“双一流”建设背景下学科可持续发展度评价指标体系构建
Whether the discipline is of high quality and sustainable is the core issue of discipline construction, and disciplinary development sustainability is a symbol of the degree of high quality and sustainable development of the discipline. From the perspective of education systematic project, the basic...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Fu dan jiao yu lun tan = Fudan education forum 2020-03, Vol.18 (2), p.086-092 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | chi |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 092 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 086 |
| container_title | Fu dan jiao yu lun tan = Fudan education forum |
| container_volume | 18 |
| creator | 蔡三发(CAI Sanfa) 任士雷(REN Shilei) 王倩(WANG Qian) |
| description | Whether the discipline is of high quality and sustainable is the core issue of discipline construction, and disciplinary development sustainability is a symbol of the degree of high quality and sustainable development of the discipline. From the perspective of education systematic project, the basic principles of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) are applied to construct the model of AHP for disciplinary development sustainability, and the index system of disciplinary development sustainability is determined. The characteristic vectors of the pairing comparison judgment matrices are used as the weights of evaluation indicators for disciplinary development sustainability, and the influence ranking of relevant evaluation indicators is determined. The results show that the leading edge of discipline direction, scientific research platform, collaborative ability of discipline team, social service ability of discipline, international exchange and cooperation, and quality of graduate students are the main factors af |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wanfang_jour_hyweb</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wanfang_journals_fdjylt202002015</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><wanfj_id>fdjylt202002015</wanfj_id><sourcerecordid>fdjylt202002015</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h515-c32de797fb20ce0476c2e2763c0d909bd9128fbfcc75540a15ff757179a5e3e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkM1Kw0AAhHNQsNS-gC_gKbDZze66Ryn-QdFL7yHZ7NqWEqFRSm8pFnowEIp4EFQ81VMNImJp0Icp2U0ew0CFgbl8MwOzZdQsQqEJAGY7RiMMux4AFAHEbFIzztfRk0rifBnpr_E6elbZqnz_LW9j_Zjmyzu1mBdvM5WkOh4X2UIlM_XxoFbzMp3k2beOp_p1mv_cF5-ZfplU2V1jW7r9UDT-vW60j4_azVOzdXFy1jxsmR1sYZMj6AvKqPQg4ALYlHAoICWIA58B5vnMggfSk5xTjG3gWlhKiqlFmYsFEgTVjf1N7dANpBtcOr2rm0FQDTrS74361xBAUMnCFbm3ITujofAcMehyp3qCEIwJ-gOZ1244</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>“双一流”建设背景下学科可持续发展度评价指标体系构建</title><source>国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库 (National Social Sciences Database)</source><creator>蔡三发(CAI Sanfa) ; 任士雷(REN Shilei) ; 王倩(WANG Qian)</creator><creatorcontrib>蔡三发(CAI Sanfa) ; 任士雷(REN Shilei) ; 王倩(WANG Qian)</creatorcontrib><description>Whether the discipline is of high quality and sustainable is the core issue of discipline construction, and disciplinary development sustainability is a symbol of the degree of high quality and sustainable development of the discipline. From the perspective of education systematic project, the basic principles of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) are applied to construct the model of AHP for disciplinary development sustainability, and the index system of disciplinary development sustainability is determined. The characteristic vectors of the pairing comparison judgment matrices are used as the weights of evaluation indicators for disciplinary development sustainability, and the influence ranking of relevant evaluation indicators is determined. The results show that the leading edge of discipline direction, scientific research platform, collaborative ability of discipline team, social service ability of discipline, international exchange and cooperation, and quality of graduate students are the main factors af</description><identifier>ISSN: 1672-0059</identifier><language>chi</language><publisher>大陸: 復旦大學</publisher><ispartof>Fu dan jiao yu lun tan = Fudan education forum, 2020-03, Vol.18 (2), p.086-092</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/images/PeriodicalImages/fdjylt/fdjylt.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,4025</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>蔡三发(CAI Sanfa)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>任士雷(REN Shilei)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>王倩(WANG Qian)</creatorcontrib><title>“双一流”建设背景下学科可持续发展度评价指标体系构建</title><title>Fu dan jiao yu lun tan = Fudan education forum</title><description>Whether the discipline is of high quality and sustainable is the core issue of discipline construction, and disciplinary development sustainability is a symbol of the degree of high quality and sustainable development of the discipline. From the perspective of education systematic project, the basic principles of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) are