Effects of Tillage Practices and Land Use Management on Soil Aggregates and Soil Organic Carbon in the North Appalachian Region, USA

Promoting soil carbon sequestration in agricultural land is one of the viable strategies to decelerate the observed climate changes. However, soil physical disturbances have aggravated the soil degradation process by accelerating erosion. Thus, reducing the magnitude and intensity of soil physical d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pedosphere 2017-02, Vol.27 (1), p.172-176
Hauptverfasser: NATH, Arun Jyoti, LAL, Rattan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 176
container_issue 1
container_start_page 172
container_title Pedosphere
container_volume 27
creator NATH, Arun Jyoti
LAL, Rattan
description Promoting soil carbon sequestration in agricultural land is one of the viable strategies to decelerate the observed climate changes. However, soil physical disturbances have aggravated the soil degradation process by accelerating erosion. Thus, reducing the magnitude and intensity of soil physical disturbance through appropriate farming/agricultural systems is essential to management of soil carbon sink capacity of agricultural lands. Four sites of different land use types/tillage practices, i) no-till (NT) corn (Zea mays L.) (NTC), ii) conventional till (CT) corn (CTC), iii) pastureland (PL), and iv) native forest (NF), were selected at the North Appalachian Experimental Watershed Station, Ohio, USA to assess the impact of NT farming on soil aggregate indices including water-stable aggregation, mean weight diameter (MWD) and geometric mean diameter (GMD), and soil organic carbon and total nitrogen contents. The NTC plots received cow manure additions (about 15 t ha-1) every other year. The CTC plots involved disking and chisel ploughing and liquid fertilizer application (110 L ha-l). The results showed that both water-stable aggregation and MWD were greater in soil for NTC than for CTC. In the 0-10 cm soil layer, the 〉 4.75-mm size fraction dominated NTC and was 46% more than that for CTC, whereas the 〈 0.25-mm size fraction was 380% more for CTC than for NTC. The values of both MWD and GMD in soil for NTC (2.17 mm and 1.19 mm, respectively) were higher than those for CTC (1.47 and 0.72 mm, respectively) in the 0-10 cm soil layer. Macroaggregates contained 6%-42% and 13%-43% higher organic carbon and total nitrogen contents, respectively, than microaggregates in soil for all sites. Macroaggregates in soil for NTC contained 40% more organic carbon and total nitrogen over microaggregates in soil for CTC. Therefore, a higher proportion of microaggregates with lower organic carbon contents created a carbon-depleted environment for CTC. In contrast, soil for NTC had more aggregation and contained higher organic carbon content within water-stable aggregates. The soil organic carbon and total nitrogen stocks (Mg ha-1) among the different sites followed the trend of NF 〉 PL 〉 NTC 〉 CTC, being 35%-46% more for NTC over CTC. The NT practice enhanced soil organic carbon content over the CT practice and thus was an important strategy of carbon sequestration in cropland soils.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60301-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wanfang_jour_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wanfang_journals_trq_e201701018</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>671276229</cqvip_id><wanfj_id>trq_e201701018</wanfj_id><els_id>S1002016017603011</els_id><sourcerecordid>trq_e201701018</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-c40a8f5f623a7a73638dc4ed8ab6b2128fa53d56519e2f92945eaecd1f1b2f5c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1vEzEQhi0EEqHwE5AskBBIbPF44_04oSgqtFJKEWnO1sQ73rja2om9BXHnh-N8AEcuHsvzzLyeeRl7CeIcBFQfliCELPJNvIX6XSVKAQU8YhMpQRQKRP2YTf4iT9mzlO6EmEILMGG_LqwlMyYeLL91w4A98a8RzegMJY6-44v9sUrEr9Hn7D35kQfPl8ENfNb3kXocT-jh7Sb26J3hc4zrzDnPxw3xLyGOGz7bbnFAs3Ho-TfqXfDv-Wo5e86eWBwSvTjFM7b6dHE7vywWN5-v5rNFYcpWjYWZCmysspUssca6rMqmM1PqGlxXawmysajKTlUKWpK2le1UEZLpwMJaWmXKM_bm2PcHeou-13fhIfqsqMe40yQF1CJvtMng6yO4jWH3QGn8R0rRtLWsK1FlSh0pE0NKkazeRneP8acGoffO6IMzer92DbU-OKMh13081lGe9bujqJNx5A11LmYvdBfcfzu8Oilvgu93Lo_yR7qqIf9Oyrb8DWbSn1s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2089727606</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Tillage