中美研究型大学工程教育制度与理念研究－基于语料库的批判话语分析方法
This paper researches what research universities ’ engineering departments in USA and China frequently talk about in their self-introduction texts which are built as a corpus. Critical discourse analysis is used to find the hot words, word clusters and so on. The research finds that, first, the disc...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Xue bao. Huadong shifan daxue xuebao / Jiao yu ke xue ban 2022-08, Vol.40 (8), p.019-030 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | chi |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 030 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 019 |
| container_title | Xue bao. Huadong shifan daxue xuebao / Jiao yu ke xue ban |
| container_volume | 40 |
| creator | 曾开富(Zeng Kaifu) 王孙禺(Wang Sunyu) 陈丽萍(Chen Liping) |
| description | This paper researches what research universities ’ engineering departments in USA and China frequently talk about in their self-introduction texts which are built as a corpus. Critical discourse analysis is used to find the hot words, word clusters and so on. The research finds that, first, the discourse mode of engineering education in the two countries is highly similar because of the title system, degree system and reward system. Second, in terms of educational concept, there are similarities and differences between the two countries in understanding the core concepts of engineering, research and engineer. Finally,the word “engineer” is not a hot word in the engineering education of both countries where engineers are educated |
| doi_str_mv | 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2022.08.003 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wanfang_jour_hyweb</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wanfang_journals_hdsfdxxb_jykxb202208003</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><wanfj_id>hdsfdxxb_jykxb202208003</wanfj_id><sourcerecordid>hdsfdxxb_jykxb202208003</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h593-6abefce1ee626e55ff47ddd2dcfceab800323c90fdc3c443c9f3e82a75eb70073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LAlEUhu-iIDH_QPuWM565d75chvQFQhv3w8yde_MjJlBC3UaIIYlQCgZZC7NaiFBkOkT9Ge-Mu_5CI0arc3g473t4X4S2FZAVnZg4WZCpV8zLCgBImqaDjAFjGUwZgKyh2D_fQIlyOe8A6AYQg-AYovPpKPxqhQ834ctE9Jti8CRGQ_HxGD43g05vcf4qGhPhD-fTVtiui-_31eXP55W49-d-azEeBd2e8K_D24vgciYag8X4LoKiUQ_67aA7C946m2id2ydllvibcZTd282mD6TM0f5heicj5bQUkXTbYZwyhTEd60zTOFcN13WxSyNqO2YUBROaAu5SQlU1WjlhJrYNjTkGgEHiKLmyrdget71jq3B6VvKih1bOLXO3WnWsQq1YdZbdwNIuUmytFLlahTkWK-WpFXVDQMUK-QUHtIsO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>中美研究型大学工程教育制度与理念研究－基于语料库的批判话语分析方法</title><source>国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库 (National Social Sciences Database)</source><creator>曾开富(Zeng Kaifu) ; 王孙禺(Wang Sunyu) ; 陈丽萍(Chen Liping)</creator><creatorcontrib>曾开富(Zeng Kaifu) ; 王孙禺(Wang Sunyu) ; 陈丽萍(Chen Liping)</creatorcontrib><description>This paper researches what research universities ’ engineering departments in USA and China frequently talk about in their self-introduction texts which are built as a corpus. Critical discourse analysis is used to find the hot words, word clusters and so on. The research finds that, first, the discourse mode of engineering education in the two countries is highly similar because of the title system, degree system and reward system. Second, in terms of educational concept, there are similarities and differences between the two countries in understanding the core concepts of engineering, research and engineer. Finally,the word “engineer” is not a hot word in the engineering education of both countries where engineers are educated</description><description>本文从中美研究型大学官方主页整理其工学系自我介绍文本并建立语料库，然后采用批判话语分析方法研究两国工学系的热词、词丛等话语方式。研究表明，两国工程教育的话语方式因为职称与学术头衔制度、学位制度、奖励制度等制度原因而具有很高的相似性。在此基础上，本文对工程、研究、工程师等核心概念进行了分析。研究发现，“工程师”一词在两国工程教育界都并不是热词</description><identifier>ISSN: 1000-5560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2022.08.003</identifier><language>chi</language><publisher>大陸: 華東師範大學</publisher><ispartof>Xue bao. Huadong shifan daxue xuebao / Jiao yu ke xue ban, 2022-08, Vol.40 (8), p.019-030</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/images/PeriodicalImages/hdsfdxxb-jykxb/hdsfdxxb-jykxb.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>曾开富(Zeng Kaifu)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>王孙禺(Wang Sunyu)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>陈丽萍(Chen Liping)</creatorcontrib><title>中美研究型大学工程教育制度与理念研究－基于语料库的批判话语分析方法</title><title>Xue bao. Huadong shifan daxue xuebao / Jiao yu ke xue ban</title><addtitle>Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences)</addtitle><description>This paper researches what research universities ’ engineering departments in USA and China frequently talk about in their self-introduction texts which are built as a corpus. Critical discourse analysis is used to find the hot words, word clusters and so on. The research finds that, first, the discourse mode of engineering education in the two countries is highly similar because of the title system, degree system and reward system. Second, in terms of educational concept, there are similarities and differences between the two countries in understanding the core concepts of engineering, research and engineer. Finally,the word “engineer” is not a hot word in the engineering education of both countries where engineers are educated</description><description>本文从中美研究型大学官方主页整理其工学系自我介绍文本并建立语料库，然后采用批判话语分析方法研究两国工学系的热词、词丛等话语方式。