山西省3种典型作物主产区土壤微量元素特征分析
【目的】探明研究区耕层土壤微量元素量现状及其影响因素。【方法】本试验分别在山西省小麦、玉米和谷子种植区,各选择作物种植面积最大的3个代表性县域,在每个县域选取100个采样点,分析其耕层土壤微量元素(Fe、Mn、Zn、Se)量,及其与pH、有机质、土壤类型和种植制度的关系。【结果】研究区耕层土壤Fe、Mn、Zn和Se分别为30.42 g/kg、626.55 mg/kg、78.06 mg/kg和0.283 mg/kg。各种植区土壤微量元素量总体表现为:小麦种植区>玉米种植区>谷子种植区,尽管3个种植区土壤微量元素整体处于中等(或适量)及以上水平,但同时也存在不同程度的微量元素缺乏,研究...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Guanʻgai paishui xuebao 2023-03, Vol.42 (3), p.40-47 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | chi ; eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 47 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 40 |
container_title | Guanʻgai paishui xuebao |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | LIU, Yang LI Tingliang Li, LI ZHANG, Jinfeng CHEN, Ting |
description | 【目的】探明研究区耕层土壤微量元素量现状及其影响因素。【方法】本试验分别在山西省小麦、玉米和谷子种植区,各选择作物种植面积最大的3个代表性县域,在每个县域选取100个采样点,分析其耕层土壤微量元素(Fe、Mn、Zn、Se)量,及其与pH、有机质、土壤类型和种植制度的关系。【结果】研究区耕层土壤Fe、Mn、Zn和Se分别为30.42 g/kg、626.55 mg/kg、78.06 mg/kg和0.283 mg/kg。各种植区土壤微量元素量总体表现为:小麦种植区>玉米种植区>谷子种植区,尽管3个种植区土壤微量元素整体处于中等(或适量)及以上水平,但同时也存在不同程度的微量元素缺乏,研究区整体Fe缺乏比例最大,谷子种植区整体微量元素缺乏比例最大。不同土壤类型中,石质土、潮土、粗骨土、褐土和红黏土的微量元素量,显著高于棕壤、黄绵土、栗褐土和风沙土(P |
doi_str_mv | 10.13522/j.cnki.ggps.2021594 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wanfang_jour_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wanfang_journals_ggps202303006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><wanfj_id>ggps202303006</wanfj_id><sourcerecordid>ggps202303006</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1286-7956ae1c677afa2a071a6268dba64965b9e2910321ad5e3eacabde36ad61a00d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFz09LAkEYBvA5FCTmN-gWHXd7Z8aZcW6F9A-ELnWWd91R2mI1N-ksYSUV9QHEggrpEggdzMi-zE5b36INg07P5cfz8BCyQMGlXDC2HLiVcH_PrdUakcuAUaHzMyRDpWIO51TNkVwUBQDABCiheYas2OHw6_Ej6bV5MriynZHtX8TvvaT7FI_e4vHAXo5t79beP9jJ8_fZte2cJC93SffVTtr2_PSzfzNPZqt4EJncX2bJ7vraTnHTKW1vbBVXS06DsoJ0lBYSDa1IpbCKDEFRlEwWfA9lXkvhacM0Bc4o-sJwgxX0fMMl-pIigM-zZGnae4xhFcNaOai3mmG6WP49m37lwAFk6hanrtGsH7ZMdPQPOegCYynU_Af-8W5y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3098222309</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>山西省3种典型作物主产区土壤微量元素特征分析</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>LIU, Yang ; LI Tingliang ; Li, LI ; ZHANG, Jinfeng ; CHEN, Ting</creator><creatorcontrib>LIU, Yang ; LI Tingliang ; Li, LI ; ZHANG, Jinfeng ; CHEN, Ting</creatorcontrib><description>【目的】探明研究区耕层土壤微量元素量现状及其影响因素。【方法】本试验分别在山西省小麦、玉米和谷子种植区,各选择作物种植面积最大的3个代表性县域,在每个县域选取100个采样点,分析其耕层土壤微量元素(Fe、Mn、Zn、Se)量,及其与pH、有机质、土壤类型和种植制度的关系。【结果】研究区耕层土壤Fe、Mn、Zn和Se分别为30.42 g/kg、626.55 mg/kg、78.06 mg/kg和0.283 mg/kg。各种植区土壤微量元素量总体表现为:小麦种植区>玉米种植区>谷子种植区,尽管3个种植区土壤微量元素整体处于中等(或适量)及以上水平,但同时也存在不同程度的微量元素缺乏,研究区整体Fe缺乏比例最大,谷子种植区整体微量元素缺乏比例最大。不同土壤类型中,石质土、潮土、粗骨土、褐土和红黏土的微量元素量,显著高于棕壤、黄绵土、栗褐土和风沙土(P<0.05),其中石质土微量元素量最高,棕壤和风沙土量最低。相关性分析结果表明,pH与4种微量元素均极显著负相关,有机质与4种微量元素均极显著正相关。