厄贝沙坦和依那普利治疗原发性高血压的对比研究

目的对比观察厄贝沙坦与依那普利治疗轻中度原发性高血压的疗效和安全性。方法随机观察厄贝沙坦(41例，150mg～300nag)与依那普利(42例，10～20mg)治疗高血压患者4周和8周的有效率，并分两组进行比较。结果两组治疗第2周后开始平均收缩压、舒张压较治疗前明显降低(P0．05。结论厄贝沙坦是一安全、有效、长效，耐受性好，不良反应轻的降压药物。...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Lin chuang nei ke za zhi 2005, Vol.22 (6), p.384-386
1. Verfasser:	陈江斌王晋明王芳江洪李建军王跃岭蒋学俊杨波李晓艳
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	chi
Schlagworte:	依那普利厄贝沙坦高血压
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	386
container_issue	6
container_start_page	384
container_title	Lin chuang nei ke za zhi
container_volume	22
creator	陈江斌王晋明王芳江洪李建军王跃岭蒋学俊杨波李晓艳
description	目的对比观察厄贝沙坦与依那普利治疗轻中度原发性高血压的疗效和安全性。方法随机观察厄贝沙坦(41例，150mg～300nag)与依那普利(42例，10～20mg)治疗高血压患者4周和8周的有效率，并分两组进行比较。结果两组治疗第2周后开始平均收缩压、舒张压较治疗前明显降低(P0．05。结论厄贝沙坦是一安全、有效、长效，耐受性好，不良反应轻的降压药物。
doi_str_mv	10.3969/j.issn.1001-9057.2005.06.008
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>wanfang_jour_chong</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wanfang_journals_lcnkzz200506008</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>15707923</cqvip_id><wanfj_id>lcnkzz200506008</wanfj_id><sourcerecordid>lcnkzz200506008</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c598-d7493ad0d8dd66ad099173bae736f2ad55a64373f5a8b8bcad71f15b3ca0104a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j81Kw0AURmehYKl9CRFcJd7pZGYySy3-QcFN92GSSWrakqJBhK6KdCEoFaWoFYqKoBTBQhFBBJ_GSdq3MFJxdb_7cbiXg9AyBpMIJlZrZhjHkYkBsCGAcrMIQE1gJoA9h3L__QIqxHHoZisGYhMrh9Z1tzN5GyTjvh486cuz76_B9Pgx6b_qk2Ey_kyvrnX3Tp9fJO3n6cvN5KGtu6fpbUePPpJRL73vpcP3RTQfyEbsF_5mHlU2NyqlbaO8u7VTWisbHhW2obgliFSgbKUYy4IQmBNX-pywoCgVpZJZhJOAStu1XU8qjgNMXeJJwGBJkkcrs7NHMgpkVHVqzcODKHvoNLyo3mr9KgPLhDNyaUZ6e82ouh9mrCu9ehA2fAdTDlwUCfkB1R1xJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>厄贝沙坦和依那普利治疗原发性高血压的对比研究</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>陈江斌王晋明王芳江洪李建军王跃岭蒋学俊杨波李晓艳</creator><creatorcontrib>陈江斌王晋明王芳江洪李建军王跃岭蒋学俊杨波李晓艳</creatorcontrib><description>目的对比观察厄贝沙坦与依那普利治疗轻中度原发性高血压的疗效和安全性。方法随机观察厄贝沙坦(41例，150mg～300nag)与依那普利(42例，10～20mg)治疗高血压患者4周和8周的有效率，并分两组进行比较。结果两组治疗第2周后开始平均收缩压、舒张压较治疗前明显降低(P<0．01)，在整个治疗期间血压持续平稳下降；厄贝沙坦与依那普利治疗4周降低舒张压总有效率分别为90．2％(37／41)和83．3％(35／42)，8周降低舒张压总有效率分别为95．1％(39／41)和90．5％(38／42)，两组比较P>0．05。结论厄贝沙坦是一安全、有效、长效，耐受性好，不良反应轻的降压药物。</description><identifier>ISSN: 1001-9057</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9057.2005.06.008</identifier><language>chi</language><publisher>430060,武汉大学人民医院心内科</publisher><subject>依那普利 ; 厄贝沙坦 ; 高血压</subject><ispartof>Lin chuang nei ke za zhi, 2005, Vol.22 (6), p.384-386</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/93865X/93865X.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>陈江斌王晋明王芳江洪李建军王跃岭蒋学俊杨波李晓艳</creatorcontrib><title>厄贝沙坦和依那普利治疗原发性高血压的对比研究</title><title>Lin chuang nei ke za zhi</title><addtitle>Journal of Clinical Internal Medicine</addtitle><description>目的对比观察厄贝沙坦与依那普利治疗轻中度原发性高血压的疗效和安全性。方法随机观察厄贝沙坦(41例，150mg～300nag)与依那普利(42例，10～20mg)治疗高血压患者4周和8周的有效率，并分两组进行比较。结果两组治疗第2周后开始平均收缩压、舒张压较治疗前明显降低(P<0．01)，在整个治疗期间血压持续平稳下降；厄贝沙坦与依那普利治疗4周降低舒张压总有效率分别为90．2％(37／41)和83．3％(35／42)，8周降低舒张压总有效率分别为95．1％(39／41)和90．5％(38／42)，两组比较P>0．05。结论厄贝沙坦是一安全、有效、长效，耐受性好，不良反应轻的降压药物。