Practices and Land Use Management on Soil Aggregates and Soil Organic Carbon in the North Appalachian Region, USA</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>NATH, Arun Jyoti ; LAL, Rattan</creator><creatorcontrib>NATH, Arun Jyoti ; LAL, Rattan</creatorcontrib><description>Promoting soil carbon sequestration in agricultural land is one of the viable strategies to decelerate the observed climate changes. However, soil physical disturbances have aggravated the soil degradation process by accelerating erosion. Thus, reducing the magnitude and intensity of soil physical disturbance through appropriate farming/agricultural systems is essential to management of soil carbon sink capacity of agricultural lands. Four sites of different land use types/tillage practices, i) no-till (NT) corn (Zea mays L.) (NTC), ii) conventional till (CT) corn (CTC), iii) pastureland (PL), and iv) native forest (NF), were selected at the North Appalachian Experimental Watershed Station, Ohio, USA to assess the impact of NT farming on soil aggregate indices including water-stable aggregation, mean weight diameter (MWD) and geometric mean diameter (GMD), and soil organic carbon and total nitrogen contents. The NTC plots received cow manure additions (about 15 t ha-1) every other year. The CTC plots involved disking and chisel ploughing and liquid fertilizer application (110 L ha-l). The results showed that both water-stable aggregation and MWD were greater in soil for NTC than for CTC. In the 0-10 cm soil layer, the 〉 4.75-mm size fraction dominated NTC and was 46% more than that for CTC, whereas the 〈 0.25-mm size fraction was 380% more for CTC than for NTC. The values of both MWD and GMD in soil for NTC (2.17 mm and 1.19 mm, respectively) were higher than those for CTC (1.47 and 0.72 mm, respectively) in the 0-10 cm soil layer. Macroaggregates contained 6%-42% and 13%-43% higher organic carbon and total nitrogen contents, respectively, than microaggregates in soil for all sites. Macroaggregates in soil for NTC contained 40% more organic carbon and total nitrogen over microaggregates in soil for CTC. Therefore, a higher proportion of microaggregates with lower organic carbon contents created a carbon-depleted environment for CTC. In contrast, soil for NTC had more aggregation and contained higher organic carbon content within water-stable aggregates. The soil organic carbon and total nitrogen stocks (Mg ha-1) among the different sites followed the trend of NF 〉 PL 〉 NTC 〉 CTC, being 35%-46% more for NTC over CTC. The NT practice enhanced soil organic carbon content over the CT practice and thus was an important strategy of carbon sequestration in cropland soils.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1002-0160</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2210-5107</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60301-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Beijing: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accelerated erosion ; Agglomeration ; aggregate stability ; Aggregates ; Agricultural land ; Agricultural practices ; Animal wastes ; Carbon ; Carbon content ; Carbon sequestration ; Carbon sinks ; Cattle manure ; Climate change ; Corn ; Deceleration ; Environmental degradation ; Farming ; Fertilizer application ; Hand tools ; Land use ; Land use management ; Liquid fertilizers ; macroaggregates ; microaggregates ; Nitrogen ; no–till ; Organic carbon ; Organic soils ; Soil aggregates ; Soil degradation ; Soil erosion ; Soil layers ; Soil management ; Soil water ; Tillage ; Watersheds ; water–stable aggregation ; Weight ; 农业系统 ; 土地利用管理 ; 土壤团聚体 ; 土壤微团聚体 ; 土壤有机碳 ; 有机碳含量 ; 美国 ; 耕作方式</subject><ispartof>Pedosphere, 2017-02, Vol.27 (1), p.172-176</ispartof><rights>2017 Soil Science Society of China</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Feb 