Community structure of picoplankton abundance and biomass in the southern Huanghai Sea during the spring and autumn of 2006

During spring and autumn of 2006, the investigations on abundance, carbon biomass and distri- bution of picoplankton were carried out in the southern Huanghai Sea (Yellow Sea, sHS). Three groups of picoplankton-Synechococcus (Syn), Picoeukaryotes (PEuk) and heterotrophic bacteria (BAC) were identifi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta oceanologica Sinica 2010, Vol.29 (1), p.58-68
Hauptverfasser: Le, Fengfeng, Ning, Xiuren, Liu, Chenggang, Hao, Qiang, Shi, Junxian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 68
container_issue 1
container_start_page 58
container_title Acta oceanologica Sinica
container_volume 29
creator Le, Fengfeng
Ning, Xiuren
Liu, Chenggang
Hao, Qiang
Shi, Junxian
description During spring and autumn of 2006, the investigations on abundance, carbon biomass and distri- bution of picoplankton were carried out in the southern Huanghai Sea (Yellow Sea, sHS). Three groups of picoplankton-Synechococcus (Syn), Picoeukaryotes (PEuk) and heterotrophic bacteria (BAC) were identified, but Prochlorococcus (Pro) was undetected. The average abundance of Syn and PEuk was lower in spring (5.0 and 1.3×10^3 cells/cm^3, respectively) than in autumn (92.4 and 2.7×0^3 cells/cm^3, respectively), but it was opposite for BAC (1.3 and 0.7×10^6 cells/cm^3 in spring and autumn, respectively). And the total carbon biomass of picoplankton was higher in spring (37.23×11.67) mg/m^3 than in autumn (21.29×13.75) mg/m^3. The ratios of the three cell abundance were 5:1:1 341 and 30:1:124 in spring and autumn, respectively. And the ratios of carbon biomass of them were 5:7:362 and 9:4:4 in spring and autumn, respectively. Seasonal distribution characteristics of Syn, PEuk, BAC were quite different from each other. In spring, Syn abundance decreased in turn in the central waters (where phytoplankton bloom in spring occurred), the southern waters and inshore waters of the Shandong Peninsula (where even Syn was undetected); the high values of PEuk abundance appeared in the central and southern waters and the inshore of the Shandong Peninsula; the abundance of BAC was nearly three order of magnitude higher than that of photosynthetic picoplankton, and high values appeared in the central waters. In autumn, Syn abundance in central waters was higher than that in surrounding waters, while for PEuk abundance, it decreased in turn in the inshore waters of the Shandong Peninsula, the southern waters and the central waters; BAC presented a complicated blocky type distribution. Sub-surface maximum of each group of picopalnkton appeared in both spring and autumn. Compared with the available lit- eratures concerning the studied area, the range of Syn abundance was larger, and the abundance of BAC was higher. In addition, the conversion factors for calculating picoplanktonic carbon biomass were discussed, with the conversion factors which are different from previous studies in the same surveyed waters. The result of regression analysis showed that there was distinct positive correlation between BAC and photosynthetic picoplankton in spring (r=0.61, P 〈0.001), but no correlation was found in autumn.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13131-010-0008-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wanfang_jour_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wanfang_journals_hyxb_e201001008</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>32749439</cqvip_id><wanfj_id>hyxb_e201001008</wanfj_id><sourcerecordid>hyxb_e201001008</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-68cae6762bc1f47b2e476ea9f2c5609e12b564294e408fd95d7f7a30cdd78393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rFTEYhQdR8Fr7A7oLunA1-uZj8rGUi1qh4MIu3IVMJrl32jvJbTJBL_3zzTjFgqAk8GbxnJPDeZvmAsN7DCA-ZEzraQFDCwCyhWfNBkuuWgxKPW82QDradtD9eNm8yvkGoMMdFZvmfhunqYRxPqE8p2LnkhyKHh1HG48HE27nGJDpSxhMsA6ZMKB-jJPJGY0BzXuHcix1pIAuiwm7vRnRd2fQUNIYditw_P1cpKbMZQqLPwHgr5sX3hyyO3-cZ83150_X28v26tuXr9uPV61llM0tl9Y4LjjpLfZM9MQxwZ1RntiOg3KY9B1nRDHHQPpBdYPwwlCwwyAkVfSsebfa_jTB14j6JpYU6od6f_rVa0dqacuVT-Qxxbvi8qynMVt3qD24WLJWQKgEzEUl3_xF_jGVAgsqCdAKvf0XRBRWlHMgvFJ4pWyKOSfnde1rMumkMehlt3rdra4Z9bJbDVVDVs3arUtPzv8TPWa2-xh2d1Wne2Nv_XhwmhLBFKtlPQB2v7Dg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2919366026</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Community