Establishment and validation of a method for cell irradiation in 96-well and 6-well plates using a linear accelerator

To establish and validate a method for cell irradiation in 96-well and 6-well plates using a linear accelerator, three irradiation methods ( G0B0F40, G0B1.5F40, and G180B1.5F40 ) were designed to irradiate cell culture plasticware simulated with RW3 slab phantom and polystyrene. The difference betwe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nuclear science and techniques 2018-05, Vol.29 (5), p.65-72, Article 67
Hauptverfasser: Dong, Xiao-Qing, Lin, Qing, Hu, Jie, Huang, Liang, Yue, Kun, Wang, Lu, Zhang, Jia-Fei, Lu, Mei-Ling
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 72
container_issue 5
container_start_page 65
container_title Nuclear science and techniques
container_volume 29
creator Dong, Xiao-Qing
Lin, Qing
Hu, Jie
Huang, Liang
Yue, Kun
Wang, Lu
Zhang, Jia-Fei
Lu, Mei-Ling
description To establish and validate a method for cell irradiation in 96-well and 6-well plates using a linear accelerator, three irradiation methods ( G0B0F40, G0B1.5F40, and G180B1.5F40 ) were designed to irradiate cell culture plasticware simulated with RW3 slab phantom and polystyrene. The difference between the actual physical measured dose and the preset dose was compared among the three methods under the preparatory conditions of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 Gy. MDA-MB-231 cells were analyzed by using a cell proliferation assay and a clonogenic assay to verify the difference between the three cell irradiation methods on cell radiosensitivity. For each preset dose, the difference between the actual measured dose and the preset dose was the lowest for Method G0B1.5F40 , the second lowest for Method G180B1.5F40 , and the maximum for Method G0B0F40 . The ranges of the differences were − 0.28 to 0.02%, − 2.17 to − 1.80%, and − 4.92 to − 4.55%, and 0.31 to − 0.12%, − 3.42 to − 2.86%, and − 7.31 to − 6.92%, respectively, for 96-well and 6-well plates. The cell culture experiments proved that Method G0B1.5F40 was an accurate, effective, simple, and practical irradiation method. The most accurate and effective cell irradiation method should always be used, as it will reduce dose differences and instability factors and provide improved accuracy and comparability for laboratories researching cellular radiosensitivity.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s41365-018-0407-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wanfang_jour_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wanfang_journals_hjs_e201805009</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><wanfj_id>hjs_e201805009</wanfj_id><sourcerecordid>hjs_e201805009</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-cd31e8cb6181e2941e28980df539e69faaad2af601be3e07569c47ce4b1471ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFtO3qKTbPbrKKV-QMGLnsPs7mybss2WZGuxv94sW_DkJROG53lDXsbuJTxKgPwpaJlkqQBZCNCQi9MFmyklQSRS55dsFiEpCtDqmt2EsAXQOkvLGTssw4BVZ8NmR27g6Br-jZ1tcLC9433Lke9o2PQNb3vPa-o6br3Hxk6AdbzMxHFcj-r5uu9woMAPwbp1DOisI_Qc66iTx6H3t-yqxS7Q3XnO2dfL8nPxJlYfr--L55WoVS4HUTeJpKKuMllIUqWOR1EW0LRpUlJWtojYKGwzkBUlBHmalbXOa9JV_LQkSubsYco9omvRrc22P3gXXzSbbTCkYl2QApQRlBNY-z4ET63Ze7tD_2MkmLFgMxVsomHGgs0pOmpyQmTdmvxf-v_SL0mjf04</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Establishment and validation of a method for cell irradiation in 96-well and 6-well plates using a linear accelerator</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Dong, Xiao-Qing ; Lin, Qing ; Hu, Jie ; Huang, Liang ; Yue, Kun ; Wang, Lu ; Zhang, Jia-Fei ; Lu, Mei-Ling</creator><creatorcontrib>Dong, Xiao-Qing ; Lin, Qing ; Hu, Jie ; Huang, Liang ; Yue, Kun ; Wang, Lu ; Zhang, Jia-Fei ; Lu, Mei-Ling</creatorcontrib><description>To establish and validate a method for cell irradiation in 96-well and 6-well plates using a linear accelerator, three irradiation methods ( G0B0F40, G0B1.5F40, and G180B1.5F40 ) were designed to irradiate cell culture plasticware simulated with RW3 slab phantom and polystyrene. The difference between the actual physical measured dose and the preset dose was compared among the three methods under the preparatory conditions of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 Gy. MDA-MB-231 cells were analyzed by using a cell proliferation assay and a clonogenic assay to verify the difference between the three cell irradiation methods on cell radiosensitivity. For each preset dose, the difference between the actual measured dose and the preset dose was the lowest for Method G0B1.5F40 , the second lowest for Method G180B1.5F40 , and the maximum for Method G0B0F40 . The ranges of the differences were − 