种植制度、土壤类型、pH和有机质4种影响因素对土壤含Se量的综合解释率最高,为47.9%;含Mn量变化仅受土壤类型和有机质影响,其综合解释率为8.1%。【结论】尽管现阶段山西省主要粮食作物种植区耕层土壤Fe、Mn、Zn和Se的4种微量元素总体处于中等(适量)及以上水平,但仍然需要注重对Fe的补充,以及提升谷子种植区整体养分量。土壤含Se量受环境变化影响最大,而Mn在土壤中的较为稳定。</description><identifier>ISSN: 1672-3317</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.13522/j.cnki.ggps.2021594</identifier><language>chi ; eng</language><publisher>Xinxiang City: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) Farmland Irrigation Research Institute Editorial Office of Journal of Irrigation and Drainage</publisher><subject>Abiotic factors ; Bioavailability ; Clay soils ; Corn ; Crop growth ; Dietary supplements ; Environmental changes ; Eolian soils ; Manganese ; Millet ; Nutrient content ; Organic matter ; Organic soils ; pH ; pH effects ; Planting ; Plows ; Regression analysis ; Sandy soils ; Selenium ; Soil analysis ; Soil improvement ; Soil layers ; Soil types ; Soils ; Trace elements ; Wheat ; Zinc</subject><ispartof>Guanʻgai paishui xuebao, 2023-03, Vol.42 (3), p.40-47</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/images/PeriodicalImages/ggps/ggps.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>LIU, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LI Tingliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, LI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZHANG, Jinfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHEN, Ting</creatorcontrib><title>山西省3种典型作物主产区土壤微量元素特征分析</title><title>Guanʻgai paishui xuebao</title><description>【目的】探明研究区耕层土壤微量元素量现状及其影响因素。【方法】本试验分别在山西省小麦、玉米和谷子种植区,各选择作物种植面积最大的3个代表性县域,在每个县域选取100个采样点,分析其耕层土壤微量元素(Fe、Mn、Zn、Se)量,及其与pH、有机质、土壤类型和种植制度的关系。【结果】研究区耕层土壤Fe、Mn、Zn和Se分别为30.42 g/kg、626.55 mg/kg、78.06 mg/kg和0.283 mg/kg。各种植区土壤微量元素量总体表现为:小麦种植区>玉米种植区>谷子种植区,尽管3个种植区土壤微量元素整体处于中等(或适量)及以上水平,但同时也存在不同程度的微量元素缺乏,研究区整体Fe缺乏比例最大,谷子种植区整体微量元素缺乏比例最大。不同土壤类型中,石质土、潮土、粗骨土、褐土和红黏土的微量元素量,显著高于棕壤、黄绵土、栗褐土和风沙土(P<0.05),其中石质土微量元素量最高,棕壤和风沙土量最低。相关性分析结果表明,pH与4种微量元素均极显著负相关,有机质与4种微量元素均极显著正相关。种植制度、土壤类型、pH和有机质4种影响因素对土壤含Se量的综合解释率最高,为47.9%;含Mn量变化仅受土壤类型和有机质影响,其综合解释率为8.1%。【结论】尽管现阶段山西省主要粮食作物种植区耕层土壤Fe、Mn、Zn和Se的4种微量元素总体处于中等(适量)及以上水平,但仍然需要注重对Fe的补充,以及提升谷子种植区整体养分量。土壤含Se量受环境变化影响最大,而Mn在土壤中的较为稳定。</description><subject>Abiotic factors</subject><subject>Bioavailability</subject><subject>Clay soils</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Crop growth</subject><subject>Dietary supplements</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Eolian soils</subject><subject>Manganese</subject><subject>Millet</subject><subject>Nutrient content</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>pH</subject><subject>pH effects</subject><subject>Planting</subject><subject>Plows</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Sandy soils</subject><subject>Selenium</subject><subject>Soil analysis</subject><subject>Soil improvement</subject><subject>Soil layers</subject><subject>Soil types</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Trace