Compromise and Change: Reconsideration on the Custody of Infants Act of 1839

The United Kingdom's Custody of Infants Act of 1839 is generally regarded as a signature instrument for women to gain guardianship of a child, and widely considered a product of the equal rights movement launched by women in England. It has played an important role in promoting women's equ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:人权(英文版) 2017, Vol.16 (5), p.493-510
Hauptverfasser: XU Yifei, NI Weisi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 510
container_issue 5
container_start_page 493
container_title 人权(英文版)
container_volume 16
creator XU Yifei
NI Weisi
description The United Kingdom's Custody of Infants Act of 1839 is generally regarded as a signature instrument for women to gain guardianship of a child, and widely considered a product of the equal rights movement launched by women in England. It has played an important role in promoting women's equal rights and breaking patri-archal absolutism. However, there was much compromise in the legal basis for the legislation and the legal provisions, resulting in debates on the legislation that have greatly diluted the revolutionary signif-icance of the Act. Starting with the Marxist argument on bourgeois family legislation, this paper analyzes the legislative and judicial practice of guardianship of minors before and after the promulgation of the Act in the United Kingdom. In view of its impact on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, this paper attempts to re-evaluate the historical status of this act.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wanfang_jour</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wanfang_journals_rq_e201705006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><wanfj_id>rq_e201705006</wanfj_id><sourcerecordid>rq_e201705006</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-wanfang_journals_rq_e2017050063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0NDM31DUxMDTjYOAqLs4yMDA1sDQy5mTwcc7PLSjKz80sTlVIzEtRcM5IzEtPtVIISk3OzyvOTEktSizJzM9TAKKSjFQF59LikvyUSoX8NAXPvLTEvJJiBcfkEhDX0MLYkoeBNS0xpziVF0pzM6i6uYY4e-iWJ4IUp8dn5ZcW5QFl4osK41ONDAzNgc4wMDMmVh0ANNg83Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Compromise and Change: Reconsideration on the Custody of Infants Act of 1839</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>XU Yifei ; NI Weisi</creator><creatorcontrib>XU Yifei ; NI Weisi</creatorcontrib><description>The United Kingdom's Custody of Infants Act of 1839 is generally regarded as a signature instrument for women to gain guardianship of a child, and widely considered a product of the equal rights movement launched by women in England. It has played an important role in promoting women's equal rights and breaking patri-archal absolutism. However, there was much compromise in the legal basis for the legislation and the legal provisions, resulting in debates on the legislation that have greatly diluted the revolutionary signif-icance of the Act. Starting with the Marxist argument on bourgeois family legislation, this paper analyzes the legislative and judicial practice of guardianship of minors before and after the promulgation of the Act in the United Kingdom. In view of its impact on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, this paper attempts to re-evaluate the historical status of this act.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1671-4016</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Renmin University of China Law School</publisher><ispartof>人权(英文版), 2017, Vol.16 (5), p.493-510</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/images/PeriodicalImages/rq-e/rq-e.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>XU Yifei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NI Weisi</creatorcontrib><title>Compromise and Change: Reconsideration on the Custody of Infants Act of 1839</title><title>人权(英文版)</title><description>The United Kingdom's Custody of Infants Act of 1839 is generally regarded as a signature instrument for women to gain guardianship of a child, and widely considered a product of the equal rights movement launched by women in England. It has played an important role in promoting women's equal rights and breaking patri-archal absolutism. However, there was much compromise in the legal basis for the legislation and the legal provisions, resulting in debates on the legislation that have greatly diluted the revolutionary signif-icance of the Act. Starting with the Marxist argument on bourgeois family legislation, this paper analyzes the legislative and judicial practice of guardianship of minors before and after the promulgation of the Act in the United Kingdom. In view of its impact on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, this paper attempts to re-evaluate the historical status of this act.</description><issn>1671-4016</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYeA0NDM31DUxMDTjYOAqLs4yMDA1sDQy5mTwcc7PLSjKz80sTlVIzEtRcM5IzEtPtVIISk3OzyvOTEktSizJzM9TAKKSjFQF59LikvyUSoX8NAXPvLTEvJJiBcfkEhDX0MLYkoeBNS0xpziVF0pzM6i6uYY4e-iWJ4IUp8dn5ZcW5QFl4osK41ONDAzNgc4wMDMmVh0ANNg83Q</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>XU Yifei</creator><creator>NI Weisi</creator><general>Renmin University of China Law School</general><scope>2B.</scope><scope>4A8</scope><scope>92I</scope><scope>93N</scope><scope>PSX</scope><scope>TCJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Compromise and Change: Reconsideration on the Custody of Infants Act of 1839</title><author>XU Yifei ; NI Weisi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-wanfang_journals_rq_e2017050063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>XU Yifei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NI Weisi</creatorcontrib><collection>Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong</collection><collection>WANFANG Data Centre</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals</collection><collection>万方数据期刊 - 香港版</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><jtitle>人权(英文版)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>XU Yifei</au><au>NI Weisi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Compromise and Change: Reconsideration on the Custody of Infants Act of 1839</atitle><jtitle>人权(英文版)</jtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>493</spage><epage>510</epage><pages>493-510</pages><issn>1671-4016</issn><abstract>The United Kingdom's Custody of Infants Act of 1839 is generally regarded as a signature instrument for women to gain guardianship of a child, and widely considered a product of the equal rights movement launched by women in England. It has played an important role in promoting women's equal rights and breaking patri-archal absolutism. However, there was much compromise in the legal basis for the legislation and the legal provisions, resulting in debates on the legislation that have greatly diluted the revolutionary signif-icance of the Act. Starting with the Marxist argument on bourgeois family legislation, this paper analyzes the legislative and judicial practice of guardianship of minors before and after the promulgation of the Act in the United Kingdom. In view of its impact on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, this paper attempts to re-evaluate the historical status of this act.</abstract><pub>Renmin University of China Law School</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1671-4016
ispartof 人权(英文版), 2017, Vol.16 (5), p.493-510
issn 1671-4016
language eng
recordid cdi_wanfang_journals_rq_e201705006
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library
title Compromise and Change: Reconsideration on the Custody of Infants Act of 1839
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T08%3A41%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wanfang_jour&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Compromise%20and%20Change:%20Reconsideration%20on%20the%20Custody%20of%20Infants%20Act%20of%201839&rft.jtitle=%E4%BA%BA%E6%9D%83%EF%BC%88%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%87%E7%89%88%EF%BC%89&rft.au=XU%20Yifei&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=493&rft.epage=510&rft.pages=493-510&rft.issn=1671-4016&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cwanfang_jour%3Erq_e201705006%3C/wanfang_jour%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_wanfj_id=rq_e201705006&rfr_iscdi=true