applied to construct the model of AHP for disciplinary development sustainability, and the index system of disciplinary development sustainability is determined. The characteristic vectors of the pairing comparison judgment matrices are used as the weights of evaluation indicators for disciplinary development sustainability, and the influence ranking of relevant evaluation indicators is determined. The results show that the leading edge of discipline direction, scientific research platform, collaborative ability of discipline team, social service ability of discipline, international exchange and cooperation, and quality of graduate students are the main factors af</description><issn>1672-0059</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkM1Kw0AAhHNQsNS-gC_gKbDZze66Ryn-QdFL7yHZ7NqWEqFRSm8pFnowEIp4EFQ81VMNImJp0Icp2U0ew0CFgbl8MwOzZdQsQqEJAGY7RiMMux4AFAHEbFIzztfRk0rifBnpr_E6elbZqnz_LW9j_Zjmyzu1mBdvM5WkOh4X2UIlM_XxoFbzMp3k2beOp_p1mv_cF5-ZfplU2V1jW7r9UDT-vW60j4_azVOzdXFy1jxsmR1sYZMj6AvKqPQg4ALYlHAoICWIA58B5vnMggfSk5xTjG3gWlhKiqlFmYsFEgTVjf1N7dANpBtcOr2rm0FQDTrS74361xBAUMnCFbm3ITujofAcMehyp3qCEIwJ-gOZ1244</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>蔡三发(CAI Sanfa)</creator><creator>任士雷(REN Shilei)</creator><creator>王倩(WANG Qian)</creator><general>復旦大學</general><general>同济大学高等教育研究所,上海200092%同济大学高等教育研究所,上海,200092</general><general>同济大学发展规划部,上海200092</general><scope>DT-</scope><scope>2B.</scope><scope>4A8</scope><scope>92I</scope><scope>93N</scope><scope>PSX</scope><scope>TCJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>“双一流”建设背景下学科可持续发展度评价指标体系构建</title><author>蔡三发(CAI Sanfa) ; 任士雷(REN Shilei) ; 王倩(WANG Qian)</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h515-c32de797fb20ce0476c2e2763c0d909bd9128fbfcc75540a15ff757179a5e3e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>chi</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>蔡三发(CAI Sanfa)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>任士雷(REN Shilei)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>王倩(WANG Qian)</creatorcontrib><collection>Ericdata Higher Education Knowledge Database</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong</collection><collection>WANFANG Data Centre</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals</collection><collection>万方数据期刊 - 香港版</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><jtitle>Fu dan jiao yu lun tan = Fudan education forum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>蔡三发(CAI Sanfa)</au><au>任士雷(REN Shilei)</au><au>王倩(WANG Qian)</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“双一流”建设背景下学科可持续发展度评价指标体系构建</atitle><jtitle>Fu dan jiao yu lun tan = Fudan education forum</jtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>086</spage><epage>092</epage><pages>086-092</pages><issn>1672-0059</issn><abstract>Whether the discipline is of high quality and sustainable is the core issue of discipline construction, and disciplinary development sustainability is a symbol of the degree of high quality and sustainable development of the discipline. From the perspective of education systematic project, the basic principles of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) are applied to construct the model of AHP for disciplinary development sustainability, and the index system of disciplinary development sustainability is determined. The characteristic vectors of the pairing comparison judgment matrices are used as the weights of evaluation indicators for disciplinary development sustainability, and the influence ranking of relevant evaluation indicators is determined. The results show that the leading edge of discipline direction, scientific research platform, collaborative ability of discipline team, social service ability of discipline, international exchange and cooperation, and quality of graduate students are the main factors af</abstract><cop>大陸</cop><pub>復旦大學</pub><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1672-0059 |
| ispartof | Fu dan jiao yu lun tan = Fudan education forum, 2020-03, Vol.18 (2), p.086-092 |
| issn | 1672-0059 |
| language | chi |
| recordid | cdi_wanfang_journals_fdjylt202002015 |
| source | 国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库 (National Social Sciences Database) |
| title | “双一流”建设背景下学科可持续发展度评价指标体系构建 |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T12%3A05%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wanfang_jour_hyweb&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9C%E5%8F%8C%E4%B8%80%E6%B5%81%E2%80%9D%E5%BB%BA%E8%AE%BE%E8%83%8C%E6%99%AF%E4%B8%8B%E5%AD%A6%E7%A7%91%E5%8F%AF%E6%8C%81%E7%BB%AD%E5%8F%91%E5%B1%95%E5%BA%A6%E8%AF%84%E4%BB%B7%E6%8C%87%E6%A0%87%E4%BD%93%E7%B3%BB%E6%9E%84%E5%BB%BA&rft.jtitle=Fu%20dan%20jiao%20yu%20lun%20tan%20=%20Fudan%20education%20forum&rft.au=%E8%94%A1%E4%B8%89%E5%8F%91(CAI%20Sanfa)&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=086&rft.epage=092&rft.pages=086-092&rft.issn=1672-0059&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cwanfang_jour_hyweb%3Efdjylt202002015%3C/wanfang_jour_hyweb%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_wanfj_id=fdjylt202002015&rfr_iscdi=true |