Establishment and validation of a method for cell irradiation in 96-well and 6-well plates using a linear accelerator
To establish and validate a method for cell irradiation in 96-well and 6-well plates using a linear accelerator, three irradiation methods ( G0B0F40, G0B1.5F40, and G180B1.5F40 ) were designed to irradiate cell culture plasticware simulated with RW3 slab phantom and polystyrene. The difference betwe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nuclear science and techniques 2018-05, Vol.29 (5), p.65-72, Article 67 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 72 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 65 |
container_title | Nuclear science and techniques |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Dong, Xiao-Qing Lin, Qing Hu, Jie Huang, Liang Yue, Kun Wang, Lu Zhang, Jia-Fei Lu, Mei-Ling |
description | To establish and validate a method for cell irradiation in 96-well and 6-well plates using a linear accelerator, three irradiation methods (
G0B0F40, G0B1.5F40,
and
G180B1.5F40
) were designed to irradiate cell culture plasticware simulated with RW3 slab phantom and polystyrene. The difference between the actual physical measured dose and the preset dose was compared among the three methods under the preparatory conditions of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 Gy. MDA-MB-231 cells were analyzed by using a cell proliferation assay and a clonogenic assay to verify the difference between the three cell irradiation methods on cell radiosensitivity. For each preset dose, the difference between the actual measured dose and the preset dose was the lowest for
Method G0B1.5F40
, the second lowest for
Method G180B1.5F40
, and the maximum for
Method G0B0F40
. The ranges of the differences were − 0.28 to 0.02%, − 2.17 to − 1.80%, and − 4.92 to − 4.55%, and 0.31 to − 0.12%, − 3.42 to − 2.86%, and − 7.31 to − 6.92%, respectively, for 96-well and 6-well plates. The cell culture experiments proved that
Method G0B1.5F40
was an accurate, effective, simple, and practical irradiation method. The most accurate and effective cell irradiation method should always be used, as it will reduce dose differences and instability factors and provide improved accuracy and comparability for laboratories researching cellular radiosensitivity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s41365-018-0407-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wanfang_jour_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wanfang_journals_hjs_e201805009</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><wanfj_id>hjs_e201805009</wanfj_id><sourcerecordid>hjs_e201805009</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-cd31e8cb6181e2941e28980df539e69faaad2af601be3e07569c47ce4b1471ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFtO3qKTbPbrKKV-QMGLnsPs7mybss2WZGuxv94sW_DkJROG53lDXsbuJTxKgPwpaJlkqQBZCNCQi9MFmyklQSRS55dsFiEpCtDqmt2EsAXQOkvLGTssw4BVZ8NmR27g6Br-jZ1tcLC9433Lke9o2PQNb3vPa-o6br3Hxk6AdbzMxHFcj-r5uu9woMAPwbp1DOisI_Qc66iTx6H3t-yqxS7Q3XnO2dfL8nPxJlYfr--L55WoVS4HUTeJpKKuMllIUqWOR1EW0LRpUlJWtojYKGwzkBUlBHmalbXOa9JV_LQkSubsYco9omvRrc22P3gXXzSbbTCkYl2QApQRlBNY-z4ET63Ze7tD_2MkmLFgMxVsomHGgs0pOmpyQmTdmvxf-v_SL0mjf04</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Establishment and validation of a method for cell irradiation in 96-well and 6-well plates using a linear accelerator</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Dong, Xiao-Qing ; Lin, Qing ; Hu, Jie ; Huang, Liang ; Yue, Kun ; Wang, Lu ; Zhang, Jia-Fei ; Lu, Mei-Ling</creator><creatorcontrib>Dong, Xiao-Qing ; Lin, Qing ; Hu, Jie ; Huang, Liang ; Yue, Kun ; Wang, Lu ; Zhang, Jia-Fei ; Lu, Mei-Ling</creatorcontrib><description>To establish and validate a method for cell irradiation in 96-well and 6-well plates using a linear accelerator, three irradiation methods (
G0B0F40, G0B1.5F40,
and
G180B1.5F40
) were designed to irradiate cell culture plasticware simulated with RW3 slab phantom and polystyrene. The difference between the actual physical measured dose and the preset dose was compared among the three methods under the preparatory conditions of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 Gy. MDA-MB-231 cells were analyzed by using a cell proliferation assay and a clonogenic assay to verify the difference between the three cell irradiation methods on cell radiosensitivity. For each preset dose, the difference between the actual measured dose and the preset dose was the lowest for
Method G0B1.5F40
, the second lowest for
Method G180B1.5F40
, and the maximum for
Method G0B0F40