elements</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><subject>Zinc</subject><issn>1672-3317</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpFz09LAkEYBvA5FCTmN-gWHXd7Z8aZcW6F9A-ELnWWd91R2mI1N-ksYSUV9QHEggrpEggdzMi-zE5b36INg07P5cfz8BCyQMGlXDC2HLiVcH_PrdUakcuAUaHzMyRDpWIO51TNkVwUBQDABCiheYas2OHw6_Ej6bV5MriynZHtX8TvvaT7FI_e4vHAXo5t79beP9jJ8_fZte2cJC93SffVTtr2_PSzfzNPZqt4EJncX2bJ7vraTnHTKW1vbBVXS06DsoJ0lBYSDa1IpbCKDEFRlEwWfA9lXkvhacM0Bc4o-sJwgxX0fMMl-pIigM-zZGnae4xhFcNaOai3mmG6WP49m37lwAFk6hanrtGsH7ZMdPQPOegCYynU_Af-8W5y</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>LIU, Yang</creator><creator>LI Tingliang</creator><creator>Li, LI</creator><creator>ZHANG, Jinfeng</creator><creator>CHEN, Ting</creator><general>Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) Farmland Irrigation Research Institute Editorial Office of Journal of Irrigation and Drainage</general><general>山西农业大学 资源环境学院,山西 太谷 030801%山西农业大学 资源环境学院,山西 太谷 030801</general><general>黄土高原特色作物优质高效生产省部共建协同创新中心,山西 太谷 030801</general><general>山西农业大学 农业资源与环境国家级实验教学示范中心,山西 太谷 030801</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>2B.</scope><scope>4A8</scope><scope>92I</scope><scope>93N</scope><scope>PSX</scope><scope>TCJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>山西省3种典型作物主产区土壤微量元素特征分析</title><author>LIU, Yang ; LI Tingliang ; Li, LI ; ZHANG, Jinfeng ; CHEN, Ting</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1286-7956ae1c677afa2a071a6268dba64965b9e2910321ad5e3eacabde36ad61a00d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>chi ; eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Abiotic factors</topic><topic>Bioavailability</topic><topic>Clay soils</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Crop growth</topic><topic>Dietary supplements</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Eolian soils</topic><topic>Manganese</topic><topic>Millet</topic><topic>Nutrient content</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>pH</topic><topic>pH effects</topic><topic>Planting</topic><topic>Plows</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Sandy soils</topic><topic>Selenium</topic><topic>Soil analysis</topic><topic>Soil improvement</topic><topic>Soil layers</topic><topic>Soil types</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Trace elements</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><topic>Zinc</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LIU, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LI Tingliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, LI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZHANG, Jinfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHEN, Ting</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong</collection><collection>WANFANG Data Centre</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals</collection><collection>万方数据期刊 - 香港版</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><jtitle>Guanʻgai paishui xuebao</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LIU, Yang</au><au>LI Tingliang</au><au>Li, LI</au><au>ZHANG, Jinfeng</au><au>CHEN, Ting</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>山西省3种典型作物主产区土壤微量元素特征分析</atitle><jtitle>Guanʻgai paishui xuebao</jtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>40</spage><epage>47</epage><pages>40-47</pages><issn>1672-3317</issn><abstract>【目的】探明研究区耕层土壤微量元素量现状及其影响因素。【方法】本试验分别在山西省小麦、玉米和谷子种植区,各选择作物种植面积最大的3个代表性县域,在每个县域选取100个采样点,分析其耕层土壤微量元素(Fe、Mn、Zn、Se)量,及其与pH、有机质、土壤类型和种植制度的关系。【结果】研究区耕层土壤Fe、Mn、Zn和Se分别为30.42 g/kg、626.55 mg/kg、78.06 mg/kg和0.283 mg/kg。各种植区土壤微量元素量总体表现为:小麦种植区>玉米种植区>谷子种植区,尽管3个种植区土壤微量元素整体处于中等(或适量)及以上水平,但同时也存在不同程度的微量元素缺乏,研究区整体Fe缺乏比例最大,谷子种植区整体微量元素缺乏比例最大。不同土壤类型中,石质土、潮土、粗骨土、褐土和红黏土的微量元素量,显著高于棕壤、黄绵土、栗褐土和风沙土(P<0.05),其中石质土微量元素量最高,棕壤和风沙土量最低。相关性分析结果表明,pH与4种微量元素均极显著负相关,有机质与4种微量元素均极显著正相关。种植制度、土壤类型、pH和有机质4种影响因素对土壤含Se量的综合解释率最高,为47.9%;含Mn量变化仅受土壤类型和有机质影响,其综合解释率为8.1%。【结论】尽管现阶段山西省主要粮食作物种植区耕层土壤Fe、Mn、Zn和Se的4种微量元素总体处于中等(适量)及以上水平,但仍然需要注重对Fe的补充,以及提升谷子种植区整体养分量。土壤含Se量受环境变化影响最大,而Mn在土壤中的较为稳定。</abstract><cop>Xinxiang City</cop><pub>Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) Farmland Irrigation Research Institute Editorial Office of Journal of Irrigation and Drainage</pub><doi>10.13522/j.cnki.ggps.2021594</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1672-3317 |
ispartof | Guanʻgai paishui xuebao, 2023-03, Vol.42 (3), p.40-47 |
issn | 1672-3317 |
language | chi ; eng |
recordid | cdi_wanfang_journals_ggps202303006 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
subjects | Abiotic factors Bioavailability Clay soils Corn Crop growth Dietary supplements Environmental changes Eolian soils Manganese Millet Nutrient content Organic matter Organic soils pH pH effects Planting Plows Regression analysis Sandy soils Selenium Soil analysis Soil improvement Soil layers Soil types Soils Trace elements Wheat Zinc |
title | 山西省3种典型作物主产区土壤微量元素特征分析 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T13%3A19%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wanfang_jour_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E5%B1%B1%E8%A5%BF%E7%9C%813%E7%A7%8D%E5%85%B8%E5%9E%8B%E4%BD%9C%E7%89%A9%E4%B8%BB%E4%BA%A7%E5%8C%BA%E5%9C%9F%E5%A3%A4%E5%BE%AE%E9%87%8F%E5%85%83%E7%B4%A0%E7%89%B9%E5%BE%81%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90&rft.jtitle=Guan%CA%BBgai%20paishui%20xuebao&rft.au=LIU,%20Yang&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=40&rft.epage=47&rft.pages=40-47&rft.issn=1672-3317&rft_id=info:doi/10.13522/j.cnki.ggps.2021594&rft_dat=%3Cwanfang_jour_proqu%3Eggps202303006%3C/wanfang_jour_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3098222309&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_wanfj_id=ggps202303006&rfr_iscdi=true |