structure of picoplankton abundance and biomass in the southern Huanghai Sea during the spring and autumn of 2006</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Le, Fengfeng ; Ning, Xiuren ; Liu, Chenggang ; Hao, Qiang ; Shi, Junxian</creator><creatorcontrib>Le, Fengfeng ; Ning, Xiuren ; Liu, Chenggang ; Hao, Qiang ; Shi, Junxian</creatorcontrib><description>During spring and autumn of 2006, the investigations on abundance, carbon biomass and distri- bution of picoplankton were carried out in the southern Huanghai Sea (Yellow Sea, sHS). Three groups of picoplankton-Synechococcus (Syn), Picoeukaryotes (PEuk) and heterotrophic bacteria (BAC) were identified, but Prochlorococcus (Pro) was undetected. The average abundance of Syn and PEuk was lower in spring (5.0 and 1.3×10^3 cells/cm^3, respectively) than in autumn (92.4 and 2.7×0^3 cells/cm^3, respectively), but it was opposite for BAC (1.3 and 0.7×10^6 cells/cm^3 in spring and autumn, respectively). And the total carbon biomass of picoplankton was higher in spring (37.23×11.67) mg/m^3 than in autumn (21.29×13.75) mg/m^3. The ratios of the three cell abundance were 5:1:1 341 and 30:1:124 in spring and autumn, respectively. And the ratios of carbon biomass of them were 5:7:362 and 9:4:4 in spring and autumn, respectively. Seasonal distribution characteristics of Syn, PEuk, BAC were quite different from each other. In spring, Syn abundance decreased in turn in the central waters (where phytoplankton bloom in spring occurred), the southern waters and inshore waters of the Shandong Peninsula (where even Syn was undetected); the high values of PEuk abundance appeared in the central and southern waters and the inshore of the Shandong Peninsula; the abundance of BAC was nearly three order of magnitude higher than that of photosynthetic picoplankton, and high values appeared in the central waters. In autumn, Syn abundance in central waters was higher than that in surrounding waters, while for PEuk abundance, it decreased in turn in the inshore waters of the Shandong Peninsula, the southern waters and the central waters; BAC presented a complicated blocky type distribution. Sub-surface maximum of each group of picopalnkton appeared in both spring and autumn. Compared with the available lit- eratures concerning the studied area, the range of Syn abundance was larger, and the abundance of BAC was higher. In addition, the conversion factors for calculating picoplanktonic carbon biomass were discussed, with the conversion factors which are different from previous studies in the same surveyed waters. The result of regression analysis showed that there was distinct positive correlation between BAC and photosynthetic picoplankton in spring (r=0.61, P 〈0.001), but no correlation was found in autumn.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0253-505X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1869-1099</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13131-010-0008-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: The Chinese Society of Oceanography</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Autumn ; Bacteria ; Biomass ; Blooms ; Carbon ; Cells ; Climatology ; Community structure ; Conversion factors ; Correlation ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Ecology ; Engineering Fluid Dynamics ; Environmental Chemistry ; Food chains ; Heterotrophic bacteria ; Marine ; Marine &amp; Freshwater Sciences ; Oceanography ; Photosynthesis ; Phytoplankton ; Picoplankton ; Plankton ; Population number ; Prochlorococcus ; Regression analysis ; Seasonal distribution ; Spring ; Spring (season) ; 光合作用 ; 同义词 ; 季节性分布 ; 山东半岛南部 ; 平均丰度 ; 微型浮游生物 ; 总碳量 ; 近岸水域</subject><ispartof>Acta oceanologica Sinica, 2010, Vol.29 (1), p.58-68</ispartof><rights>The Chinese Society of Oceanography and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010</rights><rights>The Chinese Society of Oceanography and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010.</rights><rights>Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-68cae6762bc1f47b2e476ea9f2c5609e12b564294e408fd95d7f7a30cdd78393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-68cae6762bc1f47b2e476ea9f2c5609e12b564294e408fd95d7f7a30cdd78393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/86790X/86790X.jpg</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13131-010-0008-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/871738203?