. The ranges of the differences were − 0.28 to 0.02%, − 2.17 to − 1.80%, and − 4.92 to − 4.55%, and 0.31 to − 0.12%, − 3.42 to − 2.86%, and − 7.31 to − 6.92%, respectively, for 96-well and 6-well plates. The cell culture experiments proved that
Method G0B1.5F40
was an accurate, effective, simple, and practical irradiation method. The most accurate and effective cell irradiation method should always be used, as it will reduce dose differences and instability factors and provide improved accuracy and comparability for laboratories researching cellular radiosensitivity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1001-8042</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2210-3147</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s41365-018-0407-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Singapore</publisher><subject>Energy ; Hadrons ; Heavy Ions ; Nuclear Energy ; Nuclear Physics</subject><ispartof>Nuclear science and techniques, 2018-05, Vol.29 (5), p.65-72, Article 67</ispartof><rights>Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Nuclear Society, Science Press China and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018</rights><rights>Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-cd31e8cb6181e2941e28980df539e69faaad2af601be3e07569c47ce4b1471ee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/images/PeriodicalImages/hjs-e/hjs-e.jpg</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41365-018-0407-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41365-018-0407-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dong, Xiao-Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yue, Kun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jia-Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Mei-Ling</creatorcontrib><title>Establishment and validation of a method for cell irradiation in 96-well and 6-well plates using a linear accelerator</title><title>Nuclear science and techniques</title><addtitle>NUCL SCI TECH</addtitle><description>To establish and validate a method for cell irradiation in 96-well and 6-well plates using a linear accelerator, three irradiation methods (
G0B0F40, G0B1.5F40,
and
G180B1.5F40
) were designed to irradiate cell culture plasticware simulated with RW3 slab phantom and polystyrene. The difference between the actual physical measured dose and the preset dose was compared among the three methods under the preparatory conditions of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 Gy. MDA-MB-231 cells were analyzed by using a cell proliferation assay and a clonogenic assay to verify the difference between the three cell irradiation methods on cell radiosensitivity. For each preset dose, the difference between the actual measured dose and the preset dose was the lowest for
Method G0B1.5F40
, the second lowest for
Method G180B1.5F40
, and the maximum for
Method G0B0F40
. The ranges of the differences were − 0.28 to 0.02%, − 2.17 to − 1.80%, and − 4.92 to − 4.55%, and 0.31 to − 0.12%, − 3.42 to − 2.86%, and − 7.31 to − 6.92%, respectively, for 96-well and 6-well plates. The cell culture experiments proved that
Method G0B1.5F40
was an accurate, effective, simple, and practical irradiation method. The most accurate and effective cell irradiation method should always be used, as it will reduce dose differences and instability factors and provide improved accuracy and comparability for laboratories researching cellular radiosensitivity.</description><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Hadrons</subject><subject>Heavy Ions</subject><subject>Nuclear Energy</subject><subject>Nuclear Physics</subject><issn>1001-8042</issn><issn>2210-3147</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFtO3qKTbPbrKKV-QMGLnsPs7mybss2WZGuxv94sW_DkJROG53lDXsbuJTxKgPwpaJlkqQBZCNCQi9MFmyklQSRS55dsFiEpCtDqmt2EsAXQOkvLGTssw4BVZ8NmR27g6Br-jZ1tcLC9433Lke9o2PQNb3vPa-o6br3Hxk6AdbzMxHFcj-r5uu9woMAPwbp1DOisI_Qc66iTx6H3t-yqxS7Q3XnO2dfL8nPxJlYfr--L55WoVS4HUTeJpKKuMllIUqWOR1EW0LRpUlJWtojYKGwzkBUlBHmalbXOa9JV_LQkSubsYco9omvRrc22P3gXXzSbbTCkYl2QApQRlBNY-z4ET63Ze7tD_2MkmLFgMxVsomHGgs0pOmpyQmTdmvxf-v_SL0mjf04</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Dong, Xiao-Qing</creator><creator>Lin, Qing</creator><creator>Hu, Jie</creator><creator>Huang, Liang</creator><creator>Yue, Kun</creator><creator>Wang, Lu</creator><creator>Zhang, Jia-Fei</creator><creator>Lu, Mei-Ling</creator><general>Springer Singapore</general><general>Department of Radiation Oncology, Tenth People's Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China%Medical Equipment Department, Tenth People's Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China%Department of Radiation Oncology,(North)NO.9 People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 201999, China%Central Lab, Tenth People's Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>2B.