Community structure of picoplankton abundance and biomass in the southern Huanghai Sea during the spring and autumn of 2006
During spring and autumn of 2006, the investigations on abundance, carbon biomass and distri- bution of picoplankton were carried out in the southern Huanghai Sea (Yellow Sea, sHS). Three groups of picoplankton-Synechococcus (Syn), Picoeukaryotes (PEuk) and heterotrophic bacteria (BAC) were identifi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta oceanologica Sinica 2010, Vol.29 (1), p.58-68 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 68 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 58 |
container_title | Acta oceanologica Sinica |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Le, Fengfeng Ning, Xiuren Liu, Chenggang Hao, Qiang Shi, Junxian |
description | During spring and autumn of 2006, the investigations on abundance, carbon biomass and distri- bution of picoplankton were carried out in the southern Huanghai Sea (Yellow Sea, sHS). Three groups of picoplankton-Synechococcus (Syn), Picoeukaryotes (PEuk) and heterotrophic bacteria (BAC) were identified, but Prochlorococcus (Pro) was undetected. The average abundance of Syn and PEuk was lower in spring (5.0 and 1.3×10^3 cells/cm^3, respectively) than in autumn (92.4 and 2.7×0^3 cells/cm^3, respectively), but it was opposite for BAC (1.3 and 0.7×10^6 cells/cm^3 in spring and autumn, respectively). And the total carbon biomass of picoplankton was higher in spring (37.23×11.67) mg/m^3 than in autumn (21.29×13.75) mg/m^3. The ratios of the three cell abundance were 5:1:1 341 and 30:1:124 in spring and autumn, respectively. And the ratios of carbon biomass of them were 5:7:362 and 9:4:4 in spring and autumn, respectively. Seasonal distribution characteristics of Syn, PEuk, BAC were quite different from each other. In spring, Syn abundance decreased in turn in the central waters (where phytoplankton bloom in spring occurred), the southern waters and inshore waters of the Shandong Peninsula (where even Syn was undetected); the high values of PEuk abundance appeared in the central and southern waters and the inshore of the Shandong Peninsula; the abundance of BAC was nearly three order of magnitude higher than that of photosynthetic picoplankton, and high values appeared in the central waters. In autumn, Syn abundance in central waters was higher than that in surrounding waters, while for PEuk abundance, it decreased in turn in the inshore waters of the Shandong Peninsula, the southern waters and the central waters; BAC presented a complicated blocky type distribution. Sub-surface maximum of each group of picopalnkton appeared in both spring and autumn. Compared with the available lit- eratures concerning the studied area, the range of Syn abundance was larger, and the abundance of BAC was higher. In addition, the conversion factors for calculating picoplanktonic carbon biomass were discussed, with the conversion factors which are different from previous studies in the same surveyed waters. The result of regression analysis showed that there was distinct positive correlation between BAC and photosynthetic picoplankton in spring (r=0.61, P 〈0.001), but no correlation was found in autumn. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13131-010-0008-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wanfang_jour_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wanfang_journals_hyxb_e201001008</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>32749439</cqvip_id><wanfj_id>hyxb_e201001008</wanfj_id><sourcerecordid>hyxb_e201001008</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-68cae6762bc1f47b2e476ea9f2c5609e12b564294e408fd95d7f7a30cdd78393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rFTEYhQdR8Fr7A7oLunA1-uZj8rGUi1qh4MIu3IVMJrl32jvJbTJBL_3zzTjFgqAk8GbxnJPDeZvmAsN7DCA-ZEzraQFDCwCyhWfNBkuuWgxKPW82QDradtD9eNm8yvkGoMMdFZvmfhunqYRxPqE8p2LnkhyKHh1HG48HE27nGJDpSxhMsA6ZMKB-jJPJGY0BzXuHcix1pIAuiwm7vRnRd2fQUNIYditw_P1cpKbMZQqLPwHgr5sX3hyyO3-cZ83150_X28v26tuXr9uPV61llM0tl9Y4LjjpLfZM9MQxwZ1RntiOg3KY9B1nRDHHQPpBdYPwwlCwwyAkVfSsebfa_jTB14j6JpYU6od6f_rVa0dqacuVT-Qxxbvi8qynMVt3qD24WLJWQKgEzEUl3_xF_jGVAgsqCdAKvf0XRBRWlHMgvFJ4pWyKOSfnde1rMumkMehlt3rdra4Z9bJbDVVDVs3arUtPzv8TPWa2-xh2d1Wne2Nv_XhwmhLBFKtlPQB2v7Dg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2919366026</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Community