0.28 to 0.02%, − 2.17 to − 1.80%, and − 4.92 to − 4.55%, and 0.31 to − 0.12%, − 3.42 to − 2.86%, and − 7.31 to − 6.92%, respectively, for 96-well and 6-well plates. The cell culture experiments proved that Method G0B1.5F40 was an accurate, effective, simple, and practical irradiation method. The most accurate and effective cell irradiation method should always be used, as it will reduce dose differences and instability factors and provide improved accuracy and comparability for laboratories researching cellular radiosensitivity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1001-8042</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2210-3147</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s41365-018-0407-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Singapore</publisher><subject>Energy ; Hadrons ; Heavy Ions ; Nuclear Energy ; Nuclear Physics</subject><ispartof>Nuclear science and techniques, 2018-05, Vol.29 (5), p.65-72, Article 67</ispartof><rights>Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Nuclear Society, Science Press China and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018</rights><rights>Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-cd31e8cb6181e2941e28980df539e69faaad2af601be3e07569c47ce4b1471ee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/images/PeriodicalImages/hjs-e/hjs-e.jpg</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41365-018-0407-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41365-018-0407-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dong, Xiao-Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yue, Kun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jia-Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Mei-Ling</creatorcontrib><title>Establishment and validation of a method for cell irradiation in 96-well and 6-well plates using a linear accelerator</title><title>Nuclear science and techniques</title><addtitle>NUCL SCI TECH</addtitle><description>To establish and validate a method for cell irradiation in 96-well and 6-well plates using a linear accelerator, three irradiation methods ( G0B0F40, G0B1.5F40, and G180B1.5F40 ) were designed to irradiate cell culture plasticware simulated with RW3 slab phantom and polystyrene. The difference between the actual physical measured dose and the preset dose was compared among the three methods under the preparatory conditions of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 Gy. MDA-MB-231 cells were analyzed by using a cell proliferation assay and a clonogenic assay to verify the difference between the three cell irradiation methods on cell radiosensitivity. For each preset dose, the difference between the actual measured dose and the preset dose was the lowest for Method G0B1.5F40 , the second lowest for Method G180B1.5F40 , and the maximum for Method G0B0F40 . The ranges of the differences were − 0.28 to 0.02%, − 2.17 to − 1.80%, and − 4.92 to − 4.55%, and 0.31 to − 0.12%, − 3.42 to − 2.86%, and − 7.31 to − 6.92%, respectively, for 96-well and 6-well plates. The cell culture experiments proved that Method G0B1.5F40 was an accurate, effective, simple, and practical irradiation method. The most accurate and effective cell irradiation method should always be used, as it will reduce dose differences and instability factors and provide improved accuracy and comparability for laboratories researching cellular radiosensitivity.</description><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Hadrons</subject><subject>Heavy Ions</subject><subject>Nuclear Energy</subject><subject>Nuclear Physics</subject><issn>1001-8042</issn><issn>2210-3147</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFtO3qKTbPbrKKV-QMGLnsPs7mybss2WZGuxv94sW_DkJROG53lDXsbuJTxKgPwpaJlkqQBZCNCQi9MFmyklQSRS55dsFiEpCtDqmt2EsAXQOkvLGTssw4BVZ8NmR27g6Br-jZ1tcLC9433Lke9o2PQNb3vPa-o6br3Hxk6AdbzMxHFcj-r5uu9woMAPwbp1DOisI_Qc66iTx6H3t-yqxS7Q3XnO2dfL8nPxJlYfr--L55WoVS4HUTeJpKKuMllIUqWOR1EW0LRpUlJWtojYKGwzkBUlBHmalbXOa9JV_LQkSubsYco9omvRrc22P3gXXzSbbTCkYl2QApQRlBNY-z4ET63Ze7tD_2MkmLFgMxVsomHGgs0pOmpyQmTdmvxf-v_SL0mjf04</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Dong, Xiao-Qing</creator><creator>Lin, Qing</creator><creator>Hu, Jie</creator><creator>Huang, Liang</creator><creator>Yue, Kun</creator><creator>Wang, Lu</creator><creator>Zhang, Jia-Fei</creator><creator>Lu, Mei-Ling</creator><general>Springer Singapore</general><general>Department of Radiation Oncology, Tenth People's Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China%Medical Equipment Department, Tenth People's Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China%Department of Radiation Oncology,(North)NO.9 People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 201999, China%Central Lab, Tenth People's Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>2B.