论思维客观性的论证路向及近代演变
思维的客观性问题是近代哲学的核心问题。相对于康德的知识整体论立场,康德之前的唯理论与经验论对思维客观性的论证实质上是原子论的,而黑格尔的辩证法消解了思维的客观性问题;马克思以实践作为检验认识客观性的标准,与康德的知识整体论具有内在的亲和性;现代哲学对思维客观性问题的探讨,依然没有超越康德的视野。...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | 前沿 2013 (6), p.39-40 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | chi |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 40 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 39 |
container_title | 前沿 |
container_volume | |
creator | 张红柳 |
description | 思维的客观性问题是近代哲学的核心问题。相对于康德的知识整体论立场,康德之前的唯理论与经验论对思维客观性的论证实质上是原子论的,而黑格尔的辩证法消解了思维的客观性问题;马克思以实践作为检验认识客观性的标准,与康德的知识整体论具有内在的亲和性;现代哲学对思维客观性问题的探讨,依然没有超越康德的视野。 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wanfang_jour_chong</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wanfang_journals_qy201306015</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>46113449</cqvip_id><wanfj_id>qy201306015</wanfj_id><sourcerecordid>qy201306015</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c545-1f307c1b847125953db728c00fc5f387a4f458f0e25711b5a6f20bd45c7c176d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjb1KA0EcxLdQMMQ8hFgf_Pd7r5TgFwRs0h-7e9l4ohdzh0i6KFY2MWAhARst0iWNIBjBl_Eu-xguxGqY4TczW6iBAeJIESF3UKssMwPBK0ZBNRD4xVc9fl2vPqrFm5_f1-P5evYQQr-885_L6mlaTR79z_R39V5_P1eTl1207fRl2Wv9axN1jw677ZOoc3Z82j7oRJYzHmFHQVpsFJOY8JjT1EiiLICz3FElNXOMKwc9wiXGhmvhCJiUcRtaUqS0ifY3s7c6dzrvJxeDmyIPh8lwRABTEIB5oPY2lD0f5P1hFrjrIrvSxShhAmPKWEz_AM-aWZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>论思维客观性的论证路向及近代演变</title><source>国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库 (National Social Sciences Database)</source><creator>张红柳</creator><creatorcontrib>张红柳</creatorcontrib><description>思维的客观性问题是近代哲学的核心问题。相对于康德的知识整体论立场,康德之前的唯理论与经验论对思维客观性的论证实质上是原子论的,而黑格尔的辩证法消解了思维的客观性问题;马克思以实践作为检验认识客观性的标准,与康德的知识整体论具有内在的亲和性;现代哲学对思维客观性问题的探讨,依然没有超越康德的视野。</description><identifier>ISSN: 1009-8267</identifier><language>chi</language><publisher>南开大学马克思主义教育学院,天津,300071</publisher><subject>客观性 ; 康德 ; 整体论 ; 真理标准</subject><ispartof>前沿, 2013 (6), p.39-40</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/82678X/82678X.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>张红柳</creatorcontrib><title>论思维客观性的论证路向及近代演变</title><title>前沿</title><addtitle>Forward Position</addtitle><description>思维的客观性问题是近代哲学的核心问题。相对于康德的知识整体论立场,康德之前的唯理论与经验论对思维客观性的论证实质上是原子论的,而黑格尔的辩证法消解了思维的客观性问题;马克思以实践作为检验认识客观性的标准,与康德的知识整体论具有内在的亲和性;现代哲学对思维客观性问题的探讨,依然没有超越康德的视野。</description><subject>客观性</subject><subject>康德</subject><subject>整体论</subject><subject>真理标准</subject><issn>1009-8267</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotjb1KA0EcxLdQMMQ8hFgf_Pd7r5TgFwRs0h-7e9l4ohdzh0i6KFY2MWAhARst0iWNIBjBl_Eu-xguxGqY4TczW6iBAeJIESF3UKssMwPBK0ZBNRD4xVc9fl2vPqrFm5_f1-P5evYQQr-885_L6mlaTR79z_R39V5_P1eTl1207fRl2Wv9axN1jw677ZOoc3Z82j7oRJYzHmFHQVpsFJOY8JjT1EiiLICz3FElNXOMKwc9wiXGhmvhCJiUcRtaUqS0ifY3s7c6dzrvJxeDmyIPh8lwRABTEIB5oPY2lD0f5P1hFrjrIrvSxShhAmPKWEz_AM-aWZA</recordid><startdate>2013</startdate><enddate>2013</enddate><creator>张红柳</creator><general>南开大学马克思主义教育学院,天津,300071</general><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>W93</scope><scope>~WA</scope><scope>2B.</scope><scope>4A8</scope><scope>92I</scope><scope>93N</scope><scope>PSX</scope><scope>TCJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2013</creationdate><title>论思维客观性的论证路向及近代演变</title><author>张红柳</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c545-1f307c1b847125953db728c00fc5f387a4f458f0e25711b5a6f20bd45c7c176d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>chi</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>客观性</topic><topic>康德</topic><topic>整体论</topic><topic>真理标准</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>张红柳</creatorcontrib><collection>中文科技期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-社会科学</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong</collection><collection>WANFANG Data Centre</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals</collection><collection>万方数据期刊 - 香港版</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><jtitle>前沿</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>张红柳</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>论思维客观性的论证路向及近代演变</atitle><jtitle>前沿</jtitle><addtitle>Forward Position</addtitle><date>2013</date><risdate>2013</risdate><issue>6</issue><spage>39</spage><epage>40</epage><pages>39-40</pages><issn>1009-8267</issn><abstract>思维的客观性问题是近代哲学的核心问题。相对于康德的知识整体论立场,康德之前的唯理论与经验论对思维客观性的论证实质上是原子论的,而黑格尔的辩证法消解了思维的客观性问题;马克思以实践作为检验认识客观性的标准,与康德的知识整体论具有内在的亲和性;现代哲学对思维客观性问题的探讨,依然没有超越康德的视野。</abstract><pub>南开大学马克思主义教育学院,天津,300071</pub><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1009-8267 |
ispartof | 前沿, 2013 (6), p.39-40 |
issn | 1009-8267 |
language | chi |
recordid | cdi_wanfang_journals_qy201306015 |
source | 国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库 (National Social Sciences Database) |
subjects | 客观性 康德 整体论 真理标准 |
title | 论思维客观性的论证路向及近代演变 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T13%3A19%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wanfang_jour_chong&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E8%AE%BA%E6%80%9D%E7%BB%B4%E5%AE%A2%E8%A7%82%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E8%AE%BA%E8%AF%81%E8%B7%AF%E5%90%91%E5%8F%8A%E8%BF%91%E4%BB%A3%E6%BC%94%E5%8F%98&rft.jtitle=%E5%89%8D%E6%B2%BF&rft.au=%E5%BC%A0%E7%BA%A2%E6%9F%B3&rft.date=2013&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=40&rft.pages=39-40&rft.issn=1009-8267&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cwanfang_jour_chong%3Eqy201306015%3C/wanfang_jour_chong%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cqvip_id=46113449&rft_wanfj_id=qy201306015&rfr_iscdi=true |