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009,21368,27902,27903,27904,33723,33724,41467,42536,43784,51297,64361,64363,64365,72215</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Le, Fengfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ning, Xiuren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chenggang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Junxian</creatorcontrib><title>Community structure of picoplankton abundance and biomass in the southern Huanghai Sea during the spring and autumn of 2006</title><title>Acta oceanologica Sinica</title><addtitle>Acta Oceanol. Sin</addtitle><addtitle>Acta Oceanologica Sinica</addtitle><description>During spring and autumn of 2006, the investigations on abundance, carbon biomass and distri- bution of picoplankton were carried out in the southern Huanghai Sea (Yellow Sea, sHS). Three groups of picoplankton-Synechococcus (Syn), Picoeukaryotes (PEuk) and heterotrophic bacteria (BAC) were identified, but Prochlorococcus (Pro) was undetected. The average abundance of Syn and PEuk was lower in spring (5.0 and 1.3×10^3 cells/cm^3, respectively) than in autumn (92.4 and 2.7×0^3 cells/cm^3, respectively), but it was opposite for BAC (1.3 and 0.7×10^6 cells/cm^3 in spring and autumn, respectively). And the total carbon biomass of picoplankton was higher in spring (37.23×11.67) mg/m^3 than in autumn (21.29×13.75) mg/m^3. The ratios of the three cell abundance were 5:1:1 341 and 30:1:124 in spring and autumn, respectively. And the ratios of carbon biomass of them were 5:7:362 and 9:4:4 in spring and autumn, respectively. Seasonal distribution characteristics of Syn, PEuk, BAC were quite different from each other. In spring, Syn abundance decreased in turn in the central waters (where phytoplankton bloom in spring occurred), the southern waters and inshore waters of the Shandong Peninsula (where even Syn was undetected); the high values of PEuk abundance appeared in the central and southern waters and the inshore of the Shandong Peninsula; the abundance of BAC was nearly three order of magnitude higher than that of photosynthetic picoplankton, and high values appeared in the central waters. In autumn, Syn abundance in central waters was higher than that in surrounding waters, while for PEuk abundance, it decreased in turn in the inshore waters of the Shandong Peninsula, the southern waters and the central waters; BAC presented a complicated blocky type distribution. Sub-surface maximum of each group of picopalnkton appeared in both spring and autumn. Compared with the available lit- eratures concerning the studied area, the range of Syn abundance was larger, and the abundance of BAC was higher. In addition, the conversion factors for calculating picoplanktonic carbon biomass were discussed, with the conversion factors which are different from previous studies in the same surveyed waters. The result of regression analysis showed that there was distinct positive correlation between BAC and photosynthetic picoplankton in spring (r=0.61, P 〈0.001), but no correlation was found in autumn.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Autumn</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Blooms</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Cells</subject><subject>Climatology</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Conversion factors</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Engineering Fluid Dynamics</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Food chains</subject><subject>Heterotrophic bacteria</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine &amp; Freshwater Sciences</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Photosynthesis</subject><subject>Phytoplankton</subject><subject>Picoplankton</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>Population number</subject><subject>Prochlorococcus</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Seasonal distribution</subject><subject>Spring</subject><subject>Spring (season)</subject><subject>光合作用</subject><subject>同义词</subject><subject>季节性分布</subject><subject>山东半岛南部</subject><subject>平均丰度</subject><subject>微型浮游生物</subject><subject>总碳量</subject><subject>近岸水域</subject><issn>0253-505X</issn><issn>1869-1099</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1rFTEYhQdR8Fr7A7oLunA1-uZj8rGUi1qh4MIu3IVMJrl32jvJbTJBL_3zzTjFgqAk8GbxnJPDeZvmAsN7DCA-ZEzraQFDCwCyhWfNBkuuWgxKPW82QDradtD9eNm8yvkGoMMdFZvmfhunqYRxPqE8p2LnkhyKHh1HG48HE27nGJDpSxhMsA6ZMKB-jJPJGY0BzXuHcix1pIAuiwm7vRnRd2fQUNIYditw_P1cpKbMZQqLPwHgr5sX3hyyO3-cZ83150_X28v26tuXr9uPV61llM0tl9Y4LjjpLfZM9MQxwZ1RntiOg3KY9B1nRDHHQPpBdYPwwlCwwyAkVfSsebfa_jTB14j6JpYU6od6f_rVa0dqacuVT-Qxxbvi8qynMVt3qD24WLJWQKgEzEUl3_xF_jGVAgsqCdAKvf0XRBRWlHMgvFJ4pWyKOSfnde1rMumkMehlt3rdra4Z9bJbDVVDVs3arUtPzv8TPWa2-xh2d1Wne2Nv_XhwmhLBFKtlPQB2v7Dg</recordid><startdate>2010</startdate><enddate>2010</enddate><creator>Le, Fengfeng</creator><creator>Ning, Xiuren</creator><creator>Liu, Chenggang</creator><creator>Hao, Qiang</creator><creator>Shi, Junxian</creator><general>The Chinese Society of Oceanography</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Second Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Hangzhou 310012, China</general><general>Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystems and Biogeochemistry of State Oceanic Administration, Hangzhou 310012, China%Second Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Hangzhou 310012, China</general><general>S</general><general>Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystems and Biogeochemistry of State Oceanic Administration, Hangzhou 310012, China</general><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>W95</scope><scope>~WA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>2B.</scope><scope>4A8</scope><scope>92I</scope><scope>93N</scope><scope>PSX</scope><scope>TCJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2010</creationdate><title>Community structure of picoplankton abundance and biomass in the southern Huanghai Sea during the spring and autumn of 2006</title><author>Le, Fengfeng ; Ning, Xiuren ; Liu, Chenggang ; Hao, Qiang ; Shi, Junxian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-68cae6762bc1f47b2e476ea9f2c5609e12b564294e408fd95d7f7a30cdd78393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Autumn</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Blooms</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Cells</topic><topic>Climatology</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Conversion factors</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Engineering Fluid Dynamics</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Food chains</topic><topic>Heterotrophic bacteria</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine &amp; Freshwater Sciences</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Photosynthesis</topic><topic>Phytoplankton</topic><topic>Picoplankton</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>Population number</topic><topic>Prochlorococcus</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Seasonal distribution</topic><topic>Spring</topic><topic>Spring (season)</topic><topic>光合作用</topic><topic>同义词</topic><topic>季节性分布</topic><topic>山东半岛南部</topic><topic>平均丰度</topic><topic>微型浮游生物</topic><topic>总碳量</topic><topic>近岸水域</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Le, Fengfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ning, Xiuren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chenggang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Junxian</creatorcontrib><collection>中文科技期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-农业科学</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong</collection><collection>WANFANG Data Centre</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals</collection><collection>万方数据期刊 - 香港版</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><jtitle>Acta oceanologica Sinica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Le, Fengfeng</au><au>Ning, Xiuren</au><au>Liu, Chenggang</au><au>Hao, Qiang</au><au>Shi, Junxian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Community structure of picoplankton abundance and biomass in the southern Huanghai Sea during the spring and autumn of 2006</atitle><jtitle>Acta oceanologica Sinica</jtitle><stitle>Acta Oceanol. Sin</stitle><addtitle>Acta Oceanologica Sinica</addtitle><date>2010</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>58</spage><epage>68</epage><pages>58-68</pages><issn>0253-505X</issn><eissn>1869-1099</eissn><abstract>During