《宋史·礼志》职官考误
《宋史·礼志》虽是现存古籍中记载宋代礼制最为系统和影响最大的专篇,但其中也存在不少讹误,这自然大大影响了其可信度与史料价值。据《宋会要辑稿》《续资治通鉴长编》《玉海》《文献通考》等文献的相关记载,发现中华书局1977年点校本《宋史.礼志》仅职官记述讹误就多达11处,本文逐一予以考证。...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | 图书馆理论与实践 2011 (6), p.71-73 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | chi |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 73 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 71 |
| container_title | 图书馆理论与实践 |
| container_volume | |
| creator | 王志跃 |
| description | 《宋史·礼志》虽是现存古籍中记载宋代礼制最为系统和影响最大的专篇,但其中也存在不少讹误,这自然大大影响了其可信度与史料价值。据《宋会要辑稿》《续资治通鉴长编》《玉海》《文献通考》等文献的相关记载,发现中华书局1977年点校本《宋史.礼志》仅职官记述讹误就多达11处,本文逐一予以考证。 |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8214.2011.06.020 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wanfang_jour_chong</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wanfang_journals_tsgllysj201106020</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>38473244</cqvip_id><wanfj_id>tsgllysj201106020</wanfj_id><sourcerecordid>tsgllysj201106020</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c600-1461b85787bfd88e589fb2f1758cad644f3f47571f8a68b2e19849e120407ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j71Kw1AYhs-gYKm9BwUXh8TvO_8ZpfgHBQfdw0maExNiqjmKdKu42YKjXoBzCy4uguCtlGAuw0jF6YWXh_flIWQHwWeBDPZyP3Ou9BFAeJoi9ykg-iB9oLBGOv_9Buk5lwMAMgZC0Q7ZWk4e6_m0fnr7ev9-_ag_n5eTaXM_q-cvzeShWSw2ybo1hUt6f9klZ4cH5_1jb3B6dNLfH3ixBPCQS4y0UFpFdqh1InRgI2pRCR2boeTcMsuVUGi1kTqiCQaaBwlS4KBMzLpkd7V6Z0pryjTMR7dV2f6FNy4tirHLf41Atj4tu71i44tRmV5nLX1VZZemGodMc8Uo5-wHSV9XyA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>《宋史·礼志》职官考误</title><source>国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库 (National Social Sciences Database)</source><creator>王志跃</creator><creatorcontrib>王志跃</creatorcontrib><description>《宋史·礼志》虽是现存古籍中记载宋代礼制最为系统和影响最大的专篇,但其中也存在不少讹误,这自然大大影响了其可信度与史料价值。据《宋会要辑稿》《续资治通鉴长编》《玉海》《文献通考》等文献的相关记载,发现中华书局1977年点校本《宋史.礼志》仅职官记述讹误就多达11处,本文逐一予以考证。</description><identifier>ISSN: 1005-8214</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8214.2011.06.020</identifier><language>chi</language><publisher>南开大学,历史学院,天津,300017</publisher><subject>宋史·礼志 ; 考误 ; 职官</subject><ispartof>图书馆理论与实践, 2011 (6), p.71-73</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/94730X/94730X.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,4025,27928,27929,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>王志跃</creatorcontrib><title>《宋史·礼志》职官考误</title><title>图书馆理论与实践</title><addtitle>Library Theory and Practice</addtitle><description>《宋史·礼志》虽是现存古籍中记载宋代礼制最为系统和影响最大的专篇,但其中也存在不少讹误,这自然大大影响了其可信度与史料价值。据《宋会要辑稿》《续资治通鉴长编》《玉海》《文献通考》等文献的相关记载,发现中华书局1977年点校本《宋史.礼志》仅职官记述讹误就多达11处,本文逐一予以考证。</description><subject>宋史·礼志</subject><subject>考误</subject><subject>职官</subject><issn>1005-8214</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9j71Kw1AYhs-gYKm9BwUXh8TvO_8ZpfgHBQfdw0maExNiqjmKdKu42YKjXoBzCy4uguCtlGAuw0jF6YWXh_flIWQHwWeBDPZyP3Ou9BFAeJoi9ykg-iB9oLBGOv_9Buk5lwMAMgZC0Q7ZWk4e6_m0fnr7ev9-_ag_n5eTaXM_q-cvzeShWSw2ybo1hUt6f9klZ4cH5_1jb3B6dNLfH3ixBPCQS4y0UFpFdqh1InRgI2pRCR2boeTcMsuVUGi1kTqiCQaaBwlS4KBMzLpkd7V6Z0pryjTMR7dV2f6FNy4tirHLf41Atj4tu71i44tRmV5nLX1VZZemGodMc8Uo5-wHSV9XyA</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>王志跃</creator><general>南开大学,历史学院,天津,300017</general><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>~WA</scope><scope>2B.</scope><scope>4A8</scope><scope>92I</scope><scope>93N</scope><scope>PSX</scope><scope>TCJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>《宋史·礼志》职官考误</title><author>王志跃</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c600-1461b85787bfd88e589fb2f1758cad644f3f47571f8a68b2e19849e120407ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>chi</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>宋史·礼志</topic><topic>考误</topic><topic>职官</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>王志跃</creatorcontrib><collection>中文科技期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong</collection><collection>WANFANG Data Centre</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals</collection><collection>万方数据期刊 - 香港版</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><jtitle>图书馆理论与实践</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>王志跃</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>《宋史·礼志》职官考误</atitle><jtitle>图书馆理论与实践</jtitle><addtitle>Library Theory and Practice</addtitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><issue>6</issue><spage>71</spage><epage>73</epage><pages>71-73</pages><issn>1005-8214</issn><abstract>《宋史·礼志》虽是现存古籍中记载宋代礼制最为系统和影响最大的专篇,但其中也存在不少讹误,这自然大大影响了其可信度与史料价值。据《宋会要辑稿》《续资治通鉴长编》《玉海》《文献通考》等文献的相关记载,发现中华书局1977年点校本《宋史.礼志》仅职官记述讹误就多达11处,本文逐一予以考证。</abstract><pub>南开大学,历史学院,天津,300017</pub><doi>10.3969/j.issn.1005-8214.2011.06.020</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1005-8214 |
| ispartof | 图书馆理论与实践, 2011 (6), p.71-73 |
| issn | 1005-8214 |
| language | chi |
| recordid | cdi_wanfang_journals_tsgllysj201106020 |
| source | 国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库 (National Social Sciences Database) |
| subjects | 宋史·礼志 考误 职官 |
| title | 《宋史·礼志》职官考误 |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T03%3A46%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wanfang_jour_chong&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E3%80%8A%E5%AE%8B%E5%8F%B2%C2%B7%E7%A4%BC%E5%BF%97%E3%80%8B%E8%81%8C%E5%AE%98%E8%80%83%E8%AF%AF&rft.jtitle=%E5%9B%BE%E4%B9%A6%E9%A6%86%E7%90%86%E8%AE%BA%E4%B8%8E%E5%AE%9E%E8%B7%B5&rft.au=%E7%8E%8B%E5%BF%97%E8%B7%83&rft.date=2011&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=71&rft.epage=73&rft.pages=71-73&rft.issn=1005-8214&rft_id=info:doi/10.3969/j.issn.1005-8214.2011.06.020&rft_dat=%3Cwanfang_jour_chong%3Etsgllysj201106020%3C/wanfang_jour_chong%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cqvip_id=38473244&rft_wanfj_id=tsgllysj201106020&rfr_iscdi=true |