</scope><scope>4A8</scope><scope>92I</scope><scope>93N</scope><scope>PSX</scope><scope>TCJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>Establishment and validation of a method for cell irradiation in 96-well and 6-well plates using a linear accelerator</title><author>Dong, Xiao-Qing ; Lin, Qing ; Hu, Jie ; Huang, Liang ; Yue, Kun ; Wang, Lu ; Zhang, Jia-Fei ; Lu, Mei-Ling</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-cd31e8cb6181e2941e28980df539e69faaad2af601be3e07569c47ce4b1471ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Hadrons</topic><topic>Heavy Ions</topic><topic>Nuclear Energy</topic><topic>Nuclear Physics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dong, Xiao-Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yue, Kun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jia-Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Mei-Ling</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong</collection><collection>WANFANG Data Centre</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals</collection><collection>万方数据期刊 - 香港版</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><jtitle>Nuclear science and techniques</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dong, Xiao-Qing</au><au>Lin, Qing</au><au>Hu, Jie</au><au>Huang, Liang</au><au>Yue, Kun</au><au>Wang, Lu</au><au>Zhang, Jia-Fei</au><au>Lu, Mei-Ling</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Establishment and validation of a method for cell irradiation in 96-well and 6-well plates using a linear accelerator</atitle><jtitle>Nuclear science and techniques</jtitle><stitle>NUCL SCI TECH</stitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>72</epage><pages>65-72</pages><artnum>67</artnum><issn>1001-8042</issn><eissn>2210-3147</eissn><abstract>To establish and validate a method for cell irradiation in 96-well and 6-well plates using a linear accelerator, three irradiation methods (
G0B0F40, G0B1.5F40,
and
G180B1.5F40
) were designed to irradiate cell culture plasticware simulated with RW3 slab phantom and polystyrene. The difference between the actual physical measured dose and the preset dose was compared among the three methods under the preparatory conditions of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 Gy. MDA-MB-231 cells were analyzed by using a cell proliferation assay and a clonogenic assay to verify the difference between the three cell irradiation methods on cell radiosensitivity. For each preset dose, the difference between the actual measured dose and the preset dose was the lowest for
Method G0B1.5F40
, the second lowest for
Method G180B1.5F40
, and the maximum for
Method G0B0F40
. The ranges of the differences were − 0.28 to 0.02%, − 2.17 to − 1.80%, and − 4.92 to − 4.55%, and 0.31 to − 0.12%, − 3.42 to − 2.86%, and − 7.31 to − 6.92%, respectively, for 96-well and 6-well plates. The cell culture experiments proved that
Method G0B1.5F40
was an accurate, effective, simple, and practical irradiation method. The most accurate and effective cell irradiation method should always be used, as it will reduce dose differences and instability factors and provide improved accuracy and comparability for laboratories researching cellular radiosensitivity.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Singapore</pub><doi>10.1007/s41365-018-0407-z</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1001-8042 |
ispartof | Nuclear science and techniques, 2018-05, Vol.29 (5), p.65-72, Article 67 |
issn | 1001-8042 2210-3147 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_wanfang_journals_hjs_e201805009 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Energy Hadrons Heavy Ions Nuclear Energy Nuclear Physics |
title | Establishment and validation of a method for cell irradiation in 96-well and 6-well plates using a linear accelerator |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T06%3A50%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wanfang_jour_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Establishment%20and%20validation%20of%20a%20method%20for%20cell%20irradiation%20in%2096-well%20and%206-well%20plates%20using%20a%20linear%20accelerator&rft.jtitle=Nuclear%20science%20and%20techniques&rft.au=Dong,%20Xiao-Qing&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=72&rft.pages=65-72&rft.artnum=67&rft.issn=1001-8042&rft.eissn=2210-3147&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s41365-018-0407-z&rft_dat=%3Cwanfang_jour_cross%3Ehjs_e201805009%3C/wanfang_jour_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_wanfj_id=hjs_e201805009&rfr_iscdi=true |