</scope><scope>4A8</scope><scope>92I</scope><scope>93N</scope><scope>PSX</scope><scope>TCJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>Establishment and validation of a method for cell irradiation in 96-well and 6-well plates using a linear accelerator</title><author>Dong, Xiao-Qing ; Lin, Qing ; Hu, Jie ; Huang, Liang ; Yue, Kun ; Wang, Lu ; Zhang, Jia-Fei ; Lu, Mei-Ling</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-cd31e8cb6181e2941e28980df539e69faaad2af601be3e07569c47ce4b1471ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Hadrons</topic><topic>Heavy Ions</topic><topic>Nuclear Energy</topic><topic>Nuclear Physics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dong, Xiao-Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yue, Kun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jia-Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Mei-Ling</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong</collection><collection>WANFANG Data Centre</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals</collection><collection>万方数据期刊 - 香港版</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><jtitle>Nuclear science and techniques</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dong, Xiao-Qing</au><au>Lin, Qing</au><au>Hu, Jie</au><au>Huang, Liang</au><au>Yue, Kun</au><au>Wang, Lu</au><au>Zhang, Jia-Fei</au><au>Lu, Mei-Ling</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Establishment and validation of a method for cell irradiation in 96-well and 6-well plates using a linear accelerator</atitle><jtitle>Nuclear science and techniques</jtitle><stitle>NUCL SCI TECH</stitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>72</epage><pages>65-72</pages><artnum>67</artnum><issn>1001-8042</issn><eissn>2210-3147</eissn><abstract>To establish and validate a method for cell irradiation in 96-well and 6-well plates using a linear accelerator, three irradiation methods ( G0B0F40, G0B1.5F40, and G180B1.5F40 ) were designed to irradiate cell culture plasticware simulated with RW3 slab phantom and polystyrene. The difference between the actual physical measured dose and the preset dose was compared among the three methods under the preparatory conditions of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 Gy. MDA-MB-231 cells were analyzed by using a cell proliferation assay and a clonogenic assay to verify the difference between the three cell irradiation methods on cell radiosensitivity. For each preset dose, the difference between the actual measured dose and the preset dose was the lowest for Method G0B1.5F40 , the second lowest for Method G180B1.5F40 , and the maximum for Method G0B0F40 . The ranges of the differences were − 0.28 to 0.02%, − 2.17 to − 1.80%, and − 4.92 to − 4.55%, and 0.31 to − 0.12%, − 3.42 to − 2.86%, and − 7.31 to − 6.92%, respectively, for 96-well and 6-well plates. The cell culture experiments proved that Method G0B1.5F40 was an accurate, effective, simple, and practical irradiation method. The most accurate and effective cell irradiation method should always be used, as it will reduce dose differences and instability factors and provide improved accuracy and comparability for laboratories researching cellular radiosensitivity.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Singapore</pub><doi>10.1007/s41365-018-0407-z</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1001-8042
ispartof Nuclear science and techniques, 2018-05, Vol.29 (5), p.65-72, Article 67
issn 1001-8042
2210-3147
language eng
recordid cdi_wanfang_journals_hjs_e201805009
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Energy
Hadrons
Heavy Ions
Nuclear Energy
Nuclear Physics
title Establishment and validation of a method for cell irradiation in 96-well and 6-well plates using a linear accelerator
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T06%3A50%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wanfang_jour_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Establishment%20and%20validation%20of%20a%20method%20for%20cell%20irradiation%20in%2096-well%20and%206-well%20plates%20using%20a%20linear%20accelerator&rft.jtitle=Nuclear%20science%20and%20techniques&rft.au=Dong,%20Xiao-Qing&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=72&rft.pages=65-72&rft.artnum=67&rft.issn=1001-8042&rft.eissn=2210-3147&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s41365-018-0407-z&rft_dat=%3Cwanfang_jour_cross%3Ehjs_e201805009%3C/wanfang_jour_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_wanfj_id=hjs_e201805009&rfr_iscdi=true