2017</rights><rights>Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-c40a8f5f623a7a73638dc4ed8ab6b2128fa53d56519e2f92945eaecd1f1b2f5c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-c40a8f5f623a7a73638dc4ed8ab6b2128fa53d56519e2f92945eaecd1f1b2f5c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/85078X/85078X.jpg</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1002016017603011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>NATH, Arun Jyoti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAL, Rattan</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Tillage Practices and Land Use Management on Soil Aggregates and Soil Organic Carbon in the North Appalachian Region, USA</title><title>Pedosphere</title><addtitle>Pedosphere</addtitle><description>Promoting soil carbon sequestration in agricultural land is one of the viable strategies to decelerate the observed climate changes. However, soil physical disturbances have aggravated the soil degradation process by accelerating erosion. Thus, reducing the magnitude and intensity of soil physical disturbance through appropriate farming/agricultural systems is essential to management of soil carbon sink capacity of agricultural lands. Four sites of different land use types/tillage practices, i) no-till (NT) corn (Zea mays L.) (NTC), ii) conventional till (CT) corn (CTC), iii) pastureland (PL), and iv) native forest (NF), were selected at the North Appalachian Experimental Watershed Station, Ohio, USA to assess the impact of NT farming on soil aggregate indices including water-stable aggregation, mean weight diameter (MWD) and geometric mean diameter (GMD), and soil organic carbon and total nitrogen contents. The NTC plots received cow manure additions (about 15 t ha-1) every other year. The CTC plots involved disking and chisel ploughing and liquid fertilizer application (110 L ha-l). The results showed that both water-stable aggregation and MWD were greater in soil for NTC than for CTC. In the 0-10 cm soil layer, the 〉 4.75-mm size fraction dominated NTC and was 46% more than that for CTC, whereas the 〈 0.25-mm size fraction was 380% more for CTC than for NTC. The values of both MWD and GMD in soil for NTC (2.17 mm and 1.19 mm, respectively) were higher than those for CTC (1.47 and 0.72 mm, respectively) in the 0-10 cm soil layer. Macroaggregates contained 6%-42% and 13%-43% higher organic carbon and total nitrogen contents, respectively, than microaggregates in soil for all sites. Macroaggregates in soil for NTC contained 40% more organic carbon and total nitrogen over microaggregates in soil for CTC. Therefore, a higher proportion of microaggregates with lower organic carbon contents created a carbon-depleted environment for CTC. In contrast, soil for NTC had more aggregation and contained higher organic carbon content within water-stable aggregates. The soil organic carbon and total nitrogen stocks (Mg ha-1) among the different sites followed the trend of NF 〉 PL 〉 NTC 〉 CTC, being 35%-46% more for NTC over CTC. The NT practice enhanced soil organic carbon content over the CT practice and thus was an important strategy of carbon sequestration in cropland soils.</description><subject>Accelerated erosion</subject><subject>Agglomeration</subject><subject>aggregate stability</subject><subject>Aggregates</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Animal wastes</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon content</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Carbon sinks</subject><subject>Cattle manure</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Deceleration</subject><subject>Environmental degradation</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Fertilizer application</subject><subject>Hand tools</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Land use management</subject><subject>Liquid fertilizers</subject><subject>macroaggregates</subject><subject>microaggregates</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>no–till</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>Soil aggregates</subject><subject>Soil degradation</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Soil layers</subject><subject>Soil management</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><subject>water–stable