structure of picoplankton abundance and biomass in the southern Huanghai Sea during the spring and autumn of 2006</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Le, Fengfeng ; Ning, Xiuren ; Liu, Chenggang ; Hao, Qiang ; Shi, Junxian</creator><creatorcontrib>Le, Fengfeng ; Ning, Xiuren ; Liu, Chenggang ; Hao, Qiang ; Shi, Junxian</creatorcontrib><description>During spring and autumn of 2006, the investigations on abundance, carbon biomass and distri- bution of picoplankton were carried out in the southern Huanghai Sea (Yellow Sea, sHS). Three groups of picoplankton-Synechococcus (Syn), Picoeukaryotes (PEuk) and heterotrophic bacteria (BAC) were identified, but Prochlorococcus (Pro) was undetected. The average abundance of Syn and PEuk was lower in spring (5.0 and 1.3×10^3 cells/cm^3, respectively) than in autumn (92.4 and 2.7×0^3 cells/cm^3, respectively), but it was opposite for BAC (1.3 and 0.7×10^6 cells/cm^3 in spring and autumn, respectively). And the total carbon biomass of picoplankton was higher in spring (37.23×11.67) mg/m^3 than in autumn (21.29×13.75) mg/m^3. The ratios of the three cell abundance were 5:1:1 341 and 30:1:124 in spring and autumn, respectively. And the ratios of carbon biomass of them were 5:7:362 and 9:4:4 in spring and autumn, respectively. Seasonal distribution characteristics of Syn, PEuk, BAC were quite different from each other. In spring, Syn abundance decreased in turn in the central waters (where phytoplankton bloom in spring occurred), the southern waters and inshore waters of the Shandong Peninsula (where even Syn was undetected); the high values of PEuk abundance appeared in the central and southern waters and the inshore of the Shandong Peninsula; the abundance of BAC was nearly three order of magnitude higher than that of photosynthetic picoplankton, and high values appeared in the central waters. In autumn, Syn abundance in central waters was higher than that in surrounding waters, while for PEuk abundance, it decreased in turn in the inshore waters of the Shandong Peninsula, the southern waters and the central waters; BAC presented a complicated blocky type distribution. Sub-surface maximum of each group of picopalnkton appeared in both spring and autumn. Compared with the available lit- eratures concerning the studied area, the range of Syn abundance was larger, and the abundance of BAC was higher. In addition, the conversion factors for calculating picoplanktonic carbon biomass were discussed, with the conversion factors which are different from previous studies in the same surveyed waters. The result of regression analysis showed that there was distinct positive correlation between BAC and photosynthetic picoplankton in spring (r=0.61, P 〈0.001), but no correlation was found in autumn.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0253-505X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1869-1099</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13131-010-0008-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: The Chinese Society of Oceanography</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Autumn ; Bacteria ; Biomass ; Blooms ; Carbon ; Cells ; Climatology ; Community structure ; Conversion factors ; Correlation ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Ecology ; Engineering Fluid Dynamics ; Environmental Chemistry ; Food chains ; Heterotrophic bacteria ; Marine ; Marine & Freshwater Sciences ; Oceanography ; Photosynthesis ; Phytoplankton ; Picoplankton ; Plankton ; Population number ; Prochlorococcus ; Regression analysis ; Seasonal distribution ; Spring ; Spring (season) ; 光合作用 ; 同义词 ; 季节性分布 ; 山东半岛南部 ; 平均丰度 ; 微型浮游生物 ; 总碳量 ; 近岸水域</subject><ispartof>Acta oceanologica Sinica, 2010, Vol.29 (1), p.58-68</ispartof><rights>The Chinese Society of Oceanography and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010</rights><rights>The Chinese Society of Oceanography and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010.</rights><rights>Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-68cae6762bc1f47b2e476ea9f2c5609e12b564294e408fd95d7f7a30cdd78393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-68cae6762bc1f47b2e476ea9f2c5609e12b564294e408fd95d7f7a30cdd78393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/86790X/86790X.jpg</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13131-010-0008-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/871738203?