</description><subject>依那普利</subject><subject>厄贝沙坦</subject><subject>高血压</subject><issn>1001-9057</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9j81Kw0AURmehYKl9CRFcJd7pZGYySy3-QcFN92GSSWrakqJBhK6KdCEoFaWoFYqKoBTBQhFBBJ_GSdq3MFJxdb_7cbiXg9AyBpMIJlZrZhjHkYkBsCGAcrMIQE1gJoA9h3L__QIqxHHoZisGYhMrh9Z1tzN5GyTjvh486cuz76_B9Pgx6b_qk2Ey_kyvrnX3Tp9fJO3n6cvN5KGtu6fpbUePPpJRL73vpcP3RTQfyEbsF_5mHlU2NyqlbaO8u7VTWisbHhW2obgliFSgbKUYy4IQmBNX-pywoCgVpZJZhJOAStu1XU8qjgNMXeJJwGBJkkcrs7NHMgpkVHVqzcODKHvoNLyo3mr9KgPLhDNyaUZ6e82ouh9mrCu9ehA2fAdTDlwUCfkB1R1xJQ</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>陈江斌王晋明王芳江洪李建军王跃岭蒋学俊杨波李晓艳</creator><general>430060,武汉大学人民医院心内科</general><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>W91</scope><scope>~WA</scope><scope>2B.</scope><scope>4A8</scope><scope>92I</scope><scope>93N</scope><scope>PSX</scope><scope>TCJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>厄贝沙坦和依那普利治疗原发性高血压的对比研究</title><author>陈江斌王晋明王芳江洪李建军王跃岭蒋学俊杨波李晓艳</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c598-d7493ad0d8dd66ad099173bae736f2ad55a64373f5a8b8bcad71f15b3ca0104a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>chi</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>依那普利</topic><topic>厄贝沙坦</topic><topic>高血压</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>陈江斌王晋明王芳江洪李建军王跃岭蒋学俊杨波李晓艳</creatorcontrib><collection>中文科技期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-医药卫生</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong</collection><collection>WANFANG Data Centre</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals</collection><collection>万方数据期刊 - 香港版</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><jtitle>Lin chuang nei ke za zhi</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>陈江斌王晋明王芳江洪李建军王跃岭蒋学俊杨波李晓艳</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>厄贝沙坦和依那普利治疗原发性高血压的对比研究</atitle><jtitle>Lin chuang nei ke za zhi</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Clinical Internal Medicine</addtitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>384</spage><epage>386</epage><pages>384-386</pages><issn>1001-9057</issn><abstract>目的对比观察厄贝沙坦与依那普利治疗轻中度原发性高血压的疗效和安全性。方法随机观察厄贝沙坦(41例，150mg～300nag)与依那普利(42例，10～20mg)治疗高血压患者4周和8周的有效率，并分两组进行比较。结果两组治疗第2周后开始平均收缩压、舒张压较治疗前明显降低(P<0．01)，在整个治疗期间血压持续平稳下降；厄贝沙坦与依那普利治疗4周降低舒张压总有效率分别为90．2％(37／41)和83．3％(35／42)，8周降低舒张压总有效率分别为95．1％(39／41)和90．5％(38／42)，两组比较P>0．05。结论厄贝沙坦是一安全、有效、长效，耐受性好，不良反应轻的降压药物。</abstract><pub>430060,武汉大学人民医院心内科</pub><doi>10.3969/j.issn.1001-9057.2005.06.008</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 1001-9057
ispartof	Lin chuang nei ke za zhi, 2005, Vol.22 (6), p.384-386
issn	1001-9057
language	chi
recordid	cdi_wanfang_journals_lcnkzz200506008
source	Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects	依那普利厄贝沙坦高血压
title	厄贝沙坦和依那普利治疗原发性高血压的对比研究
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T17%3A39%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wanfang_jour_chong&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E5%8E%84%E8%B4%9D%E6%B2%99%E5%9D%A6%E5%92%8C%E4%BE%9D%E9%82%A3%E6%99%AE%E5%88%A9%E6%B2%BB%E7%96%97%E5%8E%9F%E5%8F%91%E6%80%A7%E9%AB%98%E8%A1%80%E5%8E%8B%E7%9A%84%E5%AF%B9%E6%AF%94%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6&rft.jtitle=Lin%20chuang%20nei%20ke%20za%20zhi&rft.au=%E9%99%88%E6%B1%9F%E6%96%8C%20%E7%8E%8B%E6%99%8B%E6%98%8E%20%E7%8E%8B%E8%8A%B3%20%E6%B1%9F%E6%B4%AA%20%E6%9D%8E%E5%BB%BA%E5%86%9B%20%E7%8E%8B%E8%B7%83%E5%B2%AD%20%E8%92%8B%E5%AD%A6%E4%BF%8A%20%E6%9D%A8%E6%B3%A2%20%E6%9D%8E%E6%99%93%E8%89%B3&rft.date=2005&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=384&rft.epage=386&rft.pages=384-386&rft.issn=1001-9057&rft_id=info:doi/10.3969/j.issn.1001-9057.2005.06.008&rft_dat=%3Cwanfang_jour_chong%3Elcnkzz200506008%3C/wanfang_jour_chong%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cqvip_id=15707923&rft_wanfj_id=lcnkzz200506008&rfr_iscdi=true