aggregation</subject><subject>Weight</subject><subject>农业系统</subject><subject>土地利用管理</subject><subject>土壤团聚体</subject><subject>土壤微团聚体</subject><subject>土壤有机碳</subject><subject>有机碳含量</subject><subject>美国</subject><subject>耕作方式</subject><issn>1002-0160</issn><issn>2210-5107</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1vEzEQhi0EEqHwE5AskBBIbPF44_04oSgqtFJKEWnO1sQ73rja2om9BXHnh-N8AEcuHsvzzLyeeRl7CeIcBFQfliCELPJNvIX6XSVKAQU8YhMpQRQKRP2YTf4iT9mzlO6EmEILMGG_LqwlMyYeLL91w4A98a8RzegMJY6-44v9sUrEr9Hn7D35kQfPl8ENfNb3kXocT-jh7Sb26J3hc4zrzDnPxw3xLyGOGz7bbnFAs3Ho-TfqXfDv-Wo5e86eWBwSvTjFM7b6dHE7vywWN5-v5rNFYcpWjYWZCmysspUssca6rMqmM1PqGlxXawmysajKTlUKWpK2le1UEZLpwMJaWmXKM_bm2PcHeou-13fhIfqsqMe40yQF1CJvtMng6yO4jWH3QGn8R0rRtLWsK1FlSh0pE0NKkazeRneP8acGoffO6IMzer92DbU-OKMh13081lGe9bujqJNx5A11LmYvdBfcfzu8Oilvgu93Lo_yR7qqIf9Oyrb8DWbSn1s</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>NATH, Arun Jyoti</creator><creator>LAL, Rattan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><general>Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Assam University, Silchar 788011 India%Carbon Management and Sequestration Center, Ohio State University, Columbus OH 43210 USA</general><general>Carbon Management and Sequestration Center, Ohio State University, Columbus OH 43210 USA</general><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>W95</scope><scope>~WA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>2B.</scope><scope>4A8</scope><scope>92I</scope><scope>93N</scope><scope>PSX</scope><scope>TCJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Effects of Tillage Practices and Land Use Management on Soil Aggregates and Soil Organic Carbon in the North Appalachian Region, USA</title><author>NATH, Arun Jyoti ; LAL, Rattan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-c40a8f5f623a7a73638dc4ed8ab6b2128fa53d56519e2f92945eaecd1f1b2f5c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accelerated erosion</topic><topic>Agglomeration</topic><topic>aggregate stability</topic><topic>Aggregates</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Animal wastes</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon content</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Carbon sinks</topic><topic>Cattle manure</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Deceleration</topic><topic>Environmental degradation</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Fertilizer application</topic><topic>Hand tools</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Land use management</topic><topic>Liquid fertilizers</topic><topic>macroaggregates</topic><topic>microaggregates</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>no–till</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>Soil aggregates</topic><topic>Soil degradation</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Soil layers</topic><topic>Soil management</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><topic>water–stable aggregation</topic><topic>Weight</topic><topic>农业系统</topic><topic>土地利用管理</topic><topic>土壤团聚体</topic><topic>土壤微团聚体</topic><topic>土壤有机碳</topic><topic>有机碳含量</topic><topic>美国</topic><topic>耕作方式</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>NATH, Arun Jyoti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAL, Rattan</creatorcontrib><collection>中文科技期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-农业科学</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong</collection><collection>WANFANG Data Centre</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals</collection><collection>万方数据期刊 - 香港版</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><jtitle>Pedosphere</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>NATH, Arun Jyoti</au><au>LAL, Rattan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Tillage Practices and Land Use Management on Soil Aggregates and Soil Organic Carbon in the North Appalachian Region, USA</atitle><jtitle>Pedosphere</jtitle><addtitle>Pedosphere</addtitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>172</spage><epage>176</epage><pages>172-176</pages><issn>1002-0160</issn><eissn>2210-5107</eissn><abstract>Promoting soil carbon sequestration in agricultural land is one of the viable strategies to decelerate the observed climate