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009,21368,27902,27903,27904,33723,33724,41467,42536,43784,51297,64361,64363,64365,72215</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Le, Fengfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ning, Xiuren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chenggang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Junxian</creatorcontrib><title>Community structure of picoplankton abundance and biomass in the southern Huanghai Sea during the spring and autumn of 2006</title><title>Acta oceanologica Sinica</title><addtitle>Acta Oceanol. Sin</addtitle><addtitle>Acta Oceanologica Sinica</addtitle><description>During spring and autumn of 2006, the investigations on abundance, carbon biomass and distri- bution of picoplankton were carried out in the southern Huanghai Sea (Yellow Sea, sHS). Three groups of picoplankton-Synechococcus (Syn), Picoeukaryotes (PEuk) and heterotrophic bacteria (BAC) were identified, but Prochlorococcus (Pro) was undetected. The average abundance of Syn and PEuk was lower in spring (5.0 and 1.3×10^3 cells/cm^3, respectively) than in autumn (92.4 and 2.7×0^3 cells/cm^3, respectively), but it was opposite for BAC (1.3 and 0.7×10^6 cells/cm^3 in spring and autumn, respectively). And the total carbon biomass of picoplankton was higher in spring (37.23×11.67) mg/m^3 than in autumn (21.29×13.75) mg/m^3. The ratios of the three cell abundance were 5:1:1 341 and 30:1:124 in spring and autumn, respectively. And the ratios of carbon biomass of them were 5:7:362 and 9:4:4 in spring and autumn, respectively. Seasonal distribution characteristics of Syn, PEuk, BAC were quite different from each other. In spring, Syn abundance decreased in turn in the central waters (where phytoplankton bloom in spring occurred), the southern waters and inshore waters of the Shandong Peninsula (where even Syn was undetected); the high values of PEuk abundance appeared in the central and southern waters and the inshore of the Shandong Peninsula; the abundance of BAC was nearly three order of magnitude higher than that of photosynthetic picoplankton, and high values appeared in the central waters. In autumn, Syn abundance in central waters was higher than that in surrounding waters, while for PEuk abundance, it decreased in turn in the inshore waters of the Shandong Peninsula, the southern waters and the central waters; BAC presented a complicated blocky type distribution. Sub-surface maximum of each group of picopalnkton appeared in both spring and autumn. Compared with the available lit- eratures concerning the studied area, the range of Syn abundance was larger, and the abundance of BAC was higher. In addition, the conversion factors for calculating picoplanktonic carbon biomass were discussed, with the conversion factors which are different from previous studies in the same surveyed waters. The result of regression analysis showed that there was distinct positive correlation between BAC and photosynthetic picoplankton in spring (r=0.61, P 〈0.001), but no correlation was found in autumn.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Autumn</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Blooms</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Cells</subject><subject>Climatology</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Conversion factors</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Engineering Fluid Dynamics</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Food chains</subject><subject>Heterotrophic bacteria</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine & Freshwater Sciences</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Photosynthesis</subject><subject>Phytoplankton</subject><subject>Picoplankton</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>Population number</subject><subject>Prochlorococcus</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Seasonal distribution</subject><subject>Spring</subject><subject>Spring (season)</subject><subject>光合作用</subject><subject>同义词</subject><subject>季节性分布</subject><subject>山东半岛南部</subject><subject>平均丰度</subject><subject>微型浮游生物</subject><subject>总碳量</subject><subject>近岸水域</subject><issn>0253-505X</issn><issn>1869-1099</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1rFTEYhQdR8Fr7A7oLunA1-uZj8rGUi1qh4MIu3IVMJrl32jvJbTJBL_3zzTjFgqAk8GbxnJPDeZvmAsN7DCA-ZEzraQFDCwCyhWfNBkuuWgxKPW82QDradtD9eNm8yvkGoMMdFZvmfhunqYRxPqE8p2LnkhyKHh1HG48HE27nGJDpSxhMsA6ZMKB-jJPJGY0BzXuHcix1pIAuiwm7vRnRd2fQUNIYditw_P1cpKbMZQqLPwHgr5sX3hyyO3-cZ83150_X28v26tuXr9uPV61llM0tl9Y4LjjpLfZM9MQxwZ1RntiOg3KY9B1nRDHHQPpBdYPwwlCwwyAkVfSsebfa_jTB14j6JpYU6od6f_rVa0dqacuVT-Qxxbvi8qynMVt3qD24WLJWQKgEzEUl3_xF_jGVAgsqCdAKvf0XRBRWlHMgvFJ4pWyKOSfnde1rMumkMehlt3rdra4Z9bJbDVVDVs3arUtPzv8TPWa2-xh2d1Wne2Nv_XhwmhLBFKtlPQB2v7Dg</recordid><startdate>2010</startdate><enddate>2010</enddate><creator>Le, Fengfeng</creator><creator>Ning, Xiuren</creator><creator>Liu, Chenggang</creator><creator>Hao, Qiang</creator><creator>Shi, Junxian</creator><general>The Chinese Society of Oceanography</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Second Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Hangzhou 310012, China</general><general>Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystems and Biogeochemistry of State Oceanic Administration, Hangzhou 310012, China%Second Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Hangzhou 310012, China</general><general>S</general><general>Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystems and Biogeochemistry of State Oceanic Administration, Hangzhou 310012, China</general><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>W95</scope><scope>~WA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>2B.</scope><scope>4A8</scope><scope>92I</scope><scope>93N</scope><scope>PSX</scope><scope>TCJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2010</creationdate><title>Community structure of picoplankton abundance and biomass in the southern Huanghai Sea during the spring and autumn of 2006</title><author>Le, Fengfeng ; Ning, Xiuren ; Liu, Chenggang ; Hao, Qiang ; Shi, Junxian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-68cae6762bc1f47b2e476ea9f2c5609e12b564294e408fd95d7f7a30cdd78393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Autumn</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Blooms</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Cells</topic><topic>Climatology</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Conversion factors</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Engineering Fluid Dynamics</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Food chains</topic><topic>Heterotrophic bacteria</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine & Freshwater Sciences</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Photosynthesis</topic><topic>Phytoplankton</topic><topic>Picoplankton</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>Population number</topic><topic>Prochlorococcus</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Seasonal distribution</topic><topic>Spring</topic><topic>Spring (season)</topic><topic>光合作用</topic><topic>同义词</topic><topic>季节性分布</topic><topic>山东半岛南部</topic><topic>平均丰度</topic><topic>微型浮游生物</topic><topic>总碳量</topic><topic>近岸水域</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Le, Fengfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ning, Xiuren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chenggang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Junxian</creatorcontrib><collection>中文科技期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-农业科学</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong</collection><collection>WANFANG Data Centre</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals</collection><collection>万方数据期刊 - 香港版</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><jtitle>Acta oceanologica Sinica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Le, Fengfeng</au><au>Ning, Xiuren</au><au>Liu, Chenggang</au><au>Hao, Qiang</au><au>Shi, Junxian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Community structure of picoplankton abundance and biomass in the southern Huanghai Sea during the spring and autumn of 2006</atitle><jtitle>Acta oceanologica Sinica</jtitle><stitle>Acta Oceanol. Sin</stitle><addtitle>Acta Oceanologica Sinica</addtitle><date>2010</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>58</spage><epage>68</epage><pages>58-68</pages><issn>0253-505X</issn><eissn>1869-1099</eissn><abstract>During spring and autumn of 2006, the investigations