台湾刑事诉讼法对中国辩护权的建议
由于台湾辩护权发展较早,且受实务上法官造法的承认,其体系远较大陆地区刑事诉讼法完整,各种构成要件和违反的效果都有明白规定。其中尤以强制辩护、侦查与羁押中的会见权的实务经验值得大陆地区参考。
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | 晋中学院学报 2012, Vol.29 (4), p.54-61 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | chi |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 61 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 54 |
container_title | 晋中学院学报 |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | 谢易颖 |
description | 由于台湾辩护权发展较早,且受实务上法官造法的承认,其体系远较大陆地区刑事诉讼法完整,各种构成要件和违反的效果都有明白规定。其中尤以强制辩护、侦查与羁押中的会见权的实务经验值得大陆地区参考。 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wanfang_jour_chong</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wanfang_journals_jzsfgdzkxxxb201204014</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>42569694</cqvip_id><wanfj_id>jzsfgdzkxxxb201204014</wanfj_id><sourcerecordid>jzsfgdzkxxxb201204014</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c644-f1324d5ea91131c108a78f6d3f25e4476e73e2374f776d4c6af06a469e86e52a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjctKw0AYhWehYKl9CB8gMJc__0yWUrxBwU33ZZrMxFRNNUGM3erCy0JcdKO4c-PCVHBjq_ZpmpjHMFDhwNl83zkrpMFQCocpqtZIK02jPhUIQtVpEFrcv5fTeXH9sJjdVZObKv8uP8bFZLr4fCuefqr5a3n7Uj5f_j5eFV-zKs_XyarVR6lp_XeTdLe3uu1dp7O_s9fe7Dg-AjiWCQ6Ba7THmGA-o0pLZTEQlrsGQKKRwnAhwUqJAfioLUUN6BmFxuVaNImznD3XsdVx2BsMz5K4PuwNRqkNg9FhlmV9ThmnQBnU_MaS9w-GcXga1cZJEh3r5KIH3EUPPRB_UWpevg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>台湾刑事诉讼法对中国辩护权的建议</title><source>国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库 (National Social Sciences Database)</source><creator>谢易颖</creator><creatorcontrib>谢易颖</creatorcontrib><description>由于台湾辩护权发展较早,且受实务上法官造法的承认,其体系远较大陆地区刑事诉讼法完整,各种构成要件和违反的效果都有明白规定。其中尤以强制辩护、侦查与羁押中的会见权的实务经验值得大陆地区参考。</description><identifier>ISSN: 1673-1808</identifier><language>chi</language><publisher>中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088</publisher><subject>会见权 ; 侦查中辩护权 ; 审判程序之辩护权 ; 指定辩护 ; 羁押接见</subject><ispartof>晋中学院学报, 2012, Vol.29 (4), p.54-61</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/86921A/86921A.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,4012</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>谢易颖</creatorcontrib><title>台湾刑事诉讼法对中国辩护权的建议</title><title>晋中学院学报</title><addtitle>Journal of Jinzhong University</addtitle><description>由于台湾辩护权发展较早,且受实务上法官造法的承认,其体系远较大陆地区刑事诉讼法完整,各种构成要件和违反的效果都有明白规定。其中尤以强制辩护、侦查与羁押中的会见权的实务经验值得大陆地区参考。</description><subject>会见权</subject><subject>侦查中辩护权</subject><subject>审判程序之辩护权</subject><subject>指定辩护</subject><subject>羁押接见</subject><issn>1673-1808</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotjctKw0AYhWehYKl9CB8gMJc__0yWUrxBwU33ZZrMxFRNNUGM3erCy0JcdKO4c-PCVHBjq_ZpmpjHMFDhwNl83zkrpMFQCocpqtZIK02jPhUIQtVpEFrcv5fTeXH9sJjdVZObKv8uP8bFZLr4fCuefqr5a3n7Uj5f_j5eFV-zKs_XyarVR6lp_XeTdLe3uu1dp7O_s9fe7Dg-AjiWCQ6Ba7THmGA-o0pLZTEQlrsGQKKRwnAhwUqJAfioLUUN6BmFxuVaNImznD3XsdVx2BsMz5K4PuwNRqkNg9FhlmV9ThmnQBnU_MaS9w-GcXga1cZJEh3r5KIH3EUPPRB_UWpevg</recordid><startdate>2012</startdate><enddate>2012</enddate><creator>谢易颖</creator><general>中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088</general><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>~WA</scope><scope>2B.</scope><scope>4A8</scope><scope>92I</scope><scope>93N</scope><scope>PSX</scope><scope>TCJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2012</creationdate><title>台湾刑事诉讼法对中国辩护权的建议</title><author>谢易颖</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c644-f1324d5ea91131c108a78f6d3f25e4476e73e2374f776d4c6af06a469e86e52a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>chi</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>会见权</topic><topic>侦查中辩护权</topic><topic>审判程序之辩护权</topic><topic>指定辩护</topic><topic>羁押接见</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>谢易颖</creatorcontrib><collection>中文科技期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong</collection><collection>WANFANG Data Centre</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals</collection><collection>万方数据期刊 - 香港版</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><jtitle>晋中学院学报</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>谢易颖</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>台湾刑事诉讼法对中国辩护权的建议</atitle><jtitle>晋中学院学报</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Jinzhong University</addtitle><date>2012</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>54</spage><epage>61</epage><pages>54-61</pages><issn>1673-1808</issn><abstract>由于台湾辩护权发展较早,且受实务上法官造法的承认,其体系远较大陆地区刑事诉讼法完整,各种构成要件和违反的效果都有明白规定。其中尤以强制辩护、侦查与羁押中的会见权的实务经验值得大陆地区参考。</abstract><pub>中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088</pub><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1673-1808 |
ispartof | 晋中学院学报, 2012, Vol.29 (4), p.54-61 |
issn | 1673-1808 |
language | chi |
recordid | cdi_wanfang_journals_jzsfgdzkxxxb201204014 |
source | 国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库 (National Social Sciences Database) |
subjects | 会见权 侦查中辩护权 审判程序之辩护权 指定辩护 羁押接见 |
title | 台湾刑事诉讼法对中国辩护权的建议 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T12%3A55%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wanfang_jour_chong&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E5%8F%B0%E6%B9%BE%E5%88%91%E4%BA%8B%E8%AF%89%E8%AE%BC%E6%B3%95%E5%AF%B9%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E8%BE%A9%E6%8A%A4%E6%9D%83%E7%9A%84%E5%BB%BA%E8%AE%AE&rft.jtitle=%E6%99%8B%E4%B8%AD%E5%AD%A6%E9%99%A2%E5%AD%A6%E6%8A%A5&rft.au=%E8%B0%A2%E6%98%93%E9%A2%96&rft.date=2012&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=54&rft.epage=61&rft.pages=54-61&rft.issn=1673-1808&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cwanfang_jour_chong%3Ejzsfgdzkxxxb201204014%3C/wanfang_jour_chong%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cqvip_id=42569694&rft_wanfj_id=jzsfgdzkxxxb201204014&rfr_iscdi=true |