changes. However, soil physical disturbances have aggravated the soil degradation process by accelerating erosion. Thus, reducing the magnitude and intensity of soil physical disturbance through appropriate farming/agricultural systems is essential to management of soil carbon sink capacity of agricultural lands. Four sites of different land use types/tillage practices, i) no-till (NT) corn (Zea mays L.) (NTC), ii) conventional till (CT) corn (CTC), iii) pastureland (PL), and iv) native forest (NF), were selected at the North Appalachian Experimental Watershed Station, Ohio, USA to assess the impact of NT farming on soil aggregate indices including water-stable aggregation, mean weight diameter (MWD) and geometric mean diameter (GMD), and soil organic carbon and total nitrogen contents. The NTC plots received cow manure additions (about 15 t ha-1) every other year. The CTC plots involved disking and chisel ploughing and liquid fertilizer application (110 L ha-l). The results showed that both water-stable aggregation and MWD were greater in soil for NTC than for CTC. In the 0-10 cm soil layer, the 〉 4.75-mm size fraction dominated NTC and was 46% more than that for CTC, whereas the 〈 0.25-mm size fraction was 380% more for CTC than for NTC. The values of both MWD and GMD in soil for NTC (2.17 mm and 1.19 mm, respectively) were higher than those for CTC (1.47 and 0.72 mm, respectively) in the 0-10 cm soil layer. Macroaggregates contained 6%-42% and 13%-43% higher organic carbon and total nitrogen contents, respectively, than microaggregates in soil for all sites. Macroaggregates in soil for NTC contained 40% more organic carbon and total nitrogen over microaggregates in soil for CTC. Therefore, a higher proportion of microaggregates with lower organic carbon contents created a carbon-depleted environment for CTC. In contrast, soil for NTC had more aggregation and contained higher organic carbon content within water-stable aggregates. The soil organic carbon and total nitrogen stocks (Mg ha-1) among the different sites followed the trend of NF 〉 PL 〉 NTC 〉 CTC, being 35%-46% more for NTC over CTC. The NT practice enhanced soil organic carbon content over the CT practice and thus was an important strategy of carbon sequestration in cropland soils.</abstract><cop>Beijing</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60301-1</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1002-0160
ispartof Pedosphere, 2017-02, Vol.27 (1), p.172-176
issn 1002-0160
2210-5107
language eng
recordid cdi_wanfang_journals_trq_e201701018
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Accelerated erosion
Agglomeration
aggregate stability
Aggregates
Agricultural land
Agricultural practices
Animal wastes
Carbon
Carbon content
Carbon sequestration
Carbon sinks
Cattle manure
Climate change
Corn
Deceleration
Environmental degradation
Farming
Fertilizer application
Hand tools
Land use
Land use management
Liquid fertilizers
macroaggregates
microaggregates
Nitrogen
no–till
Organic carbon
Organic soils
Soil aggregates
Soil degradation
Soil erosion
Soil layers
Soil management
Soil water
Tillage
Watersheds
water–stable aggregation
Weight
农业系统
土地利用管理
土壤团聚体
土壤微团聚体
土壤有机碳
有机碳含量
美国
耕作方式
title Effects of Tillage Practices and Land Use Management on Soil Aggregates and Soil Organic Carbon in the North Appalachian Region, USA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T14%3A11%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wanfang_jour_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Tillage%20Practices%20and%20Land%20Use%20Management%20on%20Soil%20Aggregates%20and%20Soil%20Organic%20Carbon%20in%20the%20North%20Appalachian%20Region,%20USA&rft.jtitle=Pedosphere&rft.au=NATH,%20Arun%20Jyoti&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=172&rft.epage=176&rft.pages=172-176&rft.issn=1002-0160&rft.eissn=2210-5107&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60301-1&rft_dat=%3Cwanfang_jour_proqu%3Etrq_e201701018%3C/wanfang_jour_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2089727606&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cqvip_id=671276229&rft_wanfj_id=trq_e201701018&rft_els_id=S1002016017603011&rfr_iscdi=true