on abundance, carbon biomass and distri- bution of picoplankton were carried out in the southern Huanghai Sea (Yellow Sea, sHS). Three groups of picoplankton-Synechococcus (Syn), Picoeukaryotes (PEuk) and heterotrophic bacteria (BAC) were identified, but Prochlorococcus (Pro) was undetected. The average abundance of Syn and PEuk was lower in spring (5.0 and 1.3×10^3 cells/cm^3, respectively) than in autumn (92.4 and 2.7×0^3 cells/cm^3, respectively), but it was opposite for BAC (1.3 and 0.7×10^6 cells/cm^3 in spring and autumn, respectively). And the total carbon biomass of picoplankton was higher in spring (37.23×11.67) mg/m^3 than in autumn (21.29×13.75) mg/m^3. The ratios of the three cell abundance were 5:1:1 341 and 30:1:124 in spring and autumn, respectively. And the ratios of carbon biomass of them were 5:7:362 and 9:4:4 in spring and autumn, respectively. Seasonal distribution characteristics of Syn, PEuk, BAC were quite different from each other. In spring, Syn abundance decreased in turn in the central waters (where phytoplankton bloom in spring occurred), the southern waters and inshore waters of the Shandong Peninsula (where even Syn was undetected); the high values of PEuk abundance appeared in the central and southern waters and the inshore of the Shandong Peninsula; the abundance of BAC was nearly three order of magnitude higher than that of photosynthetic picoplankton, and high values appeared in the central waters. In autumn, Syn abundance in central waters was higher than that in surrounding waters, while for PEuk abundance, it decreased in turn in the inshore waters of the Shandong Peninsula, the southern waters and the central waters; BAC presented a complicated blocky type distribution. Sub-surface maximum of each group of picopalnkton appeared in both spring and autumn. Compared with the available lit- eratures concerning the studied area, the range of Syn abundance was larger, and the abundance of BAC was higher. In addition, the conversion factors for calculating picoplanktonic carbon biomass were discussed, with the conversion factors which are different from previous studies in the same surveyed waters. The result of regression analysis showed that there was distinct positive correlation between BAC and photosynthetic picoplankton in spring (r=0.61, P 〈0.001), but no correlation was found in autumn.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>The Chinese Society of Oceanography</pub><doi>10.1007/s13131-010-0008-0</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0253-505X |
ispartof | Acta oceanologica Sinica, 2010, Vol.29 (1), p.58-68 |
issn | 0253-505X 1869-1099 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_wanfang_journals_hyxb_e201001008 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; Alma/SFX Local Collection; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Abundance Autumn Bacteria Biomass Blooms Carbon Cells Climatology Community structure Conversion factors Correlation Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Ecology Engineering Fluid Dynamics Environmental Chemistry Food chains Heterotrophic bacteria Marine Marine & Freshwater Sciences Oceanography Photosynthesis Phytoplankton Picoplankton Plankton Population number Prochlorococcus Regression analysis Seasonal distribution Spring Spring (season) 光合作用 同义词 季节性分布 山东半岛南部 平均丰度 微型浮游生物 总碳量 近岸水域 |
title | Community structure of picoplankton abundance and biomass in the southern Huanghai Sea during the spring and autumn of 2006 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T15%3A30%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wanfang_jour_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Community%20structure%20of%20picoplankton%20abundance%20and%20biomass%20in%20the%20southern%20Huanghai%20Sea%20during%20the%20spring%20and%20autumn%20of%202006&rft.jtitle=Acta%20oceanologica%20Sinica&rft.au=Le,%20Fengfeng&rft.date=2010&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=58&rft.epage=68&rft.pages=58-68&rft.issn=0253-505X&rft.eissn=1869-1099&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13131-010-0008-0&rft_dat=%3Cwanfang_jour_proqu%3Ehyxb_e201001008%3C/wanfang_jour_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2919366026&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cqvip_id=32749439&rft_wanfj_id=hyxb_e201001008&rfr_iscdi=true |