spring and autumn of 2006, the investigations on abundance, carbon biomass and distri- bution of picoplankton were carried out in the southern Huanghai Sea (Yellow Sea, sHS). Three groups of picoplankton-Synechococcus (Syn), Picoeukaryotes (PEuk) and heterotrophic bacteria (BAC) were identified, but Prochlorococcus (Pro) was undetected. The average abundance of Syn and PEuk was lower in spring (5.0 and 1.3×10^3 cells/cm^3, respectively) than in autumn (92.4 and 2.7×0^3 cells/cm^3, respectively), but it was opposite for BAC (1.3 and 0.7×10^6 cells/cm^3 in spring and autumn, respectively). And the total carbon biomass of picoplankton was higher in spring (37.23×11.67) mg/m^3 than in autumn (21.29×13.75) mg/m^3. The ratios of the three cell abundance were 5:1:1 341 and 30:1:124 in spring and autumn, respectively. And the ratios of carbon biomass of them were 5:7:362 and 9:4:4 in spring and autumn, respectively. Seasonal distribution characteristics of Syn, PEuk, BAC were quite different from each other. In spring, Syn abundance decreased in turn in the central waters (where phytoplankton bloom in spring occurred), the southern waters and inshore waters of the Shandong Peninsula (where even Syn was undetected); the high values of PEuk abundance appeared in the central and southern waters and the inshore of the Shandong Peninsula; the abundance of BAC was nearly three order of magnitude higher than that of photosynthetic picoplankton, and high values appeared in the central waters. In autumn, Syn abundance in central waters was higher than that in surrounding waters, while for PEuk abundance, it decreased in turn in the inshore waters of the Shandong Peninsula, the southern waters and the central waters; BAC presented a complicated blocky type distribution. Sub-surface maximum of each group of picopalnkton appeared in both spring and autumn. Compared with the available lit- eratures concerning the studied area, the range of Syn abundance was larger, and the abundance of BAC was higher. In addition, the conversion factors for calculating picoplanktonic carbon biomass were discussed, with the conversion factors which are different from previous studies in the same surveyed waters. The result of regression analysis showed that there was distinct positive correlation between BAC and photosynthetic picoplankton in spring (r=0.61, P 〈0.001), but no correlation was found in autumn.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>The Chinese Society of Oceanography</pub><doi>10.1007/s13131-010-0008-0</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0253-505X
ispartof Acta oceanologica Sinica, 2010, Vol.29 (1), p.58-68
issn 0253-505X
1869-1099
language eng
recordid cdi_wanfang_journals_hyxb_e201001008
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; Alma/SFX Local Collection; ProQuest Central
subjects Abundance
Autumn
Bacteria
Biomass
Blooms
Carbon
Cells
Climatology
Community structure
Conversion factors
Correlation
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Ecology
Engineering Fluid Dynamics
Environmental Chemistry
Food chains
Heterotrophic bacteria
Marine
Marine & Freshwater Sciences
Oceanography
Photosynthesis
Phytoplankton
Picoplankton
Plankton
Population number
Prochlorococcus
Regression analysis
Seasonal distribution
Spring
Spring (season)
光合作用
同义词
季节性分布
山东半岛南部
平均丰度
微型浮游生物
总碳量
近岸水域
title Community structure of picoplankton abundance and biomass in the southern Huanghai Sea during the spring and autumn of 2006
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T15%3A30%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wanfang_jour_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Community%20structure%20of%20picoplankton%20abundance%20and%20biomass%20in%20the%20southern%20Huanghai%20Sea%20during%20the%20spring%20and%20autumn%20of%202006&rft.jtitle=Acta%20oceanologica%20Sinica&rft.au=Le,%20Fengfeng&rft.date=2010&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=58&rft.epage=68&rft.pages=58-68&rft.issn=0253-505X&rft.eissn=1869-1099&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13131-010-0008-0&rft_dat=%3Cwanfang_jour_proqu%3Ehyxb_e201001008%3C/wanfang_jour_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2919366026&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cqvip_id=32749439&rft_wanfj_id=hyxb_e201001008&rfr_iscdi=true