行政学院学报, 2006-02 (1), p.103-106</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/84152X/84152X.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>万巍</creatorcontrib><title>违宪审查司法化之民主逻辑</title><title>天水行政学院学报</title><description>国内外学界一直存在着对违完审查司法化是否符合民主这一宪政基本原则的质疑。从政治学、法理学、宪法学的角度来认识，本文提出了自己的看法。</description><subject>民主</subject><subject>违宪审查</subject><issn>1009-6566</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFjz9Lw0AYxm9QsNR-AFfp4pD43iW5y41S_AcFl-7hzSVXU0uKnmJ0cleQDnUTcXBxKIJLpaBfpgn1W3jSotMLz-_H8_IQ0qTgepLL7Z6bGZO7FEA6PODcZQDcBeoCC1dI7S9fIw1jshiAMe5RSmukOf96LMev5fi5enop7yfV-6i8e5h93FZvw9lk-n0znX8O18mqxr5JG8tbJ5293U7rwGkf7R-2dtqOEjJ0JNU6Ae6hH8QiDlPBfQiF1Jgg6JgrmyrNkGKILFGYCEGlH_pMaoVCstSrk61F7SXmGvNu1BtcnOX2YXRuiuviqoh_ZwG1o6y7sXAVGhPlxiQRoxYJCCzbXLLjQd49zWxTjOpEZ_30X_oB6ghlhA</recordid><startdate>20060201</startdate><enddate>20060201</enddate><creator>万巍</creator><general>天水市行政学院</general><general>苏州大学法学院,江苏,苏州,215006</general><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>W93</scope><scope>~WA</scope><scope>NSCOK</scope><scope>2B.</scope><scope>4A8</scope><scope>92I</scope><scope>93N</scope><scope>PSX</scope><scope>TCJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060201</creationdate><title>违宪审查司法化之民主逻辑</title><author>万巍</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c798-91ffd063a45b7b8e7640879fada0fb6c5b7cf2a1a8a2dcad771948429fca792e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>chi</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>民主</topic><topic>违宪审查</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>万巍</creatorcontrib><collection>中文科技期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-社会科学</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><collection>国家哲学社会科学文献中心 (National Center for Philosophy and Social Sciences Documentation)</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong</collection><collection>WANFANG Data Centre</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals</collection><collection>万方数据期刊 - 香港版</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><jtitle>天水行政学院学报</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>万巍</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>违宪审查司法化之民主逻辑</atitle><jtitle>天水行政学院学报</jtitle><date>2006-02-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><issue>1</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>106</epage><pages>103-106</pages><issn>1009-6566</issn><abstract>国内外学界一直存在着对违完审查司法化是否符合民主这一宪政基本原则的质疑。从政治学、法理学、宪法学的角度来认识，本文提出了自己的看法。</abstract><pub>天水市行政学院</pub><doi>10.3969/j.issn.1009-6566.2006.01.028</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 1009-6566
ispartof	天水行政学院学报, 2006-02 (1), p.103-106
issn	1009-6566
language	chi
recordid	cdi_wanfang_journals_tsxzxyxb200601028
source	国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库 (National Social Sciences Database)
subjects	民主违宪审查
title	违宪审查司法化之民主逻辑
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T17%3A00%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cass_wanfa&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E8%BF%9D%E5%AE%AA%E5%AE%A1%E6%9F%A5%E5%8F%B8%E6%B3%95%E5%8C%96%E4%B9%8B%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%BB%E9%80%BB%E8%BE%91&rft.jtitle=%E5%A4%A9%E6%B0%B4%E8%A1%8C%E6%94%BF%E5%AD%A6%E9%99%A2%E5%AD%A6%E6%8A%A5&rft.au=%E4%B8%87%E5%B7%8D&rft.date=2006-02-01&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=106&rft.pages=103-106&rft.issn=1009-6566&rft_id=info:doi/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6566.2006.01.028&rft_dat=%3Ccass_wanfa%3E21010705%3C/cass_wanfa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cass_id=21010705&rft_cqvip_id=21010705&rft_wanfj_id=tsxzxyxb200601028&rfr_iscdi=true