研究表明，两国工程教育的话语方式因为职称与学术头衔制度、学位制度、奖励制度等制度原因而具有很高的相似性。在此基础上，本文对工程、研究、工程师等核心概念进行了分析。研究发现，“工程师”一词在两国工程教育界都并不是热词</description><issn>1000-5560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE1LAlEUhu-iIDH_QPuWM565d75chvQFQhv3w8yde_MjJlBC3UaIIYlQCgZZC7NaiFBkOkT9Ge-Mu_5CI0arc3g473t4X4S2FZAVnZg4WZCpV8zLCgBImqaDjAFjGUwZgKyh2D_fQIlyOe8A6AYQg-AYovPpKPxqhQ834ctE9Jti8CRGQ_HxGD43g05vcf4qGhPhD-fTVtiui-_31eXP55W49-d-azEeBd2e8K_D24vgciYag8X4LoKiUQ_67aA7C946m2id2ydllvibcZTd282mD6TM0f5heicj5bQUkXTbYZwyhTEd60zTOFcN13WxSyNqO2YUBROaAu5SQlU1WjlhJrYNjTkGgEHiKLmyrdget71jq3B6VvKih1bOLXO3WnWsQq1YdZbdwNIuUmytFLlahTkWK-WpFXVDQMUK-QUHtIsO</recordid><startdate>202208</startdate><enddate>202208</enddate><creator>曾开富(Zeng Kaifu)</creator><creator>王孙禺(Wang Sunyu)</creator><creator>陈丽萍(Chen Liping)</creator><general>華東師範大學</general><general>北京化工大学高等教育研究所,北京 100029%清华大学教育研究院,北京 100084</general><scope>DT-</scope><scope>2B.</scope><scope>4A8</scope><scope>92I</scope><scope>93N</scope><scope>PSX</scope><scope>TCJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202208</creationdate><title>中美研究型大学工程教育制度与理念研究－基于语料库的批判话语分析方法</title><author>曾开富(Zeng Kaifu) ; 王孙禺(Wang Sunyu) ; 陈丽萍(Chen Liping)</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h593-6abefce1ee626e55ff47ddd2dcfceab800323c90fdc3c443c9f3e82a75eb70073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>chi</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>曾开富(Zeng Kaifu)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>王孙禺(Wang Sunyu)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>陈丽萍(Chen Liping)</creatorcontrib><collection>Ericdata Higher Education Knowledge Database</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong</collection><collection>WANFANG Data Centre</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals</collection><collection>万方数据期刊 - 香港版</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><jtitle>Xue bao. Huadong shifan daxue xuebao / Jiao yu ke xue ban</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>曾开富(Zeng Kaifu)</au><au>王孙禺(Wang Sunyu)</au><au>陈丽萍(Chen Liping)</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>中美研究型大学工程教育制度与理念研究－基于语料库的批判话语分析方法</atitle><jtitle>Xue bao. Huadong shifan daxue xuebao / Jiao yu ke xue ban</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences)</addtitle><date>2022-08</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>019</spage><epage>030</epage><pages>019-030</pages><issn>1000-5560</issn><abstract>This paper researches what research universities ’ engineering departments in USA and China frequently talk about in their self-introduction texts which are built as a corpus. Critical discourse analysis is used to find the hot words, word clusters and so on. The research finds that, first, the discourse mode of engineering education in the two countries is highly similar because of the title system, degree system and reward system. Second, in terms of educational concept, there are similarities and differences between the two countries in understanding the core concepts of engineering, research and engineer. Finally,the word “engineer” is not a hot word in the engineering education of both countries where engineers are educated</abstract><abstract>本文从中美研究型大学官方主页整理其工学系自我介绍文本并建立语料库，然后采用批判话语分析方法研究两国工学系的热词、词丛等话语方式。研究表明，两国工程教育的话语方式因为职称与学术头衔制度、学位制度、奖励制度等制度原因而具有很高的相似性。在此基础上，本文对工程、研究、工程师等核心概念进行了分析。研究发现，“工程师”一词在两国工程教育界都并不是热词</abstract><cop>大陸</cop><pub>華東師範大學</pub><doi>10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2022.08.003</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1000-5560 |
| ispartof | Xue bao. Huadong shifan daxue xuebao / Jiao yu ke xue ban, 2022-08, Vol.40 (8), p.019-030 |
| issn | 1000-5560 |
| language | chi |
| recordid | cdi_wanfang_journals_hdsfdxxb_jykxb202208003 |
| source | 国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库 (National Social Sciences Database) |
| title | 中美研究型大学工程教育制度与理念研究－基于语料库的批判话语分析方法 |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T03%3A37%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wanfang_jour_hyweb&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E4%B8%AD%E7%BE%8E%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E5%9E%8B%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%A6%E5%B7%A5%E7%A8%8B%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E5%88%B6%E5%BA%A6%E4%B8%8E%E7%90%86%E5%BF%B5%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%EF%BC%8D%E5%9F%BA%E4%BA%8E%E8%AF%AD%E6%96%99%E5%BA%93%E7%9A%84%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4%E8%AF%9D%E8%AF%AD%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90%E6%96%B9%E6%B3%95&rft.jtitle=Xue%20bao.%20Huadong%20shifan%20daxue%20xuebao%20/%20Jiao%20yu%20ke%20xue%20ban&rft.au=%E6%9B%BE%E5%BC%80%E5%AF%8C(Zeng%20Kaifu)&rft.date=2022-08&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=019&rft.epage=030&rft.pages=019-030&rft.issn=1000-5560&rft_id=info:doi/10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2022.08.003&rft_dat=%3Cwanfang_jour_hyweb%3Ehdsfdxxb_jykxb202208003%3C/wanfang_jour_hyweb%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_wanfj_id=hdsfdxxb_jykxb202208003&rfr_iscdi=true |